ARHEOLOGIJA I PRIRODNE NAUKE Center for New Technology Archaeological Institute Belgrade ARCHAEOLOGY AND SCIENCE 8 2012 Belgrade 2013 Centar za nove tehnologije Arheološki institut Beograd ARHEOLOGIJA I PRIRODNE NAUKE 8 2012 Beograd 2013. Published: Center for New Technology Viminacium Archaeological Institute Belgrade Kneza Mihaila 35/IV 11000 Belgrade, Serbia e-mail: [email protected] Tel. +381 11 2637191 For the publishers: Miomir Korać Slaviša Perić Editor-in-chief: Miomir Korać Editorial Board: Roksana Chowaniec, University of Warsaw, Institute of Archaeology, Warsaw Gianfranco Cicognani, Central European Initiative (CEI-ES), Trieste Rosemarie Cordie, Archäologiepark Belginum Eric De Sena, John Cabot University, Rome Snežana Golubović, Archaeological Institute, Belgrade Gisela Grupe, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München Michaela Harbeck, Staatssammlung für Anthropologie und Paläoanatomie, München Lanfranco Masotti, Universita’ di Bologna, Bologna Žarko Mijailović, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Mathematics, Belgrade Živko Mikić, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy, Belgrade Milan Milosavljević, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Belgrade Dragan Milovanović, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Mining and Geology, Belgrade Zoran Obradović, Temple University, Philadelphia Zoran Ognjanović, Mathematical Institute, Belgrade Marco Pacetti, Universita’ Politecnico delle Marche, Ancona Slaviša Perić, Archaeological Institute, Belgrade Milica Tapavički-Ilić, Archaeological Institute, Belgrade Dejan Vučković, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Mining and Geology, Belgrade Zsolt Zolnai, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison Olivera Ilić (secretary), Archaeological Institute, Belgrade Translation: Milica Tapavički-Ilić Lecturer: Dave Calcutt Graphic design: Nemanja Milićević Print: Digital Art Company Beograd Printed in: 500 copies ISSN 1452-7448 Izdavači: Centar za nove tehnologije Viminacium Arheološki institut Beograd Kneza Mihaila 35/IV 11000 Beograd, Srbija e-mail: [email protected] Tel. +381 11 2637191 Za izdavače: Miomir Korać Slaviša Perić Urednik: Miomir Korać Uređivački odbor: Đanfranko Čikonjani, Centralnoevropska inicijativa (CEI-ES), Trst Roksana Hovanjec, Univerzitet u Varšavi, Arheološki institut, Varšava Erik De Sena, Džon Kabot Univerzitet, Rim Snežana Golubović, Arheološki institut, Beograd Gizela Grupe, Ludvig-Maksimilians-Univerzitet, Minhen Mihaela Harbek, Zbirka za antropologiju i paleoanatomiju, Minhen Rozmari Kordi, Arheološki park Belginum Lanfranko Masoti, Univerzitet u Bolonji, Bolonja Žarko Mijailović, Univerzitet u Beogradu, Matematički fakultet, Beograd Živko Mikić, Univerzitet u Beogradu, Filozofski fakultet, Beograd Milan Milosavljević, Univerzitet u Beogradu, Elektrotehnički fakultet, Beograd Dragan Milovanović, Univerzitet u Beogradu, Rudarsko-geološki fakultet, Beograd Zoran Obradović, Univerzitet Templ, Filadelfija Zoran Ognjanović, Matematički institut, Beograd Marko Paćeti, Politehnički univerzitet Marke, Ankona Slaviša Perić, Arheološki institut, Beograd Milica Tapavički-Ilić, Arheološki institut, Beograd Dejan Vučković, Univerzitet u Beogradu, Rudarsko-geološki fakultet, Beograd Zolt Zolnaj, Univerzitet u Viskonsinu - Medison, Medison Olivera Ilić (sekretar), Arheološki institut, Beograd Prevod: Milica Tapavički-Ilić Lektor: Dejv Kalkat Dizajn i tehničko uređenje: Nemanja Milićević Štampa: Digital Art Company Beograd Tiraž: 500 primeraka ISSN 1452-7448 Archaeology and Science 8 (2012) Archaeology and Science 8 (2012) CONTENTS Roksana Chowaniec NEW TERRACOTTA FIGURINE OF DEMETER/CERES FROM Matera Marcin THE SOUTHEASTERN Sicily.......................................................9-20 Emilija Nikolić CONTRIBUTION TO THE STUDY OF ROMAN ARCHITECTURE IN VIMINACIUM: CONSTRUCTION materials AND BUILDING TECHNIQUES............................................................21-48 Vojislav Filipović DESTRUCTION OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND Cultural Vladimir Petrović Heritage IN THE AREA OF SVRLJIG....................................49-54 Eric De Sena POROLISSUM: A CASE STUDY IN THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL HERITAGE OF ROMANIA............................................................55-68 Magdalena Manaskova ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE’S utilization AND POPULARIZA- TION – THE CASE OF THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE KALE VINICA............................................................................................69-76 Boško Angelovski Educational AND PRESENTATIONAL ASPECTS AS ECO- NOMIC POTENTIAL OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL HERITAGE......................................................................................77-82 Jagoda Šarić Contemporary EXHIBITION-ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT