Project Camel Was a Subsidiary Project of the Manhattan Engineer

Project Camel Was a Subsidiary Project of the Manhattan Engineer

u o o o a y 7 0 / This document cona^f^of _pase 3 Copy So. vJ?__o^|?frS erie 5; __ _______ REDACTED COPY BOOK VIII, VOLUI2E 5 CHAPTER 2 r_t^ * IF.10AT,0N CAKCeUrEO MABB&TTA1 DISTRICT HISTORY f ~ f o PROJECT G&iEI, .............. °A T r.r/jjj3 r /REST iT'A iTfils document Restricted Data as defined In the Energy Act of 1954. Its dlssem disclosure to a n y vn&uthorlzed ,prolilbltod. I0M BUS A c t 1948 Spe«^io R^irietad Dut.o ^Tarehce Pequxved iU c n i i AL <£or3oze?iQf£f Project Camel was a subsidiary project of the Manhattan Engineer District, It was financed through an GSRD contract with the California Institute of Technology* The California Institute m m already engaged in similar tsar emergency development work in cooperation with the ifavy. This Chapter presents a general description of the scope of Project Camel* The work, carried out under great pressure, was subject to general coordination between Dr* Oppenhelaer of Los Labora­ tories and Dr. Lauritson of GST# This close personal relation assured security, unity of research effort and integration with the Los Alamos objective, A great deal of the effort expended under froject Caasi m s insurance against accident, Jfer failure, of similar work highly central­ ized at Los Alamos, la addition# hosever, there neve assigned to Fro* jeet Camel several research, development and testing problems in sup* part of the "satin line* work at Los Alaaos* Hot the least contribution of the Caesl Project m s in procure- aent# where the engineering ability of its staff, t«@ether with contacts in the industrial production field in the southern California area, sere of tremendous importance to the success of tbs final product* This chapter covers the history of Project Camel from its inception to the termination and transfer of its activities after the cessation of hostilities, as described in Section S* FI TABLS OF CONTENTS fer« 93 * , Page 80 * yonswD-ap pi SSCTIQg 1 - IH?RODUCTIOH 1*1# General 2*1 1-2* Purpose of the History- 2*1 1-5* Evanta Leading to tho Organization of Projeet Camel 2.2 SBCTIOB a - OROASIZATIOH OF gag PgQJSCt 2-1* General 8*5 2-2* Initiation of the Work 2*9 2-5* Soope of the Work 2,9 2-4* CIS Organization 2*10 2-5* Statement of the Problem 2*15 SSCTIQB 5 * PEmOPMESt OF BJEPLQSm QQMPQMBT3 5-1* General 2*17 5-2* Detonator# 2*17 5*3* &>We 2*20 5-i»* Contact Fuse* 2*22 SECl?108 it - PB7BI/)PMSHT OF I&TAL CQMPQKBffT3 4*1* General 2*24 i*-2* Pumpkin a 2*24 Par* Ho# Page Ho* lt-3- Tail* 2*25 k*h* Spheres 2.26 hm5* Pits 2*27 i^“6« Kilip«old3 £*2s U*7<* Electronic Fuses 2*20 li-S* Firing Systea* 2.29 k~9* Handling Equipment 2*32' SECTION 5 - FLIGHT A ® STATIC TESTS 5*2.* General 2*35 5*2- Types of Testa 2*55 5*5* A Typical Test ' 2*36 5*4» Deli vary 2*57 5-5* Construction of Test Facilities 2*3? 5-6* Scab Assembly Buildings 2.3a 5-7. Change in Organisation 2*39 5-8* Telemetering 2*39 5-9* Photography 2*39 SECTION 6 * PRODUCTION AND PHQCUREJEHT SaCTIOW 7 - DSVELQPfiiaiT OF HIGH EXPLOSIVE PROOPCTICW m m M m . - s m .ima.. m m 7-1. , General 2.44 7-2. Site 2.44 7-3* Typo of Construction 2.45 7-4» Construction Schedule 2.46 ,.<7-5* Responsibility and Organization 2.46 7-6. Priorities 2.49 7*7* Chang© to Lena Castings <* Increeent 3 2.59 7*8. Jnerecent 2 2.51 7-9* lncre»ent 4 2.52 7-10. Trial Operation 2*53 7-11* Pressing Hon-Lens Blocks 2,53 SECTICK a - YgBMHMyiCW ASP...TOMBaEajg JMKfc..AaEgXEBB 8-1* General 2.54 3-2* Decision to Terminate 2.55 3-3. Transfer of Peraoawol 2*56 8-4. Coapletion of Construction 2*56 8-5. Transfer of Techniques 2.56 8-6* Disposition of Records and Materials 2.57 General 2 . 5 9 JfoEsJbu IszslMs . 9-2* Housing 2.59 9-3. Contracts 2.39 9-4* Cost 2.60 9-5* Constraction at Pasadena 2.60 ssctxgn io - s m m m 10-1. General 2.62 10-2, Joint Responsibility of MED, the Navy and Gif 2,62 10-3. CoopartBentalisafcian 2.62 10-4* Personnel Investigations 2.62 10-5. Pasadena Branch Gfflee 2.63 10-6* Agents at HC3ES, Inyokern 2,63 20-7. Assignment of Personnel 2,64. 