Questionnaire for pilot sites Collection of facts and information of pilot sites for building a comparative, transnational typology of alpine territories For project partners: Please fill in the predefined gaps and boxes and try to answer all the questions clearly and completely. Use the predefined boxes and stick to the space limitations. If space isn’t enough, please use the attached document to add more information. The questionnaire will be transferred directly into a kind of factsheet of your pilot site. Therefor please try to give clear information and formulate it well, so that it can be used for presenting your pilot site. If you have questions concerning the filling in, the meaning of a question or anything else, do not hesitate to contact us (iSpace – Dagmar Lahnsteiner, [email protected], CEREMA – David Caubel, [email protected]) Name and type of the territory: Saint-Marcellin-Vercors-Isère, inter-municipality Location (political district / region, federal province, country, other relevant position information): Located in Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes Region, in Isère department, between the urban areas of Grenoble and Valence. - PART A: MAIN TERRITORIAL FEATURES - Factor Description Please fill in… Population Number of inhabitants (main residence) and year About 45 000 inhabitants - shares by age groups (INSEE, 2013) - share of working population About 18 300 workers Area Total area of the municipality in km² About 650 km² Pop. density Number of inhabitants per km² (year) About 75 inhab/km² Settlement Number of inhabitants per km² settlement area/ In Saint-Marcellin (the main density theoretically inhabitable area (year) town-centre) : 1033 inhab/km², and Vinay (another centre) : 258 inhab/km² Elevation Height above mean sea level in m Between 100m and 800m to the highest altitude Settlement Sprawled settlements or mainly compact? Satellite The main town-centre : Saint- structure areas around a centre or more disconnected Marcellin centres/settlements? Physical barriers? The other centres : Vinay, Chatte, Pont-en-Royans Topography of Is it flat land / hilly terrain/ alpine valley and basin Flat land but a part of the pilot settlement area landscape? Other? site is included in a natural mountainous park (Vercors) Functional Are there any characteristics describing special -Residential function characteristics functions of the municipality (e.g.: popular tourist -Services, commercial destination, concentration of jobs, school centre, function, economic activities regional centre, winter sport resort, economically concentrated in 3 main attractive, isolated/ central/ interconnected to,..) centres Jobs Number of workplaces and employees within the About 13 500 jobs municipality (year) 1 Commuter Number of working population commuting to outside 7 400 workers (40%) (2012) balance the municipality (year) Number of people commuting from outside into the About 2000 workers from municipality (year) outside (2012) - PART B: MOBILITY SUPPLY AND DEMAND- 1. Modal split: Please insert the smallest-scale modal split values of traffic volume available for the municipality/territory adding also the scale, source, and year (= percentage of travellers using a particular type of transportation). Scale, source, year EMD (2010) Share by foot value in % By foot 76,00% Share bicycle value in % By bicycle 1,00% Share MIV value in % By MIV 15,00% Share PT value in % By PT 6,00% Share other/n.s. value in % Other 3,00% 2. Public transport - Existing offer: Please describe the existing mobility offer in the municipality/ territory. - Which means of transport do exist? ☐ Local bus ☒ Regional bus ☒ Local train ☒ Long-distance train ☐ Urban railways (S-Bahn) ☐ Tramway ☐ Metro ☐ Other: - Frequency of public transport services: what is the shortest interval? ☐ < 5 minutes ☒ 5 - 15 min. ☐ 15 - 30 min. ☐ 30 – 60 min. ☐ > 60 minutes - How long is the travel time to the next regional/national centre? ☐ < 15 min OR the next centre is within the pilot site /municipality ☐ 15 – 30 minutes ☒ 30 – 60 minutes ☐ > 60 minutes - Is there a multi/intermodal hub? If yes, of which services does it consist (in the case of several hubs, choose a representative/ the best developed one)? ☐ No ☒ Yes, consisting of: 2 ☒ Bus/tram station ☒ Railway station ☐ Metro station ☒ Park & Ride area ☒ Bicycle parking ☐ E-bike charging ☐ E-car charging ☒ Car sharing ☐ Bike rental ☐ Taxi rank ☐ Other: 3. Public transport - incentives: What is done to make public transport attractive? ☒ Dedicated tariff system (discounted tickets, annual passes, combined/integrated tickets for different means of transport, special offers, etc.) ☒ Dedicated information (websites, smartphone apps, campaigns etc.) ☒ Other (max.150 characters): -Platform “Covoit’oura” to promote car-sharing -Platform for car-sharing