ls ia er at M ed ht ig yr op C s: es r The P © 2021 by the Journal of Chinese Linguistics. ISSN 0091-3723/ An investigation of initial criteria of JournalQing scholars’ of Chinese “yisheng Linguistics zhi zhuan”. (In Chinese) By Kun Ma and Miao Wang. g All rights reserved. on K g on H f vol.49, no.2 (June 2021): 507–543 o 䇪␵ӪĀа༠ѻ䖜āⲴ༠㓭ᇑ丣ḷ߶ ity rs ᪈㾱 e ൘䘁ᒤᡰ䉃Āㅜй⅑ਔ丣ᆖབྷ䗙䇪āѝˈᆖ⭼ത㔅ljᒯ䳵⮿䇱NJĀа༠ѝኡབྷᆖˈᒯᐎ v ѻ䖜āᴮᴹнቁҹ䇪ˈ❖⛩൘Ҿ⦻ᘥᆉሩ丣䈫ޣ㌫Ⲵࡔᯝᱟ੖ਸ⨶DŽ傜 i ඔ n ⦻∿Ⲵ਼Ⓚ⹄ウ⁑ᔿ᢯㠚ᡤ䴷DŽᡤ∿ljᯩ䀰⮿䇱NJǃ⇥⦹㻱lj䈤᮷䀓ᆇ U ⌘NJㅹ਼ṧḷ䇠Ҷབྷ䟿Āа༠ѻ䖜āDŽᵜ᮷ޘ䶒䗁ᖅк䘠й⿽䇝䇲㪇֌ se ѝⲴ䖜䈝ᶀᯉˈ࠶᷀ᖃѝⲴ༠㓭᧕䀖㊫රˈ㚄㌫ҮహᰦᵏⲴਔ༠㓭ᆖ e 䈤ˈሩ਴ᇦⲴᇑ丣ḷ߶䘋㹼㘳ሏDŽ᮷ㄐ䇔Ѫ䫡བྷ᱅Ⲵਔ༠㓭㘳䇱㔃䇪 in ൘ᖃᰦቊᵚ㻛Პ䙽᧕ਇˈ⇥ǃ⦻Ҽ∿䜭䟷㓣Ҷᡤ䴷Ⲵ༠䖜䈤ˈն৸࠶ 䟽DŽᵜ᮷䘈䇘䇪ҶᡤǃחҶ䈳ᮤˈণሩĀ↓䖜ā઼Āਈ䖜ā਴ᴹڊh ࡛ C ⇥ǃ⦻൘䇝䇲ᇎ䐥ѝሩ᮷⥞䇱ᦞ઼丣严⨶䇪Ⲵᵳ㺑ˈ࠶᷀Ҷ䖜䈝ᶀᯉ ᒯᐎབྷᆖˈᒯᐎ e ѝ༠㓭᧕䀖㹼Ѫо༠䖜䈤ѻ䰤Ⲵ䳄䰲DŽᵜ⹄ウᴹࣙҾ䠀␵ԕᖰሩĀа h ⦻ T ༠ѻ䖜āⲴ䈟䀓ˈҏਟԕѪ䟽ᔪՐ㔏ਔ丣ᆖᵟਢᨀ׋৲㘳DŽ 㤇 ޣ䭞䇽 ␵ ԓਔ丣ᆖ ਔ ਔ ༠㓭 ༠ 㠤 䉒 䭉䉜ᾲ⭡֌㘵ᵜӪ䍏䍓DŽᵜ᮷Ѫഭᇦ⽮、ส䠁䶂ᒤ亩ⴞ ༠ ᝏ䉒९਽ᇑはуᇦሩᵜ᮷Ⲵ㓶㠤ᇑ䈫ԕ৺ᨀࠪⲴ䈨ཊᇍ䍥᜿㿱DŽ᮷ѝਟ㜭ᆈ൘Ⲵ䖜䈤 Āа ⦻ ᆖ䲒㤇 China); (Miaohttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9789-7672 Wang; 510006 (College of Humanities, Guangzhou University, Panyu, Guangzhou, 510006,а ༠ѻ䖜ā 䙊䇟֌㘵 ) [[email protected]]; ˄ 18CYY032 ѝഭᒯᐎᐲ⮚⿪४ᒯᐎབྷᆖӪ᮷ 507 ˅ Ⲵѝᵏᡀ᷌DŽ 䇪␵ӪĀа༠ѻ䖜āⲴ༠㓭ᇑ丣ḷ߶ 543 AN INVESTIGATION OF INITIAL CRITERIA OF QING SCHOLARS’ “YISHENG ZHI ZHUAN” Kun Ma Miao Wang Sen Yat-Sen University Guangzhou University ls ABSTRACT a ri In the so-called “third great debates on Old Chinese phonology” in recent te years, there has been heated discussions on “yisheng zhi zhuan а༠ѻ䖜 a M (sound shift)” mentioned in the Guangya shuzheng, with a particular efocusd on the legitimacy of Wang Niansun’s theories on Chinese historicalht phonology. Wang Niansun followed the paradigm set up by Daiig Zhen in identifying cognate words. In Dai Zhen’s Fangyan shuzhengyr as well as Duan Yucai’s Shuowenjiezi zhu, there is a large number ofo “Zhuanyup 䖜䈝 (transmitted words)” materials. This paper collects: C the “Zhuanyu” materials from the three exegetical works above, analyzesss contact types of re initials, and discusses the different accounts P of Old Chinese initials proposed by Dai Zhen, Duan Yucai and Wangg Niansun, under the historical context between the reigns of Qianlongo nand Jiaqing. We find that Qian Daxin's view of Old Chinese initials Kwas not well received at that time. While Duan Yucai and Wangn gNiansun both adopted Dai Zhen’s “Shengzhuan theory ༠䖜䈤”, theyo made adjustments by prioritizing either H “zhengzhuan ↓䖜 (positiveof shifting)” or “bianzhuan ਈ䖜 (alternative shifting)”. This paper alsoy compares the different evaluations of textual evidence vis-à-vis phonologicalit theory in the exegetical studies of Dai, rs Duan and Huang,ve and analyzes disagreements between contact behaviors of initials andn Shengzhuani theories in their “Zhuanyu” materials. Our study clarifies misunderstandingsU about “yisheng zhi zhuan” and provides e insightses for reconstructing the academic history of traditional Chinese phonology.n hi C he KEYWORDS T Qing dynasty phonology Old Chinese initials “Shengzhuan” theory “Yisheng zhi zhuan” .