Perfect Devices: the Amazing Endurance of Hard Disk Drives Giora J

Perfect Devices: the Amazing Endurance of Hard Disk Drives Giora J

T TarnoTek Perfect Devices: The Amazing Endurance of Hard Disk Drives Giora J. Tarnopolsky TARNOTEK & INSIC - Information Storage Industry Consortium www.tarnotek.com [email protected] www.insic.org 2004 - Mass Storage Systems & Technologies Outline z Perfect Inventions z Hard Disk Drives & other consumer products z Hard Disk Drives: Developments 1990 - 2004 z Marketplace z How the technology advances have affected the product offerings z Technology z How market opportunities propelled basic research forward z Disk Drives at the Boundaries z INSIC and Data Storage Systems Research z Closing Remarks: Hard Disk Drive Endurance Giora J. Tarnopolsky HDD - Perfect Devices © 2002-2004\14 April 2004\2 TARNOTEK 2004 - Mass Storage Systems & Technologies PERFECT INVENTIONS Giora J. Tarnopolsky HDD - Perfect Devices © 2002-2004\14 April 2004\3 TARNOTEK 2004 - Mass Storage Systems & Technologies Nearly Perfect Inventions z Certain inventions are created “perfect:” their operation relies on a fundamental principle that cannot be improved, or does not merit improvement z This assures their endurance … z … and defines their domain of development, the limits of applicability of the invention z Examples of perfect inventions are the bicycle, the umbrella, the book, and the disk drive Giora J. Tarnopolsky HDD - Perfect Devices © 2002-2004\14 April 2004\4 TARNOTEK 2004 - Mass Storage Systems & Technologies Bicycle z Gyroscope effect assures stability of the rider z Under torque T, the bike turns but does not fall z Low ratio of vehicle mass to rider mass z ~ 15 % (as compared to ~2,200% for car) z Efficient r T z Rugged r dL z Mass-produced r dt L z Affordable Giora J. Tarnopolsky HDD - Perfect Devices © 2002-2004\14 April 2004\5 TARNOTEK 2004 - Mass Storage Systems & Technologies Development Columbia Light Roadster 1892 Draisienne 1817 z dL/dt = T cannot be Santa Cruz improved upon 2002 Giora J. Tarnopolsky HDD - Perfect Devices © 2002-2004\14 April 2004\6 TARNOTEK 2004 - Mass Storage Systems & Technologies Disk Drive z Magnetic hysteresis z 2-D travel with only one linear motion z High volumetric density z Random access z Mass-produced ÎFew-hundred $/box z Non-volatile ÎNo vibration isolation z Affordable Îno T stabilization z Rugged ÎThese properties define drives Giora J. Tarnopolsky HDD - Perfect Devices © 2002-2004\14 April 2004\7 TARNOTEK 2004 - Mass Storage Systems & Technologies Development ColumbiaSeagate’s Light ST506 Roadster 1979 1892 STSanta ’Cuda Cruz V IBMDraisienne RAMAC 1817 1953 20022002 Giora J. Tarnopolsky HDD - Perfect Devices © 2002-2004\14 April 2004\8 TARNOTEK 2004 - Mass Storage Systems & Technologies Hard Disk Drives Giora J. Tarnopolsky HDD - Perfect Devices © 2002-2004\14 April 2004\9 TARNOTEK 2004 - Mass Storage Systems & Technologies Hard Disk Drives: Nanotechnology z In a disk drive, the data is recorded in concentric tracks z Track pitch, TP, is the distance between track centers z Bit length is the shortest Bit length recorded bit TP auxiliary fields: