0922-Leiocephalus-Personatus.Pdf (4.271Mb)

0922-Leiocephalus-Personatus.Pdf (4.271Mb)

1 REPTILIA: SQUAMATA: LEIOCEPHALIDAE Leiocephalus personatus Catalogue of American Amphibians and in Mus. Compar. Zool.” (Museum of Reptiles 922 Comparative Zoology; MCZ), date unknown. Cannot be located (e.g., Powell, R. 2019. Leiocephalus personatus. Barbour 1914; Pregill 1992; Schwartz and Thomas 1975). Synonymy fide Boulenger Leiocephalus personatus Cope (1885), although attributed to Cochran Hispaniolan Masked Curly-tailed Lizard (1941, 2005) by Pregill (1992); see also Remarks. Liocephalus personatus Cope 1862:182. Type Leiocephalus personatus: Barbour 1914:302. locality, “Hayti (near Jeremie)” (= near Jérémie, Département de la Grand’Anse, CONTENT. Twelve subspecies are currently Haiti). Syntypes, Museum of Comparative recognized: Leiocephalus personatus actites, Zoology (MCZ) R–3615 (see Remarks), Leiocephalus personatus agraulus, Leiocephalus two adults (one male and one female) personatus budeni, Leiocephalus personatus “sent in a valuable collection made by elattoprosopon, Leiocephalus personatus mentalis, Dr. D. F. Weinland to Prof. Agassiz,” date Leiocephalus personatus personatus, Leiocephalus unknown (not examined by author). personatus poikilometes, Leiocephalus personatus Liocephalus trigeminatus Cope 1862:183. Type pyrrholaemus, Leiocephalus personatus scalaris, locality, “Hayti (near Jeremie)” (= near Leiocephalus personatus socoensis, Leiocephalus Jérémie, Département de la Grand’Anse, personatus tarachodes, and Leiocephalus personatus Haiti). Syntypes, “Dr. Weinland’s Coll. trujilloensis (see Remarks). Figure 1. Adult male Leiocephalus personatus mentalis from Cabo San Rafael, La Altagracia Province, Dominican Republic. Photograph by Miguel A. Landestoy. 2 Map. Map of Hispaniola showing the distribution of Leiocephalus personatus; open circles indicate type localities, black dots mark other known records (some proximate localities are indicated by single dots), the red x marks a fossil locality, and question marks indicate records of specimens not assigned to subspecies. Numbers refer to subspecies and correspond to the numbers of the subspecific accounts: 1 – Leiocephalus personatus personatus; 2 – Leiocephalus personatus actites; 3 – Leiocephalus personatus agraulus; 4 – Leiocephalus personatus budeni; 5 – Leiocephalus personatus elattoprosopon; 6 – Leiocephalus personatus mentalis; 7 – Leiocephalus personatus poikilometes; 8 – Leiocephalus personatus pyrrholaemus; 9 – Leiocephalus personatus scalaris; 10 – Leiocephalus personatus socoensis; 11 – Leiocephalus personatus tarachodes; 12 – Leiocephalus personatus trujilloensis. Modified from Schwartz and Henderson (1991). DESCRIPTION. Leiocephalus personatus scales include 6 (usually) supraoculars, 2–17 is a moderately sized member of the genus loreals, and 7–14 temporals; median head (maximum snout–vent length [SVL] in scales number 4–6 (mode 4), frontoparietals males is 86 mm, maximum SVL in females 3–5 (mode varies by subspecies), supraorbital is 63 mm; Schwartz 1967). An estimated semicircles usually complete, and parietals maximum SVL of 90 mm was mistakenly are almost always in contact. Males have a reported for Leiocephalus personatus by pair of enlarged postcloacal scales. Olson (1990); however, based on cited Sexual dichromatism is evident (Schwartz locality data, the species measured was and Henderson 1991). Throat color in males Leiocephalus melanochlorus. Estimated varies from solid black to immaculate yellow female SVL at maturity is 42.5 mm (Gifford with a contrasting black mental scale; males and Powell 2007). Lateral folds are absent in some subspecies might bear a few scattered (Schwartz and Henderson 1991). Dorsal and diffuse dusky spots but are never heavily, scales are imbricate, weakly tricuspid to regularly, and discretely spotted. Throats of denticulate, and keeled. Ventral scales are females have distinct black to dark gray spots. imbricate, weakly denticulate, and smooth. Males have no ventral pattern, whereas the Median dorsal crest scales are enlarged, ventral surfaces of females are heavily dotted greatly attenuate, strongly overlapping, much with black to dark gray spots. Males have a lower than median dorsal caudal scales, and dark brown to black facial mask, but no black number 41–64 in occiput–vent distance; one– neck or shoulder patches; the dorsum can half midbody scales number 18–28. Head be dark brown, reddish-brown dotted with 3 yellow, light brown, tan, tan flecked with gold, grayish-tan, sandy, practically black, tan to dark brown and often flecked or mottled with yellow or brick-red, and sometimes with tan, creamy, or sandy dorsolateral lines; transverse neck bars are present or absent, at times reduced to a series of black median dots on enlarged middorsal scales; flanks usually tan to brown with admixed red, green, and cream scales; the