Distribution and Ecology of the Stoneflies (Plecoptera) of Flanders

Distribution and Ecology of the Stoneflies (Plecoptera) of Flanders

Ann. Limnol. - Int. J. Lim. 2008, 44 (3), 203 - 213 Distribution and ecology of the stonefl ies (Plecoptera) of Flanders (Belgium) K. Lock, P.L.M. Goethals Ghent University, Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology and Aquatic Ecology, J. Plateaustraat 22, 9000 Gent, Belgium. Based on a literature survey and the identifi cation of all available collection material from Flanders, a checklist is presented, distribution maps are plotted and the relationship between the occurrence of the different species and water characteristics is analysed. Of the sixteen stonefl y species that have been recorded, three are now extinct in Flanders (Isogenus nubecula, Taen- iopteryx nebulosa and T. schoenemundi), while the remaining species are rare. The occurrence of stonefl ies is almost restricted to small brooks, while observations in larger watercourses are almost lacking. Although a few records may indicate that some larger watercourses have recently been recolonised, these observations consisted of single specimens and might be due to drift. Most stonefl y population are strongly isolated and therefore extremely vulnerable. Small brooks in the Campine region (northeast Flanders), which are characterised by a lower pH and a lower conductivity, contained a different stonefl y community than the small brooks in the rest of Flanders. Leuctra pseudosignifera, Nemoura marginata and Protonemura intricata are mainly found in small brooks in the loamy region, Amphinemura standfussi, Isoperla grammatica, Leuctra fusca, L. hippopus, N. avicularis and P. meyeri mainly occur in small Campine brooks, while L. nigra, N. cinerea and Nemurella pictetii can be found in both types. Nemoura dubitans can typically be found in stagnant water fed with freatic water. Sustainable populations of these stonefl y species can only be achieved when their present habitats are adequately protected and in addition, measures should be taken to connect and enlarge the remaining populations. Keywords: ecoregions, checklist, distribution maps, phenology Introduction 1984). Recently, however, the Multimetric Macroin- vertebrate Index Flanders (MMIF; Gabriels et al. 2006) The main objective of the European Water Frame- was developed in order to meet the requirements of the work Directive (EWFD) is to achieve a good ecological EWFD. In both indexes, stonefl ies are recognised as the status of groundwater and surface water in Europe by most sensitive group of water invertebrates, which only 2015 (European Council 2000). For natural waters, this occur in waters with a high water quality. objective is more specifi cally described as the attain- Despite their importance as water quality indicators, ment of a good ecological and chemical status. The stonefl ies have hardly received any attention in Flan- ecological status of each type of water body has to be ders. In the present study, an overview of the available defi ned based on near-natural reference conditions. literature is given, a checklist of the stonefl ies occur- The EWFD requires the use of biotic indicators, such ring in Flanders is presented, distribution maps for all as macrobenthic fauna, fi sh fauna and aquatic fl ora, to species are plotted and the relationship between the assess water quality. occurrence of the different species and the water char- In the past, the Flemish Environment Agency used acteristics was analysed. the Belgian Biotic Index (BBI; De Pauw & Vanhooren 1983), which has been adopted as a standard method for assessing river water quality by means of macroinver- Materials and methods tebrates by the Belgian Institute of Normalization (IBN All available Plecoptera from Flanders and Brussels were identifi ed to species level using the identifi cation * Corresponding author : E-mai : [email protected] keys by Aubert (1959) and Illies (1955). The largest Article available at http://www.limnology-journal.org or http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/limn:2008005 5 - LLock.inddock.indd 1 224/09/084/09/08 110:33:200:33:20 NNoiroir qquadriuadri 204 K. LOCK, P.L.M. GOETHALS (2) collection was present in the Royal Belgian Institute for Natural Sciences, where also the material of the Flem- ish Environment Agency is conserved. Some smaller collections were present at Antwerp University, where the collection of the Flemish Entomological Society is kept, in the Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology and Aquatic Ecology at Ghent University and at the Gembloux Agricultural University. In the context of water quality monitoring by the Flemish Environment Agency, macroinvertebrates Fig. 1. Map of Flanders with indication of the different ecoregions: have been sampled at several thousand sampling points dune area (black), polder area (horizontal stripes), sandy region since 1989. During