New Constraints on Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter from $ Nustar $ M31

New Constraints on Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter from $ Nustar $ M31

New Constraints on Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter from NuSTAR M31 Observations Kenny C. Y. Ng,1, ∗ Brandon M. Roach,2, y Kerstin Perez,2, z John F. Beacom,3, 4, 5, x Shunsaku Horiuchi,6, { Roman Krivonos,7, ∗∗ and Daniel R. Wik8, yy 1Department of Particle Physics and Astrophysics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel 2Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 3Center for Cosmology and AstroParticle Physics (CCAPP), Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA 4Department of Physics, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA 5Department of Astronomy, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA 6Center for Neutrino Physics, Department of Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA 7Space Research Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IKI), Moscow, Russia, 117997 8Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA (Dated: April 22, 2019) We use a combined 1.2 Ms of NuSTAR observations of M31 to search for X-ray lines from sterile neutrino dark matter decay. For the first time in a NuSTAR analysis, we consistently take into account the signal contribution from both the focused and unfocused fields of view. We also reduce the modeling systematic uncertainty by performing spectral fits to each observation individually and statistically combining the results, instead of stacking the spectra. We find no evidence of unknown lines, and thus derive limits on the sterile neutrino parameters. Our results place stringent constraints for dark matter masses & 12 keV, which reduces the available parameter space for sterile neutrino dark matter produced via neutrino mixing (e.g., in the νMSM) by approximately one-third. Additional NuSTAR observations, together with improved low-energy background modeling, could probe the remaining parameter space in the future. Lastly, we also report model-independent limits on generic dark matter decay rates and annihilation cross sections. I. INTRODUCTION via a small mixing with active neutrinos [12], which may be enhanced by the presence of primordial lepton asym- Numerous lines of evidence from gravitational sig- metry [13]. As the mixing angle determines both the natures point to the existence of beyond the Stan- abundance and decay rate, there is a finite window in dard Model matter|dark matter (DM)|that consti- the mass-mixing angle parameter plane in which sterile tutes more than five times the cosmic energy density of neutrinos could constitute the full DM abundance, thus baryons [1{3]. The identification of DM is an important allowing this scenario to be fully testable. Closing this task in modern science and could lead to the resolution window would imply additional physics and production of many outstanding problems in particle physics and mechanisms are needed to make sterile neutrinos a viable cosmology. DM candidate [14{21]. The existence of sterile neutrino A powerful DM search strategy is to look for signa- DM could provide strong clues for explaining neutrino tures of DM decaying or annihilating into visible prod- mass and baryogenesis [22], such as the scenario advo- ucts, i.e., indirect detection. In particular, channels with cated in the νMSM model [23{26]. monoenergetic photons in the final state are powerful Due to several sensitive X-ray instruments, such as search modes due to the efficient separation of signal and Chandra, Suzaku, XMM-Newton, and INTEGRAL, strin- background, as the latter is often dominated by a smooth gent constraints on X-ray line emission have been ob- continuum emission. tained using many different observations (e.g., Refs. [27{ Many well-motivated DM candidates could lead to line 33]). Interest in these topics was heightened with the signatures. In the X-ray band, one of the most stud- tentative detection of a 3.5-keV line from cluster observa- ied candidates is sterile neutrinos [4{7], which can ra- tions [34], which was followed up by many observational arXiv:1901.01262v2 [astro-ph.HE] 22 Apr 2019 diatively decay into an active neutrino and a monoen- studies [35{56]. The nature of this line is still incon- ergetic photon (χ γ + ν) with energy equal to half clusive. The line could be a signature of sterile neutrino of the DM mass [8!