3 J 0 - S ...... Limitation of Naval Responsibility 2.64 10-9. Concealment of Infonmticm 2.64 APPEIffilCES A. Photographs and Drawing B* Documents i located in the to# Angeles*&fea was on# of the most discoure.ging factor# in keeping abreast of the difficult schedule# and v»a resulting in lo#« of irreplaoable time# c. In order not to place too much information in the hand# of any on# individual or firm, a practice had been instituted of distributing order# for the simplest possible component# among a# many manufacturer# a# were able to produce the item# in the time required* the manufacture1 e problem was on# then of adapting hi# personnel and equipment to the comparatively mall seal# production# to very exacting specifications, of 1tarns requiring unusual technique# and material#. Solution# of the problem# which naturally ares# were difficult to obtain in a short tim#, since they were relayed from the Lo# Angeles procure* ment office to Site Y, and back again* Further, * small change from the drawing or specification which wa# not apparent or appeared unimportant to the manufacturer could not b# discovered until the order "*# received and tested at to# Alamo## X# discover errors, advise the manufacturer of necessary changes and agree on method# by which corrections might be effeoted were time consuming operations which were eliminating all possibility of adherence to schedules* d. Xt also wa# apparent that there were other phase# of the work on which the La* Alamo# laboratory would need assistance* These fact# were recognised by the University of California and were var made known to fir # Vann cover Bush, Chairman, OSRD. e. Previous to this time, the California Institute of Technology under Contract OJBMsr 1+16 with the OSRD had independently carried the develojasent of rookets to a point where the Savy had taken an active Interest in their use* Pending the construction of large production facilities by the Navy, OIT had been induced to undertake the experimental production of rockets as a part of its contract* For this purpose, the Havy had transferred large amounts of money to the OSED, as a result of whioh CIS had developed extensive facilities for the procure­ ment, production and inspection of metal and explosive rocket components* Since the peak of Clf*e program had been reached by the fall of lyUkt end the Kavy’s facilities were being put into operation, It was apparent that the Cl* rocket organization and facilities could be cf tremendous assistance to the Quiver si ty of California in the development and pro* cureaent of specialised equipment and fabricated parts required for the atomic bomb* It was also apparent that this organisation, because of its experience with explosives end related fields In rocket development, was la a position to provide a great deal of “know haw" in the solution of problems with whioh the &os Alamos laboratory was faced* SSCTIGH 2 * ORGAHlZATIOH 0? "PROJECT CAMED" 2-1• general* a. At the suggestion of Dr* Bash, Or* a* 0* Lauritsen, Director of Research for Contract OEHsr 2*18, was invited to visit !*>• Alamos In November l$t& to discuss the problems with whloh Site If was confronted* As a result of this visit* Dr* Qppeaheimer outlined ia a letter to Dr* Bush, on Sovember 21, 19M m the extent and manner in whioh the collaboration of Clt could be utilised and requested that necessary arrangements be effected toward that end (Appendix JML)* b* To Admiral W* S* Parsons# USS, on special assignment by the Havy to the MBD# and In charge of the Ordnance Division at Los Alamos, fell the task of obtaining the agreement of the parties concern­ ed* the feraation* by OSRD* of a special committee under &DEG composed of Br* J* B* Coaaat# Chairaan, Dr* t* b* Sbyae and Mr* ifrrtley Hows*; had resulted ia the transfer of 11,000,000 to contract QEMsr i<18 for initia­ tion of work on a "special War Department project1* (Appendix B-2), there was an immediate reaction* however# by the Bureau of Ordnance of the Bfevy Department, upon receipt of Inform tlonfrom CIT that it pro­ posed to undertake work on another project of considerable magnitude* the tfavy was greatly concerned over the potential effect of the special project on its program for rocket development and production* i*hereas the . DSHD and CIT had been committed to a reduction la the program of rocket production as Kavy facilities became available, there remained problame connected with the improvement of rocket performance, and develo|aaeat of new types# which the lavy felt required the continued aotiva partici­ pation of top CIS personnel* The matter m s resolved in a series of discussions by Admiral Parsons with Admiral Hussey, Chief of tha Bureau of Ordnance, and other* In the Navy Department, and, at a con­ ference on 30 December 19^ 4. in Pasadena, California, reported la a letter from Dr* F» L* Efcvde, Chief of EH.vision 3, I?I®C,to Dr.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    109 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us