Supreme Court, New York County, Index No. 152656/14 Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: First Department ROY DEN HOLLANDER, Plaintiff-Appellant, -against- TORY SHEPHERD, ADVERTISER NEWSPAPERS PTY LTD., AMY MCNEILAGE, AND FAIRFAX MEDIA PUBLICATIONS PTY LTD., Defendants-Respondents. SUPPLEMENTAL APPENDIX FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT ROY DEN HOLLANDER, ESQ. Plaintiff-Appellant Pro Se 545 East 14th Street, 10D New York, New York 10009 (917) 687-0652 [email protected] LEVINE SULLIVAN KOCH & SCHULZ, LLP KATHERINE M. BOLGER, ESQ. Attorneys for Defendants-Respondents 321 West 44th Street, Suite 1000 New York, New York 10036 (212) 850-6100 [email protected] [Reproduced on Recycled Paper] DICK BAILEY SERVICE (212) 608-7666 (718) 522-4363 (516) 222-2470 (914) 682-0848 Fax: (718) 522-4024 1-800-531-2028 - Email: [email protected] -Website: www.dickbailey.com Table of Contents for the Supplemental Appendix as Ordered by the Appellate Division-First Department Page Supreme Court Appellate Division-First Department Order requiring a supplemental appendix, May 3, 2016 ................................................................... SA1 Cathy Young, Women Against Feminism: Some women want equality without anger, Boston Globe, September 2, 2014 ....................................... SA2-SA4 Tory Shepherd, Men’s rights extremists go online, The Advertiser, January 10, 2012 .......................................................................................... SA5-SA7 Tory Shepherd, 'Carnivorous men' versus 'lying bitches' in sex war, news.com.au, July 17, 2012 ......................................................................... SA8-SA9 David Futrelle, Australian "Male Studies" initiative under fire because of its connections to raving misogynists; raving misogynists blame feminists, January 13, 2014 ........................................................... SA10-SA13 Tory Shepherd, Tweet, June 17, 2014 ................................................................SA14 Who We Are | News Corp, September 8, 2014 ....................................... SA15-SA19 Plaintiff-Appellant’s Copyright Complaint filed in Hollander v. Donovan, et al., No. 08-4045 (E.D.N.Y. October 3, 2008) ..................... SA20-SA59 Plaintiff-Appellant’s Complaint filed in Hollander v. Institute for Research on Women & Gender at Columbia University, U.S. Department of Education, New York State Board of Regents, et al., No. 08 Civ. 7286 (S.D.N.Y. August 18, 2008) ........................................ SA60-SA77 Plaintiff-Appellant’s Brief filed in Hollander v. Copacabana Nightclub, et al., No. 08-5547-cv (2d Cir. March 19, 2009) ................. SA78-SA127 Plaintiff-Appellant’s Brief filed in Hollander v. United States, et al., No. 08-6183-cv (2d Cir. April 25, 2009) ............................................. SA128-SA230 The lower court’s January 8, 2016, Decision and Order denying Plaintiff-Appellant’s Motion to Strike ..............................................................SA231 i Judicial Subpoena Duces Tecum to Clerk for transferring the record on appeal .............................................................................................. SA232-SA240 List of Perjuries and Omissions by Defendants-Respondents ............ SA241-SA246 Certification Pursuant to CPLR 2105 ...............................................................SA247 ii SA 1 Supreme Court Appellate Division-First Department Order requiring a supplemental appendix, May 3, 2016 [SA1] At a Term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court held in and for the First Judicial Department in the County of New York on May 3, 2016. PRESENT: Hon. Angela M. Mazzarelli, Justice Presiding, David Friedman Richard T. Andrias Karla Moskowitz Marcy L. Kahn, Justices. -------------------------------------X Roy Den Hollander, Plaintiff-Appellant, -against- M-1708 Index No. 152656/14 Tory Shepherd, et al., Defendants-Respondents. -------------------------------------X An appeal having been taken from an order of the Supreme Court, New York County, entered on or about January 12, 2016, and said appeal having been perfected, And defendants-respondents having moved to dismiss the appeal, or in the alternative, for an order striking plaintiff- appellant’s brief and appendix, for certain costs and to adjourn the appeal to the September 2016 Term, Now, upon reading and filing the papers with respect to the motion, and due deliberation having been had thereon, It is ordered that the motion is granted to the extent of directing plaintiff-appellant to file a supplemental appendix, at his own expense, which shall include all exhibits attached to the Affirmation of Katherine M. Bolger submitted with defendants’ motion to