1 . Testimony of Dorothy Melanson, Public Hearing Before the Maine Bureau of Corporations, Elections and Commissions, August 30-3 1 , 2004

1 . Testimony of Dorothy Melanson, Public Hearing Before the Maine Bureau of Corporations, Elections and Commissions, August 30-3 1 , 2004

1 . Testimony of Dorothy Melanson, Public Hearing Before the Maine Bureau of Corporations, Elections and Commissions, August 30-3 1 , 2004. 2. Katharine Q. Seelye, "Democrats' Legal Challenges Impede Nader,"7J* New York Times (Aug. 19, 2004). 3. The Ballot Project, Inc. IRS Statements. it 4. Jonathan Finer and Brian Faler, "Nader Still Unsure of Ballot Spot in Many ° States," Washington Post (Aug. 24, 2004). <^i r^ 5. Associated Press, "lawyers, Aided by Democratic leaden, Challenge <M Petitions,** (Aug. 10, 2004). <tf !j 6. Julian Borger, "Fasten Your SeatbeltCTfeCfeo^^^^ Q rH 7. Caroline Adler Email and Bio; Jack Corrigan DNC Phone Script 8. Jack Corrigan Bio. 9. Email from Kerry-Edwards Campaign Deputy National Director Judy Reardon. 10. Progressive Unity Voter Fund "About Us" and FEC Filing. 1 1 . The National Progress Fund IRS Statements. 12. Americans for Jobs IRS Statements. 13. The Nader Factor About Us/Mission Statement 14. Katharine Q. Seelye, "Convictions Intact, Nader Soldiers On," The New York 77mej (Aug. 2,2004). 15. Janice D'Arcy, "Anti-Nader Forces Coordinate Strategy," Hartford Courant (July 27,2004). 16. David Postman, "Nader Foes Seek Funding from Democratic Donors," The Seattle Tunes (July 28, 2004). 17. The Nader Factor Television Advertisements. 18. The Nader Factor Post-Election Thank You. 19. United Progressives for Victory About Us. 20. Uniting People for Victory IRS Statements. 21. United Progressives for Victory Press and Media. 22. FEC Thangavelu Letter. 23. United Progressives for Victory FEC Statements. 24. Brian Faler, "Nader to Be Absent from Florida Ballot,1' Washington Post (Sept 11,2004). ci> O 25. Charles Lewis, "Political Mugging in America, Anatomy of an "Independent" -1 Smear Campaign," Center for Public Integrity (March 4,2004). ^ 26. United Progressives for Victory Press and Media Page 2. <tf <* 27. DNC Membership Roster 2004-2008. O 2 28. {Catherine Pringle Bio. 29. Mary Ellen Gurewitz and Andrew Nickelhoff Bios. 30. Lawyers for Kerry Contact Sheet and Sign-Up Form. 31. Donald McTigue Email and Letter. 32. Gregory Harvey Bio. 33. William S. Gordon Bio. 34. Robert Brandon Bio. 35. Janice D'Arcy, "Moffett's Political Mission Is Derailing Nader," Hartford C0uranr(Octl8,2004). 36. Steve Terrell, "Fears of Nader Keep Dems on Offensive," The New Mexican (July 29,2004). 37. "Democratic Chief Urges Nader to Back Kerry," CNN.com (July 14,2004). 38. Paul Magnusson, "The Dems' Game Plan to Create a Two-Man Race," Business Week Online (July 29,2004). 39. Nedra Pickler, "Kerry Has Chat with Nader - No Plea," Associated Press (May 20,2004). 40. Eric Hcyl, "Papers want to unseal Sen. Heinz estate records," Pittsburgh Tribune- Review (Aug. 18,2004); Shannon Duffy, "Still Battling," The Legal Intelligencer Online (July 13,2006). 41. Carlyn Kolker, "Anti-Nader raiders: a massive pro bono effort works to block a third-party ballot spot in the Keystone State," American Lawyer (Oct. 1,2004). 42. Sam Hananel, "Democrats Challenge Nader in Arizona," Associated Press (June 27,2004). ^ 43. Maria Recio, "Nader Vows Legal Fight to Appear on Florida Ballot," Knighl- O JWdfefer(Sept9,2004). •H ° 44. Hugo Torres, 'Tribe Argues to Keep Nader off Florida Ballot," The Record (Sept £ 30,2004). <tf T 45. Janice D* Arcy, "Nader Says He'll Take on Democrats in Swing States," Hartford g Cowant, (Sept. 10,2004). <H 46. Todd Spivak, Challenging the Challengers," Illinois Times (July 8,2004). 47. Patrick Martin, "Illinois Democratic Officials Use Legislative Staffers to Attack Third-Party Campaigns," World Socialist Web Site (July 6,2004); "Democrats Put Bush on Ballot While Fighting to Keep Nader Off It," Critical Montages (July 19,2004). 48. City of Chicago Board of Election Commissioners Office Sign-In Sheets. 49. Lynn Campbell, "Petition Challenger: I'm No Activist," Des Moines Register (Aug. 26,2004). 50. Iowa Secretary of State Opinion, page 3. 51. Center for Responsive Politics Judy Reardon Salary Report 52. Court Filing by Eric Sedillo Jeffries. 53. James Drew, "Blackwell Orders Removal of Nader from Ohio's Nov. 2 Ballot," Toledo Blade (Sept. 29,2004). 54. Clothilde Ewing, "Nader's Tough Road Ahead," CBS News (April 30,2004). ; i 55. "Raiders of the Lost Cause," by Chris Lydgate, Willamette Week, June 30,2004. | 56. Oregon Petitioner Affidavit. 57. Letter from Margaret Olney. 58. Kari Chisholm, Blue Oregon Blog (Aug. 18,2004). 59. William Gfflis Blog Archive August 2004. 60. SEIU Press Releases. 61. SEIU Political Contributions Report «• 62. RoyPulversBio. O Q 63. Press Release: PA Stays Blue Despite Repeated Bush Visits. i*-. <M 64. Rebecca Bellville, Brian Hickey and Tasha Kates, MDarth Nader," Philadelphia * City Paper (June 17-24,2004). *f § 65. Tom Barnes, "Petitions Submitted to Put Nader on PA. Presidential Ballot," M Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (Aug. 3,2004). 