hindlimbs usually some shade of green; the forelimbs tan; the venter some shade of green; the tail brown above (often chevronate) and orange below. The facial mask of females often is reduced to a dark-edged temporal triangle; the dorsum is brown, with or without complete chevrons; flanks are tan with dark brown vertical Figure 2. Adult female Leiocephalus personatus bars; pale dorsolateral and lateral lines are mentalis from near Juanillo, La Altagracia Prov- prominent; the venter can be dirty yellow, ince, Dominican Republic. Photograph by Robert white, pale green, or opalescent; the limbs Powell. are brown; the underside of the tail is yellow- orange to bright orange or pink. Leiocephalus lunatus lacks a facial mask, male throats have discrete dots, female throats have DIAGNOSIS. Leiocephalus personatus faint gray dots, and a neck blotch is present can be distinguished from all Hispaniolan (Leiocephalus personatus has a facial mask, congeners using the following characteristics male throats solid black to patternless or (Henderson and Schwartz 1984; Henderson with few diffuse spots, female throats heavily et al. 1984; Köhler et al. 2016): Leiocephalus patterned with dark gray spots, and a neck melanochlorus, Leiocephalus schreibersii, and blotch is absent). Leiocephalus sixtoi are relatively large (male SVL of first two species to >100 mm and that PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS. Leio- of the third to 88 mm) and have distinct lateral cephalus barahonensis, Leiocephalus lunatus, folds and lateral scales conspicuously smaller Leiocephalus personatus, Leiocephalus semil- than dorsal scales (Leiocephalus personatus ineatus, and Leiocephalus vinculum were hy- is smaller, lacks prominent lateral folds, pothesized to form the Leiocephalus persona- and lateral scales only slightly smaller than tus group (Schwartz 1967), but a study based dorsal scales); Leiocephalus pratensis lacks a on 39 morphological characters provided lit- regular row of middorsal scales (present in tle support for this hypothesis (Pregill 1992). Leiocephalus personatus); preauricular scales Two alternative tree topologies and a consen- of Leiocephalus barahonensis and Leiocephalus sus tree were presented by Pregill (1992), all semilineatus are much larger than adjacent of which showed Leiocephalus personatus in temporal scales (preauricular scales of a clade that included Leiocephalus lunatus of Leiocephalus personatus are not enlarged Hispaniola, Leiocephalus loxogrammus of the when compared to adjacent temporal scales); Bahamas, and Leiocephalus raviceps of Cuba, dorsal crest scales of Leiocephalus rhutidira all within a larger clade comprised mainly of and Leiocephalus vinculum are not attenuate or Hispaniolan species (Leiocephalus barahon- strongly overlapping (attenuate and strongly ensis, Leiocephalus lunatus, Leiocephalus per- overlapping in Leiocephalus personatus); and sonatus, Leiocephalus pratensis, Leiocephalus 4 Figure 3. Adult female Leiocephalus personatus pyrrholaemus from Frontón, Samaná Province, Domin- ican Republic. Photograph by Miguel A. Landestoy. rhutidira, Leiocephalus semilineatus) but also CONSERVATION STATUS. Because this including three Cuban species (Leiocephalus species is widely distributed, abundant, and cubensis, Leiocephalus raviceps, Leiocephalus not declining fast enough to qualify for a more stictigaster) in addition to a single Bahamian threatened category, Leiocephalus personatus species (Leiocephalus loxogrammus). is listed as being of Least Concern (LC) on Based on albumin immunological meth- the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species ods, lizards in the genus Leiocephalus repre- (Incháustegui and Landestoy 2016). sent a relatively recent radiation, with the old- est divergences within the genus occurring PUBLISHED DESCRIPTIONS. In addition less than 10 mya (Hass et al. 2001). Immu- to the original descriptions (Cochran 1932; nological distance (ID) values of Hispaniolan Cope 1862; Gali and Schwartz 1982; Gali et species (including Leiocephalus personatus) al. 1988; Mertens 1939a; Schwartz 1967, 1969, ranged from 0 to 4 (Leiocephalus personatus 1971), detailed descriptions were provided had an ID of 1 to Leiocephalus schreibersii, by Cochran (1941, 2005) and Schwartz and which was within the ± 2 ID-unit error range Henderson (1991). A list of morphological of the technique). (including skeletal), meristic, and pattern Leiocephalus personatus was the sister characters were published by Pregill (1992). species of Leiocephalus lunatus within a His- paniolan clade that also included Leiocephalus ILLUSTRATIONS. Color photographs of barahonensis, Leiocephalus schreibersii, and adult males were published by Bartlett and Leiocephalus semilineatus, but distinct from Bartlett (2009),

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    30 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us