November 7, 2019

November 7, 2019

A DIALOGUE WITH THE NORTHERN VIRGINIA DISTRICT November 7, 2019 1 Jeff Southard, Esq. VTCA Executive Vice President 2 Helen Cuervo, P.E. Northern Virginia District Engineer Virginia Department of Transportation 3 CONSTRUCTION Bill Cuttler, P.E., District Construction Engineer 11/7/2019 Safety Message: Pedestrian Safety 5 6 7 8 CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM PERFORMANCE 10 Construction Quality FY20 (as of 9/23/2019) Improvement Program District 94.6% Target 91% State TBD Environmental Commitments District 92% (12/13) Target TBD State TBD 11 VDOT Construction FY20 (as of 9/23/2019) On-Budget District 87% Minimum Target 85% State 92% Number of District 31 Projects 12 VDOT Construction FY20 (as of 11/1/2019) On-Time District 94% Minimum Target 77% State 96% Number of District Projects 32 13 14 15 16 Northern Virginia Construction On-Time Performance 17 “Bumpy roads lead to beautiful places, and this is a beautiful place.” – Dave Martinez 18 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT Nicholas J. Roper, P.E. District Project Development Engineer November 7, 2019 Project Development Dashboard a/o 1 Nov NOVA Overall for Project Development On-Time VDOT Dashboard VDOT Performance – 56% On-Budget Performance – 73% Projects scheduled for award in FY20 LAP Dashboard LAP 20 FY20 Late Activities for On-Time Development VDOT & Locally Administered – 66 projects Initial Baseline 2nd Baseline • During the initial Dashboard phase of project development scoping was completed late more than 50% of the time • Even though the baseline was reset after scoping was completed projects are not staying on schedule for on-time advertisement starting & completing right of way on time is the most influential cause 21 FY21-25 Late Activities for On-Time Development VDOT & Locally Administered – 149 projects Initial Baseline 2nd Baseline • Projects not yet on the Dashboard • 28% of projects are or were late for the completion of scoping • Pattern looks the same • Advertisement and Award not shown because they are not scheduled 22 In Development | VDOT Administered I-95 Southbound Auxiliary Route 286 Widening & Popes Richmond Highway Corridor Lane $32M Head Interchange $290M Improvements $372M Patriot Park Interchange • NVTA & SMART SCALE funds • $156 million RW/U; 203 parcels • Concession Fee, State, & Federal Funds • Public Hearing in 2019-20 • Federal, state, county, and NVTA funds • Public Hearing Dec 4, 2019 • Advertise interchange in 2022 • RW begins 2020 • Construction from spring 2021-late 2022 • Widening construction by • Construction planned to begin in 2023 phases beginning in 2023 23 In Development | VDOT Administered Route 29 Widening (Union Mill Route 1 Widening & SB I-395 & Boundary Channel Drive to Buckley’s Gate) $86M Realignment in Dumfries $130M Interchange $21M • 1.5 miles, relieve a.m./p.m. bottleneck • Last 4-lane segment of Rte 29 between I-66 & Fairfax City • NVTA and local funds • Funded with SMART SCALE & I-66 • Federal, state, NVTA funds • IMR prepared under Arlington County confession fee • Approximately 2 miles from • Project administration changing • Public Hearing held June 10, 2019; Brady Hill Rd to Route 234 to VDOT in spring 2020 design approved; construction • Main Street reverts to local • Design-build delivery w/ RFQ planned in 2023 traffic in fall 2020 • May begin RW in 2020 24 In Development | Locally Administered Prince William Rte 1 Widening (Featherstone- Fairfax Loudoun St. Marys) $85M Springfield CBC Garage $64M Northstar Blvd $98M • 6 level parking garage w/ 1000 spaces, bus bays & transit center, bike storage, community space for events • Approximately 1.7 miles from • SMART SCALE, NVTA, RSTP funds • Federal, state and local funds Shreveport Drive to Route 50 • Will complete widening of Route 1 to 6 • Advertise in Dec 2019 • local & federal ($25M TIGER) funds lanes from Neabsco Road to Occoquan • Design-Build delivery w/ RFP spring • Advertise in 2020 2020 25 In Procurement | Locally Administered Fairfax County Prince William County Widen Rte 28 from Old Centreville Interchange at Route 234 Bypass & Balls Ford Rd Rd to PW line (2.3 mi) $96M $145M • Financed by federal, SMART SCALE, • Financed with local funds and I-66 concession fee state and local funds • Design-Build RFP released in Sept 2019 • Design Build RFP released in Sept 2019 26 Local Projects In Development | Loudoun County Fairfax County Prince William County Route 15 North of Leesburg $210M Richmond Hwy BRT $735M Route 28 Bypass $300M • Local “super” transportation projects with non-VDOT funding becoming more common • Outside VDOT’s Permit or Land Development review capabilities • Future business transformation for NOVA how to provide oversight for reviews and inspection? 