servo, ... user data fields Giora J. Tarnopolsky HDD - Perfect Devices © 2002-2004\14 April 2004\10 TARNOTEK 2004 - Mass Storage Systems & Technologies Hard Disk Drives now: 60Gb/in2 z Areal density, AD, is the number of magnetic bits per unit area 2 z At 60 Gb/in , the track density is 100,000 tracks per inch, and the bit density along the track is 600,000 bits per inch (100 ktpi x 600 kbpi) TP z TP = 10 µin = 254 nm B z B = 1.7 µin = 42 nm z The servo tracking mechanism 1-σ error (or misregistration) is 8.5 nm Giora J. Tarnopolsky HDD - Perfect Devices © 2002-2004\14 April 2004\11 TARNOTEK 2004 - Mass Storage Systems & Technologies HDD’s & other consumer products z 5 megapixel digital camera: pixel ~2.7 x 2.7 µm2 , or 680 times less “dense” than bit storage 1 pixel = 680 magnetic bits z The focusing accuracy of the lens-to-CCD distance is ±7.5 µm, or 882 times lower precision than HDD tracking z 5 megapixel camera, $379. 200 GB drive, $100. ~ x1,000 mechanism, 1/4 price. Giora J. Tarnopolsky HDD - Perfect Devices © 2002-2004\14 April 2004\12 TARNOTEK 2004 - Mass Storage Systems & Technologies Technology Advances Rapidly Deployed into Products Giora J. Tarnopolsky HDD - Perfect Devices © 2002-2004\14 April 2004\13 TARNOTEK 2004 - Mass Storage Systems & Technologies The Future of Hard Disk Drive Technology Lab Demos: Possible HDD Areal Density Progression 100000.0 Laboratory Demonstrations e lin e at 10000.0 G r CA ) % 2 0 1 Terabit per inch2 goal 5 e 1000.0 in G l CA % 30 100.0 highest in products Areal Density (Gb/ in Areal Density (Gb/ 70 perpendicular recording now 10.0 heat-assisted mag recording patterned media ? 1.0 self-organized arrays ? Jan-90 Jan-93 Jan-96 Jan-99 Jan-02 Jan-05 Jan-08 Jan-11 Jan-14 Jan-17 Date Giora J. Tarnopolsky HDD - Perfect Devices © 2002-2004\14 April 2004\14 TARNOTEK 2004 - Mass Storage Systems & Technologies $ of HD Drive ≥ $ Components Price of HDD, 95 mm Desktop ≤ 7,200 rpm Moderate 00 decline in ,0 1 unit cost Seagate’s $/Drive 100 plans 1TB, $200 2006 one platter HGST Maxtor /one head, Seagate WDC 30GB 0 1 Jul-98 Jul-99 Jul-00 Jul-01 Jul-02 Jul-03 Jul-04 Jan-98 Jan-99 Jan-00 Jan-01 Jan-02 Jan-03 Jan-04 (C) 2003-2004 TarnoTek Date Giora J. Tarnopolsky HDD - Perfect Devices © 2002-2004\14 April 2004\15 TARNOTEK 2004 - Mass Storage Systems & Technologies Precipitous decline in $/GB Cost per Gigabyte, 95 mm Desktop ≤ 7,200 rpm 100.00 HGST Maxtor 10.00 Seagate WDC 1.00 $/GB 0.10 0.01 Jan-98 Jan-99 Jan-00 Jan-01 Jan-02 Jan-03 Jan-04 Jan-05 Jan-06 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 (C) 2002-2004 TarnoTek Time Giora J. Tarnopolsky HDD - Perfect Devices © 2002-2004\14 April 2004\16 TARNOTEK 2004 - Mass Storage Systems & Technologies Precipitous decline in $/GB Cost per Gigabyte, 95 mm Desktop ≤ 7,200 rpm 100.00 HGST Maxtor 10.00 Seagate WDC 1.00 $/GB - 40%/ year $15*exp(-0.53*(yyyy-1998)) ? 