Figure 8.1A - Election Results in the Czech Republic, 1990-2017 90%

Figure 8.1A - Election Results in the Czech Republic, 1990-2017 90%

Figure 8.1a - Election results in the Czech Republic, 1990-2017 90% Ano: 29.6% ODS: 11.3% 80% CivicForum: 49.5% SPD: 10.6% KDU: 8.4% KDU-ČSL: 5.8% Top09: 5.3% 70% ODS-KDS: 29.7% ODS: 29.6% Ano: 18.6% KDU-ČSL: 6.3% KDU-ČSL: 8.1% SPR-RSČ: 6% SPR-RSČ: 8% ODS: 20.2% Top09: 11.3% ODA: 6.4% ODS: 7.7% ODS:27.7% Top09: 16.7% 60% ČSSD:30.2% ČSSD: 32.3% Usvit: 6.9% KDU-ČSL: 9% VV:10.8% KSČM:18.5% KSČM:12.8% KDU-ČSL: 6.8% US-DEU: 8.6% SZ: 6.3% 50% ČSSD: 32.3% ODS: 35.3% ČSSD: 20.4% KSČM: 11% ODS: 24.5% KDU-ČSL:7.2% ČSSD: 22% KSČM: 14.9% 40% KDU-ČSL, US-DEU:14% KSČM: 11.2% LevyBlok: 14% ČSSD: 26.4% ČSSD:6.5% KSČM: 10.3% LSU: 6.5% 30% Left-wing parties Pirati: 10.8% KSČ: 13.2% KSČM: 7.8% 20% Right-wing parties ČSSD: 7.7% 10% 0% 1990 1992 1996 1998 2002 2006 2010 2013 2017 Source: authors' computations using official election results (see wpid.world). Note: labels show parties that received more than 5% of total votes. Figure 8.1b - Election results in Hungary, 1990-2018 80% Fidesz: 49.3% Fidesz: 52.7% Jobbik: 19.1% Jobbik: 16.7% Other: 5.3% Other: 2.2% Fidesz: 44.9% 70% MDF: 24.7% Jobbik: 20.2% FKgP: 11.7% Fi-MPSZ: 9% KDNP: 6.5% Fi-MPSz: 29.5% Other: 7.9% MSZP: 33% FKgP: 13.1% 60% SZDSZ: 19.7% MIEP: 5.5% Other: 3.2% Other: 7.4% MSZP: 42% SZDSZ: 5.6% MSZP: 43.2% Other: 2.2% SZDSZ: 6.5% 50% Fi-MPSZ: 41.1% Fi/KDNP: 42.0% Other: 8.3% MDF: 5% MSZP: 32.9% Other: 2.2% 40% SZDSZ: 7.6% MDF: 11.7% Other: 4% MSZP: 25.6% SZDSZ: 21.4% FKgP: 8.8% LMP: 5.3% MSZP: 10.9% Fi-MPSZ: 7.0% Other: 0.6% Other: 7.3% KDNP: 7.0% MSZP: 11.9% Other: 6.9% LMP: 7.1% 30% DK: 5.4% Other: 0.7% MSZP: 19.3% Left-wing parties LMP: 7.5% 20% Right-wing parties 10% 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018 Source: authors' computations using official election results (see wpid.world). Note: list votes are reported. After 2006 votes for Fidesz include votes for KDNP. Figure 8.1c - Election results in Poland, 1991-2019 100% PiS: 37.6% Left-wing parties PO: 24.1% K'15: 8.8% 90% .N: 7.6% PO: 39.2% Right-wing parties UPR: 4.8% PiS: 29.9% RP: 10.0% 80% PO: 41.5% PiS: 43.6% PiS: 27.0% PO: 27.4% KWN: 6.8% 70% SLD: 41.0% PO: 24.1% SRP: 10.2% PiS: 27.0% UD: 12.3% PSL: 9.0% LPR: 8.0% WAK: 8.7% SLD: 20.4% AWS: 33.8% 60% POC: 8.7% PSL: 8.7% UW: 13.4% KPN: 7.5% UP: 7.3% ROP: 5.6% KLD: 7.5% NSZZ "S": 4.9% 50% PPPP: 3.3% 40% SLD: 27.1% UD: 10.6% PO: 12.7% BBWR: 7.3% PSL: 7.3% UP: 4.7% PiS: 9.5% 30% KKW "O": 6.4% LPR: 7.9% SRP: 11.4% SLD: 12.0% KPN: 5.8% KKW AKWSP: 5.6% SLD: 11.3% PSL: 8.7% POC: 4.4% PSL: 7.0% PSL-PL: 5.5% KLD: 4.0% SP: 3.9% 20% NSZZ "S": 5.1% UPR: 3.2% SLD: 13.2% SLD: 12.6% PSL:7.0% PSL: 8.4% SLD: 7.6% PSL: 8.6% SLD: 8.2% 10% PSL: 5.1% Razem: 3.6% 0% 1991 1993 1997 2001 2005 2007 2011 2015 2019 Source: authors' computations using official election results (see wpid.world). Note: labels show parties that obtained more than 3% of total votes. Figure 8.2a - Vote and income in the Czech Republic, 1990-2017 0,50 0,40 Left-wing parties (ČSSD/KSČM/SZ) Right-wing parties (ODS/Top09) KDU-ČSL Ano2011 0,30 0,20 0,10 0,00 -0,10 -0,20 -0,30 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 Source: authors' computations using post-electoral surveys (see wpid.world). Note: the figure shows the difference between the share of top 10% earners and the share of bottom 90% earners voting for the main Czech parties or groups of parties, after controlling for age, gender, and education. In 1996, left-wing parties obtained a score that was 16 points lower among top 10% earners than among the bottom 90%; in 2017, their score was 5 points lower. The right includes Civic Forum in 1990 and STAN in 2017. Figure 8.2b - Vote and income in Hungary, 1998-2018 0,40 Fidesz 0,35 Non-Fidesz right (FKGP, KDNP, MDF, MIEP, MDNP (1998)) SZDSZ 0,30 Left-wing parties (MSZP, MPP (1998-2010), Egyutt, DK, PM, MLP (2014)) 0,25 Jobbik 0,20 0,15 0,10 0,05 0,00 -0,05 -0,10 -0,15 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 Source: authors' computations using post-election surveys for 1998 and 2002, ESS for all other years (see wpid.world). Note: the figure shows the difference between the share of top 10% earners and the share of bottom 90% earners voting for the main Hungarian parties or groups of parties, after controlling for age, gender, and education. In 1998, top 10% earners were less likely to vote Fidesz by 9 percentage points, while they were more likely to do so by 19 percentage points in 2018. No data on income in 2006. Figure 8.2c - Vote and income in Poland, 1991-2015 0,30 PiS PO SLD AWS/NSZZ Solidarnosc UW/UD 0,25 0,20 0,15 0,10 0,05 0,00 -0,05 -0,10 -0,15 -0,20 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 Source: authors' computations using POLPAN (1991-1997), CSES (2001, 2005), and ESS (2007-2015) (see wpid.world). Note: the figure shows the difference between the share of top 10% earners and the share of bottom 90% earners voting for the main Polish parties or groups of parties, after controlling for age, gender, and education. During the 2007-2015 period, top 10% earners were less likely to vote PiS by between 8 and 12 percentage points, while they were more likely to vote for the Civic Platform by 12 to 19 percentage points. Figure 8.3a - The educational cleavage in the Czech Republic, 1990-2017 0,25 Left-wing parties (ČSSD/KSČM/SZ) 0,20 Right-wing parties (ODS/Top09) KDU-ČSL 0,15 Ano2011 0,10 0,05 0,00 -0,05 -0,10 -0,15 -0,20 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 Source: authors' computations using post-electoral surveys (see wpid.world). Note: the figure shows the difference between the share of university graduates and the share of non-university graduates voting for the main Czech parties or groups of parties, after controlling for age, gender, and income. In 1996, university graduates were more likely to vote for right-wing parties by 3 percentage points, compared to 11 points in 2017. Figure 8.3b - The educational cleavage in Hungary, 1998-2018 0,20 Fidesz Non-Fidesz right (FKGP, KDNP, MDF, MIEP, MDNP (1998)) 0,15 SZDSZ Left-wing parties (MSZP, MPP (1998-2010), Egyutt, DK, PM, MLP (2014)) 0,10 Jobbik 0,05 0,00 -0,05 -0,10 -0,15 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 Source: authors' computations using post-election surveys for 1998 and 2002, ESS for all other years (see wpid.world). Note: the figure shows the difference between the share of university graduates and the share of non-university graduates voting for the main Hungarian parties or groups of parties, after controlling for age, gender, and income. In 1998, university graduates were more likely to vote Fidesz by 1 percentage point, while they were less likely to do so by 11 points in 2018. No data on income in 2006. Figure 8.3c - The educational cleavage in Poland, 1991-2015 0,25 PiS PO SLD AWS/NSZZ Solidarnosc UW/UD 0,20 0,15 0,10 0,05 0,00 -0,05 -0,10 -0,15 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 Source: authors' computations using POLPAN (1991-1997), CSES (2001, 2005), and ESS (2007-2015) (see wpid.world). Note: the figure shows the difference between the share of university graduates and the share of non-university graduates voting for the main Polish parties or groups of parties, after controlling for age, gender, and income. During the 2007-2015 period, university graduates were less likely to vote PiS by 1 to 11 percentage points, while they were more likely to vote for the Civic Platform by 5 to 11 percentage points..

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    9 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us