in the territory 4. Supplementary mobility offer and initiatives: Please give a brief description (+ year of implementation, owner/ operator) of supplementary public transport systems and innovative initiatives in the municipality/territory which assist the PT or help to reduce private car use (Park & Ride areas, Carpooling/ Carsharing initiatives, bus-on-demand / call bus, share taxi, Secure hitchhiking, etc.). (max. 5 listings with max. 300 characters each) Car-sharing with the platform « Covoit’oura » The Association “Mobil’Emploi” proposes car rental and other mobility solutions for workers (especially to support social inclusion) 5. Conditions for non-motorized private transport: How is the situation for biking and walking within the Are there additional offers like (free) (electric) bicycle municipality/territory?(max. 500 characters) rental, bike sharing or special measures/initiatives for pedestrians? (max. 500 characters) -Bicycle lanes to access to train stations -Secured lockers for bicycles in train stations 6. Local mobility knowledge: Which kind of data or studies are used or gathered on local mobility knowledge? Is there any kind of observation system in place to enhance the information about current and forecast local mobility needs, practices and CO2 impacts? (max. 5 listings with max. 300 characters each) EMD 2010 Diagnostic SCOT RUG Study to promote Electric bicycles Studies by the AURG (Urbanism Agency of ‘Région Grenobloise’) 7. Mobility needs and demands: Do inhabitants or local stakeholders express mobility needs or gaps with regard to the current situation and territorial issues? If yes, what are the major ones? (max. 5 listings with max. 200 characters each) An improved railway network service between Valence and Grenoble (for example : more places for bicycles in trains) 3 - PART C: MOBILITY AND SPATIAL PLANNING BACKGROUND - 1. Planning authorities: Please give an overview of the responsibilities concerning mobility and spatial/housing planning in the municipality/territory. Are there also authorities combining the spatial and mobility planning aspect? Mobility planning (max. 800 characters) Spatial/housing planning (max. 800 characters) National level : National level : -French State -French State -SNCF Regional level : Regional level : -Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes Region -Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes Region Departmental level : Departmental level : -Conseil Départemental de l’Isère -Conseil Départemental de l’Isère -EPFL Dauphiné Local level : Local level : -CC Saint-Marcellin-Vercors-Isère Communauté -CC Saint-Marcellin-Vercors-Isère Communauté -Etablissement Public du SCoT de la Région Urbaine -Etablissement Public du SCoT de la Région Urbaine de Grenoble de Grenoble 2. Planning instruments: Which planning instruments and strategic documents influence /control spatial/housing and mobility planning in the municipality/territory THE MOST? In which way, at what time and territorial scale do they act? Are they obligatory? Think of any programmes, concepts, regulation, strategic processes etc. (max. 5 listings with max 400 characters each) SCoT Région Grenobloise PLU (Local Urban Planning documents) per municipality Charte PNR Vercors 3. Main objectives: What are current and forecast main objectives and guiding principles for the municipality/territory, linked with mobility issues(+ sources)? Think of local, regional and national scale. (max. 5 listings with max 200 characters each) Urban planning around train stations (for example housing projects) Density in town-centres and other centres To balance between town-centres/villages/etc. in terms of jobs, services supply, etc. To reinforce some town-centres roles at a larger scale 4. Planning measures: What are concrete planning measures already in use within the municipality/ territory, helping to reduce CO2 and foster/push the usage and implementation of public transport and other low CO2 mobility options? E.g. car- reduced building projects, precautionary land use (saving areas next to public transport infrastructure for building compact settlements), subsidy for compact settlements, strengthening of town centres, regulation of residential densities next to public transport stops (max. 5 listings with max.300 characters each) Densify town-centres Land use under control 4 Strategic areas for urban planning Car-pool parking spaces -PART D: STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES – In conclusion, regarding requirements, offer, planning and implementation of low CO2 mobility and related issues, what are: (max. 800 charcters each) - strengths & benefits of the municipality/territory? - weaknesses & problems of the municip./ territory? - 4 train stations - Concentration of jobs more in Grenoble - High frequency of trains than