Case Law Registry

Case Law Registry

Case Law Registry Court of Justice of the European Union Case 1/58, Stork v High Authority,97n4 Case 36/59, Geitling v High Authority,97n4 Case 26/62, NV Internationale Transportonderneming Van Gend & Loos v Nederlandse Administratie der Belastingen,97n5 Case 29/69, Stauder v Stadt Ulm,97n7 Case 11/70, Internationale Handelsgesellschaft GmbH v Einfuhr- und Vorratsstelle fur€ Getreide und Futtermittel,97n9 Case 22/70, Commission v Council (ERTA), 2n2, 4n9, 7n18 Joined Cases 41-44/70, NV International Fruit Company and others v Commission, 72n25 Case 4/73, Nold Kohlen- und Baustoffgrosshandlung v Commission,97n8 Case 181/73, Haegeman v Belgium,72n26 Case 41/74, Van Duyn v Home Office, 144n14 Opinion 1/75, Draft Understanding on a Local Cost Standard,12n31, 68n13 Case 87/75, Bresciani v Amministrazione Italiana delle Finanze, 145n18 Joined Cases 3, 4 and 6/76, Cornelis Kramer and others,8n20 Opinion 1/76, Draft agreement establishing a European laying-up fund for inland waterway vessels,8n21, 142n1, 143n4 Case 41/76, Criel, ne´e Donckerwolcke and Schou v Procureur de la Re´publique au tribunal de grande instance de Lille and Director General of Customs,68n15 Case 106/77, Amministrazione delle Finanze dello Stato v Simmenthal SpA,97n6 Opinion 1/78, International agreement on natural rubber,68n14, 109n4 Case 93/78, Mattheus v Doego, 123n1 Case 91/79, Commission v Italy,83n5 Case 812/79, Attorney General v Burgoa, 146n28 Case 270/80, Polydor Limited and RSO Records Inc. v Harlequin Records Shops Limited and Simons Records Limited,72n26, 127n15 Case 104/81, Hauptzollamt Mainz v C.A. Kupferberg & Cie KG, 127n15 Case 264/82, Timex Corporation v Council and Commission,78n67 Case 14/83, Von Colson and Kamann v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen,74n44 H. de Waele, Layered Global Player, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-20751-8, 161 # Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011 162 Case Law Registry Case 240/83, Procureur de la Re´publique v Association de de´fense des bruˆleurs d’huile usages,83n5 Case 294/83, Parti e´cologiste ‘Les Verts’ v European Parliament, 144n11 Case 12/86, Meryem Demirel v Stadt Schwabisch€ Gmund€ Case 70/87, Fe´de´ration de l’industrie de l’huilerie de la CEE (FEDIOL) v Commission,72n27 Case 30/88, Greece v Commission, 127n14 Case C-69/89, Nakajima All Precision Co. v Council,72n28 Case C-192/89, Sevince v Staatssecretaris van Justitie, 127n14 Case C-358/89, Extramet Industrie SA v Council,78n67 Case C-18/90, Office national de l’emploi v Kziber, 145n18 Case C-286/90, Anklagemyndigheden v Peter Michael Poulsen and Diva Navigation Corp,71n23, 143n10 Opinion 1/91, Draft agreement on the creation of the European Economic Area (I), 143n5 Opinion 2/91, Conclusion of ILO Convention No. 170 concerning safety in the use of chemicals at work,85n6, 149n44 Joined Cases C-181/91 & C-248/91, Parliament v Commission and Council (Bangladesh), 109n7 Case C-188/91, Deutsche Shell AG v Hauptzollamt Hamburg, 127n14 Case C-316/91, Parliament v Council (Lome´ IV), 109n6 Case C-327/91, France v Commission,7n16 Opinion 1/92, Draft agreement on the creation of the European Economic Area (II), 143n5 Case C-280/93, Germany v Council,72n31 Case C-324/93, The Queen v Secretary of State for Home Department, ex parte Evans Medical Ltd and Macfarlan Smith Ltd, 147n32 Case