Abuse of Mariners Under the Two-Watch System

Abuse of Mariners Under the Two-Watch System

Abuse of Mariners Under the Two-Watch System Report #R-370, Revision 4 Asserting our right “…to petition the Government for redress of grievances.” Amendment 1, U.S. Constitution, Dec. 15, 1791 TABLE OF CONTENTS NMA Report #R-370, Rev. 4. Report to Congress: Abuse of Mariners Under the Two-Watch System . Acronyms & Editorial Notes ....................................................................................................................................i Chapter 1 – The 12-Hour Rule in Law and Regulation ................................................................................... 1-1 Chapter 2 – The 12-Hour Rule and Coast Guard Policy ................................................................................. 2-1 Document: USCG Policy Letter #G-MOC-04-00, Revision 1....................................................................... 2-2 Chapter 3– Fatigue and Sleep Issues ................................................................................................................ 3-1 Chapter 4 – NTSB Recommendations on Fatigue and Hours of Service Regulations .................................... 4-1 Document #1: NTSB Safety Recommendation I-99-1 .................................................................................. 4-4 Document #2: USCG Reply to NTSB.........................................................................................................4-17 Chapter 5 – Reporting Hours-of-Service and Safety Violations ...................................................................... 5-1 Case #1 – Feemster vs BJ-Titan................................................................................................................... 5-4 Case #2 – Garrie vs James L. Gray, Inc........................................................................................................ 5-4 Case #3 – Meaige vs Hartley Marine Corp. and Midland Enterprises ........................................................... 5-4 Case #4 – Winkler vs Coastal Towing, LLC ................................................................................................ 5-9 Chapter 6 – Congressional Intent for Towing Vessel Inspection ..................................................................... 6-1 Document: The Oberstar Letter.................................................................................................................... 6-1 Chapter 7 – Focus on Hours-of-Service Statutes and Regulations That Need Attention ................................ 7-1 Problem #1: Discrimination Against Towing Vessel Officers on Long Voyages........................................... 7-2 Problem #2: Provide Adequate Manning for the “Two-Watch” System’s 84-Hour Workweek ..................... 7-2 Problem #3: Taking Charge of a Watch Following Crew Change................................................................. 7-3 Problem#4: Needed – Hours-of-Service Limits for Unlicensed Mariners...................................................... 7-4 Problem #5: Outdated Coast Guard Manning Regulations............................................................................ 7-4 Problem #6: Deceptive Tonnage Parameters for 100-ton Towing Vessels ................................................... .7-4 Problem#7: Obtaining a Sea Service Letter.................................................................................................. 7-5 Problem #8: The Marine Safety Directorate Ignores Limited-Tonnage Mariners .......................................... 7-5 Chapter 8 – The “Two-Watch” System Prevails in Industry’s Offshore Oil and Towing Sectors ................. 8-1 Issue #1: Existing Manning Regulations Need Clarification........................................................................ 8-1 Issue #2: Existing Manning Regulations for Towing Vessels Must be Updated............................................ 8-2 Issue #3: Entry-Level Mariners Need Training............................................................................................. 8-2 Issue #4: The Coast Guard Ignored Adequate Engineer Training................................................................. 8-2 Issue #5: Shortcomings of On-the-Job Training to Serve as Engineer........................................................... 8-3 Issue #6: Engineering Statute Ignored.......................................................................................................... 8-3 Issue #7: Intelligent Handling of Pollutants.................................................................................................. 8-4 Issue #8: Substandard Manning Levels for Engineers on OSVs.................................................................... 8-4 Issue #9: Who Determines a Vessel’s Crew Size?........................................................................................ 8-7 Issue #10: Undermanning vs Industry’s “Availability of Close Support” Argument ..................................... 8-8 Example #1: Undermanning on Two Vessels in Collision Leaves Three Fatalities ....................................... 8-9 Example #2: Tonnage Manipulation Leaves Four Men to Operate a 184-foot OSV...................................... 8-9 Example #3: FJA Should be Required Reading for the Marine Safety Directorate!......................................8-10 Example #4: Undermanning and Tonnage Manipulation on Super Crewboats.............................................8-10 Example #5: Undermanning Mini-Supply Boats .........................................................................................8-12 Example #6: Untrained “Deckineers” Are Dangerous?................................................................................8-13 Chapter 9 – Harbor Tugs and the “One-Watch” System . ............................................................................... 9-1 Example 1 – The Onset of Fatigue and its Consequences ............................................................................. 9-1 Chapter 10 – Safe Management of Crew Travel Time ................................................................................... 10-1 Document #1 – Captain John Sutton’s Letter ..............................................................................................10-1 Chapter 11 – The “Call Watch” is a Major Safety Issue for Unlicensed Crewmembers ............................... 11-1 Chapter 12 – Crew Endurance Management Systems ................................................................................... 12-1 Document #1: ACBL Mandatory CEMS Program ......................................................................................12-8 CEMS Connects Food Service and Crew Endurance.................................................................................12-11 Our Mariners View Food Service Issues ...................................................................................................12-13 Chapter 13 – Mismanagement of the Marine Casualty Investigations Program ........................................... 13-1 Example #1 – The Cosco Busan Congressional Hearing .............................................................................13-1 Example #2 – The Webbers Falls Interstate 40 Bridge Allision...................................................................13-3 Example #3 – The Seabulk Georgia Accident .............................................................................................13-9 Example #4 – Tug Chinook’s Tow Damages Lake Washington High-Rise Bridge ....................................13-20 Example #5 – Collision Between a Tug and an OSV.................................................................................13-27 Example #6 – The Miss Amanda Incident.................................................................................................13-28 Chapter 14 – Undermanned Engine Rooms on Inspected, Limited Tonnage Vessels ................................... 14-1 Example #1 – The OSV Cheramie Bo Truc 26 Sinks With 2 Fatalities........................................................14-2 Example #2 – Death of River Towboat Chief Engineer Gary Duncan..........................................................14-2 Example #3 – In Search of Justice for Disabled OSV Chief Engineer Leon Manderson...............................14-4 Chapter 15 – Mariners Tell Our Association of Their Concerns ................................................................... 15-1 Chapter 16 – Direct Request for Congressional Action .................................................................................. 16-1 APPENDIX – Index R (List of all NMA Reports including those cited herein) ..............................................A-1 ACRONYMS & EDITORIAL NOTES Acronyms ACBL = American Commercial Barge Lines (now American Commercial Lines, an inland towing company) ALJ = Administrative Law Judge. ATA = American Trucking Association. AWO = American Waterways Operators. (The tug and barge industry’s trade association.) BAC = Blood-Alcohol Concentration. CFR = Code of Federal Regulation COI = Certificate of Inspection DHS OIG = Department of Homeland Security, Office of the Inspector General DOL = (U.S.) Department of Labor. DOT = (U.S.) Department of Transportation. FAA = Federal Aviation Administration. FJA = Functional Job Analysis. (A 1982 Coast Guard Report on OSVs.) FMCSA = Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. FR = Federal Register GRT = Gross Register Tons GCMA = Gulf Coast Mariners Association. (Since Jan. 1,

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    179 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us