Downloaded from Elgar Online at 09/28/2021 04:48:53PM Via Free Access

Downloaded from Elgar Online at 09/28/2021 04:48:53PM Via Free Access

JOBNAME: Stone PAGE: 1 SESS: 3 OUTPUT: Tue Jun 26 10:09:58 2018 TABLE OF CASES EU CASES A, Case C-523/07, [2009] ECR I-2805 ......... 20.21, 20.45, 21.32, 21.44, 21.75, 21.83, 21.93 AvB,Case C-112/13, EU:C:2014:2195 ........................................................................... 8.75 AvB,Case C-184/14, EU:C:2015:479 ........................................................................... 22.24 AvB,Case C-489/14, EU:C:2015:654 ................................................................. 20.36–20.37 AOy,Case C-123/11 EU:C:2013:84 .................................................................................. 1.56 Aertssen v VSB, Case C-523/14 EU:C:2015:722, ...................................................... 2.39, 9.29 Aguirre Zarraga v Pelz, Case C-491/10-PPU, [2010] ECR I-14247 ............................. 21.159 Alder v Orŧowska Case C-325/11, EU:C:2012:824 ............................................................. 3.25 Allianz v West Tankers, Case C-185/07 [2009] ECR I-663 .......... 2.65, 2.74–2.75, 2.77–2.81, 2.84–2.85, 9.57 Alpha Bank Cyprus, Case C-519/13, EU:C:2015:603 ......................................................... 3.27 Alta Realitat, Case C-384/14, EU:C:2016:316 ................................................................... 3.27 Antonio Gramsci Shipping Corp v Lembergs, Case C 350/13, EU:C:2014:1516. ............... 11.26 Apostolides v Orams, Case C-420/07 [2009] ECR I-3571 .......... 2.02, 2.32, 3.19, 7.02, 11.13, 11.27, 11.36, 11.51, 11.55, 11.74 Apple and Pear Australia Ltd v OHIM and Carolus C. BVBA, Case T-378/13, EU:T:2015:186 ............................................................................................................ 7.91 Arcado v Haviland, Case 9/87, [1988] ECR 1539 .............................................................. 4.18 AS-Autoteile Service v Mahle, Case 220/84, [1985] ECR 2267 ........................................ 7.116 ASML v Semiconductor Industry Services, Case C-283/05, [2006] ECR I-12041 ................................................................................................. 11.71, 11.73 Assens Havn v Navigators Management, Case C-368/16, EU:C:2017:546 ......................... 6.22 Austro-Mechana v Amazon, Case C-572/14, EU:C:2016:286 .................................... 4.70, 4.98 Bank Handlowy v Christianapol, Case C-116/11, EU:C:2012:739 ............ 24.52, 24.60, 25.07, 25.20 Bavaria Fluggesellschaft Schwabe v Eurocontrol, Case 9–10/77 [1977] ECR 1517 ............. 2.33 Benincasa v Dentalkit, Case C-269/95 [1997] ECR I-3767 ................... 6.29, 6.31, 8.35–8.36 Berghoefer v ASA, Case 221/84 [1985] ECR 2699 ............................................................. 8.10 Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe v JPMorgan Chase Bank, Case C-144/10 [2011] ECR I-3961 .... 7.19 Bertrand v Ott, Case 150/77 [1978] ECR 1431 ................................................................. 6.29 Besix v WABAG, Case C-256/00, [2002] ECR I-1699 ............................................. 4.57, 4.61 Bier v Mines de Potasse d’Alsace, Case 21/76, [1976] ECR 1735 ........................................ 4.78 Blanckaert &Willems v Trost, Case 139/80, [1981] ECR 819 .......................................... 4.116 BMW v Acacia, Case C-433/16, EU:C:2017:550 ...................................................... 7.88, 8.76 Bohez v Wiertz, Case C-4/14, EU:C:2015:563 ............................................................... 21.134 Bolagsupplysningen v Svensk Handel, Case C-194/16, EU:C:2017:766 ............................... 4.90 Bradbrooke v Aleksandrowicz, Case C-498/14-PPU, EU:C:2015:3 ................................. 21.116 Brenner v Dean Witter Reynolds, Case C-318/93, [1994] ECR I-4275 ............................. 8.73 Brennero v Wendel, Case 258/83, [1984] ECR 3971 ................................... 12.28–12.29, 12.31 xviii Peter Stone - 9781784712662 Downloaded from Elgar Online at 09/28/2021 04:48:53PM via free access Columns Design XML Ltd / Job: Stone-Private_international_law_in_the_EU / Division: TableCases /Pg. Position: 1 / Date: 13/6 JOBNAME: Stone PAGE: 2 SESS: 4 OUTPUT: Tue Jun 26 10:09:58 2018 TABLE OF CASES Brite Strike Technologies Inc v Brite Strike Technologies SA Case C-230/15, EU:C:2016:560 .................................................................................................. 2.90, 7.35 Brogsitter v Fabrication de Montres Normandes, Case C-548/12, EU:C:2014:148 ..... 4.76, 6.59 Burgo Group v Illochroma, Case C-327/13, EU:C:2014:2158 ........................................... 25.09 C, Case C-435/06, [2007] ECR I-10141 ................................................... 20.75, 21.14, 21.32 CvM,C-376/14-PPU, EU:C:2014:2268 ................................................ 