C-395/93, Neckermann Versand AG v Hauptzollamt Frankfurt/Main-Ost, 76n57 Case C-469/93, Amministrazione delle Finanze dello Stato v Chiquita Italia SpA, 145n19 Opinion 1/94, Competence of the Community to conclude international agreements concerning services and the protection of intellectual property,69n17 Opinion 2/94, Accession of the Community to the European Convention on Human Rights,15n44, 98n13 Opinion 3/94, Framework agreement on bananas,15n45 Case C-61/94, Commission v Germany, 144n16 Case C-124/95, The Queen, ex parte Centro-Com Srl v HM Treasury and Bank of England,3n6, 147n29 Case C-337/95, Parfums Christian Dior SA v Evora BV,74n37, 74n45, 150n48, 150n50 Case C-341/95, Gianni Bettati v Safety Hi-Tech Srl,71n23, 144n16 Case C-53/96, Herme`s International v FHT Marketing Choice BV,74n43, 149n40, 150n48 Case Law Registry 163 Case C-149/96, Portugal v Council,73n32, 128n16 Case C-162/96, A. Racke GmbH & Co. v Hauptzollamt Mainz,71n23, 145n23 Case C-416/96, El-Yassini v Secretary of State for Home Department, 145n18 Case C-414/97, Commission v Spain,55n39 Case C-62/98, Commission v Portugal, 147n33 Case C-84/98, Commission v Portugal, 147n34 Case C-170/98, Commission v Belgium, 147n34 Case C-377/98, Netherlands v Council and Parliament,84n10 Case C-467/98, Commission v Denmark,8n23 Case C-468/98, Commission v Sweden,8n23 Case C-469/98, Commission v Finland,8n23 Case C-471/98, Commission v Belgium,8n23 Case C-472/98, Commission v Luxembourg,8n23 Case C-475/98, Commission v Austria,8n23 Case C-476/98, Commission v Germany,8n23 Case C-63/99, The Queen v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Gloszczuk, 127n33 Case C-239/99, Nachi Europe GmbH v Hauptzollamt Krefeld,78n67 Case C-353/99 P, Hautala v Council,18n60 Opinion 1/00, Envisaged agreement on the establishment of a European Common Aviation Area, 143n6 Opinion 2/00, Cartagena Protocol,87n20 Case C-13/00, Commission v Ireland, 150n49, 150n51 Joined Cases C-27/00 & C-122/00, The Queen v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions, ex parte Omega Air Ltd and Omega Air Ltd, Aero Engines Ireland Ltd and Omega Aviation Services Ltd v Irish Aviation Authority,74n37 Case C-438/00, Deutscher Handballbund eV v Kolpak, 145n18 Case C-171/01, Birlikte v Wahlergruppe€ Gemeinsam, 127n13 Case C-216/01, Budvar v Rudolf Ammersin GmbH, 148n37 Case C-93/02 P, Biret International SA v Council,74n37 Case C-281/02, Commission v Council (Energy Star Agreement), 87n21 Case C-377/02, Le´on van Parys NV v Belgisch Interventie- en Restitutiebureau, 74n39 Opinion 1/03, Competence of the Community to conclude the new Lugano Convention,11n29 Case C-94/03, Commission v Council (Conclusion of the Rotterdam Convention), 87n23 Case C-105/03, Criminal proceedings against Maria Pupino,74n46 Case C-178/03, Commission v Council (Incorporation of the Rotterdam Convention), 17n50, 88n24 Case C-239/03, Commission v France, 150n52 Case C-265/03, Igor Simutenkov v Ministerio de Educacio´n y Cultura and Real Federacio´n Espan˜ola de Fu´tbol, 127n13, 129n20 164 Case Law Registry Case C-266/03, Commission v Luxembourg, 147n30 Case C-433/03, Commission v Germany, 147n30 Case C-459/03, Commission v Ireland, 151n54 Case C-144/04, Werner Mangold v Rudiger€ Helm,98n12 Case C-344/04, The Queen on the application of International Air Transport Association and European Low Fares Airline Association v Department for Transport, 