State of Implementation of the Valletta Action Plan Mr

State of Implementation of the Valletta Action Plan Mr

State of implementation of the Valletta Action Plan Mr. Ralph Genetzke, Head of Mission, ICMPD Brussels Ralph Genetzke, ICMPD, ACP-EU JPA Political Affairs Committee, Brussels, 24.03.2017 Index Valletta framework Analysis of the implementation of the JVAP Detailed assessment along the 5 Valletta Action Plan domains Joint conclusions Ralph Genetzke, ICMPD, Brussels, 24.03.2017 1 Valletta Framework • Valletta Summit, Malta, 11-12 November 2015 - Comprehensive political declaration - Joint Valletta Action Plan (JVAP) – 5 domains • Valletta Summit Stocktaking Meeting, Brussels, 21-22 June 2016 - Range of recommendations (consolidated mapping on 16 priority initiatives) • SOM in Malta, 8-9 February 2017 - 2 individual Analysis Reports (Khartoum and Rabat Processes) - Joint conclusions Ralph Genetzke, ICMPD, Brussels, 24.03.2017 2 Role of the Dialogues • Mandate given to the Regional Dialogues (the Rabat and Khartoum Processes) to monitor the JVAP for the period 2016- 2018 • Participative approach, key roles of the Chairs and support from the Secretariats Ralph Genetzke, ICMPD, Brussels, 24.03.2017 3 Analysis of the implementation of the JVAP-Dec.2016 Domain No. of initiatives in % Financial value (in M €) in % Domain 1 307 49% 3,821 58% Domain 2 14 2% 61 1% Domain 3 99 16% 837 13% Domain 4 77 12% 465 7% Domain 5 63 10% 307 5% Cross-cutting 65 10% 1,054 16% Total 625 100% 6,545 100% Ralph Genetzke, ICMPD, Brussels, 24.03.2017 4 Analysis of the implementation of the JVAP Funding Financial value (in M €) in % Contributions from EU 2,023 31% Contributions from EU Member States 4,522 69% Total 6,545 100% Ralph Genetzke, ICMPD, Brussels, 24.03.2017 5 Analysis of the implementation of the JVAP Geographical region Number of initiatives* in % Northern Africa 254 24% Western Africa 355 34% Central Africa 107 10% Eastern Africa 343 32% Total 1,059 100% *Single- and multi-country initiatives Ralph Genetzke, ICMPD, Brussels, 24.03.2017 6 Analysis of the implementation of the JVAP Political Process Number of initiatives* in % Countries of the Rabat Process 535 51% Countries of the Khartoum Process 416 39% Countries belonging to both Processes (Tunisia) 52 5% Other countries 56 5% Total 1,059 100% *Single- and multi-country initiatives Ralph Genetzke, ICMPD, Brussels, 24.03.2017 7 Detailed assessment along the 5 JVAP domains Domain 1: Development benefits of migration, and addressing root causes of irregular migration and forced displacement (Priority Initiatives: 1-4) Domain 2: Legal migration and mobility (Priority Initiatives: 5-7) Domain 3: Protection and asylum (Priority Initiatives: 8-10) Domain 4: Prevention of and fight against irregular migration, migrant smuggling and trafficking in human beings (Priority Initiatives: 11-14) Domain 5: Return, readmission and reintegration (Priority Initiatives: 15-16) Domain 6: Cross-cutting initiatives Ralph Genetzke, ICMPD, Brussels, 24.03.2017 8 Domain 1: Development benefits of migration, and addressing root causes of irregular migration and forced displacement VAP priority No. of initiatives in % Financial value (in M €) in % Related to more than one 19 6% 53 1% priority action P 1 171 56% 2,514 66% P 2 79 26% 897 23% P 3 4 1% 33 1% P 4 34 11% 324 8% Total 307 100% 3,821 100% Ralph Genetzke, ICMPD, Brussels, 24.03.2017 9 Domain 2: Legal migration and mobility VAP priority No. of initiatives in % Financial value (in M €) in % Related to more than one 3 21% 5 8% priority action P 5 2 14% 41 67% P 6 8 57% 15 25% P 7 1 7% 0 0% Total 14 100% 61 100% Ralph Genetzke, ICMPD, Brussels, 24.03.2017 10 Domain 3: Protection and asylum VAP priority No. of initiatives in % Financial value (in M €) in % Related to more than one 17 17% 56 7% priority action P 8 19 19% 181 22% P 9 8 6% 4 0% P10 55 56% 596 71% Total 99 100% 837 100% Ralph Genetzke, ICMPD, Brussels, 24.03.2017 11 Domain 4: Prevention of and fight against irregular migration, migrant smuggling and trafficking in human beings VAP priority No. of initiatives in % Financial value (in M €) in % Related to more than one 11 14% 33 7% priority action P 11 25 32% 262 56% P 12 28 36% 156 34% P 13 2 3% 8 2% P 14 11 14% 6 1% Total 77 100% 465 100% Ralph Genetzke, ICMPD, Brussels, 24.03.2017 12 Domain 5: Return, readmission and reintegration VAP priority No. of initiatives in % Financial value (in M €) in % Related to more than one 10 16% 10 3% priority action P 15 23 37% 115 37% P 16 30 48% 182 59% Total 63 100% 307 100% Ralph Genetzke, ICMPD, Brussels, 24.03.2017 13 Joint Conclusions • Renew joint efforts • Strengthen coherence between the different frameworks which contribute to the dynamic of the JVAP, in particular the Rabat and Khartoum Processes • Call for equal attention to be afforded to the 5 domains of the JVAP • Initiatives and coordination mechanisms need to promote ownership • Added-value of initiatives with a regional scope • Call for the mobilisation of the whole range of existing resources and financial instruments • Mainstream all aspects of migration into relevant policies • Importance of measuring the implementation of the JVAP against real progress on the ground. Establishment of a fully-fledged and efficient reporting/monitoring tool which will include systematic data collection Ralph Genetzke, ICMPD, Brussels, 24.03.2017 14 Thank you! Ralph Genetzke Head of Mission 159 rue Belliard 1040 Brussels Tel: +32 2 233 11 60 Belgium Email: [email protected] www.icmpd.org.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    17 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us