dismiss. Plaintiff-appellant is directed to serve and file said supplemental appendix on or before July 11, 2016. Page 163 of plaintiff-appellant’s appendix is deemed stricken and judicial notice is taken of the documents reproduced on pages A.159-162 of said appendix. The motion is otherwise denied. The appeal will be maintained on this Court’s calendar for the September 2016 Term. ENTER: _____________________ CLERK SA 2 Cathy Young, Women Against Feminism: Some women want equality without anger, Boston Globe, September 2, 2014 [SA2-SA4] CATHY YOUNG Women Against Feminism: Some women want equality without anger By Cathy Young DO AMERICAN women still need feminism? A controversial social media movement called Women Against Feminism features women explaining - mostly in "selfies" with handwritten signs why they do not. Feminist responses have ranged from bafflement to vitriol or mockery to arguments that these women don't know what feminism is. But while this new movement has its silly aspects, it raises some much-needed questions about feminism's present and future state - and, in the weeks since it first attracted notice, many prominent feminists have helped validate some of the criticisms. Ohe might assume that Women Against Feminism is a traditionalist backlash against gender equality. Yet many of the women say they reject feminism precisely because they are pro­ equality. A blogger who goes by AstrokidNJ has analyzed a week's worth of posts on Women Against Feminism and found that 46 percent were egalitarian, 19 percent endorsed men's issues, and 12 percent criticized feminist intolerance toward dissent. Only 23 percent reflected traditionalist views such as support for distinct sex roles, chivalry, or full-time motherhood. Some commentators suggest that pro-equality women who reject feminism are misguided. After all, the dictionary defines feminism as belief in the social, economic, and political equality of the sexes. But these women usually know that (and often sarcastically stress that they do). They simply think that real-life feminism has come to mean something else: vilification of men, support for female privilege, and a demeaning view of women as victims rather than free agents. Are they wrong? Well, one of Women Against Feminism's harshest critics, leading feminist pundit Jessica Valenti, makes it clear that being a feminist means believing that women in America and other modern liberal democracies are "a victimized class." They are "systematically discriminated against in school, work, and politics," "objectified," and "harassed, attacked, and sexually assaulted." This, Valenti asserts, is "not a matter of politics, but of truth." SA3 But contributors to Women Against Feminism disagree. They note that many studies show the pay gap to be largely due to women's choices of more family-friendly - and life-friendly - jobs. (As for school, American women have long outpaced men in educational attainment, currently earning about 60 percent of college degrees.) They take issue with rape statistics that lump alcohol-fueled, judgment-impaired sex with sexual assault. They argue that men face their own negative stereotypes. They point out that men are at higher risk than women for most violent crimes - and may be far more likely than previously thought to experience domestic violence and sexual coercion. They say that in many areas, from divorce to mental health to workplace safety, it's men who have it worse. These arguments need to be engaged, not dismissed and ridiculed. Yet many feminists have responded with nastiness that would normally be called misogynist: In the New York Observer, Nina Burleigh focused on a few photos showing too much skin or black-polished fingernails to sneer that the women were "dressed and posed like ads for DIY escort services." Meanwhile, even as feminists deplore accusations of male-bashing, many are embracing "ironic misandry" (hatred of men). Valenti recently tweeted a picture of herself in at-shirt declaring "I bathe in male tears." Other examples include the mottoes "Ban Men" and "Kill All Men" and Internet jokes that turn book titles into castration one-liners. Feminist commentators such as Slate.corn's Amanda Hess defend this practice as a cool in-joke that annoys sexists and mocks the idea that feminists are anti-male. But aside from the fact that cliquish in-jokes are off-putting and "ironic" hate can still sound pretty hateful, the "misandry" joke falls flat because there are too many real-life examples of feminist anti-male bias. The National Organization for Women has fought against more rights for divorced fathers, often suggesting that men who advocate for such rights are abusers. Feminist groups urging stronger enforcement of domestic violence laws have cried foul when such tough