PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI THE EFFECT OF EILIS LACEY’S MAJOR CONFLICTS TO HER DECISION SEEN IN COLM TÓIBÍN’S BROOKLYN: A PSYCHOANALYTIC STUDY AN UNDERGRADUATE THESIS Presented as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Sarjana Sastra in English Letters By STEVANUS KUSTANTO Student Number: 144214134 DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LETTERS FACULTY OF LETTERS UNIVERSITAS SANATA DHARMA YOGYAKARTA 2018 PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI THE EFFECT OF EILIS LACEY’S MAJOR CONFLICTS TO HER DECISION SEEN IN COLM TÓIBÍN’S BROOKLYN: A PSYCHOANALYTIC STUDY AN UNDERGRADUATE THESIS Presented as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Sarjana Sastra in English Letters By STEVANUS KUSTANTO Student Number: 144214134 DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LETTERS FACULTY OF LETTERS UNIVERSITAS SANATA DHARMA YOGYAKARTA 2018 ii PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI A Sarjana Sastra Undergraduate Thesis THE EFFECT OF ElLIS LACEY'S MAJOR CONFLICTS TO HER DECISION SEEN IN COLM TOmlN'S BROOKLYN: A PSYCHOANALYTIC STUDY By STEVANUSKUSTANTO Stlldent Number: 144214134 Approved by ( Drs. Hinnawan Wijanarka. M. Hum. May 17,2018 Advisor Harris Hermansyah Setiajid, M. Hum. May 17,2018 Co-Advisor 111 PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI A Sarjana Sastra Undergraduate Thesis THE EFFECT OF ElliS LACEY'S MAJOR CONFliCTS TO HER DECISION SEEN IN COLM TomiN'S BROOKLYN: A PSYCHOANALYTIC STUDY By STEVANUSKUSTANTO Student Number: 144214134 Defended before the Board ofExaminers on June 7, 2018 and Declared Acceptable BOARD OF EXAMINERS Name Chairperson : Drs. Hirmawan Wijanarka, M. Hum. Secretary : Harris Hermansyah Setiajid, M. Hum. Member 1 : Ni LOO Putu Rosiandani, M. Hum. Member 2 : Drs. Hirmawan Wijanarka, M. Hum. Member 3 : Harris Hermansyah Setiajid, M. Hum. IV PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY I verify that this undergraduate thesis contains no material which has been previously submitted for the award ofany other degree at any university, and that, to the best of my knowledge, this undergraduate thesis contains no material previously written by any other person except where due reference is made in the text ofthe undergraduate thesis. Yogyakarta, May 15,2018 Stevanus Kustanto v PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI LEMBAR PERNYATAAN PERSETUJUAN PUBLIKASI KARYA ILMIAH UNTUK KEPENTINGAN AKADEMIS Yang bertanda tangan di bawah ini, saya mahasiswa Universitas Sanata Dharma Nama : Stevanus Kustanto Nomor Mahasiswa : 144214134 Demi pengembangan ilmu pengetahuan, saya memberikan kepada Perpustakaan Universitas Sanata Dharma karya ilmiah saya yang berjudul THE EFFECT OF ElLIS LACEY'S MAJOR CONFLICTS TO HER DECISION SEEN IN COLM TOIBIN'S BROOKLYN: A PSYCHOANALYTIC STUDY beserta perangkat yang diperlukan (bila ada). Dengan demikian saya memberikan kepada Perpustakaan Universitas Sanata Dharma hak untuk menyimpan, mengalihkan dalam bentuk media lain, mengelolanya dalam bentuk pangkalan data, mendistribusikan secara terbatas, dan mempublikasikannya di internet atau media lain untuk kepentingan akademis tanpa perlu meminta ijin kepada saya maupun memberikan royalti kepada saya selama tetap mencantumkan nama saya sebagai penulis. Demikian pernyataan ini saya buat dengan sebenarnya. Dibuat di Yogyakarta Pada tanggal 15 Mei 2018 Yang menyatakan, Stevanus Kustanto VI PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI If at first you don’t succeed, laugh until you do. (Emilia Clarke) vii PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI FOR MY AWESOME FAMILY AND ALL THE DREAMERS EVERYWHERE viii PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI ACKNOWLEDGMENTS It takes a village to do certain things in life, and this one is included. I would like to express my biggest gratitude to God for His guidance throughout the whole process until the very end. I am also very grateful for Drs. Hirmawan Wijanarka, M. Hum. as my thesis advisor and Harris Hermansyah Setiajid, M. Hum. as my thesis co-advisor for their guidance and support from the minute I started my thesis until the moment I finished. It is with their support, critiques, and encouragement that I get to improve and continue to push for the better. I send my greatest thanks to both my parents, Very Kustanto and Metty Tjhoe for supporting me every step of the way. All the good things I have done in life I did it for them. They are my biggest reason for me to finish my study. I also give a bunch of thanks for my two siblings, Renold Kustanto and Trisna Oktavia Kustanto, for the laughter and joy all these years. This is for all of you. I would also like to give my huge gratitude to my friends at SWIRRAM: Aci, Melur, Rani, Riska, and Wika. All of you girls give me the laughter and support when I needed it the most. I want to thank you all for sharing these last few years together. My gratitude