REFERENCES Almeder, Robert. 1990. on Naturalizing

REFERENCES Almeder, Robert. 1990. on Naturalizing

REFERENCES Almeder, Robert. 1990. On naturalizing epistemology. American Philosophical Quarterly 27 (4): 263– 79. Anglin, Jeremy. 1977. Word, object, and conceptual development. New York: W.W. Norton and Company. Ariew, Roger. 1984. The Duhem thesis. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35: 313–25. Aristotle. 1941. De anima. In The basic works of Aristotle, ed. Richard McKeon. New York: Random House. Armstrong, D.M. 1973. Belief, truth and knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bangu, Sorin. 2006. Underdetermination and the argument from indirect confirmation. Ratio 19 (3): 269–77. Bartsch, Karen, and Henry Wellman. 1995. Children talk about the mind. New York: Oxford University Press. Bedau, Marc. 1991. Can biological teleology be naturalized? Journal of Philosophy 88: 647–55. Ben-Menahem, Yemima. 2005. Black, white and gray: Quine on convention. Synthese 146: 245–82. Bergstrom, Lars. 1990. Quine on underdetermination. In Perspectives on Quine, ed. Robert Barrett and Roger Gibson, 38–54. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. ———. 1993. Quine, underdetermination and skepticism. The Journal of Philosophy 90 (7): 331–58. ———. 2004. Underdetermination of physical theory. In The Cambridge companion to Quine, ed. Roger Gibson, 91–114. New York: Cambridge University Press. Bernier, Paul. 2002. From simulation to theory. In Simulation and knowledge of action, ed. Jerome Dokic and Joelle Proust, 33–48. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co. Binswanger, Harry. 1990. The biological basis of teleological concepts. Los Angeles: ARI Press. Bishop, Michael, and Stephen Stich. 1998. The flight to reference, or how not to make progress in the philosophy of science. Philosophy of Science 65: 33–49. Block, Ned, and Robert Stalnaker. 1999. Conceptual analysis, dualism, and the explanatory gap. The Philosophical Review 108 (1): 1–46. Bloom, Lois. 1973. One word at a time: the use of single word utterances before syntax. Janua linguarum, series minor, 154. The Hague: Mouton. ———. 1993. The transition from infancy to language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 256 Bloom, Paul, and Tim German. 2000. Two reasons to abandon the false belief task as a test of theory of mind. Cognition 77: B25–B31. Boghossian, Paul. 1990. The status of content. The Philosophical Review 99 (2): 157–84. ———. 1996. Analyticity regained. Nous 30 (3): 360–91. BonJour, Laurence. 1985. The structure of empirical knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ———. 2000. Toward a defense of empirical foundationalism. In Resurrecting old- fashioned foundationalism, ed. M. DePaul, 21–38.. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield. ———. 2004. In search of direct realism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (2): 349– 67. Bonevac, Daniel. 2001. Naturalism for the faint of heart. In Reality and Humean supervience: essays on the philosophy of David Lewis, eds. G. Preyer and F. Siebelt. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Boyd, Richard. 1991. Realism, anti-foundationalism and the enthusiasm for natural kinds. Philosophical Studies 61: 127–48. Brandom, Robert. 1998. Insights and blindspots of reliabilism, Monist 81: 371–92. ———. 2001. Modality, normativity, and intentionality. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (3): 587–609. Bretherton, Inge, Sandra McNew and Marjorie Beeghly-Smith. 1981. Early person knowledge as expressed in gestural and verbal communication: When do infants acquire a “theory of mind”? In Infant Social Cognition, eds. M.E. Lamb and L.R. Sherrod, 333–73. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Brewer, Bill. 1999. Perception and reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Burge, Tyler. 1979. Individualism and the mental. In Midwest Studies in Philosophy 4, Studies in Metaphysics, eds. Peter French, Theodore Euhling Jr., and Howard Wettstein. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Burr, Jean, and Barbara Hofer. 2002. Personal epistemology and theory of mind: deciphering young children’s beliefs about knowledge and knowing. New Ideas in Psychology 20: 199–224. Chalmers, David. 1996. The conscious mind. New York: Oxford University Press. Chisholm, Roderick. 1977. Theory of knowledge. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Churchland, Paul. 1981. Eliminative materialism and the propositional attitudes. Journal of Philosophy, 78: 67–90. 257 ———. 1996. Matter and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Crane, Tim. 1998. How to define your (mental) terms. Inquiry 41: 341–54. Cummins, Robert. 1989. Meaning and mental representation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ———. 1996. Representations, targets and attitudes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Daniel, Steven. 1999. Why even Kim-style psychophysical laws are impossible. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 80: 225–37. Davidson, Donald. 