{11]. The production of sterile neu- DM [57] or other candidates [58{62]. However, as the line trino DM can be naturally achieved in the early universe flux is weak, astrophysical modeling systematics [37, 41] or new astrophysical processes [63, 64] could also be the explanation. New detectors [44, 56, 65, 66] or techniques, ∗ [email protected]; orcid.org/0000-0001-8016-2170 such as velocity spectroscopy [67, 68], are likely required y [email protected]; orcid.org/0000-0003-3841-6290 to fully determine its nature. (Recently, Ref. [69] claims z [email protected]; orcid.org/0000-0002-6404-4737 that blank-sky observations with XMM-Newton disfavor x [email protected]; orcid.org/0000-0002-0005-2631 { [email protected]; orcid.org/0000-0001-6142-6556 the DM interpretation of the 3.5-keV line. On the other ∗∗ [email protected]; orcid.org/0000-0003-2737-5673 hand, Ref. [70] claims detection of the 3.5 keV line in yy [email protected]; orcid.org/0000-0001-9110-2245 the Milky Way halo up to 35◦ with XMM-Newton, and 2 refutes the claim of Ref. [69].) each FPM consisting of an X-ray optic and a detector. For X-ray searches of DM, NuSTAR provides unique The energy resolution is set by the X-ray detectors, which capabilities in the hard X-ray band, filling a sensitivity have a FWHM of 0.4 keV for 5-keV photons, increasing gap that persisted for many years [71] (partially covered to 0.9 keV for 70-keV photons. The X-ray optics are by Fermi-GBM [72]). The first NuSTAR DM search was conical approximations of the grazing-incidence Wolter- performed with focused observations of the Bullet Clus- I design, with nested Pt/C multilayer-coated mirrors. ter [45]. But it was soon realized that by taking advan- After entering the telescope, X-rays reflect once off a tage of the open telescope design and using \0-bounce parabolic mirror segment, followed by a hyperbolic mir- photons" (photons that enter the detector without pass- ror segment. These correctly focused X-rays are called ing through the reflecting optics), a larger (unfocused) \2-bounce" photons, as they reflect twice inside the op- field of view (FOV) can be achieved, thus boosting the tics. NuSTAR is sensitive to 2-bounce photons with en- sensitivity to the diffuse DM emission. Stringent con- ergies 3{79 keV. The lower limit is due to absorption by straints were then obtained using the extragalactic back- the dead layer of the CdZnTe detector, the Pt contact ground [52] and Galactic Center observations [54]. Inter- coating, and the 100 µm-thick Be window, effects which estingly, a 3.5-keV line is also included in the NuSTAR become significant only for E < 10 keV [75]. The upper instrumental background [73]. The background nature limit is set by the Pt K-edge of the optics. Both FPMs of this line has been questioned in Ref. [52]. However, have the same essentially overlapping 130 130 FOV for Ref. [54] found evidence of the 3.5-keV line in Earth- 2-bounce photons. × occulted data, which suggests that the line has a detector The NuSTAR optical elements and detectors are sepa- background origin. The line is also close to the energy rated by a 10-m mast, which is open to the sky. The ob- threshold of the detector; detailed studies of its possi- servatory therefore includes a series of aperture stops to ble instrumental origin are ongoing. Future work from limit unfocused X-rays from striking the detectors. How- the NuSTAR collaboration is expected to elucidate the ever, this shielding is not complete, and there remains nature of this line in the NuSTAR data. a circular region of radius 3:5◦ on the sky (partially In this work, we search for DM lines with a combined blocked by the optics bench),∼ from which X-rays can 1.2 Ms of observations of M31, and offer several improve- strike the detectors without interacting with the optical ments on previous works. Compared to Ref. [54], the re- elements. These are called \0-bounce" photons. The en- duction of the astrophysical background, especially from ergy range for these 0-bounce photons is not constrained astrophysical emission lines, improves the sensitivity to by the performance of the optics, and thus extends up to DM. We also consistently include both focused (2-bounce the instrumental limit of 165 keV. Similar to the 2-bounce photons) and unfocused (0-bounce photons) FOV in sig- photons, 0-bounce photons are also subject to absorption nal modeling. To reduce potential systematic errors from effects from detector components at low energy. stacking different data sets, we devise a method to statis- tically combine sensitivities from individual observations. We present our NuSTAR data analysis in Sec. II, our B. NuSTAR's view of M31 DM signal modeling in Sec. III, and our DM results in Sec.IV. We conclude in Sec.V. To probe the diffuse X-ray emission from the direction of M31, we use both NuSTAR's 0-bounce photons from the wide-angle unfocused FOV and the 2-bounce pho- II. NUSTAR DATA ANALYSIS tons from the narrower focused FOV. Unlike our previous work [54], none of the observations used in the present In this section, we describe the NuSTAR instrument, analysis were contaminated by significant \stray light" or the NuSTAR M31 observations, and details about the 0- \ghost rays" resulting from bright, isolated off-axis X-ray bounce and 2-bounce FOV.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    16 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us