0.10 Factor: 0.60/year 0.01 Jan-98 Jan-99 Jan-00 Jan-01 Jan-02 Jan-03 Jan-04 Jan-05 Jan-06 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 (C) 2002-2004 TarnoTek Time Giora J. Tarnopolsky HDD - Perfect Devices © 2002-2004\14 April 2004\17 TARNOTEK 2004 - Mass Storage Systems & Technologies “Box” Capacity Growth HDD Capacity vs. Time, 95 mm Desktop ≤ 7,200 rpm 1000 HGST 400 GB 100 All HDD Early HDD 10 HDD Capacity (GB) 1 Jan-98 Jan-99 Jan-00 Jan-01 Jan-02 Jan-03 Jan-04 Jan-05 Jan-06 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 Time (C) 2003-2004 TarnoTek Giora J. Tarnopolsky HDD - Perfect Devices © 2002-2004\14 April 2004\18 TARNOTEK 2004 - Mass Storage Systems & Technologies Capacity Growth: Sustainable? HDD Capacity vs. Time, 95 mm Desktop ≤ 7,200 rpm 1000 y = 6.6 e0.6584(yyyy-Jan HGST ? 400 GB 98) Rate: 93%/year Seagate’s Factor: 1.93/year plans 100 2 All HDD Early HDD 10 HDD Capacity (GB) Toshiba’s 0.85 inch 1 Jan-98 Jan-99 Jan-00 Jan-01 Jan-02 Jan-03 Jan-04 Jan-05 Jan-06 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 (C) 2003-2004 TarnoTek Time Giora J. Tarnopolsky HDD - Perfect Devices © 2002-2004\14 April 2004\19 TARNOTEK 2004 - Mass Storage Systems & Technologies Product Capacity vs. Normalized Cost Capacity vs. Price/GB z Capacity inversely 1000 2000/ 2004 95 mm Desktop proportional to Apple I-Pod drives Freecom USB C_Card $/GB Hitachi µ-drive Compact Flash z AD growth 100 USB Drives Secure Digital invested almost exclusively in y = 96.533x-0.7974 capacity growth R2 = 0.885 10 z Increased AD & miniaturization 1998/ Capacity (GB) ? have not reduced 1999 1 drives cost at desirable capacities z No 10 GB, $5 HDD products 0.1 z Beyond some 0.1 1.0 10.0 100.0 1,000.0 capacity, capacity Price per Gigabyte ($/GB) (C) 2003-2004 TarnoTek itself is not a customer need. Giora J. Tarnopolsky HDD - Perfect Devices © 2002-2004\14 April 2004\20 TARNOTEK 2004 - Mass Storage Systems & Technologies Magnetic Areal Density Progression Giora J. Tarnopolsky HDD - Perfect Devices © 2002-2004\14 April 2004\21 TARNOTEK 2004 - Mass Storage Systems & Technologies Areal Density Growth z Laboratory magnetic areal density has grown from 1 Gb/in2 in 1990 to ~170 Gb/in2 by December 2003 2 z It is 60 to 70 Gb/in in current products 2 z Feasibility assessments of 1 Tb/in under intense scrutiny, stated INSIC research goal 2 z 10, 50 Tb/in have been suggested for HAMR, Heat Assisted Magnetic Recording HDD future predicated on continuing growth of the areal density. Or does it? Giora J. Tarnopolsky HDD - Perfect Devices © 2002-2004\14 April 2004\22 TARNOTEK 2004 - Mass Storage Systems & Technologies From 1 to 170 Gb/in2: 1990 - 2003 Hitachi PMR Gb/in2 Superior achievement 600 Fujitsu IBM Log- log plot of track 500 SEG / Perp ReadRite density and linear density 300 Hitachi Long. 1k Wood 12/2003 Negative slope lines: 200 Mallary P Gao & Bertram P P 500 constant AD Victora1 100 P Positive slope lines: BAR P constant BAR 2 200 -9 50 4 Low AD demos: 10 , 30 100 much better BER than 8 75 recent demos 20 recent demos Track Density (ktpi) Density Track 50 Since 1 Gb/in2, the BAR 12 16 20 25 40 10 30 has changed from ~ 25 to ~ 4 to 6 1991 10 20 5 Track density has grown 100200300 500 700 1000 2000 3000 faster than linear density Linear Density (kbpi) © 2002-2004 TarnoTek Giora J.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    61 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us