66. Melissa Nann Burke, "Foiling the Spoiler," The Legal Intelligencer (Nov. 2, 2004); Carlyn Kolker, "Anti-Nader raiders: a massive pro bono effort works to block a third-party ballot spot in the Keystone State," American Lawyer (Oct. 1, 2004). 67. Tom Barnes, "Nader Petitions Challenged to Keep Him off Pennsylvania Ballot,' Pittsburgh Gazette (Aug. 10,2004). 68. Dennis Roddy and Trade Mauriello, "E-mails show how Dems tied staffers' bonuses to campaign work," Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (Dec. 16,2007). 69. Drew Hansen Bio. 70. DiAnne Grieser Online Petition Signature. 71. Randy Poplock John Kerry Meetup Message Board Posts. 72. Letter From Jason Huber to West Virginia Mountain Party. 73. Editorial, "Nader's Complaint," Wall Street Journal (Sept. 14,2004). D *H O O O Exhibit 1 Testimony of Dorothy Mebnson, PubUc Hairing Before the Maine Bureau of Corporations, Elections and Commissions, August 30-31,2004. TRANSCRIPT OF TESTIMONY FROM DOROTHY MELANSON, CHAIRWOMAN OF MAINE DEMOCRATIC PARTY Public Hearing Define the Bureau of Corporations, Elections and Commissions Augusta, Maine August 30 and 31,2004 HB = Attorney Harold H. Burbank n (Attorney for Ralph Nader and Peter Miguel Camejo) DM = Dorothy Melanson (Chairwoman for Maine Democratic Party) •H HB: Good Morning, or Good Afternoon I should say. rH ? DM: Good afternoon. r«. <M «=y HB:Well after going through all this testimony, and the reading Fve done and the hearing of *T all me issues raised, I have but really one question. And that is why do you feel compelled to O bring this challenge against Mr. Nader and Mr. Camejo, who represent, in my judgment, the 2 views of not less than 4,000 signatories of petitions mat attempt to place him on the ballot in Maine? And in your own words can you explain to me what your motivations are? DM: We had heard from several people who fefo (hat they were somewhat tricked into signing these petitions. We also were alerted to problems in other states—many other states. As I'm sure you're aware... HB: No, I am not aware, but... DM: So we started looking into the petitions themselves; we started looking into the electors, and just to make sure everything was okay. This is a nationwide process mat many states are going through the exact same thing with the exact same problems. HB: When you say it's a nationwide process, is it being coordinated from any central location? DM: Urn...the Democratic Party. The national Party is certainly looking at it. There's also an organization called stopnader.com. HB: Okay. Are yon affiliate with stopnader.com? DM: I am not at all. HB: Are you affiliated with the Democratic Party? DM: I most certainly am. HB: In what capacity is that? DM: I am the Chair of the Maine Democratic Party. HB: The Chair of the Maine Democratic Party. Do you have any personal feeling or belief toward eitfarr candidate Nader or ffncfffrttg O»"g|> *h«* they personally are unqualified for the office of President and Vice President of the United States? T>M-1 «to"*t famw one riling afrnnt the VJM Pyea^gntjfll cmiflidatp Om*jn Ihavenoidea. In my personal opinion, Mr. Nader is not qualified for me. rH HB: Right HI rH DM: In my qualifications. ; O J^j HB: But is he unfit for office in anyway that would disqualify him personally or legally to *T *pply *ff fr« g gmfJJdqtg in Wiy a***? ^M* *^> frim^, ftmi*1, Harem, placed nm vnters tir persons? T 0 DM: There were some states—I don't have the documentation mfrcmt of me now---that 2 many many of his signatures were removed. HB: Tm talking about Mr. Nader personally now. DM: Personally? HB:Yes. DM: I think he's old enough and a citizen, and he meets all me qualifications in the Constitution. HB: You're not aware that he's ever committed any crimes... DM: I'm not aware. HB: That would disqualify him for running for office? DM: No. HB: You're not aware of any campaigns he's run to discredit people on a false basis or lend the air of fraud to the careers of other candidates for public office? DM: I'm not aware. HB: Or mistake or lack of qualification due to anything other than perhaps their public positions—such as policy decisions, election records, that kind of thing? You're not aware of Mr. Nader being disqualified for any reason tfi«t the public can scrutinize through die media, through libraries, through records of any kind, other than peihaps, you know, on a petition basis that you brought your petition on today? DM: There are many states that have the same questions. But other than that, I'm not aware of any fraud that Mr. Nader has committed. HB: Or any other basis he should be disqualified as a candidate for President of the United States? DM: No.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    228 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us