Sartre: being-there 1 8-14 70 pages Sartre: being-there other Files Index: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U-Z 3-13bein being-there .................................................................................... 4 Sartre correlates three degrees of consciousness with the two dialectic negations ..................................................................................... 4 being[there]lived (lower case, Index) ............................................................. 5 Being[there]posited/1neg (capitalized, Index) ...................................................... 6 Unreflective/non-reflected first degree consciousness (index) .............. 8 Sartre’s early use of ‘pre-reflectiveI’ consciousness (9 hits in early BN) .................................................................................................. 10 8-15bein ............................................................................ Lived experience 11 The ‘conception of "lived experiencelived" marks my change since L’Etre et Le Néant’ (IT41) ........................................................... 11 lived I I I Experience as ‘life aware of itself’ without cognitive knowledge Fr=? 15 8-15bein .................................................................... Sartre and Heidegger 17 Heidegger’s Dasein: subject-object human_realitylived vs. Sartre’s dualismI ..................................................................................... 18 Heidegger: Being attuned as the fundamental nature of DaseinI .................................................................................................. 22 ................................................................. Equipment as ready-to-hand 24 Hubert L. Dreyfus: B&T circumspection is restricted to direct transparent environment/context ............................................... 25 John Haugeland: Disclosedness ‘presents a curious doubling’ ......... 27 8-15Hesa ......................................................................................................... Heidegger’s object without subject [ground] 28 Heidegger, ‘The perceiving of what is known is not a process of returning with one’s booty to the "cabinet of consciousness"...’28 Rüdiger Safranski: Heidegger’s foundered thinking ......................... 31 8-14bein ........................................................ Reflection: the French terms 32 French ‘mirror’ as English ‘reflect/mirror’ [refléter]lived ; reflected_on lived [reflété] .................................................................................... 32 Sartre: being-there 2 ................................... Reflectionlived-reflectinglived: [reflet]lived-[reflétant]lived 33 .................................. Reflectionlived-reflected_onlived: refletlived-reflétélived 34 French ‘think’ as English ‘reflection’ [réfléchir]lived; reflexion [réflexion]lived ; reflecting [réfléchissant]lived ....................................... 35 Reflective’ [réflexive]lived; reflexive [réflexif]lived ; reflexivity [réflexivité]posited ; reflexively [réflexivement]lived 37 8-14bein The Transcendence of the Ego, Tr. by Forrest Williams and Robert Kirkpatrick, N.Y., Hill and Wang, a division of Farrar, Straus and Giroux, or Noonday Press, 1960. (1936) [Original translation modified by my Sartrean terms and clarifications] ................................................................ 39 8-14bein ......................................................................................................... i. the I and the Me (TE31-60) 39 A. The theory of the formallived presence of the I [Je]lived (TE32-42) ....... 39 . The ‘transcendental Iposited is the death of consciousness’ (TE33, 37-8, 40) 41 Connectionslived&lived ‘of the Ilived/1neg to consciousnesslived/2neg are existential problems’ (TE34) 43 B. The Cogito (TE43) ........................................................................... 44 ................................................. Third_degreeontology consciousness (TE44) 48 .............................................................................................................. Unreflected ‘thoughtlived undergoes a radicalontology modification in becoming reflected_on [réfléchi]lived’ (TE45-50) .................................................................................................. 50 .............................................................................................................. Unreflected actionlived continuously transformslived our projectslived without a reflexive [réflexive]lived consciousness (out of sequence E52-7) 54 .............................................................................................................. The Family Idiot: ‘Reflection [réflexion]lived shapes lived experiencelived according to its own endslived’ (FI 5:36) 60 .............................................................................................................. BondI of being[-there]lived unites reflected-on [réfléchi]lived to reflective [réflexive]lived (BN150, out of sequence) 63 By ‘way of conclusion’ (TE52-3) ......................................................... 