Caught in the Middle? Young offenders in the Swedish and German criminal justice systems Persson, Mareike 2017 Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Persson, M. (2017). Caught in the Middle? Young offenders in the Swedish and German criminal justice systems. (1 ed.). Lund University (Media-Tryck). Total number of authors: 1 General rights Unless other specific re-use rights are stated the following general rights apply: Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Read more about Creative commons licenses: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. LUND UNIVERSITY PO Box 117 221 00 Lund +46 46-222 00 00 MAREIKE PERSSON MAREIKE , 3041 0903 NORDIC ECOLABEL Caught in the middle? Caught in the middle? Caught in the middle? Responding to a criminal offence committed by a young person raises complex questions. Multiple Printed by Media-Tryck, Lund 2017 Printed by Media-Tryck, factors play important roles: the offence itself, Young offenders in the Swedish and but also the juvenile’s background in terms of German criminal justice systems education, socialization, prior convictions, etc. Every case is unique, but the criminal legal system MAREIKE PERSSON has to follow the principles of legal certainty and predictability. A legal response to juvenile FACULTY OF LAW | LUND UNIVERSITY 2017 offending is a consequence of the criminal action, but it also has to consider the lesser maturity and greater vulnerability of young offenders. The ideology of culpability and punishment emphasizes the seriousness of a certain offence. The ideology of welfare accentuates the social situation of the young offender and his or her individual needs. Juvenile criminal justice systems seem to face contradictory demands from the law in a strict sense and from society at large. They are caught in the middle: between the culpability for the offence and the best interests of the young person. This thesis investigates the tension(s) between “welfare” and “justice” that the juvenile criminal justice system has to deal with (the “welfare/ justice clash”) in Sweden and Germany. After exploring the differences between young and adult offenders which underlie the welfare/justice clash, the project presents an in-depth investigation of the Swedish and the German juvenile criminal justice systems. The analysis suggests an explanation for the ability of the juvenile criminal justice systems of Sweden and Germany to function in spite of the tensions highlighted. LUND UNIVERSITY 532835 Faculty of Law Department of Law ISBN 978-91-7753-283-5 789177 9 Caught in the middle? Young offenders in the Swedish and German criminal justice systems Mareike Persson DOCTORAL DISSERTATION by due permission of the Faculty of Law, Lund University, Sweden. To be defended at Pufendorfsalen, Juridiska institutionen, Lilla Gråbrödersgatan 3C. Date 24 May 2017, at 10:15. Faculty opponent Associate Professor Monica Burman 1 Organization Document name LUND UNIVERSITY Doctoral Dissertation Date of issue Author Mareike Persson Sponsoring organization Title and subtitle Caught in the middle? Young offenders in the Swedish and German juvenile criminal justice systems Abstract How should we respond to a criminal offence committed by a young person? It is obvious that this is a very complex question. Multiple factors play important roles: the offence itself, but also the juvenile’s background in terms of education, socialization, prior convictions, etc. Every case is unique, but the criminal legal system has to follow the principles of legal certainty and predictability. A legal response to juvenile offending is a consequence of the criminal action, but it also has to consider the lesser maturity and greater vulnerability of young offenders. This dualism makes a trial against a young perpetrator complicated. The ideology of culpability and punishment emphasizes the seriousness of a certain offence. The ideology of welfare accentuates the social situation of the young offender and his or her individual needs. Juvenile criminal justice systems seem to face contradictory demands: from the law in a strict sense and from society at large. They are caught in the middle: between the culpability for the offence and the best interests of the young person. This thesis investigates the tension(s) between “welfare” and “justice” that the juvenile criminal justice system has to deal with (the “welfare/justice clash”) in Sweden and Germany. After exploring the differences between young and adult offenders which underlie the welfare/justice clash, the project presents an in-depth investigation of the Swedish and the German juvenile criminal justice systems. Thus, this study is comparative in its approach. To illustrate the different forms the welfare/justice clash takes in the Swedish and the German juvenile criminal justice systems, I focus on these systems’ guiding principles, legal responses and sentencing rules, procedural rules and safeguards, and on the figures in the juvenile courtroom. The investigation is not limited to a doctrinal study. I also present an empirical study, in the form of participant observations in the juvenile courtroom and semi-structured interviews with judges and public prosecutors from both countries, to gain insight into legal practice. The study of the two juvenile criminal justice systems shows that the theoretical welfare/justice clash is visible in books as well as in action, irrespective of the different approaches towards young offenders these countries pursue. However, this does not appear to give rise to any major problems in legal practice, as surprising as this may be. The practitioners in the juvenile courtroom seem to be able to balance and respect both ideologies. In the analysis, I suggest an explanation for the ability of the juvenile criminal justice systems in Sweden and in Germany to function in spite of the tensions highlighted in the previous chapters. Here, I switch perspectives from an internal view of the juvenile criminal justice system to an external view. I suggest abandoning the purely legal dogmatic (justice) approach and the purely welfare-based or social approach and instead combining elements of them in an approach to juvenile criminal justice that understands it as a system in its own right. Key words: Young offenders, Juvenile criminal justice systems, Juvenile legal consequences, Sentencing, Law in action, Autopoiesis, Socio-legal studies Classification system and/or index terms (if any) Supplementary bibliographical information Language English ISSN and key title ISBN 978-91-7753-283-5 (print) 978-91-7753-284-2 (pdf) Recipient’s notes Number of pages 408 Price Security classification I, the undersigned, being the copyright owner of the abstract of the above-mentioned dissertation, hereby grant to all reference sources permission to publish and disseminate the abstract of the above-mentioned dissertation. Signature Date 2 Caught in the middle? Young offenders in the Swedish and German juvenile criminal justice systems Mareike Persson 3 Coverphoto by canva.com Copyright Mareike Persson Faculty of Law Department of Law ISBN (print) 978-91-7753-283-5 ISBN (pdf) 978-91-7753-284-2 Printed in Sweden by Media-Tryck, Lund University Lund 2017 4 Content Acknowledgements ........................................................................... 9 Table of Abbreviations .................................................................... 11 Chapter 1 Introduction ............................................................................. 13 1.1. The juvenile dilemma .............................................................. 13 1.2. Welfare considerations and justice considerations .................... 17 1.3. The notion of a juvenile criminal justice system ....................... 19 1.4. Aim ......................................................................................... 22 1.5. Methodology, methods, and material....................................... 24 1.5.1. Law in books and law in action .................................... 24 1.5.2. A multi-method approach ............................................ 29 1.5.3. Explaining the juvenile criminal justice system ............. 41 1.6. Previous research and relevance ................................................ 43 1.7. Limitations .............................................................................. 50 1.8. Outline .................................................................................... 52 Chapter 2 Between childhood and adulthood ............................................ 55 2.1. Biological factors ..................................................................... 56 2.1.1. Brain maturation ......................................................... 56 2.1.2.