Iva Marković IN THE presentation OF ARCHAELOGICAL Mladen Pešić HERITAGE......................................................................................83-88 Mario Novak THE ROLE OF BIOARCHAEOLOGY IN presentation AND popularisation OF SCIENCE IN Croatia........................................................................................89-96 Milica Tapavički-Ilić OPENARCH, EUROPEAN PROJECT OF POPULARIZING Jelena Anđelković Grašar ARCHAEOLOGY ........................................................................97-100 7 Archaeology and Science 8 (2012) Snežana Golubović T-PAS – PROJECT ON TOURIST PROMOTION OF THE Nemanja Mrđić ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES ALONG THE ROUTE AQUILEIA, EMONA, VIMINACIUM ...........................................................101-112 Marina Kovač EXperimental WORKSHOP OF MAKING ROMAN MOSAICS IN THE MUSEUM OF Slavonia IN OSIJEK.......................113-120 Nikolina Adamović Creative WORKSHOPS FOR CHILDREN INSPIRED BY AR- Nataša Popovska CHAEOLOGICAL EXHIBITIONS IN BELGRADE CITY MUSE- UM...............................................................................................121-130 Vanja Korać Digital ARCHEOLOGY IN VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT........................................................................131-142 GUIDELINES GUIDELINES FOR SUBMITTING MANUSCRIPTS FOR THE PERIODICAL ARHEOLOGIJA I PRIRODNE NAUKE (ARCHAEOLOGY AND SCIENCE...................................................................................142-149 8 Chowaniec, Marcin - New Terracotta Figurine... (9-20) Archaeology and Science 8 (2012) ROKSANA Chowaniec, UDC: 904:738.6”652”(450.82); University of Warsaw, Institute of Archaeology, 902.2(450.82)”2010” Warsaw, Poland Original research article email: [email protected] Received: May 13th 2013 Accepted: October 15th 2013 Matera MARCIN, University of Warsaw, Institute of Archaeology, Warsaw, Poland NEW TERRACOTTA FIGURINE OF DEMETER/CERES FROM THE SOUTH–EASTERN SICILY ABSTRACT On a southern hill slope facing the Tellaro River valley, in the autumn of 2010 during a field survey, the new female terracotta figurine has been found. The figure can be interpreted as a represen- tation of the goddess Demeter/Ceres, whose cult was very common in Sicily. However newly discov- ered terracotta coming from a context dated by the accompanying ceramic assemblage to the Middle Imperial period. Keywords: terracotta figurine, Demeter/Ceres, field survey, pottery, cult. To a dynamically developing Rome the is- after the Punic wars. There are multiple unan- land of Sicily appeared tempting as much for its swered questions, like how did the Greek colo- fertile land as for, and perhaps foremost, its stra- nies change after the 212-210 BC, the year that tegic location. Conquering it and other islands Marcus Claudius Marcellus sealed the conquest on the Mediterranean Sea weakened Carthage, of Sicily? (The military operation followed a re- Rome’s biggest rival in the 3rd century BC. nouncement of the alliance with Rome by Hiero- (Bringmann 2007: 107–108). According to the nymus, ruler of Syracuse, successor and grandson relation between Rome and local cultures on Sic- of Hiero II, who had sought instead the help of the ily cf. Language and Linguistic Contacts in An- enemy in Carthage.) How was the island’s econ- cient Sicily, O. Tribulato (ed.), Cambridge 2012; omy restructured after that? Did the new, foreign, Wilson R.J.A., Hellenistic Sicily, c. 270-100 BC, Roman administration and the presence of Rome in The Hellenistic West. Rethinking in Ancient in an agriculturally rich Sicily turn cities into rural Mediterranean, J.W.W. Prag, Quinn J.C. (eds.), centres and the countryside into a food resource? Cambridge 2013, 79-119. What did direct subordination to Roman authority Upon closer investigation of historical mean for the Greek colonies and was Roman rule and archaeological sources, the seemingly well effective enough to penetrate island structures? studied history of the first Roman provincia re- From Cicero we know that in Sicily the Ro- veals many gaps and uncertainties. These are due mans experimented with governing newly con- mostly to the state of research, but also to mea- quered peoples, learning how to dominate by trial gre scholarly interest in the archaeology of Sicily and error (Cicero II.1.2; cf also Clemente 1980: 9 Archaeology and Science 8 (2012) Chowaniec, Marcin - New Terracotta Figurine... (9-20) 105; Zambon 2008). First and foremost, officials were dispatched to Sicily and Sardinia already in 227 BC, swelling thus the praetors’ ranks. By the end of the Second Punic War Rome’s control over Sicily was judged firm enough for the praetor’s role to be reduced to administration, legislation, and tax collection. However, the island remained proud and in a sense it retained its independence with local traditions lingering in the shadow of Roman expansion. For