State of Implementation of the Valletta Action Plan Mr
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
State of implementation of the Valletta Action Plan Mr. Ralph Genetzke, Head of Mission, ICMPD Brussels Ralph Genetzke, ICMPD, ACP-EU JPA Political Affairs Committee, Brussels, 24.03.2017 Index Valletta framework Analysis of the implementation of the JVAP Detailed assessment along the 5 Valletta Action Plan domains Joint conclusions Ralph Genetzke, ICMPD, Brussels, 24.03.2017 1 Valletta Framework • Valletta Summit, Malta, 11-12 November 2015 - Comprehensive political declaration - Joint Valletta Action Plan (JVAP) – 5 domains • Valletta Summit Stocktaking Meeting, Brussels, 21-22 June 2016 - Range of recommendations (consolidated mapping on 16 priority initiatives) • SOM in Malta, 8-9 February 2017 - 2 individual Analysis Reports (Khartoum and Rabat Processes) - Joint conclusions Ralph Genetzke, ICMPD, Brussels, 24.03.2017 2 Role of the Dialogues • Mandate given to the Regional Dialogues (the Rabat and Khartoum Processes) to monitor the JVAP for the period 2016- 2018 • Participative approach, key roles of the Chairs and support from the Secretariats Ralph Genetzke, ICMPD, Brussels, 24.03.2017 3 Analysis of the implementation of the JVAP-Dec.2016 Domain No. of initiatives in % Financial value (in M €) in % Domain 1 307 49% 3,821 58% Domain 2 14 2% 61 1% Domain 3 99 16% 837 13% Domain 4 77 12% 465 7% Domain 5 63 10% 307 5% Cross-cutting 65 10% 1,054 16% Total 625 100% 6,545 100% Ralph Genetzke, ICMPD, Brussels, 24.03.2017 4 Analysis of the implementation of the JVAP Funding Financial value (in M €) in % Contributions from EU 2,023 31% Contributions from EU Member States 4,522 69% Total 6,545 100% Ralph Genetzke, ICMPD, Brussels, 24.03.2017 5 Analysis of the implementation of the JVAP Geographical region Number of initiatives* in % Northern Africa 254 24% Western Africa 355 34% Central Africa 107 10% Eastern Africa 343 32% Total 1,059 100% *Single- and multi-country initiatives Ralph Genetzke, ICMPD, Brussels, 24.03.2017 6 Analysis of the implementation of the JVAP Political Process Number of initiatives* in % Countries of the Rabat Process 535 51% Countries of the Khartoum Process 416 39% Countries belonging to both Processes (Tunisia) 52 5% Other countries 56 5% Total 1,059 100% *Single- and multi-country initiatives Ralph Genetzke, ICMPD, Brussels, 24.03.2017 7 Detailed assessment along the 5 JVAP domains Domain 1: Development benefits of migration, and addressing root causes of irregular migration and forced displacement (Priority Initiatives: 1-4) Domain 2: Legal migration and mobility (Priority Initiatives: 5-7) Domain 3: Protection and asylum (Priority Initiatives: 8-10) Domain 4: Prevention of and fight against irregular migration, migrant smuggling and trafficking in human beings (Priority Initiatives: 11-14) Domain 5: Return, readmission and reintegration (Priority Initiatives: 15-16) Domain 6: Cross-cutting initiatives Ralph Genetzke, ICMPD, Brussels, 24.03.2017 8 Domain 1: Development benefits of migration, and addressing root causes of irregular migration and forced displacement VAP priority No. of initiatives in % Financial value (in M €) in % Related to more than one 19 6% 53 1% priority action P 1 171 56% 2,514 66% P 2 79 26% 897 23% P 3 4 1% 33 1% P 4 34 11% 324 8% Total 307 100% 3,821 100% Ralph Genetzke, ICMPD, Brussels, 24.03.2017 9 Domain 2: Legal migration and mobility VAP priority No. of initiatives in % Financial value (in M €) in % Related to more than one 3 21% 5 8% priority action P 5 2 14% 41 67% P 6 8 57% 15 25% P 7 1 7% 0 0% Total 14 100% 61 100% Ralph Genetzke, ICMPD, Brussels, 24.03.2017 10 Domain 3: Protection and asylum VAP priority No. of initiatives in % Financial value (in M €) in % Related to more than one 17 17% 56 7% priority action P 8 19 19% 181 22% P 9 8 6% 4 0% P10 55 56% 596 71% Total 99 100% 837 100% Ralph Genetzke, ICMPD, Brussels, 24.03.2017 11 Domain 4: Prevention of and fight against irregular migration, migrant smuggling and trafficking in human beings VAP priority No. of initiatives in % Financial value (in M €) in % Related to more than one 11 14% 33 7% priority action P 11 25 32% 262 56% P 12 28 36% 156 34% P 13 2 3% 8 2% P 14 11 14% 6 1% Total 77 100% 465 100% Ralph Genetzke, ICMPD, Brussels, 24.03.2017 12 Domain 5: Return, readmission and reintegration VAP priority No. of initiatives in % Financial value (in M €) in % Related to more than one 10 16% 10 3% priority action P 15 23 37% 115 37% P 16 30 48% 182 59% Total 63 100% 307 100% Ralph Genetzke, ICMPD, Brussels, 24.03.2017 13 Joint Conclusions • Renew joint efforts • Strengthen coherence between the different frameworks which contribute to the dynamic of the JVAP, in particular the Rabat and Khartoum Processes • Call for equal attention to be afforded to the 5 domains of the JVAP • Initiatives and coordination mechanisms need to promote ownership • Added-value of initiatives with a regional scope • Call for the mobilisation of the whole range of existing resources and financial instruments • Mainstream all aspects of migration into relevant policies • Importance of measuring the implementation of the JVAP against real progress on the ground. Establishment of a fully-fledged and efficient reporting/monitoring tool which will include systematic data collection Ralph Genetzke, ICMPD, Brussels, 24.03.2017 14 Thank you! Ralph Genetzke Head of Mission 159 rue Belliard 1040 Brussels Tel: +32 2 233 11 60 Belgium Email: [email protected] www.icmpd.org.