27 Local Projects In Development | Arlington National Cemetery Southern Expansion • Adds approximately 40 acres for future interments • Includes a Defense Access Road (DAR) project administered by EFL-FHWA o Realigns Columbia Pike (Rte 244) to S. Joyce Street & Pentagon o Reconfigures the interchange at Columbia Pike (Rte 244) and Washington Blvd (Rte 27) o $50 million estimate o Design-bid-build delivery w/ advertisement in mid-2020 28 Coming Soon for Development | Route 1 Multi-modal Improvements VDOT Administered • Part of the Amazon HQ2 agreement • $2 million authorized in FY20- 25 SYIP for traffic & pedestrian improvements on Route 1 in Crystal City between 12th & 23rd Streets • Overall estimate $250 million Study Limits • VDOT plans to initiate a study in late FY20 • RFP for consultant procurement likely in late 2019/early 2020 29 Coming Soon for Development | Connector Bridge at Crystal City and Reagan National Airport Locally Administered (Arlington) • Part of the Amazon HQ2 agreement • CC2DCA plan developed by the Crystal City BID • Administered by Arlington County w/ VDOT oversight during the PE phase • Development plan includes an EIS • $35 million estimate financed with CMAQ and local funds (TBD) • Arlington likely to initiate consultant procurement in mid 2020 30 Environmental Performance Program • 15 months since program was inaugurated • Tangible improvement in environmental compliance throughout NOVA Non-compliant Compliant 31 Drainage & Storm Water Management Assistance/Site Inspections 32 BRIDGE AND PAVEMENT CONDITIONS NOVA Maintenance Lauren C. Mollerup, P.E., District Maintenance Engineer 11/7/2019 Note: Funding and Activities based on previous three fiscal year averages (FY 2016 – FY 2018); numbers are rounded to the nearest $5 million 34 PAVEMENT 35 36 37 38 39 40 Secondary Network –Tiered Approach • Secondary • Over 100,000 LM Secondary Current Condition and Traffic Current % % % AADT • Not meeting target (65%) %. Suff. Network Truck VMT . Current sufficiency: 60% Above 54.8 5 75 59 • Top 5% of Secondary (~ 5,000 LM) 3,500 . Over 75% truck traffic Above 55.2 4 70 54 . Around 60% vehicle miles traveled 5,000 • Why should we differentiate between high volume Secondary and low volume Primary? 41 Primary and Secondary Network –Tiered Approach Primary Current Condition and Traffic Secondary Current Condition and Traffic Current % % % Current % % % AADT AADT %. Suff. Network Truck VMT %. Suff. Network Truck VMT Above Above 85.1 68 94 95 54.8 5 75 59 3,500 3,500 Above Above 85.1 62 90 91 55.2 4 70 54 5,000 5,000 42 Primary and Secondary Network –Tiered Approach Primary Current Condition and Traffic Secondary Current Condition and Traffic Current % % % Current % % % AADT AADT %. Suff. Network Truck VMT %. Suff. Network Truck VMT Above Above 85.1 68 94 95 54.8 5 75 59 3,500 3,500 Above Above 85.1 62 90 91 55.2 4 70 54 5,000 5,000 Primary Current Investment: $165M per year, FY 2020 Secondary Current Investment: $200M per year, FY2020 AADT ≥ 3,500 AADT < 3,500 Avg. Total Cost % Suff. for ≥ 3,500 % Suff. for < 3,500 Avg. Total Cost 82% $225M 82% 75% $150M 75% $221M 60% 70% $219M 65% $215M 43 Summary - Pavement Investment Options Current investment: $425M per year, FY 2020 Avg. Total Cost per Year, Targets, % Sufficiency $ Millions Years 1-6 Years 7-20 IS PR SC IS PR SC IS PR SC Current Investment – Current Policy 88 171 227 111 193 203 82% 82% 65% $486 $507 ($61) ($82) Current Policy Proposed Targets *All amounts in 2019 dollars 44 BRIDGE STRUCTURES 45 46 Structures Inventory – by Type Metal Culverts Timber Deck Bridges Concrete Girder Bridges Concrete Slab Bridges Concrete Culverts Steel Girder Bridges 47 Rating – General Condition Rating (GCR) Condition General Condition Description Category Rating (GCR) Components of a Bridge 9 Excellent Good 8 Very Good 7 Good 6 Satisfactory Fair 5 Fair 4 Poor 3 Serious Poor (Structurally 2 Critical Deficient) Imminent 1 Failure 0 Failed 48 Structurally Deficient (SD) Structures Improved Since 2010 2,130 SD Structures Replaced or Improved 49 2019 SD Structures – Significant Improvement Since 2010 Currently 793 SD structures 50 Next Challenge - 4,440 Structures on CUSP • One inspection rating from becoming Poor (SD) • Most can be rehabilitated & preserved at ~15% replacement cost • Preservation - decades of additional service life • Average age = 62 years 51 Overall Funding Scenario Preservation Activities and Investment Levels Evaluated (75%) • Deck repair and preservation (overlays & joints) • Superstructure repair (beam ends) and preservation • Substructure repair and preservation • Culvert (liners) Replacement Activities (25%) • Components or whole structures 52 Summary - Structures Investment Options Current investment: $384M per year, FY 2020 Avg. Total Cost per Year, Targets, % Not-SD $ Millions All Systems Years 1-50 IS PR SC Average GCR IS

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    87 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us