I NUCLEAR PSYCHOLOGY: A PRELIMINARY BIBLIOGRAPHY Bernard M. Kramer with the assistance of Catherine Girrier, Wendy Barrett, and Janice Chiaratto CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 *uiiIIIllliluum unIMMuMEEEEEm Emiinn C/85-5 NUCLEAR PSYCHOLOGY: A PRELIMINARY BIBLIOGRAPHY Bernard M. Kramer Department of Psychology University of Massachusetts/Boston with the assistance of Catherine Girrier Department of Political Science Massachusetts Institute of Technology Wendy Barrett Psychology Department University of Massachusetts/Boston Janice Chiaratto Political Science Department University of Massachusetts/Boston Defense and Arms Control Studies Program Center for International Studies Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, Mass. 02139 and The William Joiner Center for the Study of War and Social Consequences University of Massachusetts/Boston Dorchester, Mass. 02125 August 1985 (Additional copies may be obtained by contacting Bernard M. Kramer, Psychology Department, University of Massachusetts/Boston, Dorchester, Mass. 02125) NUCLEAR PSYCHOLOGY: A PRELIMINARY BIBLIOGRAPHY by Bernard M. Kramer, Professor of Psychology, University of Massachusetts Boston with the assistance of Catherine Girrier, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Wendy Barrett, and Janice Chiaratto, University of Massachusetts Boston Abrams, L. (1973). Commitment: Public pr otest as a determinant of attitudes con cerning U.S. defense pol icy and political dissent. Psychological Reports, 32, 251-254. Abt,C.C., (September 1965) National opinion and military security: Research problems. Journal of Confl ict Resolution, 9, 334-44. Adams, W.C., Smith, D.J., Salzman, A., Crossen, R., Hieber, S. (1984, May). Before and after "The day after" :A nati onwide survey of a mo vie's political impact. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association , San Francisco, CA. Adelson, J. and Finn, C.E. (1985). Terrorizing Children. Commentary, 79(4), 29-36. Agnew, H.M. (1977). Plan to lessen suspicions. Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, 33(3), 6-7. Albert, D.H. (1985). People's power: Applying nonviolence theory in the nuclear age. Philadelphia : New Society Education Foundation. Alfven,H. (1981). Human IQ vs nuclear IQ. Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, 37(1 ), 4-5. Alger, C.F. (1965). Decis ion making theory and human conflict. In E.B. McNeil (Ed.), The na ture of human conflict (pp. 274-292). Englewood Cliffs , NJ: Prentice Hal 1. Allen, B.P. (in press). After missiles: Sociopsychological effects of nuclear war. American Psychologist. Allen, J. (1984). Averting world war III: An interview with Morton Deutsch. New ideas in psychology, 2, 189-199. Allison, G.T. (1971). Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston, MA: Little, Brown. Almond, G.A. (1968). Public opinion and the development of space technol ogy: 1957-60. In R.L. Merritt & D.J. Puchala (Eds.), Western Europea i perspectives on international affairs: Public opinion studies and evaluations (pp.86-110). New York: Praeger. Almond, G.A. (1973). The public's impact on foreign policy. publisher? Almond, G.A. (1983). Nuclear fear shall make us free. Human Rights, 11(1 ), 22. 2 Altman, J.W., Smith, R.W., Meyer, R.L., Mckenna, F.S., and Bryson, S. (1960). Psychological and social adjustment in a simulated shelter: A research report. American Institute for Research. (Reprint by Office of Civil and Defense Mobilization.). Andreas, C. (1969). War toys and the peace movement. Journal of Social Issues, 25(1), 83-99. Arbatov, G. (1982a ). The strategy of nuclear madness. Co-Existence 18(2), 162-17 4. Arbatov, G. (1982b ). A Soviet commentary. In A.M. Cox (Ed.), Russian roulet te: The superpower game (pp. 173-179). New York: Time Books. Arbatov, G. (1983). The Soviet viewpoint. New York: Dodd Mead and Co. Archibald, K. (Ed.). (1966). Strategic interaction and conflict. Berkley, CA: University of California Press. Arnett, R.L. (1979). Soviet attitudes towards nuclear war: Do they really think that they can win? Journal of Strategic Studies , 2, 172-191. Awakening in the Nuclear Age Journal, (1985). Issue 9, Winter. Axelrod, R. (1967). The structure of public opinion on policy issues. Public Opinion Quarterly, 31, 51-60. Axlerod, R. (Ed.).(1976). Structure of decision. NJ: Princeton University Press. Bagby, R., Michal and Schuller, D. (1984) . A reply to "Psychol ogy and nuclearism." Ontario Psychologist, 16(1 ), 9-10. Bakan, D. (1982). The interface between war and the social sciences. Journal of Humanis tic Psychology, 22, 5-18. Baker, G.W., Rohrer, J. H. (Eds.).(1960). Human problems in the utilization of fal lout shelters. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science - National Research Council. Ballard, S.C., Brosz, A.R. and Parker, L.B. (1981). Social science and social pol icy - Roles of the appl ied researcher . Policy Studies, 179-188. Bandura, A. (1979). Psychological mechanisms of aggression. In VonCranac h, M., Foppa, K., Lepenies, W., Ploog, D. (Eds.), Human Ethology: Claims and Limits of a New Discipline. (pp.301-3 15). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. Barash, D.P., Lipton, J.E. (1982). Psychology: Thinking and not thinking about the unthinkable. In Stop _Nuclear War: A Handb ook, (214-239), NY:Grove Press. Barghoorn, F. (1950). The soviet image of the United States: A study of distortion. New York: Harcourt Brace. 3 Bargman, A. (1967). Study of test ban and disarmament conferences: A review. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 11, 223-234. Barnaby, F. (1981). Social and economic reverberations of military research, Impact of Science on Society, 31(1), 73-83. Barnet, R.J. (1972). The roots of war. New York: Antheneum. Barnet, R.J. (1982a). Teaching peace. Teachers College Record, 84(1), 30-37. Barnet, R.J. (1982b). Fantasy, reality and the arms race: Dilemmas of national security and human survival. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 52(4), 582-589. Bass, G., Jenkins, B., Kel len, K., Krofchee,J., Petty, G., Reinsten, R., Ronfeldt, D. (1981). Motivations and possible actions of potential criminal adversaries of United-States nuclear programs. Nuclear Safety, 22(1), 21-25. Bates, D.G. (1983). International physicians group attacks illusions of nuclear war. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 129(4), 369-371. Baugh, W.H. (1977). Response to sudden shifts in a two-nation arms race. Behavioral Science, 22(2), 69-86. Beardslee, W.R. , & Mack, J.E. (1982). The impact on children and adolescent s of nuclear development. In Psycholog ical Aspects of nuclear development, (Task force report #20, pp. 64-93). Washington ,DC: American Psychiatric Association. Beardslee, W.R., & Mack, J.E. (1983). Adol escents and the threat of nuclear war - the evolution of a perspective. Yale Journal of Biology, 56(2), 79-91. Behavioral Sciences Tap e Library. (1974). Arms con trol attitudes: Three theoretical perspe ctives. c/o Sigma Informati on, Inc., 240 Grand Avenue, Leonia, N. J. (201-947-4154). Behr, R.L. and Iyengar, S. (1985). Television news, real-world cues, and changes in the public agenda. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49, 38-57. Bennett, P.G., Dando, M.R. (1983). The arms race: Is it just a mistake? New Scientist, Feb 17, 432-435. Berkun, M.M., Timi ras, P.S., Pace, N. (1958). Psychological and physiological responses in observers of an atomic test shot. Psychological Reports, 4, 679-682. Berman, S. (1983). A break in the silence: Raising nuclear issues in the schools. Social Education, 47(7), 501-503, 556. 4 Bernard, V.W., Ottenberg, P., and Redl, F. (1965). Dehumanizati on: A composite psychological defense in relation to modern war. In Schwebel, M. (Ed.), Behavioral Science and Human Survival, (64-82), Palo Alto CA: Behavioral Science Press. Bernard, V.W., Davidson, W.D. , Frank, J., & Ruin a, J.P. (1 972, September ). Human behavi or and the nuclear arms race. Paper presented at the 22nd Pugwash Conference, 0xford. Bernert, E.H., and Ikle, F.C. (1952). Evacuation and the cohesion of urban groups. American Journal of Sociology, 58, 133-138. Berrien, F.K., Schulman, C., & Amarel, M. (1963). The fallout-shelter owners: A study of attitude formation. Public Opinion Quarterly, 27, 206-215. Beussee, M.P. Ahearn, T.R., & Hammes, J.A. (1970). Intros pective reports of large groups experimen tally confine d in an austere environment. Journal of Clinical Psych ology, 26(2), 240-244. Bhatia, S. (1977). Beyond proliferation - Political fears and scientific hopes and nuclear debate. Round Table, 1977(268), 325-336. Bialer, S. (1983, May 8). The Soviets really need their nukes. Washington Post, p. Bl. Blain, B.G. , & Brewer, G. D. (1977). Management of nuclear force: To err is human. New Haven, CT: Yale University, School of Organization and Management. Blechman, B.M. (1982). Do negotiated arms limitations have a future? In J. Reichar t & S. Sturm (Eds.), American Defense Policy (5th. ed. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press. Blight, J.G. (1984). How might psychology contribute to reducing the risk of nuclear war? Center for Science and International Affaires, Harvard University. Bloom, J.B. (1985, May). Women and war: A feminist perspective. Paper presented at the Massachusetts Psychological Association, Cambri dge, MA. Bloomfield, L.P. (1978). Public opinion and U.S. Foreign policy: Conventional wisdom revised. Cambridge, MA: Center for International Studies, MIT. Blumenfeld, W.S., Franklin, R.D., & Memmers, H.H. (1962). Youth's atti tudes towards civil defense, fallout shelters and homework. Purdue Opinion Panel Poll, report #65, p. 39. Bogardus, E. S. (1956). Social implications of atomic energy, Sociology and Social Research, 40, 190-196. Bogart, L. (1972). Silent politics: Polls and the awareness of public opinion. New York: Wiley - Interscience. 5 Bonham, G.M. (1971). Simulating international disarmament negotiations. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 15(3), 299-315. Boone, R., Cobb, N., Friedman, R., Lodwig, N., Marshall, M., and McCauley, K. (1983, January). Psychological effects of nuclear developments. California State Psychological Association Task Force on Psychologists for Social Responsibility. Booth, A. (1978). Atomic bombs and human beings.