United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Richmond Division

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Richmond Division

Case 3:14-cr-00012-JRS Document 582 Filed 12/23/14 Page 1 of 60 PageID# 16410 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) CRIMINAL NO. 3:14-CR-00012 ) ROBERT F. MCDONNELL ) JUDGE JAMES R. SPENCER MAUREEN G. MCDONNELL ) DEFENDANT ROBERT F. MCDONNELL’S SENTENCING MEMORANDUM Case 3:14-cr-00012-JRS Document 582 Filed 12/23/14 Page 2 of 60 PageID# 16411 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 1 BOB MCDONNELL’S BACKGROUND .................................................................................... 1 A. Early Years (1954 – 1976) ..................................................................................... 1 B. Military Service (1976 – 1997) .............................................................................. 3 C. Early Career (1980 – 1991) .................................................................................... 4 D. Virginia House of Delegates & Law Practice (1992 – 2005) ................................ 6 E. Attorney General (2006 – 2009) ............................................................................ 8 F. Governor (2010 – 2014)....................................................................................... 11 G. Personal & Family Life ........................................................................................ 18 ARGUMENT ............................................................................................................................... 20 I. THE PROPER SENTENCING GUIDELINES RANGE IS 33 TO 41 MONTHS ......... 20 II. APPLICATION OF THE 18 U.S.C. § 3553 FACTORS COMPEL A VARIANT SENTENCE ..................................................................................................................... 21 A. Bob McDonnell’s history and characteristics support a sentence well below the Guidelines range .................................................................................. 21 1. Exceptional character ............................................................................... 22 2. A lifetime of public service...................................................................... 25 3. Strong family bonds ................................................................................. 26 4. Mercy to others ........................................................................................ 28 B. The nature and circumstances of the offense compel a below-Guidelines sentence ................................................................................................................ 29 C. Mr. McDonnell’s trial and conviction act as powerful deterrents to criminal conduct................................................................................................... 32 D. A prison sentence is not needed to protect the public from further crimes by Mr. McDonnell ............................................................................................... 35 E. A sentence far below the Guidelines range is needed to avoid unwarranted disparities ............................................................................................................. 36 F. A prison sentence would heighten the disparate treatment of Mr. McDonnell and his alleged co-conspirator Mr. Williams .................................... 40 G. A non-incarcerative sentence would be a just punishment for Mr. McDonnell’s offense ............................................................................................ 40 H. A sentence based on the Guideline § 2B1.1 loss table would be unjust in this case ................................................................................................................ 42 Case 3:14-cr-00012-JRS Document 582 Filed 12/23/14 Page 3 of 60 PageID# 16412 I. An alternative sentence of rigorous community service is sufficient, but not greater than necessary, to fulfill the statutory goals ...................................... 45 ii Case 3:14-cr-00012-JRS Document 582 Filed 12/23/14 Page 4 of 60 PageID# 16413 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page CASES Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38 (2007) .............................................................................................................21, 45 Kimbrough v. United States, 552 U.S. 85 (2007) ...................................................................................................................21 Koon v. United States, 518 U.S. 81 (1996) ...................................................................................................................29 Rita v. United States, 551 U.S. 338 (2007) ...........................................................................................................21, 25 United States v. Adelson, 441 F. Supp. 2d 506 (S.D.N.Y. 2006)..........................................................................25, 33, 34 United States v. Anderson, 533 F.3d 623 (8th Cir. 2008) ...................................................................................................33 United States v. Argo, No. 07-CR-683 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 28, 2008) ................................................................................40 United States v. Autery, 555 F.3d 864 (9th Cir. 2009) ...................................................................................................21 United States v. Benkahla, 501 F. Supp. 2d 748 (E.D. Va. 2007) ................................................................................22, 27 United States v. Carmona-Rodriguez, No. 04-CR-667, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6254 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 11, 2005) ...............................35 United States v. Carter, 538 F.3d 784 (7th Cir. 2008) ...................................................................................................35 United States v. Cherry, 366 F. Supp. 2d 372 (E.D. Va. 2005) ......................................................................................23 United States v. Cooper, 394 F.3d 172 (3d Cir. 2005).....................................................................................................22 iii Case 3:14-cr-00012-JRS Document 582 Filed 12/23/14 Page 5 of 60 PageID# 16414 United States v. Coughlin, No. 06-CR-20005, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11263 (W.D. Ark. Feb. 1, 2008) .........................47 United States v. Edwards, 303 F.3d 606 (5th Cir. 2002) ...................................................................................................37 United States v. Edwards, 595 F.3d 1004 (9th Cir. 2010) .................................................................................................33 United States v. Hamilton, No. 3:11-CR-00013 (E.D. Va. Nov. 22, 2011) ........................................................................38 United States v. Harding, No. 05-CR-1285-02, 2006 WL 2850261 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 28, 2006) ......................................27 United States v. Howe, 543 F.3d 128 (3d Cir. 2008)...............................................................................................23, 25 United States v. Hutcherson, No. 6:05-cr-00039 (W.D. Va. Dec. Aug. 30, 2006) ................................................................48 United States v. Jefferson, No. 1:07-CR-00209 (E.D. Va. Nov. 13, 2009) ........................................................................37 United States v. Litvak, No. 3:13-CR-00019-JCH (D. Conn.) .......................................................................................44 United States v. Lukens, No. 1:95-CR-00041 (D.D.C. June 29, 1996) ...........................................................................37 United States v. Morales, 972 F.2d 1007 (9th Cir. 1992) .................................................................................................22 United States v. Myers, 353 F. Supp. 2d 1026 (S.D. Iowa 2005) ..................................................................................27 United States v. Nellum, No. 2:04-CR-30, 2005 BL 88941 (N.D. Ind. Feb. 3, 2005) .....................................................27 United States v. Ney, No. 1:06-CR-00272 (D.D.C. Oct. 13, 2006) ............................................................................37 United States v. Pauley, 511 F.3d 468 (4th Cir. 2007) ...................................................................................................32 iv Case 3:14-cr-00012-JRS Document 582 Filed 12/23/14 Page 6 of 60 PageID# 16415 United States v. Prosperi, No. 1:06-CR-10116 (D. Mass. May 25, 2010) ........................................................................47 United States v. Prosperi, 686 F.3d 32 (1st Cir. 2012) ......................................................................................................47 United States v. Ranum, 353 F. Supp. 2d 984 (E.D. Wis. 2005) .....................................................................................23 United States v. Renzi, No. 4:08-CR-00212 (D. Ariz. Oct. 28, 2013) ..........................................................................37 United States v. Rivernider, No. 3:10-CR-222-RNC (D. Conn.) ..........................................................................................44 United States v. Sachakov, No. 11-CR-120, 2013 WL 101287 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 8, 2013) ...................................................33 United States v. Stewart, 590 F.3d 93 (2d Cir. 2009).................................................................................................33, 42 United States v.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    60 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us