Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. hkifu_rev1_arxiv c ESO 2018 October 10, 2018 Constraints on core-collapse supernova progenitors from explosion site integral field spectroscopy? H. Kuncarayakti1; 2; 3; 4??, J. P. Anderson5, L. Galbany6, K. Maeda7; 8, M. Hamuy4; 3, G. Aldering9, N. Arimoto10; 11, M. Doi12; 13, T. Morokuma12, T. Usuda14; 15 1 Finnish Centre for Astronomy with ESO (FINCA), University of Turku, Väisäläntie 20, 21500 Piikkiö, Finland 2 Tuorla Observatory, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Turku, Väisäläntie 20, 21500 Piikkiö, Finland 3 Millennium Institute of Astrophysics, Casilla 36-D, Santiago, Chile 4 Departamento de Astronomía, Universidad de Chile, Casilla 36-D, Santiago, Chile 5 European Southern Observatory, Alonso de Córdova 3107, Vitacura, Casilla 19001, Santiago, Chile 6 PITT PACC, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA 7 Department of Astronomy, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan 8 Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (WPI), The University of Tokyo, 5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8583, Japan 9 Physics Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 10 Astronomy Program, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University, 599 Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, 151-742, Korea 11 Subaru Telescope, National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, National Institutes of Natural Sciences, 650 North A’ohoku Place, Hilo, HI 96720, USA 12 Institute of Astronomy, Graduate School of Science, University of Tokyo, 2-21-1, Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-0015, Japan 13 Research Center for the Early Universe, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan 14 National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, 2-21-1, Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo, 181-8588, Japan 15 Department of Astronomical Science, SOKENDAI (The Graduate University for Advanced Studies), 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan Received; accepted 10 November 2017 ABSTRACT Context. Observationally, supernovae are divided into subclasses pertaining to their distinct characteristics. This diversity naturally reflects the diversity in the progenitor stars. It is not entirely clear however, how different evolutionary paths leading massive stars to become a supernova are governed by fundamental parameters such as progenitor initial mass and metallicity. Aims. This paper places constraints on progenitor initial mass and metallicity in distinct core-collapse supernova subclasses, through a study of the parent stellar populations at the explosion sites. Methods. Integral field spectroscopy (IFS) of 83 nearby supernova explosion sites with a median distance of 18 Mpc has been collected and analysed, enabling detection and spectral extraction of the parent stellar population of supernova progenitors. From the parent stellar population spectrum, the initial mass and metallicity of the coeval progenitor are derived by means of comparison to simple stellar population models and strong-line methods. Additionally, near-infrared IFS was employed to characterise the star formation history at the explosion sites. Results. No significant metallicity differences are observed among distinct supernova types. The typical progenitor mass is found to be highest for supernova type Ic, followed by type Ib, then types IIb and II. Type IIn is the least associated with young stellar populations and thus massive progenitors. However, statistically significant differences in progenitor initial mass are observed only when comparing supernovae IIn with other subclasses. Stripped-envelope SN progenitors with initial mass estimate lower than 25 M are found; these are thought to be the result of binary progenitors. Confirming previous studies, these results support the notion that core-collapse supernova progenitors cannot arise from single-star channel only, and both single and binary channels are at play in the production of core-collapse supernovae. Near-infrared IFS suggests that multiple stellar populations with different ages may be present in some of the supernova sites. As a consequence, there could be a non-negligible amount of contamination from old populations, and arXiv:1711.05765v1 [astro-ph.SR] 15 Nov 2017 therefore the individual age estimates are effectively lower limits. Key words. supernovae: general – stars: massive 1. Introduction entire host galaxy where it resides. The explosion distributes heavy elements forged inside the stellar interior (Hoyle & Fowler A core-collapse (CC) supernova (SN) is produced when the stel- 1960; Nomoto et al. 2006), driving chemical enrichment of the lar core collapses onto itself at the end of the lifetime of a mas- interstellar medium (Matteucci & Greggio 1986; Timmes et al. sive star. SNe are one of the brightest phenomena in the Uni- 1995), and may trigger new waves of star formation (McCray & verse. At peak