The Case System of Tagalog Verbs

The Case System of Tagalog Verbs

PACIFIC LINGUISTICS Senie� B - No. 21 THE CASE SYSTEM OF TAGALOG VERBS by Teresita V. Ramos Department of Linguistics Research School of Pacific Studies THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY Ramos, T.V. The case system of Tagalog verbs. B-27, viii + 178 pages. Pacific Linguistics, The Australian National University, 1974. DOI:10.15144/PL-B27.cover ©1974 Pacific Linguistics and/or the author(s). Online edition licensed 2015 CC BY-SA 4.0, with permission of PL. A sealang.net/CRCL initiative. -------------------------------- PACIFIC LINGUISTICS is published by the Ling ui��ie CiAeie 06 CanbeAAa and consists of four series: SERIES A - OCCASI ONAL PAPERS SERIES B - MONOGRAPHS SERIES C - BOOKS SERIES V - SPECIAL PUBLICATIONS . ED ITOR: S.A. Wurm . ASSOCIATE EDITORS : D.C. Laycock , C.L. Voorhoeve. ALL CORRESPONDENCE concerning PACIFIC LINGUISTICS, including orders and su bscriptions, should be addressed to: The Secretary , PACIFIC LINGUISTICS, Department of Linguistics , School of Pacific Studies , The Australian National University , Canberra , A. C.T. 2600. Australia. Copyright (§) Teresita V. Ramos. First published 1974. The editors are indebted to the Australian National University for help in the production of this series. ' This publication was made possible by an initial grant from the Hunter Douglas Fund. National Library of Australia card number and ISBN 0 85883 115 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT vi LIST OF TERMS AND ABBREVIATIONS viii CH APTER I. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1. The Tagalog Language 1 1. 2. Tagalog Linguistic Studies 1 1. 3. Theoretical Orientation 3 CHAPTER II. TAGALOG DEEP STRUCTURE CASES 15 2.1. The Use of Case in Philippine Studies 15 2.2. Case as Used in this Study 19 2.3. Tagalog Cases 19 2.3.1. Inherent Cases 19 2.3.1. 1 . The Agentive Case 20 2.3.1.2. The Objective Case 23 2.3.1.3. The Directional Case 30 2.3.1.4. The Locative Case 32 2.3. 1 . 5 . The Instrumental Case ( Force) 33 2. 3.2. Non-inherent Cases 34 2.3.2.1. The Instrumental Case 34 2.3.2.2. The Benefactive Case 39 2.3.2.3. The Affected Case 40 2.3.3. Summary 40 CH APTER III . BASE RULES 41 3.1. Introduction 41 3.2. Base Rules 43 111 iv Page CHAPTER IV. SELECTIONAL REDUNDAN CY RULES 65 CHAPTER V. THE SUB CATEGORI ZAT ION OF TAGALOG VERBS 79 CHAPTER VI . SURFACE CAS E FORMS IN THE NOUN PHRASES 99 6.1. The Inherent Noun Phrases 100 6.1.1. The Agentive Noun Phrase 100 6.1. 2. The Objective Noun Phrase 100 6.1. 3. The Directional Noun Phrase 101 6.1. 4. The Locative Noun Phrase 101 6.1. 5. The Instrumental Noun Phrase (Force) 102 6.2. The Non-inherent Noun Phrases 103 6.2.1. The Instrumental Noun Phrase 103 6.2.2. The Benefactive Noun Phrase 104 6.2.3. The Affected Noun Phrase 105 6.3. Suppressed Noun Phrases in the Surface Structure 105 6.3.1. Built-in Roles 105 6.3.1. 1. Incorporated Roles 106 6.3.1. 1.1. Incorporated Objects 106 6. 3.1.1.2. Incorporated Instruments 106 6.3.1 .1.3. Incorporated Directionals 107 6.3. 1.2. Lexicalized Roles 107 6.3.1.2.1. Lexicalized Objects 108 6.3.1.2.2. Lexicalized Instruments 109 6.3.1.2.3. Lexicalized Directionals 109 6.3.2. Coreferential Roles 110 6.3.3. Vacant Roles 111 6.3.3.1. Vacant Objective Role 111 6.3.3.2. Vacant Instrumental Role 111 6.4. Surface Realization of Arguments 112 CHAPTER VI I. SURFACE MANIFESTATIONS OF TAGALOG CASES llS 7. 1. Introduction llS 7.2. Subject as a Surface Phenomenon llS 7. 3. Process of Subjectivalization 116 7. 3. 1 . Subject Marking, TR#l 118 7.3.2. K Case Feature Incorporation, TR#2 118 7.4. Verbal Affixes as Case Indicators 120 7.4.1. Inherent Cases as Marked in the Verb 120 7. 4.1. 1. The Agentive Noun Phrase as Subject 120 v Page 7.4.1 .2. The Objective Noun Phrase as Subject 124 7.4.1.2.1. With Agentive Noun Phrases 124 7. 4.1.2.2. Without Agentive Noun Phrases 125 7.4.1.3. The Directional Noun Phrase as Subject 127 7.4. 1.4. The Locative Noun Phrase as Subject 127 7.4.1.5. The Instrumental Noun Phrase (Force) as Subject 128 7.4.2. Non-inherent Cases as Marked in the Verb 128 7.4.2.1. The Instrumental Noun Phrase as Subject 128 7.4.2. 2. The Benefactive Noun Phrase as Subject 129 7.4. 2. 