Transcript of Commission 800219 Discussion in Washington,DC Re

Transcript of Commission 800219 Discussion in Washington,DC Re

# r q,y- .s -miu f 9, Ei* S -3 ,- r ,.-- 's,Qtit j , %, y %* U NIT E D STATES NUCLEAR R EG UL ATO RY COMMISSION in the matter of: DISCUSSION OF COMMISSION'S DECISION-MAKING ROLE IN EMERGENCY RESPONSE , l. PIoee: 1717 a street, Room 1130, Washington, D.C. DQte: February 19, 1980 pC9eS: 1-56 8o0:aa90009 IN 4 uNATicNAL VrosATIM RE?caTus, INc. 499 sctri r4 CAPITCL a. s, s. W. suiTI 1o7 x WASHINCN, ::. C. .*::CC2 ( 222 484-2550 a =' =" _ : , a ,c, Type 1-1 4 , I UNITED STATES I NCCLEAR REGULATORY CO.'01ISSION ,/- . ' ; _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _x : 1 In the Matter of: . I t . i j DISCUSSION OF COMMISSION'S DECISION-MAKING : | : i 4 ROLE IN EMERGENCY RESPONSE : i I , : 7 ---- ---------- - - - - - - - -x ! l 3 i - 3' I e f 10 Room 1130, Eleventh Floor j 1717 H Street, N.W. | ii Washington, D.C. I: Tuesday, February 19, 1980 , is , Id The Commission met, pursuant to notice, for il presentation of the above-entitled matter, at 10:35 a.m., | 1 1 Id BEFORE: I i !? JOHN F. AHEARNE, CHAIRMAN VICTOR GILINSKY, COSLMISSIONER I !a , I i 19 RICHARD T. KENNEDY, COMMISSIONER g PETER A. BRADFORD, CCMMISSIONER , .I. JOSEPH M. HENDRIE, COMMISSIONER anse i ; i b I : i og I me sq f k N de 1CE,TW W STWEI'T. L e. WI*T :27 ; sam.ee a :. m a aY t vr ' 1 macz Nc. 2 % i , i _P _R _O _C _E _E _D _I _N _G _S b CHAIRMAN AREARNE: The purpose of the meeting this ' ; morning is to attempt to come to grips with a problem that i i 4 ; came up most visibly to many of us in the Three Mile Island , ' accident and has been raised in number of the reviews, for 6 essential review, our own special inquiry review. Commissioners 7 ; have wrestled it themselves since the time of the accident | I i , and that is what is the Commission role in emergency response, ' explicitly the role of the Commissioners. 9 Mr. Hanrahan has provided a number of papers } , attempting to help us thi'nk through this. I'm not really sure as read these papers whether he has reached a specific 12 , conclusion as to what is the right solution. As the last 10 (. '- ;g paper seems to say that there are a variety of approaches, all of them have some problems. i IS I would suggest that one thing we might do this id ' morning is first to have Ed just briefly review some of the o options that he has seen. Then I will ask my colleagues !8 I whether they have any preferred approach, either those that ' 19 l i Ed has talked about or some of their own. If that's acceptable,' 20 I'll ask Ed. 21 , MR. HANRAHAN: Thank you. _. " | , The number of the recommendations frcm either the | i 1 President's Commission or the Special Inquiry Group, we're ! ~4* ! , not always consistent in what they thought the Commission's ' kJ ~3- role ought to be. While the Fresident's Commission (arftytreafkasema. '/tPPEAT'ne REPeerff71 I4 1 6 O as tr:1tne Cu'Tt::t. ST!*Er?. L * IIMPE '87 d 1 wamew=4TCre.1 C. JEE1 4 -- - i m a cz sc. J l - + , 1 recommendation followed from their belief that the agency , t ' ; ought to have a single head. It therefore suggested that it I i ' - : was followed that the single head of the agency would be the A head to act in any emergency. i i e The President in his response while rejecting or t } putting aside the recommendation on a single head, proposed 3 ! to seek authority for the Chairman to act in emergencies. 7 ; i I ' , A special inquiry group recommended that the Commission not - , ! ' interject itself into a response. However, they did recommend o ,' ' I that the Chairman or the Executive there, Director for | 10 , ; , Operations, head the Emergency Management Team in order to ; provide executive ability to direct and bring together parts j 12 i , of the agencies so that there would someone in authority to ! ! coordinate and insure actions by all of the different offices. ; b i4 ' , I think that's an important point and that ought not to be dealt with solely in the context of the Rogovan recommen- | I6 . dation that the Commission not interject itself. I think 17 | there is an importance all by itself of the head of the , I8 ! Emergency Management Team being able to have the institutional ! 