Thiopurines Activate an Antiviral Unfolded Protein Response That

Thiopurines Activate an Antiviral Unfolded Protein Response That

bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.30.319863; this version posted October 1, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Thiopurines activate an antiviral unfolded protein response that blocks viral glycoprotein 2 accumulation in cell culture infection model 3 Patrick Slaine1, Mariel Kleer 2, Brett Duguay 1, Eric S. Pringle 1, Eileigh Kadijk 1, Shan Ying 1, 4 Aruna D. Balgi 3, Michel Roberge 3, Craig McCormick 1, #, Denys A. Khaperskyy 1, # 5 6 1Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Dalhousie University, 5850 College Street, Halifax 7 NS, Canada B3H 4R2 8 2Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Infectious Diseases, University of Calgary, 3330 9 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary AB, Canada T2N 4N1 10 3Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 2350 Health Sciences Mall, University of 11 British Columbia, Vancouver BC, Canada V6T 1Z3 12 13 14 #Co-corresponding authors: C.M., [email protected], D.A.K., [email protected] 15 16 17 Running Title: Drug-induced antiviral unfolded protein response 18 Keywords: virus, influenza, coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, thiopurine, 6-thioguanine, 6- 19 thioguanosine, unfolded protein response, hemagglutinin, neuraminidase, glycosylation, host- 20 targeted antiviral 21 22 23 ABSTRACT 24 Enveloped viruses, including influenza A viruses (IAVs) and coronaviruses (CoVs), utilize the 25 host cell secretory pathway to synthesize viral glycoproteins and direct them to sites of assembly. 26 Using an image-based high-content screen, we identified two thiopurines, 6-thioguanine (6-TG) 27 and 6-thioguanosine (6-TGo), that selectively disrupted the processing and accumulation of IAV 28 glycoproteins hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA). Selective disruption of IAV 29 glycoprotein processing and accumulation by 6-TG and 6-TGo correlated with unfolded protein 30 response (UPR) activation and HA accumulation could be partially restored by the chemical 31 chaperone 4-phenylbutyrate (4PBA). Chemical inhibition of the integrated stress response (ISR) 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.30.319863; this version posted October 1, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 32 restored accumulation of NA monomers in the presence of 6-TG or 6-TGo, but did not restore 33 NA glycosylation or oligomerization. Thiopurines inhibited replication of the human coronavirus 34 OC43 (HCoV-OC43), which also correlated with UPR/ISR activation and diminished 35 accumulation of ORF1ab and nucleocapsid (N) mRNAs and N protein, which suggests broader 36 disruption of coronavirus gene expression in ER-derived cytoplasmic compartments. The 37 chemically similar thiopurine 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) had little effect on the UPR and did not 38 affect IAV or HCoV-OC43 replication. Consistent with reports on other CoV Spike (S) proteins, 39 ectopic expression of SARS-CoV-2 S protein caused UPR activation. 6-TG treatment inhibited 40 accumulation of full length S0 or furin-cleaved S2 fusion proteins, but spared the S1 ectodomain. 41 DBeQ, which inhibits the p97 AAA-ATPase required for retrotranslocation of ubiquitinated 42 misfolded proteins during ER-associated degradation (ERAD) restored accumulation of S0 and 43 S2 proteins in the presence of 6-TG, suggesting that 6-TG induced UPR accelerates ERAD- 44 mediated turnover of membrane-anchored S0 and S2 glycoproteins. Taken together, these data 45 indicate that 6-TG and 6-TGo are effective host-targeted antivirals that trigger the UPR and 46 disrupt accumulation of viral glycoproteins. Importantly, our data demonstrate for the first time 47 the efficacy of these thiopurines in limiting IAV and HCoV-OC43 replication in cell culture 48 models. 49 50 IMPORTANCE 51 Secreted and transmembrane proteins are synthesized in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), where 52 they are folded and modified prior to transport. During infection, many viruses burden the ER with 53 the task of creating and processing viral glycoproteins that will ultimately be incorporated into 54 viral envelopes. Some viruses refashion the ER into replication compartments where viral gene 55 expression and genome replication take place. This viral burden on the ER can trigger the cellular 56 unfolded protein response (UPR), which attempts to increase the protein folding and processing 57 capacity of the ER to match the protein load. Much remains to be learned about how viruses co- 58 opt the UPR to ensure efficient synthesis of viral glycoproteins. Here, we show that two FDA- 59 approved thiopurine drugs, 6-TG and 6-TGo, induce the UPR in a manner that impedes viral 60 glycoprotein accumulation for enveloped influenza viruses and coronaviruses. These drugs may 61 impede the replication of viruses that require precise tuning of the UPR to support viral 62 glycoprotein synthesis for the successful completion of a replication cycle. 