brightness, a SN may rival or even outshine the Kafatos 1987; Thornton et al. 1998). Thus, SNe are important ?? e-mail: [email protected] players in cosmic evolution. Article number, page 1 of 18 A&A proofs: manuscript no. hkifu_rev1_arxiv A star needs to be massive enough to experience core col- Hirai 2017). Along with the observational constraints on SN IIb lapse at the end of its life. It has been established that in general progenitors this questions the importance of massive, single WR stars with initial mass around 8 M and above finish their life- stars in the production of SESNe. time with a CC (see reviews by Langer 2012, and Smartt 2009, An independent way to constrain SN progenitors is by study- from both theoretical and observational standpoints). One lin- ing their environments. Unlike direct detection methods that gering question is how does the observed diversity in SNe relate are strictly limited to the availability of useful archival images, to the distribution of massive star parameters in terms of initial and analyses based on SN light curves and spectra that are re- mass and pre-SN evolutionary state, or in other words: which stricted to the time window when the SN is still visible, environ- kind of massive star gives rise to which type of CCSN? ment studies do not depend on these limitations and still can be Some of the massive star progenitors of SNe have been di- achieved much later after the SN has faded. Therefore, it is pos- rectly identified in archival images taken before the explosion. sible to build statistically large samples of SN environments and This method provides currently the most reliable constraints on derive strong progenitor constraints from there (see Anderson et the physical parameters of SN progenitors. The hydrogen-rich al. 2015, for a review). From the environments, the estimate for type-II SNe, which are the most abundant among CCSN sub- metallicity and age of the stellar population that gave rise to the types (Li et al. 2011), are found to be predominantly produced SN can be derived. This subsequently reflects the birth metallic- by red supergiant (RSG) progenitors (Smartt et al. 2009). These ity and mass of the SN progenitor, which are the two fundamen- SN II progenitors are born with initial masses between ∼8-20 M tal factors driving massive star evolution up to the terminal SN and spend their main sequence lifetime as late-O/early-B spec- explosion (see e.g. Heger et al. 2003; Georgy et al. 2009). tral type stars. By the end of stellar evolution, they still retain The birth mass and metallicity of SN progenitors are thought most of their H envelope and appear as RSGs, before eventually to strongly affect the mass loss, and thus the degree of enve- exploding as type-II SNe. lope stripping and the eventual SN type. Several studies have The H-poor CCSNe1, which encompass types Ib (H spectral used proxies such as host central metallicity and SN radial dis- lines absent, He present), Ic (both H and He absent), and IIb (He tance from host centers for metallicity estimates of SN progen- present, little H) (Filippenko 1997), are thought to arise from itors (e.g. Prieto et al. 2008; Anderson & James 2009). A more massive stars that have lost most of their outer envelope due to direct approach to measure metallicity is by obtaining the spec- some mechanism. One way for a massive star to lose its outer trum of the explosion site, and using strong line diagnostics to envelope is through metallicity-driven stellar winds. With higher derive metallicity. Anderson et al. (2010) and Leloudas et al. metallicity, the stellar wind becomes stronger due to increased (2011) showed that the gas-phase metallicities measured at SN line opacity, thus the rate of mass removed from the star would explosion sites do not show statistically significant differences be higher (M˙ / Z0.6-0.7 Vink et al. 2001). The progenitors of for SNe of different types, while exhibiting an overall trend of SESNe are thought to be classical Wolf-Rayet (WR) stars that higher metallicity for SESN explosion sites. Modjaz et al. (2008) are deprived of the envelope and exhibit strong stellar winds. At showed that the environments of broad-lined type-Ic SNe (IcBL) solar metallicity, the lower limit of the initial ZAMS (zero-age that are associated with long gamma-ray bursts (GRB) are more main sequence) mass for a star to eventually evolve into a WR metal-poor compared to their GRB-less counterparts. star is around 25 M (Crowther 2007). If SESNe are produced by classical WR stars that are sin- An alternative to the metallicity-driven wind mechanism gle and massive (&25 M ) at birth, there may be a correlation is mass loss via close binary interaction (Podsiadlowski et al. between birth mass and degree of envelope stripping, such that 1992). In this scenario the SN progenitor star is in a close bi- the most massive stars would lose H and He more easily com- nary system, and as stellar evolution proceeds, the progenitor pared to their lower mass counterparts.