3. The Affected Noun Phrase as Subject 130 7.4.3. Surface Realization of Tagalog Cases 130 7.4.4. Problems and Exceptions 138 CHAPTER VI II. CONCLUS ION 143 APPENDI X A. SEMANTIC FEATURE DISPLAYS OF TH E VERB AND TH E CASES 147 APPENDI X B. BASE RULES 152 APPENDI X C. SELECTIONAL REDUNDANCY RULES 155 APPENDIX D. MAJOR CLASSES OF TAGALOG VERBS 157 BIBLIOGRAPHY 160 ABSTRACT The Ca� e Sy�tem 06 Tagalog Ve�b� is a study of the underlying case relationships in the sentence, and the dominant role the verb plays in dictating the types of cases it allows to co-occur with it. This linguistic information is used to subcategorize the verbs of Tagalog in a manner that is sensitive both to the syntactic and semantic relationships existing between the verb and the cases that occur with it. The classification proposed not only takes into consideration the case frame of the verb but also the total semantic reading of a sentence. To formalize the syntactic-semantic relationships in the sentence, semantic features for the verbs have been made prominent, a step in a continuing effort to explain the verb in Philippine languages. Chapter III gives a modification of Fillmore's case grammar by the use of semantic features and is the core of this study. These semantic features of the verb determine the case frames (case co-occurrence restrictions) . The centrality of the verb is emphasized. The noun complements are predictable from the verb rather than vice versa as in Fillmore's view. Base rules given in Chapter III illustrate how the case selectional features of the verb are introduced in a complex symbol, a matrix of specified features. To match the verbal case features, nouns also are assigned case features which are described in detail in Chapter II. Subcategorizational and redundancy rules attribute features to both nouns and verbs. The Tagalog deep structure cases are defined in Chapter II. Most , of Fillmore's case designations have been adopted. However, broad case roles have been redefined as having sub case features to capture the fine meanings of case roles intuitively perceived for Tagalog as well as in an attempt to formalize Fillmore'S prose descriptions of his cases. On the other hand, where similarities have been intuitively vi vii perceived, Fillmore's cases have been collapsed. The result is a small inventory of broad cases (i. e. , five inherent cases) with subcases which work toward a more adequate and precise semantic and syntactic description of Tagalog verbal sentences. Chapter IV deals with the selectional redundancy rules that restrict the types of nouns that occur with certain types of verbs on the basis of the latter's meaning. Case frames are represented as selectional features instead of in terms of category symbols as Fillmore does in his grammar. These selectional redundancy rules account for the co­ occurrence of the inherent types of cases with the verb except for the locatives. Chapter V presents the major subcategorization of the Tagalog verbs. Each of the fifteen classes of verbs is described by matrices consisting of the semantic features as well as the contextual case features that distinguish each class from the rest. The first four chapters of this study discuss the underlying semantic­ syntactic case relationships of the Tagalog sentence. The surface case forms (i. e. , the case marking particle and the verbal affixes) that mark case relationships in the surface structure are discussed in Chapters VI and VII. The many-to-one correspondence between case function and form is emphasized. The process of subject formation, which is considered a surface phenomenon in this study, is also de­ scribed in Chapter VII. While stressing the importance of features for a more precise description of the behaviour of Tagalog verbs, no claim is made that the display of verbal and nominal features introduced in this study will completely define all Tagalog verb-noun case relationships, let alone the total meanings of verbs and nouns. The study needs more empirical validation, but has accomplished the following: (1) a more adequate and precise sub categorization of Tagalog verbs by the use of features; and (2) a formalization of the introspective judgements of this native speaker about the case system of Tagalog verbs, thus getting closer to semantic adequacy. LIST OF TERMS ANV ABBREVIATIONS 1. agentive (agt) 20. external (ext) 2. Agentive (A) 21. goal (g) 3. affected (af) 22 . inchoative (inch) 4. animate (an) 23. instrumental (I) 5. Benefactive (ben, B) 24. Locative (L) 6. begun (beg) 25. meteorological (met) 7. case (c) 26. neutral aspect (neut. asp.) 8. case marking particle (K) 27. noun (N) 9. centrifugal (cf) 28. Objective (0) 10. change of state (cs) 29 . patient (pat) 11. common (com) 30 . singular (sg) 12. completed (comp) 31. subject (subj) 13. complex symbol (c. s. ) 32 . terminal (ter) 14. concrete (conc) 33. total (t) 15. determiner (det) 34 . transient (trans) 16.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    176 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us