monitoring, macroinvertebrates (white), Campine region (dots) and loamy region (vertical are sampled using a standard handnet, as described by stripes). De Pauw & Vanhooren (1983) and IBN (1984). With the handnet, a stretch of 10-20 meters is sampled dur- ing approximately fi ve minutes. Sampling effort is proportionally distributed over all accessible aquatic Results habitats. This includes the bed substrate (stones, sand or mud), macrophytes (fl oating, submerging, emerg- Despite their value as biological indicators of a good ing), immersed roots of overhanging trees and all other water quality, hardly any data have been published about natural or artifi cial substrates, fl oating or submerged in the stonefl ies in Flanders. De Selys-Longchamps (1888) the water. Each aquatic habitat is explored, in order to reported three species from the river Meuse: Isogenus collect the highest possible diversity of macroinverte- nubecula, Isoperla grammatica and Nemoura cinerea. brates. For this purpose, kicksampling is performed. In He also reported Protonemura lateralis from Rouge- addition to the handnet sampling, animals are manu- Cloître in Forêt de Soignes, close to Brussels, however, ally picked from stones, leafs or branches (De Pauw & this consisted probably of P. intricata, which is the Vanhooren 1983). Conductivity, pH, oxygen content only species of Protonemura that could be confi rmed and water temperature are measured at each sampling for this region. Lestage (1921) reported the presence point. of exuviae of Taeniopteryx nebulosa from the Dommel in Neerpelt. Although Lestage (1938a,b) observed that In Flanders, a typology of the watercourses has been these specimens had a variable number of processes made by Jochems et al. (2002). The main separation of on the abdominal tergites, he could not believe two the types is based on the catchment area and in addi- different species occurred together. However, Aubert tion, the watercourses in the polder area are separated (1950) indicated that T. nebulosa and T. schoenemundi from the remaining watercourses and also the small and could occur together in Belgium and during the present large brooks of the Campine area are separated from study it could be confi rmed that the material collected the small and large brooks in the rest of Flanders. The by Lestage (deposited in the Royal Belgian Institute of different types of watercourses are listed in Table 2 and Natural Sciences) consisted of specimens from both a map of Flanders with indication of the ecoregions is species. Demoulin (1953) reported three species from presented in Fig. 1. Schelderode: Nemoura cinerea, Amphinemura sulcicol- To analyse the distribution, phenology and ecology lis and Protonemura species, however, A. sulcicollis of stonefl ies, literature data as well as all available data turned out to be A. standfussi, while no specimens of the from the collections and the water quality monitor- genus Protonemura could be found in the collection of ing data from the Flemish Environment Agency were Demoulin (deposited in the Royal Belgian Institute of brought together in one dataset. However, only the Natural Sciences). Aubert (1956, 1957) summarised the monitoring data could be linked to environmental vari- available Plecoptera data for Belgium and reported the ables. The Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) following species for Flanders and Brussels: Amphine- option from the program package CANOCO (Ter Braak mura standfussi, Nemoura cinerea, N. dubitans, N. 1988) was applied to determine which environmental marginata, Nemurella pictetii, Protonemura intricata parameters might be responsible for the differences in and Isogenus nubecula. He also reported Marthamea species composition. A log-transformation was applied selysii, Isoptena serricornis and Xanthoperla apicalis prior to the CCA to normalise the data. from Limburg, however, these records were actually 5 - LLock.inddock.indd 2 224/09/084/09/08 110:33:210:33:21 NNoiroir qquadriuadri (3) PLECOPTERA OF FLANDERS 205 from the Netherlands, which also contains a region oxygen content under 4 mg.l-1. Several species, such as called Limburg. Grootaert & Verbeke (1983) found L. hippopus and P. meyeri, were mainly found in the Nemoura cinerea in Zedelgem. No stonefl y observa- Campine region, where watercourses contained acid or tions from Flanders have been published recently. circumneutral water with a relatively low conductivity For this study, 8931 stonefl ies were identifi ed: 524 (Fig. 3). Other species, such as N. marginata and P. adults, 132 exuviae and 8275 larvae. They represent 562 intricata, mainly occurred in the loamy region, where records of which only 147 date from before 1990 and watercourses contained alcalic water with a higher con- 415 since 1990. Of the 16 species that were recorded for ductivity

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    12 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us