144n15 Case C-532/04, Commission v Netherlands,8n23 Case C-91/05, Commission v Council (ECOWAS), 16n48, 118n33, 154n1 Case C-266/05 P, Sison v Council,17n55 Case C-284/05, Commission v Finland,55n39 Case C-337/05, Commission v Italy,55n39 Case C-341/05, Laval un Partneri Ltd v Svenska Byggnadsarbetarefo€rbundet and Others Joined Cases C-402/05 P & C-415/05 P, Kadi and Al Barakaat International Foundation v Council and Commission,17n53, 71n24, 104n31, 143n7, 144n14 Case C-431/05, Merck Gene´ricos – Produtos Farmaceˆuticos Lda v Merck & Co. Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Lda,75n47, 150n50 Case C-205/06, Commission v Austria, 147n31, 148n35 Case C-242/06, Minister voor Vreemdelingenzaken en Integratie v Sahin, 129n20 Case C-249/06, Commission v Sweden, 147n31, 148n35 Case C-308/06, The Queen, on the application of International Association of Independent Tanker Owners (Intertanko) and Others v Secretary of State for Transport,71n24, 144n13, 145n17, 145n20, 145n22, 146n28 Case C-411/06, Commission v Parliament and Council,88n25 Case C-45/07, Commission v Greece, 150n46 Case C-166/07, Parliament v Council (International Fund for Ireland), 17n50 Case C-118/07, Commission v Finland Case C-188/07, Commune de Mesquer v Total France and Total International Ltd, 146n28 Case C-246/07, Commission v Sweden, 150n46 Case C-370/07, Commission v Council (CITES) Opinion 1/08, Conclusion of agreements pursuant to Article XXI GATS,70n19 Case C-56/08, Parlitigu€ OU€ v Maksu- ja Tolliameti Po˜hja maksu- ja tollikeskus, 76n57 Case C-301/08, Bogiatzi v Deutscher Luftpool, Socie´te´ Luxair, European Communities, Luxembourg Foyer Assurances SA, 146n28 Case C-386/08, Brita GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Hafen, 143n10 Opinion 1/09, Creation of a unified patent litigation system,15n44 Case C-160/09, Ioannis Katsivardas – Nikolaos Tsitsikas OE v Ipourgos Ikonomikon, 145n19 Case C-343/09, Afton Chemical Limited v Secretary of State for Transport,84n10 Case Law Registry 165 General Court of the European Union (Formerly Court of First Instance) Case T-115/94, Opel Austria GmbH v Council, 144n15 Case T-14/98, Hautala v Council,18n60 Case T-2/99, T. Port GmbH & Co. KG v Council,74n41 Case T-18/99, Cordis Obst und Gemuse€ Grobhandel v Commission,74n38 Case T-243/01, Sony Computer Entertainment Europe Ltd v Commission,76n57 Case T-383/00, Beamglow Ltd v European Parliament and Others,74n42 Case T-306/01, Yusuf and Al Barakaat International Foundation v Council and Commission,18n57 Case T-315/01, Kadi v Council and Commission,18n57 Case T-228/02, Organisation des Modjahedines du peuple d’Iran v Council,17n54 Case T-47/03, Sison v Council,17n55 Case T-429/05, Artegodan v Commission,84n10 Case T-1/07, Apache Footwear Ltd and Apache II Footwear Ltd v Council,78n67 Case T-157/07, People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran v Council,17n54 Case T-183/07, Poland v Commission,90n33 Case T-256/07, People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran v Council,17n54 Case T-263/07 Estonia v Commission,90n33 Case T-341/07, Sison v Council,17n54 Case T-284/08, People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran v Council1,17n54 Case T-85/09, Kadi v Commission,18n57 Case T-122/09, Zhejiang Xinshiji Foods Co.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    10 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us