65 9-14bein ......................................................................................................... ii. the constitutionBN of the Egoposited/1neg (TE60-93) 66 Page 60-1 out of sequence at Sartre\The Other-Egoposited/1neg as an objectI in the worldI: in-itselflived, not for-itselflived (TE31, 60-1, BN102) ........................... 66 A. Stateslived as transcendentlived/1neg unitiesI of consciousness (TE61-68) .................................................................................................. 66 Pages 61-68 out of sequence at Sartre\Emotions-Hatredlived ‘is credit for an infinity of angerlived or repulsed consciousness in the past or in the future ... a veritable passage to infinity’ 66 B. The constitutionBN of actionslived (TE68-69) [not cited] ......................... 66 C. Qualitieslived as optional unitiesI of stateslived (TE70-71) [not cited] ....... 66 D. The constitutionBN of the Egoposited/1neg as the poleI of actionsposited, stateslived, and qualitiesposited (TE71-91) [not cited] .............................. 67 E. The Iposited/1neg and consciousness in the cogitolived (TE91-92) [not cited] .................................................................................................. 67 Two consciousnesses cognitionI of one cognition between them: but othersI lived experience is radically impenetrable (TE93-103) 67 Egoposited/1neg is not the owner of consciousness; it is the objectposited of consciousness (TE96) 69 Sartre: being-there 3 Page 101-2 out of sequence at Sartre\Phenomenology-BN phenomenologyposited converts dualismsI of interiorI/exteriorI, beingI/appearanceI, potency/actI to that of the ‘infinite in the finite’ (TE63, 101-2, BNxlv) 70 ................................ Remarks 2. (TE103), remarks 3. (TE104-6) [no citations] 70 The Emotions: fearlived is not origianally consciousness of being afraidposited (E50-2)......................................................................... 70 8-14bein ........................................................................................ Appendix 72 Reflected-on [réfléchi]lived as an appearancelived for reflective [réflexif]lived as witness (of) itself: reflectivelived witness (of) reflected-onlived as appearancelived to itself (BN 151-4, 174, 239, 298, 340, inaccessible 2&1/2 pages) .......................................................................................... 72 E N D O F T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S 3-13bein being-there [This first alphabetical file could not fit intentions better.] Ref Sartre\Index of Terms-BEING-THERElived [êtren, êtrev ]. See *- capitalization; See Herein-being[-there]lived BN (p. 322, Fr. 361) sartre¶"Thus I am in the presence of things which are only promises beyond an ineffable presenceI which I can not possess and which is the pure ‘being-therelived’ of things..." P The War Dairies (p. 39 , Fr. 55) "It remains to be determined [‘that is, as lived&lived limitation’] what this connectionok [of three degrees] between consciousnesslived/2neg and its possibleslived/1neg is. So far we have basically followed Heidegger. But now we can follow him no longer. Effectively, for him, the Dasein (being-therelived) is quite simply its own possibilities. But it would then be useless to posit3cog/1neg transcendencelived/1neg like him, if we fall back into another kind of immanencelivedc...” The Family Idiot (1:140-1, Fr. 1:148) "...The unlovedI child suffers from neglect, from naturelived present_to the selfI as inadequacy—through his futile efforts to grasp [transformslived/2negtolived/1neg] inaccessible significationslived—as passivitylived and as pure ‘being-therelived’ with no purpose or reason. Yet these negative and general characteristics do not emerge from any comparison. It is simply the lackI of loveI felt by the livinglived himself..." Sartre\Heidegger&Sartre-RRonald Aronson and Hubert L. Dreyfus: Dasein’s subject-object human_reality vs. Sartre’s dualism Sartre: being-there 4 Joseph Fell, Heidegger and Sartre: (p. 10) states that for Heidegger, being, lower case, is ontic/ontological. 2-15bein Sartre correlates three degrees of consciousness with the two dialectic negations Sartre correlates normal and capitalized terms of the three_degrees_of_consciousness** with negation1 and negation2*** of the dialectic. Ten flags result: lived,posited,ontology,1neg,2neg, lived/1neg, lived/2neg, posited/1neg,