Homer and Rhetoric in Byzantium: Eustathios of Thessalonike on the Composition of the Iliad Van Den Berg, B

Homer and Rhetoric in Byzantium: Eustathios of Thessalonike on the Composition of the Iliad Van Den Berg, B

UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Homer and rhetoric in Byzantium: Eustathios of Thessalonike on the composition of the Iliad van den Berg, B. Publication date 2016 Document Version Final published version Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): van den Berg, B. (2016). Homer and rhetoric in Byzantium: Eustathios of Thessalonike on the composition of the Iliad. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:02 Oct 2021 301 Bibliography Agapitos, P.A. 1998. Mischung der Gattungen und Überschreitung der Gesetze: Die Grabrede des Eusthatios von Thessalonike auf Nikolaos Hagiotheodorites. Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Byzantinistik 48: 119-46. ---- 2000. Poets and Painters: Theodoros Prodromos’ Dedicatory Verses of his Novel to an Anonymous Caesar. Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Byzantinistik 50: 173-85. ---- 2003. Ancient Models and Novel Mixtures: The Concept of Genre in Byzantine Funerary Literature from Photios to Eustathios of Thessalonike. In: Modern Greek Literature: Critical Essays. Eds. G. Nagy & A. Stavrakopoulou, 5-23. London: Routledge. ---- 2008. Literary Criticism. In: The Oxford Handbook of Byzantine Studies. Ed. E.M. Jeffreys, 77-85. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ---- 2012. In Rhomaian, Frankish and Persian Lands: Fiction and Fictionality in Byzantium and Beyond. In: Medieval Narratives between History and Fiction. From the Centre to the Periphery of Europe, c. 1100-1400. Eds. P.A. Agapitos & L.B. Mortensen, 235-367. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press. ---- 2014. Grammar, Genre and Patronage in the Twelfth Century: A Scientific Paradigm and its Implications. Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Byzantinistik 64: 1-22. ---- 2015a. Literary Haute Cuisine and its Dangers: Eustathios of Thessalonike on Schedography and Everyday Language. Dumbarton Oaks Papers 69: 225-41. ---- 2015b. Learning to Read and Write a Schedos: The Verse Dictionary of Paris. Gr. 400. In: Pour une poétique de Byzance. Hommage à Vasillis Katsaros. Eds. S. Efthymiadis, C. Messis, P. Odorico, I. Polemis, 11-24. Paris: Centre d’études byzantines, néo-helléniques et sud-est européennes, E.H.E.S.S. ---- 2015c. New Genres in the Twelfth Century: The Schedourgia of Theodore Prodromos. Medioevo greco 15: 1-41. Agapitos, P.A. & D.R. Reinsch eds. 2000. Der Roman im Byzanz der Komnenenzeit. Referate des Internationalen Symposiums an der Freien Universität Berlin, 3.-6. April 1998. Frankfurt am Main: Beerenverlag. 302 Bibliography Allan, R., I.J.F. de Jong & C.C. de Jonge. 2014. Homerus’ narratieve stijl: enargeia en immersion. Lampas 47(3): 202-23. Andersen, L. 2014. Unfolding Compressed Knowledge. Wisdom Expressions in the Homeric Commentaries by Eustathios of Thessalonike. Dissertation, University of Southern Denmark. Angold, M. 1995. Church and Society in Byzantium under the Comneni, 1081-1261. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Barber, C. & D. Jenkins eds. 2009. Medieval Greek Commentaries on the Nicomachean Ethics. Leiden: Brill. Barthes, R. 1968. L’effet de réel. Communications 11(1): 84-9. Basilikopoulou-Ioannidou, A. 1971–1972. Ἡ ἀναγέννησις τῶν γραμμάτων κατὰ τὸν IB΄αἰῶνα εἰς τὸ Βυζάντιον καὶ ὁ Ὅμηρος. Athens: Filosofikē scholē, Ethnikon kai kapodistriakon Panepistēmion Athēnōn. Bazzani, M. The Historical Poems of Theodore Prodromos, the Epic-Homeric Revival and the Crisis of Intellectuals in the Twelfth Century. Byzantinoslavica 65(1): 211-28. Beaton, R. 1996 [1989]. The Medieval Greek Romance, 2nd edition. London: Routledge. Beaton, R. & D. Ricks eds. 1993. Digenes Akrites: New Approaches to Byzantine Heroic Poetry. Aldershot: Variorum. Belfiore, E.S. 1992. Tragic Pleasures: Aristotle on Plot and Emotion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. van den Berg, B. 2015. Homerus als grammaticus, retor en bron van alle wijsheid: Eustathius’ Parekbolai op de Ilias. Lampas 48(2): 130-46. ---- Forthcoming (2016). The Wise Homer and His Erudite Commentator: Eustathios’ Imagery in the Proem of the Parekbolai on the Iliad. Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies. ---- Forthcoming (2017a). Homer and the Good Ruler in the ‘Age of Rhetoric’: Eustathios of Thessalonike on Excellent Oratory. In: Homer and the Good Ruler in Antiquity and Beyond. Eds. J.J.H. Klooster & B. van den Berg. Leiden: Brill. Homer and Rhetoric in Byzantium 303 ---- Forthcoming (2017b). Eustathios on Homer’s Narrative Art: The Homeric Gods and the Plot of the Iliad. Eds. V. Katsaros, F. Pontani, V. Sarris. Berlin: De Gruyter. van den Berg, B. & E. Cullhed. Forthcoming. Eustathios of Thessaloniki (ca. 1115- 1195). Homeric Art Objects in the Parekbolai on the Iliad. In: Medieval Texts on Byzantine Art and Aesthetics. Volume 3: From Alexios I Komnenos to the Rise of Hesychasm (1081 - ca. 1330). Eds. C. Barber & F. Spingou. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bernard, F. 2014. The Ethics of Authorship: Some Tensions in the 11th Century. In: The Author in Middle Byzantine Literature: Modes, Functions, and Identities. Ed. A. Pizzone, 41-60. Berlin: De Gruyter. Bourbouhakis. E.C. 2010. Rhetoric and Performance. In: The Byzantine World. Ed. P. Stephenson, 175-87. London: Routledge. Boys-Stones, G.R. 2003. The Stoics’ Two Types of Allegory. In: Metaphor, Allegory, and the Classical Tradition: Ancient Thought and Modern Revisions. Ed. idem, 189-216. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Brisson, L. 2004 [1996]. How Philosophers Saved Myths: Allegorical Interpretation and Classical Mythology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Broadie, S. & C. Rowe. 2002. Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics. Translation, Introduction, and Commentary. New York: Oxford University Press. Brodersen, K. 1992. Reiseführer zu den Sieben Weltwundern Texte: Philon von Byzanz und andere antike Texte. Frankfurt am Main: Insel Verlag. Browning, R. 1964. Byzantine Scholarship. Past & Present 28: 3-20. ---- 1975. Homer in Byzantium. Viator 6: 15-33. ---- 1992. The Byzantines and Homer. In: Homer’s Ancient Readers: The Hermeneutics of Greek Epic’s Earliest Exegetes. Eds. R. Lamberton & J.J. Keaney, 135-48. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ---- 1995a. Eustathios of Thessalonike Revisited. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 40(1): 83-90. ---- 1995b. Tradition and Originality in Literary Criticism and Scholarship. In: Originality in Byzantine Literature, Art and Music: a Collection of Essays. Ed. A.R. Littlewood, 17-28. Oxford: Oxbow Books. ---- 1997. Teachers. In: The Byzantines. Ed. G. Cavallo, 95-116. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 304 Bibliography Budelmann, F. 2002. Classical Commentary in Byzantium: John Tzetzes on Ancient Greek Literature. In: The Classical Commentary: Histories, Practices, Theory. Eds. R.K. Gibson & C.S. Kraus, 141-69. Leiden: Brill. Buffière, F. 1956. Les mythes d’Homère et la pensée grecque. Paris: Les Belles Lettres. Bühler, W. 1964. Beitrage zur Erklärung der Schrift vom Erhabenen. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. Buxton, R. 2006. Similes and Other Likenesses. In: The Cambridge Companion to Homer. Ed. R.L. Fowler, 139-55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cesaretti, P. 1991. Allegoristi di Omero a Bisanzio: ricerche ermeneutiche, XI-XII secolo. Milan: Guerini. ---- 2014. The Exegete as a Storyteller: The Dawn of Humanity according to Eustathios of Thessalonike. In: Medieval Greek Storytelling: Fictionality and Narrative in Byzantium. Ed. P. Roilos, 131-40. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag. ---- 2015. The Echo of the Sirens: Allegorical Interpretation and Literary Deployment from Eustathios to Niketas Choniates. In: Μυθοπλασίες. Χρήση και πρόσληψη των αρχαίων μύθων από την αρχαιότητα μέχρι σήμερα. Eds. S. Efthymiadis & A.K. Petridis, 251-77. Peristeri: Ekdoseis Ellēn. Clay, J.S. 1983. The Wrath of Athena: Gods and Men in the Odyssey. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. ---- 1999. The Whip and Will of Zeus. Literary Imagination 1: 40-60. Coffey, M. 1957. The Function of the Homeric Simile. American Journal of Philology. 78(2): 113-32. Cohoon, J.W. 1939. Dio Chrysostom: Discourses 12-30. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Conley, T.M. 2005. Byzantine Criticism and the Uses of Literature. In: The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism. Volume 2: The Middle Ages. Eds. A. Minnis & I. Johnson, 669-92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossett, J. 1969. The Art of Homer’s Catalogue of Ships. The Classical Journal 64(6): 241-5. Cullhed, E. 2012. The Autograph Manuscripts Containing Eustathius’ Commentary on the Odyssey. Mnemosyne 65(3): 445-61. Homer and Rhetoric in Byzantium 305 ---- 2014a. Eustathios of Thessalonike. Parekbolai on Homer’s Odyssey 1-2. Proekdosis. Dissertation, Uppsala University. ---- 2014b. The Blind Bard and ‘I’: Homeric Biography and Authorial

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    24 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us