1963. Actions, reasons and causes. The Journal of Philosophy 60(23): 685–700. ———. 1968. On saying that. Synthese 19, 139–46. ———. 1983. A coherence theory of truth and knowledge. In Kant oder Hegel?, ed. D. Heinrich: 423–38. Stuggart: Klett-Cotta. ———. 1984. Inquiries into truth and interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ———. 1990a. Meaning, truth and evidence. In Perspectives on Quine, eds. R. Barrett and R. Gibson: 68–79. Oxford: Blackwell. ———. 1990b. The structure and content of truth. The Journal of Philosophy 88 (6): 279–328. Davies, Martin, and Tony Stone. 2001. Mental simulation, tacit theory, and the threat of “collapse”. Philosophical Topics 29 (1&2): 127–73. Decety, Jean. 2002. Neurophysiological evidence for simulation of action. In Simulation and knowledge of action, eds. Jerome Dokic and Joelle Proust, 53–72. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co. Devitt, Michael. 1996. Coming to our senses. New York: Cambridge University Press. Devitt, Michael, and Kim Sterelny. 1999. Language and reality: an introduction to the philosophy of language. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Dretske, Fred. 1986. Misrepresentation. In Belief: form, content, and function, ed. R. Bogdan, 17–36. NewYork: Oxford University Press. Dummett, Michael. 1973. Frege: philosophy of language London: Duckworth. Ebbs, Gary. 1994. Review of Pursuit of truth. The Philosophical Review 103 (3): 535–41. ———. 2003. Denotation and discovery. In Socializing metaphysics: the nature of social reality, ed. F. Schmitt, 247–68. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. Feldman, Richard. 2006. Naturalized epistemology. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2006 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2006/entries/epistemology- 258 naturalized (accessed July 6, 2007). Fodor, Jerry. 1974. Special sciences (or the disunity of science as a working hypothesis). Synthese 28 (2): 97–115. ———. 1987. Psychosemantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Fodor, Jerry, and Zenon Pylyshyn. 1981. How direct is visual perception?: Some reflections on Gibson’s “ecological approach.” Cognition 9: 139–96. Geach, Peter. 1957. Mental acts: their contents and their objects. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Gibson, James J. 1966. The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin Co. ———. 1986. The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Publishers. Gibson, Roger. 1986. Translation, physics and facts of the matter. In The philosophy of W.V. Quine, eds. L. Hahn and P. Schilpp, 139–54. La Salle, IL.: Open Court. ———. 1988. Enlightened empiricism: an examination of W.V. Quine’s theory of knowledge. Tampa, FL.: University of South Florida Press. Giere, Ronald. 1985. Philosophy of science naturalized. Philosophy of Science 52: 331–56. ———. 1988. Explaining science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ———. 1989. Scientific rationality as instrumental rationality. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 20 (3): 377–84. Goldman, Alvin. 1979. What is justified belief? In Justification and knowledge: new studies in epistemology, ed. George Pappas. Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Company. ———. 1986. Epistemology and cognition. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press. ———. 1993. Epistemic folkways and scientific epistemology. Philosophical Issues 3: 271–85. ———. 1995. Interpretation psychologized. In Folk psychology: the theory of mind debate, eds. M Davies and T. Stone. 74–99. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. Originally published in Mind and Language 4, 161–85, 1989. ———. 2006. Simulating minds: the philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of mindreading. New York: Oxford University Press. Gopnik, Alison and Janet Astington. 1988. Children’s understanding of representational change and its relation to understanding of false-belief and appearance-reality distinction. Child Development 59: 27–37. 259 Gopnik, Alison and Peter Graf. 1988. Knowing how you know: young children’s ability to identify and remember the sources of their beliefs. Child Development 59: 1366–71. Gordon, Robert. 1995a. Folk psychology as simulation. In Folk psychology: the theory of mind debate, eds. M. Davies and T. Stone, 59–73. Oxford: Blackwell. Originally published in Mind and Language 1: 158–70, 1986. ———. 1995b The simulation theory: objections and misconceptions. In Folk psychology: the theory of mind debate, in eds. M. Davies and T. Stone, 100–22. Oxford: Blackwell. Originally published in Mind and Language 7 (1–2): 11–34, 1992. ———. 1995c. Simulation without introspection or inference from me to you. In Mental simulation: evaluations and applications, eds. M. Davies and T. Stone, 53–67. Oxford: Blackwell. ———. 1996. “Radical” simulation. In Theories of theories of mind, eds. P. Carruthers and P. Smith, 11–21. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    8 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us