Report of Genemania Search

Report of Genemania Search

GeneMANIA http://www.genemania.org/print Created on: 5 December 2012 00:37:59 Last database update: 19 July 2012 20:00:00 Application version: 3.1.1 Report of GeneMANIA search Network image PCNA RRM2B BCL2 3.08 Functions legend Networks legend induction of apoptosis by intracellular signals Co-expression query genes Co-localization Genetic interactions Pathway Physical interactions Predicted Shared protein domains 第1页 共60页 2012/12/5 14:07 GeneMANIA http://www.genemania.org/print Search parameters Organism: H. sapiens (human) Genes: BID; IGF1; FAS; CASP8; TCOF1; GTSE1; TP73; CD82; BAX; GADD45B; TSC2; CCNE1; CDK6; UBTF; CCND1; PERP; CCNG1; CCND2; APAF1; CDK2; CDKN1A; GADD45G; SESN2; CASP9; CCNB1; CDK4; THBS1; CCNG2; TP53; PMAIP1; CDKN2A; SESN3; EI24; CHEK1; CCNB2; CASP3; CDK1; POLR1C; RRM2; PTEN; CYCS; ZMAT3; ATR; CCNE2; SFN; LRDD; POLR1D; SIAH1A Networks: Attributes: Network weighting: Automatically selected weighting method (Assigned based on query genes) Number of gene results: 20 第2页 共60页 2012/12/5 14:07 GeneMANIA http://www.genemania.org/print Networks Predicted 27.86 % I2D-Tarassov-PCA-Yeast2Human 6.55 % An in vivo map of the yeast protein interactome. Tarassov et al. (2008). Science . Note: I2D predictions of protein protein interactions using Tarassov-Michnick-2008 Saccharomyces cerevisiae data Source: Direct interaction with 441 interactions from I2D Tags: cell proliferation I2D-IntAct-Mouse2Human 4.34 % The IntAct molecular interaction database in 2010. Aranda et al. (2010). Nucleic Acids Res . Note: I2D predictions of protein protein interactions using IntAct Mus musculus data Source: Direct interaction with 3,422 interactions from I2D I2D-MGI-Mouse2Human 3.32 % Ontological visualization of protein-protein interactions. Drabkin et al. (2005). BMC Bioinformatics . Note: I2D predictions of protein protein interactions using MGI Mus musculus data Source: Direct interaction with 724 interactions from I2D I2D-BioGRID-Mouse2Human 3.06 % BioGRID: a general repository for interaction datasets. Stark et al. (2006). Nucleic Acids Res . Note: I2D predictions of protein protein interactions using BioGRID Mus musculus data Source: Direct interaction with 288 interactions from I2D I2D-MINT-Rat2Human 2.78 % MINT: a Molecular INTeraction database. Zanzoni et al. (2002). FEBS Lett . Note: I2D predictions of protein protein interactions using MINT Rattus norvegicus data Source: Direct interaction with 574 interactions from I2D I2D-INNATEDB-Mouse2Human 2.21 % InnateDB: facilitating systems-level analyses of the mammalian innate immune response. Lynn et al. (2008). Mol Syst Biol . Note: I2D predictions of protein protein interactions using INNATEDB Mus musculus data Source: Direct interaction with 1,455 interactions from I2D Tags: signal transduction; immune system I2D-BIND-Mouse2Human 1.95 % BIND--a data specification for storing and describing biomolecular interactions, molecular complexes and pathways. Bader et al. (2000). Bioinformatics . Note: I2D predictions of protein protein interactions using BIND Mus musculus data Source: Direct interaction with 1,198 interactions from I2D I2D-Giot-Rothbert-2003-High-Fly2Human 1.88 % A protein interaction map of Drosophila melanogaster. Giot et al. (2003). Science . Note: I2D predictions of protein protein interactions using Giot-Rothbert-2003 Drosophila melanogaster data Source: Direct interaction with 602 interactions from I2D Tags: cell proliferation; signal transduction; nervous system; immune system I2D-BIND-Yeast2Human 0.78 % BIND--a data specification for storing and describing biomolecular interactions, molecular complexes and pathways. Bader et al. (2000). Bioinformatics . Note: I2D predictions of protein protein interactions using BIND Saccharomyces cerevisiae data Source: Direct interaction with 1,543 interactions from I2D Stuart-Kim-2003 0.52 % 第3页 共60页 2012/12/5 14:07 GeneMANIA http://www.genemania.org/print A gene-coexpression network for global discovery of conserved genetic modules. Stuart et al. (2003). Science . Source: 24,952 interactions from supplementary material Tags: cell proliferation; cultured cells; signal transduction; cancer I2D-Yu-Vidal-2008-GoldStd-Yeast2Human 0.25 % High-quality binary protein interaction map of the yeast interactome network. Yu et al. (2008). Science . Note: I2D predictions of protein protein interactions using Yu Gold Standard Saccharomyces cerevisiae data Source: Direct interaction with 386 interactions from I2D Tags: transcription factors; signal transduction I2D-BIND-Fly2Human 0.21 % BIND--a data specification for storing and describing biomolecular interactions, molecular complexes and pathways. Bader et al. (2000). Bioinformatics . Note: I2D predictions of protein protein interactions using BIND Drosophila melanogaster data Source: Direct interaction with 2,625 interactions from I2D Physical interactions 