21.31–21.32, 21.107 Capelloni v Pelkmans, Case 119/84, [1985] ECR 3147 ................... 12.08, 12.17, 12.19, 12.32 Car Trim v KeySafety Systems, Case C-381/08, [2010] ECR I-1255 ...... 4.35, 4.37–4.38, 4.40 Cartel Damage Claims (CDC) Hydrogen Peroxide v Akzo Nobel, Case C-352/13, EU:C:2015:335 .......................................................... 4.103–4.104, 5.13, 5.20, 8.38, 8.48 Cartesio, Case C-210/06 [2008] ECR I-9641. .......................................................... 1.57–1.58 Cartier v Ziegler, Case C-1/13, EU:C:2014:109 ........................................................ 9.12, 9.32 Castelletti v Trumpy, Case C-159/97, [1999] ECR I-1597 ........... 8.12–8.16, 8.20–8.21, 8.24, 8.31, 8.34, 8.40 CE de Nortel Networks SA v Rogeau, Case C-649/13, EU:C:2015:384. ........ 2.53, 2.57, 24.65, 25.13–25.14, 25.16 Centros, Case C-212/97 [1999] ECR I-1459 ............................................................ 1.54, 7.80 Česká Spořitelna v Feichter, Case C-419/11, EU:C:2012:586 and EU:C:2013:165 ........... 4.11, 4.18, 4.44, 4.55, 4.60, 6.29, 6.32 Child and Family Agency v JD, Case C-428/15, EU:C:2016:458 ................ 21.76, 21.78–21.79 Chudaś v Deutsche Allgemeine, Case C-66/17, EU:C:2017:972 ......................................... 13.06 CHW v GJH, Case 25/81 [1982] ECR 1189 ................................................. 2.47, 8.76, 10.04 CILFIT v Ministry of Health Case 283/81 [1982] ECR 3415 ........................................... 1.09 Collect Inkasso v Aint, Case C-289/17, EU:C:2018:133 ......................................... 13.16–13.17 Color Drack v LEXX International, Case C-386/05 [2007] ECR I-3699 ........ 4.32, 4.36–4.37 Commission v AMI Semiconductor, Case C-294/02, [2005] ECR I-2175 ......................... 24.62 Commission v Spain, Case C-70/03, [2004] ECR I-7999 ................................................ 16.24 Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Sunico, Case C-49/12, EU:C:2013:545 .................................................................................................. 2.33, 2.38 Concurrence v Samsung and Amazon, Case C-618/15, EU:C:2016:843 ............................ 4.102 Coreck Maritime v Handelsveem, Case C-387/98, [2000] ECR I-9337 .......... 3.19, 8.21, 8.33, 8.46 Corman-Collins v La Maison du Whisky, Case C-9/12, EU:C:2013 .......................... 4.45, 4.52 Coty v First Note Perfumes, Case C-360/12, EU:C:2014:1318 ... 4.83, 4.96, 4.100, 4.102, 7.88 Coursier v Fortis Bank, Case C-267/97, [1999] ECR I-2543 ........................................... 11.27 ČPP v Bilas, C-111/09, [2010] ECR I-4545 ............... 6.04, 6.16, 6.18, 6.47, 6.49, 6.67, 6.70 Custom Made v Stawa, Case C-288/92, [1994] ECR I-2913 ........ 4.33, 4.57, 4.60, 8.14, 8.25 Daily Mail and General Trust, Case 81/87 [1988] ECR 5483 ........................................... 1.57 Dansommer v Götz, Case C-8/98, [2000] ECR I-393 ............................................... 7.12–7.14 Danvaern v Otterbeck, Case C-341/93, [1995] ECR I-2053 ............................................. 5.30 Data Delecta v MSL Dynamics, Case C-43/95, [1996] ECR I-4661 ............................... 10.13 De Bloos v Bouyer, Case 14/76, [1976] ECR 1497 .................................................. 4.57, 4.116 DeCavelvDeCavel(No1)[1979] ECR 1055 ............. 2.43, 2.47, 10.04, 22.12–22.13, 22.74 DeCavelvDeCavel(No2)Case 120/79, [1980] ECR 731 ... 2.43, 2.47, 10.04, 22.02, 22.12 De Wolf v Cox, Case 42/76, [1976] ECR 1759 ..................................................... 11.14, 12.08 Debaecker v Bouwman, Case 49/84, [1985] ECR 1779 ......................................... 11.68, 11.71 Denilauler v Couchet Frères, Case 125/79, [1980] ECR 1553 ........................................... 11.11 xix Peter Stone - 9781784712662 Downloaded from Elgar Online at 09/28/2021 04:48:53PM via free access Columns Design XML Ltd / Job: Stone-Private_international_law_in_the_EU / Division: TableCases /Pg. Position: 2 / Date: 19/6 JOBNAME: Stone PAGE: 3 SESS: 3 OUTPUT: Tue Jun 26 10:09:58 2018 TABLE OF CASES Deticˇek v Sgueglia, Case C-403/09-PPU, [2009] ECR I-12193 ........................... 21.92, 21.95 Deutsche Genossenschaftsbank v Brasserie du Pecheur, Case 148/84, [1985] ECR 1981 ..... 12.08, 12.23, 12.32 Develey v OHIM, Case C-238/06-P, [2007] ECR I-9375 ................................................. 7.91 DFDS Torline v SEKO, Case C-18/02, [2004] ECR I-1417 .................................... 4.65, 4.80 DHL v Chronopost, Case C-235/09, [2011] ECR I-2801 .................................................. 7.94 Di Paolo v Office National de l’Emploi, Case 76/76, [1977] ECR 315 ............................. 20.21 Diageo Brands v Simiramida-04 EOOD, Case C-681/13, EU:C:2015:471 .......... 11.29–11.30,

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    37 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us