Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2020 Cascading effects in freshwater microbial food webs by predatory Cercozoa, Katablepharidacea and ciliates feeding on aplastidic bacterivorous cryptophytes Šimek, Karel ; Grujčić, Vesna ; Mukherjee, Indranil ; Kasalický, Vojtěch ; Nedoma, Jiří ; Posch, Thomas ; Mehrshad, Maliheh ; Salcher, Michaela M Abstract: Heterotrophic nanoflagellates (HNF) are considered as major planktonic bacterivores, however, larger HNF taxa can also be important predators of eukaryotes. To examine this trophic cascading, natu- ral protistan communities from a freshwater reservoir were released from grazing pressure by zooplankton via filtration through 10- and 5-µm filters, yielding microbial food webs of different complexity. Protis- tan growth was stimulated by amendments of five Limnohabitans strains, thus yielding five prey-specific treatments distinctly modulating protistan communities in 10- versus 5-µm fractions. HNF dynamics was tracked by applying five eukaryotic fluorescence in situ hybridization probes covering 55–90% oftotal flagellates. During the first experimental part, mainly small bacterivorous Cryptophyceae prevailed, with significantly higher abundances in 5-µm treatments. Larger predatory flagellates affiliating with Katable- pharidacea and one Cercozoan lineage (increasing to up to 28% of total HNF) proliferated towards the experimental endpoint, having obviously small phagocytized HNF in their food vacuoles. These predatory flagellates reached higher abundances in 10-µm treatments, where small ciliate predators and flagellate hunters also (Urotricha spp., Balanion planctonicum) dominated the ciliate assemblage. Overall, our study reports pronounced cascading effects from bacteria to bacterivorous HNF, predatory HNFand ciliates in highly treatment-specific fashions, defined by both prey-food characteristics and feeding modes of predominating protists. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiaa121 Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-198381 Journal Article Published Version The following work is licensed under a Creative Commons: Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License. Originally published at: Šimek, Karel; Grujčić, Vesna; Mukherjee, Indranil; Kasalický, Vojtěch; Nedoma, Jiří; Posch, Thomas; Mehrshad, Maliheh; Salcher, Michaela M (2020). Cascading effects in freshwater microbial food webs by predatory Cercozoa, Katablepharidacea and ciliates feeding on aplastidic bacterivorous cryptophytes. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 96(10):fiaa121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiaa121 2 FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 96, 2020, fiaa121 doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiaa121 Advance Access Publication Date: 18 June 2020 Research Article Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/femsec/article/96/10/fiaa121/5859480 by University of Zurich user on 29 January 2021 January 29 user on Zurich of University by https://academic.oup.com/femsec/article/96/10/fiaa121/5859480 from Downloaded RESEARCH ARTICLE Cascading effects in freshwater microbial food webs by predatory Cercozoa, Katablepharidacea and ciliates feeding on aplastidic bacterivorous cryptophytes Karel Simekˇ 1,2,*,§, Vesna Grujciˇ c´ 1,†, Indranil Mukherjee1, Vojtechˇ Kasalicky´ 1,#, Jirˇ´ı Nedoma1, Thomas Posch3, Maliheh Mehrshad1,‡ and Michaela M. Salcher1, 1Biology Centre CAS, Institute of Hydrobiology, Na Sadk´ ach´ 7, 370 05 Ceskˇ e´ Budejovice,ˇ Czech Republic, 2University of South Bohemia, Faculty of Science, Branisovskˇ a´ 31, 370 05 Ceskˇ e´ Budejovice,ˇ Czech Republic and 3Limnological Station, Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of Zurich, 8802 Kilchberg, Switzerland ∗Corresponding author: Biology Centre CAS, Institute of Hydrobiology, Na Sadk´ ach´ 7, CZ-37005 Ceskˇ e´ Budejovice,ˇ Czech Republic. Tel: +420 387775873; Fax: +420 385310248; E-mail: [email protected] One sentence summary: Presented are experimentally induced cascading effects from bacteria to bacterivorous flagellates, predatory flagellates and ciliates in different plankton size fractions, modulated by prey-food characteristics and feeding modes of predominating protists. Editor: Martin W. Hahn †Current address: Science for Life laboratory, School of engineering sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, Department of Gene Technology, KTH Royal institute of Technology, SE-17121, Stockholm, Sweden. ‡Current address: Department of Ecology and Genetics, Limnology and Science for Life Laboratory, Uppsala University, Norbyvagen¨ 18D, 752 36 Uppsala, Sweden. §Karel Simek,ˇ http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7058-9063 #Vojtechˇ Kasalicky,´ http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9132-8321 Michaela M. Salcher, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1063-6523 ABSTRACT Heterotrophic nanoflagellates (HNF) are considered as major planktonic bacterivores, however, larger HNF taxa canalsobe important predators of eukaryotes. To examine this trophic cascading, natural protistan communities from a freshwater reservoir were released from grazing pressure by zooplankton via filtration through 10- and 5-µm filters, yielding microbial food webs of different complexity. Protistan growth was stimulated by amendments of five Limnohabitans strains, thus yielding five prey-specific treatments distinctly modulating protistan communities in 10- versus 5-µm fractions. HNF dynamics was tracked by applying five eukaryotic fluorescence in situ hybridization probes covering 55–90% of total flagellates. During the first experimental part, mainly small bacterivorous Cryptophyceae prevailed, with significantly higher abundances in 5-µm treatments. Larger predatory flagellates affiliating with Katablepharidacea and one Cercozoan lineage (increasing to up to 28% of total HNF) proliferated towards the experimental endpoint, having obviously small Received: 27 April 2020; Accepted: 17 June 2020 C The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of FEMS. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected] 1 2 FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2020, Vol. 96, No. 10 phagocytized HNF in their food vacuoles. These predatory flagellates reached higher abundances in 10-µm treatments, where small ciliate predators and flagellate hunters alsoUrotricha ( spp., Balanion planctonicum) dominated the ciliate assemblage. Overall, our study reports pronounced cascading effects from bacteria to bacterivorous HNF, predatory HNF and ciliates in highly treatment-specific fashions, defined by both prey-food characteristics and feeding modesof predominating protists. Keywords: freshwater microbial food webs; bacterivorous and predatory flagellates; Cryptophyceae; Katablepharidacea; Cercozoa; ciliates Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/femsec/article/96/10/fiaa121/5859480 by University of Zurich user on 29 January 2021 January 29 user on Zurich of University by https://academic.oup.com/femsec/article/96/10/fiaa121/5859480 from Downloaded INTRODUCTION technique provides even higher resolution by allowing simul- taneous phylogenetic identification of both predator and prey Heterotrophic nanoflagellates (HNF) represent an extremely (Grujciˇ c´ et al. 2018). These cumbersome single-cell approaches diverse polyphyletic group of mostly uncultured representatives have recently revealed novel findings on the importance of var- belonging to a heterogeneous functional guild. The small HNF ious flagellate taxa in marine and freshwater pelagic food webs. are considered as key bacterivores in pelagic systems (Berninger, For instance, tiny flagellated stramenopiles from the MAST-1 Finlay and Kuuppo-Leinikki 1991; Pernthaler 2005), whereas the and MAST-4 lineages have been identified as important bac- larger ones are omnivorous, or likely predators of small bacteriv- terivores in marine systems (Massana et al. 2009). Likewise, orous flagellates (Arndt et al. 2000 and references therein, Piwosz small aplastidic representatives of cryptophytes (mostly known and Pernthaler 2010). However, the term ‘omnivorous protists’ as chloroplast-bearing autotrophs) and therein the Cry1 lineage is still not as clearly defined. This topic gets even more com- can be the core bacterivores with high cell-specific bacterial plex in view of current discussions about adequate terminol- uptake rates in freshwater pelagic environments (Grujciˇ c´ et al. ogy describing feeding modes of planktonic protists in general 2018, Mehrshad and coauthors, unpublished data). (Kiørboe´ 2011; Weisse 2017). A strict categorization of protistan In addition, specific experimental setups were designed species as ‘algivores’ and ‘predators’ may be valid only for a with the aim of minimizing the manipulation-induced distur- few distinct taxa, however, this terminology probably does not bances of natural microbial communities that yield considerable reflect the breadth of ingested food particles for the majority of enrichments of protistan bacterivores (Simekˇ et al. 2001, 2013). protistan grazers (Weisse et al. 2016). In our study, we use the For instance, simplified microbial food webs, that excluded zoo- term omnivory as a synonym for a flagellate feeding mode where plankton grazing pressure on protists