19 ability to bring the various organizations together and to , 20 direct their response. | : 21 I So, the options that have gone through here which are ; i not mutually exclusive by any means, but somewhat representativN - the first follows frcm the Rogovan recommendation that the I* Cctmission not interject itself into the response for an -e - s_ emergency. This I think fails really on the basis that the w rm vour.r - .'c ' me 331tDe W STWEZ'. A e, ATTC :27 f , .-.-m : - av a AY = * 2 442 N c. * , i i Commission would not be involved in any way in an event for ; which the body is constituted and which is of grave national ' ( \ ; or of large area concern. i ; ; , A CHAIRMAN AHEARNE: Wasn't, though, also part of that j i e same set of recommendations that the main decision unit for I ) , 3 and would be handling these accidents would be the Regional ! i . Director located at the site of the accident? | | MR. RANRAHAN: Yes, it was. I think that is somewhat , separable. I think that doesn't argue for-- y CHAIRMAN AHEARNE: Well, except that if you conclude 10 | | that the decisions are going to be made by the NRC 3enior 11 individual on the site,doesn't that automatically then 13ad tno t you to moving the Commission out of making those decisions? I 13 MR. HANRAHAN: Not out of making all decisions. I {~ 1.L mean if you argue that all decisions are made at the site, ! .i. c. ! so that if you also argue that all decisions are made by an { |4 ' Emergency Management Team in Bethesda headec by someone other i 17 than the Commissioner or Commissioners or the Chairman, that i3 those remove the Commission from the role as well. So, I 19 don't think it's completely exclusive, although, I think more so than just having the Executive Director. *1* I think that's where the response or the responsibilityI i lies at the site or at headquarters, perhaps ought to await ~ further discussion on the exact role of the Commission. I* Although, I think it touches there, I think that's trying to < -- s . deal with too much at one time. M T*@N h W O '0 VFEYA Y f | * ee SOLIThe C.4MT9:4. f7WEI*. L 4 EM "97 . ere s. :. .= a . , . : +- , ~ snax sc. r + . * i CHAIRMAN AHEARNE: | Except that it may really be j 2 mutually exclusive. i ( ' , 2 MR. HANRAHAN: Well, I'm not so sure that they really | A are. I 3 CHAIRMAN AHEARNE: Well, better yet, if you reach | ! 6 the conclusion that t4 e only way to handle the accident is to ! , ; , ' have the decision made at the site, therefore are you saying ! i I 3 the Regional Director there snd that individual now is the i 1 . person who makes the decisions on behalf of the NRC? I 9 If you , i I I !O reach the conclusion that this site control is the most j i critical element than you've automatically reached the conclu- h sion the Commission is out of that chain once the Regional ! Director gets on the site. ' 13 MR. HANRAHAN: Yeah, once the Regional Director gets , on site. I think that's the key facet of it, because that can f ' i in hours or a fairly, you know, lengthy period of time !. '4 ' depending upon where the reactor is and where the Regional t ; Director is and so forth. IS I I think in reality it can never remove the Commission ' 19 itself from some review of some assessment on their part that 20 whoever is making those decisions ~is making the right decisions Il and that the right sort I of public actions are being taken. ; - I don't think you can remove yourself frcm that. ' -, '~ { CCMMISSION.R GILINSKY: What are we talking abcut ~ ~1 here? Are we talking about setting up a series of internal ', . ~ y _, procedures, guidelines, regulations, or what? ' i 8tT17t9eA PCreA4. V N Pid D*:F'TTM1 'N , eg 33ttne ?Lery=& J?PII?, L e EM E ! waskeepe4The.1 * 2ME 2 - : sacz sc. + . I I ' , MR. HANRAHAN: Well, I think first you have to I ! establish what it is you're going to do and then you can pur ( ' ' | : in the procedures and guidelines and recommendations. So, i A I'd like to say is exactly what will the Commission or a j i i e Commissioner or Chairman do in this regard? If there is an f i 3 , emergency call what will they do? Will they just sit back 7 and let it go on? OMMISSIONER GILINSKY: Well, we have a procedure 3 ; , that Joe put in place and it is still in place I assume. y MR. H ANRAHAN : That's right. At the present time , the Chairman is a member and the head of the Emergency ,li ' Management Team.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    57 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us