25.39 % Ramachandran-LaBaer-2004 14.50 % Self-assembling protein microarrays. Ramachandran et al. (2004). Science . Source: Direct interaction with 119 interactions from iRefIndex IREF-CORUM 3.53 % Source: Direct interaction with 637 interactions from iRefIndex IREF-MPPI 3.52 % Source: Direct interaction with 385 interactions from iRefIndex IREF-DIP 1.95 % Source: Direct interaction with 12,700 interactions from iRefIndex IREF-GRID 0.51 % Source: Direct interaction with 33,623 interactions from iRefIndex IREF-INTACT 0.48 % Source: Direct interaction with 21,448 interactions from iRefIndex Rual-Vidal-2005 B 0.42 % Towards a proteome-scale map of the human protein-protein interaction network. Rual et al. (2005). Nature . Note: One of 2 datasets produced from this publication. Source: Direct interaction with 2,624 interactions from iRefIndex Rual-Vidal-2005 A 0.23 % Towards a proteome-scale map of the human protein-protein interaction network. Rual et al. (2005). Nature . Note: One of 2 datasets produced from this publication. Source: Direct interaction with 2,581 interactions from BioGRID IREF-BIND 0.22 % Source: Direct interaction with 5,310 interactions from iRefIndex BIOGRID-SMALL-SCALE-STUDIES 0.02 % Source: Direct interaction with 28,821 interactions from BioGRID Hutchins-Peters-2010 0.01 % Systematic analysis of human protein complexes identifies chromosome segregation proteins. Hutchins et al. (2010). Science . Source: Direct interaction with 141 interactions from iRefIndex Tags: cell proliferation; nervous system; localization Co-expression 15.99 % 第4页 共60页 2012/12/5 14:07 GeneMANIA http://www.genemania.org/print Nakayama-Hasegawa-2007 2.95 % Gene expression analysis of soft tissue sarcomas: characterization and reclassification of malignant fibrous histiocytoma. Nakayama et al. (2007). Mod Pathol . Source: Pearson correlation with 361,398 interactions from GEO Tags: transcription factors; cancer Rieger-Chu-2004 2.05 % Toxicity from radiation therapy associated with abnormal transcriptional responses to DNA damage. Rieger et al. (2004). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . Source: Pearson correlation with 220,846 interactions from GEO Tags: cultured cells; cell line Jones-Libermann-2005 1.80 % Gene signatures of progression and metastasis in renal cell cancer. Jones et al. (2005). Clin Cancer Res . Source: Pearson correlation with 365,428 interactions from GEO Tags: transcription factors; disease; cancer Peng-Katze-2009 1.19 % Computational identification of hepatitis C virus associated microRNA-mRNA regulatory modules in human livers. Peng et al. (2009). BMC Genomics . Source: Pearson correlation with 349,954 interactions from GEO Tags: liver Burington-Shaughnessy-2008 1.01 % Tumor cell gene expression changes following short-term in vivo exposure to single agent chemotherapeutics are related to survival in multiple myeloma. Burington et al. (2008). Clin Cancer Res . Source: Pearson correlation with 266,464 interactions from GEO Tags: transcription factors; time series; cancer; chemotherapy Hummel-Siebert-2006 0.92 % A biologic definition of Burkitt's lymphoma from transcriptional and genomic profiling. Hummel et al. (2006). N Engl J Med . Source: Pearson correlation with 466,765 interactions from GEO Tags: cancer Kang-Willman-2010 0.90 % Gene expression classifiers for relapse-free survival and minimal residual disease improve risk classification and outcome prediction in pediatric B-precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Kang et al. (2010). Blood . Source: Pearson correlation with 549,783 interactions from GEO Tags: transcription factors; lymphoma; cancer Gobble-Singer-2011 0.89 % Expression profiling of liposarcoma yields a multigene predictor of patient outcome and identifies genes that contribute to liposarcomagenesis. Gobble et al. (2011). Cancer Res . Source: Pearson correlation with 449,507 interactions from GEO Tags: apoptosis; cell line; cultured cells; cancer; transcription factors Radtke-Downing-2009 0.87 % Genomic analysis reveals few genetic alterations in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia. Radtke et al. (2009). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . Source: Pearson correlation with 377,767 interactions from GEO Tags: transcription factors; nervous system; cancer Raue-Trappe-2012 0.65 % Transcriptome signature of resistance exercise adaptations: mixed muscle and fiber type specific profiles in young and old adults. Raue et al. (2012). J Appl Physiol . Source: Pearson correlation with 483,849 interactions from GEO Wang-Maris-2006 0.60 % 第5页 共60页 2012/12/5 14:07 GeneMANIA http://www.genemania.org/print Integrative genomics identifies distinct molecular classes of neuroblastoma and shows that multiple genes are targeted by regional alterations

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    60 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us