2 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.30.319863; this version posted October 1, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 63 64 INTRODUCTION 65 Enveloped viruses encode integral membrane proteins that are synthesized and post- 66 translationally modified in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) prior to transport to sites of virion 67 assembly. When ER protein folding capacity is exceeded, the accumulation of unfolded proteins 68 in the ER causes activation of the unfolded protein response (UPR) whereby activating 69 transcription factor-6 (ATF6), inositol requiring enzyme-1 (IRE1) and PKR-like endoplasmic 70 reticulum kinase (PERK) sense ER stress and trigger the synthesis of basic leucine zipper (bZIP) 71 transcription factors that initiate a transcriptional response (1). UPR gene expression causes the 72 accumulation of proteins that attempt to restore ER proteostasis by expanding ER folding capacity 73 and stimulating catabolic activities like ER-associated degradation (ERAD) (2). ERAD ensures 74 that integral membrane proteins that fail to be properly folded are ubiquitinated and 75 retrotranslocated out of the ER for degradation in the 26S proteasome. There is accumulating 76 evidence that bursts of viral glycoprotein synthesis can burden ER protein folding machinery, and 77 that enveloped viruses subvert the UPR to promote efficient viral replication (3, 4). 78 Influenza A viruses (IAVs) encode three integral membrane proteins: hemagglutinin (HA) 79 neuraminidase (NA) and matrix protein 2 (M2). HA adopts a type I transmembrane topology in 80 the ER, followed by addition of N-linked glycans, disulfide bond formation, and trimerization prior 81 to transport to the Golgi and further processing by proteases and glycosyltransferases (5–11); NA 82 adopts a type II transmembrane topology in the ER, is similarly processed by glycosyltransferases 83 and protein disulfide isomerases, and assembles into tetramers prior to traversing the secretory 84 pathway to the cell surface (12, 13). The small M2 protein also forms disulfide-linked tetramers in 85 the ER, which is a prerequisite for viroporin activity (14–16). IAV replication causes selective 86 activation of the UPR; IRE1 is activated, but PERK and ATF6 are not (17), although the precise 87 mechanisms of regulation remain unknown. Furthermore, chemical chaperones and selective 88 chemical inhibition of IRE1 activity inhibit IAV replication, suggesting that IRE1 has pro-viral 89 effects. HA is sufficient to activate the UPR (18) and is subject to ERAD-mediated degradation 90 (19). By contrast, little is known about how NA and M2 proteins affect the UPR. 91 Several coronaviruses (CoVs) have been shown to activate the UPR, including infectious 92 bronchitis virus (IBV) (20, 21), mouse hepatitis virus (MHV) (22), transmissible gastroenteritis 3 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.30.319863; this version posted October 1, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 93 virus (TGEV) (23), human coronavirus (HCoV)-OC43 (24) and SARS-CoV-1 (25–27). However, 94 proximal UPR sensor activation does not always elicit downstream UPR transcription responses 95 during CoV replication (28), which suggests complex regulation of the UPR by certain CoVs. The 96 coronavirus structural proteins Spike (S), Envelope (E) and Membrane (M) are synthesized in the 97 ER as transmembrane glycoproteins (29). S is heavily modified by N-glycosylation in the ER, 98 which promotes proper folding and trimerization (30). Ectopic expression of S proteins from MHV 99 (22), HCoV-HKU1 (31) and SARS-CoV-1 (26, 31) have all been shown to be sufficient for UPR 100 activation in cell culture. Additional transmembrane CoV proteins have been shown to be 101 sufficient to induce the UPR, including SARS-CoV-1 non-structural protein 6 (nsp6) (32), ORF3a 102 (33) and ORF8ab (34) proteins. CoVs rearrange ER membranes into a complex reticulovesicular 103 network that includes double-membrane vesicles (DMVs) (35). Precise roles for these 104 compartments remain incompletely understood, but multispanning transmembrane proteins nsp3, 105 nsp4 and nsp6 are thought to physically anchor CoV replication/transcription complexes (RTCs) 106 to these membranes (36, 37), and the N-glycosylation of nsp3 and nsp4 indicates the ER origin of 107 DMVs. The observation of UPR gene products ER degradation-enhancing alpha-mannosidase-like 108 protein 1 (EDEM1) and osteosarcoma amplified 9 (OS-9) in DMVs provides additional linkage 109 between CoV RTCs and ER proteostasis mechanisms (38).

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    40 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us