also goes to my friends back home, Felia, Angel, Gina, and Suwandy. Even though we are apart and did not have a lot of time together, your endless support keeps me going to reach the highest star up there. I thank you all for that. STEVANUS KUSTANTO ix PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE ..................................................................................... ii APPROVAL PAGE ........................................................................... iii ACCEPTANCE PAGE ..................................................................... iv STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY ................................................. v LEMBAR PERNYATAAN PERSETUJUAN PUBLIKASI KARYA ILMIAH ................................................................................ vi MOTTO PAGE ................................................................................... vii DEDICATION PAGE ........................................................................ viii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................... ix TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................... x ABSTRACT ......................................................................................... xii ABSTRAK ............................................................................................ xiii CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION ...................................................... 1 A. Background of the Study ........................................................... 1 B. Problem Formulation ................................................................... 3 C. Objectives of the Study .............................................................. 3 D. Definition of Terms ................................................................... 4 CHAPTER II: REVIEW OF LITERATURE .................................. 6 A. Review of Related Studies ......................................................... 6 B. Review of Related Theories ........................................................ 11 1. Theory of Conflicts ............................................................... 11 2. Theory of Decision Making .................................................. 12 3. Theory of Psychoanalysis ..................................................... 13 4. The Relationship between Psychology and Literature ........... 18 C. Theoretical Framework ............................................................... 19 CHAPTER III: METHODOLOGY ..................................................... 22 A. Object of the Study ...................................................................... 22 B. Approach of the Study ................................................................. 23 C. Method of the Study .................................................................... 24 CHAPTER IV: ANALYSIS ................................................................. 27 A. Major Conflicts Faced by Eilis Lacey .......................................... 28 1. Man versus Man: Eilis Lacey and Mammy ............................ 28 2. Man versus Man: Eilis Lacey and Jim Farrell ........................ 30 3. Man versus Society: Eilis Lacey and Her Neighbors in Enniscorthy ....................................................... 31 4. Man versus Self: Doubting Everything .................................. 33 5. Man versus Self: Uncertainty ................................................. 35 6. Man versus Self: Fear of Hurting Anyone ............................. 37 B. Steps of Decision Making Process by Eilis Lacey ........................ 39 C. The Effects of Conflicts to Eilis Lacey’s Decision ....................... 45 x PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI CHAPTER V: CONCLUSION ............................................................ 53 REFERENCES ...................................................................................... 56 APPENDICES ....................................................................................... 58 Appendix 1: Summary of Colm Tóibín’s Brooklyn .................... 58 Appendix 2: Colm Tóibín’s Biography ....................................... 60 xi PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI ABSTRACT KUSTANTO, STEVANUS. (2018). The Effect of Eilis Lacey’s Major Conflicts to Her Decision seen in Colm Tóibín’s Brooklyn: A Psychoanalytic Study. Yogyakarta: Department of English Letters, Faculty of Letters, Universitas Sanata Dharma. This undergraduate thesis discusses a novel written by Colm Tóibín entitled Brooklyn through psychoanalytic study. The novel was published in 2015 by Scribner. The novel talks about an Irish girl named Eilis Lacey, who got a chance to work in Brooklyn, New York. There, she met an Italian-American
Details
-
File Typepdf
-
Upload Time-
-
Content LanguagesEnglish
-
Upload UserAnonymous/Not logged-in
-
File Pages74 Page
-
File Size-