SEMITIC PHILOSOPHY S H O W I NG T H E UL TIM ATE SOCIAL AND SCIE NTIFIC OUTCOM E OF ORIGINAL CH RISTIANITY I N I T S C O N F LI C T W I TH S RVI E U VING ANCIE NT H ATH E NISM . P H I L I P C . C H I C A G O s C . G R I G G S C O M P A N Y , 1 8 9 0 . C omwm' 1890 , , BY 8 . C G I G G S A N D C O P AN Y . R M N C O T E N T S . C HAPTER I . P AGE THE S EM I TI C PHI LO S O PHY C E S MI I C F O M T H E , ALL D E T R ’ A O O F I T S R I — I M S I S UTH R GREAT EV VAL, BE NG AN F R T O As AN I S O P S O O I I O TH UGHT LATED ER N, BEF RE THE NVENT N O F L U I C O C Y M E S O F ANG AGE, AND BE NG NDU TED B AN THE S S O S I DE As —WAs O M I NS T I NC T I vE O I I EN U U , THE N R AL, , R G NAL P I L O S O Y H PH , 1 Thou ht without L an ua e i n the I so ate I n v ua . g g g l d di id l . Philoso h man s stems e ns i n ch hoo wi th p y, y y , b gi ild d I nst nct ve Thou ht i i g , 2 I nst nct ve Thou ht of the unleaI ned ma be Ph oso h . i i g y il p y. T he H her L aw ig , 3 . Revo ut ons of the Past and of the Future I nst nct ve l i , by i i Thou ht g , T he means em o e b I nst nct ve Thou ht are the nsu 4. pl y d y i i g S e ous I eas d , ! 0 T here i s b ut one Ph oso h the I)octr1ne of the n il p y, Ki g domof G od — the S emt c Ph oso h , i i il p y, 6 Thou ht before Lan ua e i n the I so ate I n v ua . g g g l d di id l . rv t ve Anal sis !of C ons 7 . C onse a c ousness i y i , C onservat ve Ana is !of the act on of M an 3 S ll' l t 8 . s i ly i p , ’ 9 C onservat ve Ana s s !of Man s o . i ly i b dy, 10 T he S ens uous I eas . d , 11 T he I m nat ve I eas . agi i d , Enumera n of he Mo ficat ons of S e u at ve and P rac 12. tio t di i p c l i t ca Act on i l i , 13 Fee n . li g, I s w thout L an 1 . U se of the re resen t ve S ensuous ea 4 p ta i d , i e m , I V C O NTENTS . 15 We know th n s as the are . i g y , 1 A un versa concrete not on 6 . i l i , w its s d 17. I t a ternates I n its ana s s th artificia nthesI S an l ly i i l y , furni shes the hole omain of Phi oso h W d l p y, C HAP TE R I I . ’ MA S O RI GI AL PHI LO S O PHY O R FI RS T THO HT N N , UG , WHE N I N C O S C I O S R I O T o O S PI I S I S T N U ELAT N THER R T , F R , I HO T L I N N S O C I T Y TH I TH W T U ANGUAGE, ATURAL E , EN W L I N A I FI C I S O C I TY WAS T I S T I N ANGUAGE, RT AL E , A F R O C S S O M I ANC I A TI I CI S O C I TY B TH A E N R AL ; UNT L ENT R F AL E , ’ BY THE LAPS E O F MA N S THO UGHT THRO UGH THE ABUS E O F LANGUAGE I NTO I DO LATRY AND BY THE REDUC TI O N O F H I S PR C TI C C I O TH O I O TRY I O C I M A AL A T N R UGH D LA NT R E, C M AS H I O N O F I O Y AND C I M AB BE A E , T E UN D LATR R E, O M WAS C A C I E HE I S M 35-64 N R AL, AND ALLED N NT ATHEN , 18 M an st ll W thout Lan ua e in consc ous re at ons to other . , i i g g , i l i s r ts sees mov n mater a outward ob ts pi i , i g, i l , jec , O r an c Wor I nor an c Wor . g i ld, g i ld , ne u er or r O S p i S pi it, Pract ca act on nour shment of the o i l i , i b dy, Assoc at on th fellow-men for th s ur ose i i Wi i p p , M an cooks his foo and thereb o serves Art fic a as e l d, y b i i l W l as atura ua t es of Matter N l !li i , Before treat n of the uses of Lan ua e in S oc et some i g g g i y, th n of the nature of Lan ua e is here ant c ate to i g g g i ip d , ex a n the S ensuous I eas Lan ua e extemalizes the pl i d . g g nsuous I eas S e d , ace T me G ravi tat on g S p , i , i , M ster es create b S c ence 3 y i d y i , Fa th ma be ac ui re W thout Lan ua e 5 i y q d i g g , 5 Pr mt ve atura S oc et ithout Lan ua e Art fic a i i i N l i y W g g , i i l S oc et th Lan ua e i y Wi g g , 29 atura S oc et the Fami assoc ate b the orI I nal . N l i y, ly, i d y g S oc a C ontract etween God and M an 46 i l b , ’ 80 Mora o at on fromMan s re at ons to ant fe and . l blig i l i pl li an ma fe i l li , C O NTENTS . I n Human S ociety the moral obligati ons of M an to M an ar se un er the ori na and conti nu n S oc a C ontract i d gi l i g i l , T he five e ementar S oc a Act v t es S oc et an I nte ra l y i l i i i , i y g l Who e atural S oc et Un enomnat ona ase on l . N i y d i i l, b d the F rst Pr nc e cannot be h stor ca trace in its i i ipl , i i lly d ve nt n ua e nto Art fic a et Nor de lopme by La g g i i i l S oci y. can the or n of Lan ua e be trace in h stor igi g g d i y, Lan ua e a s stemof externa ize S ensuous I eas was g g , y l d d , roba su ste b Pra er S u er or t of the S en p bly gge d y y . p i i y suons I eas d , 53 34 Mora E VI I arose fromI o atr and I do atr fromthe . l d l y , l y, a use of Lan ua e b g g , T he abso ute swa of I o atr over Anc ent S oc et resu t l y d l y i i y, l in in Des ot sm S ac er ota sm O ffens ve W ar and g p i , d li , i , S aver l y, C HAPTER I I I . THE DO C TRI NE AND THE PRAC TI C E O F THE KI NG DO M O F GO D I R I Y S S O F , BE NG THE EV VAL B JE U NO RMAL ARTI FI C I AL S O C I ETY FRO M ANC I ENT HE ATHEN I S M BY MEANS O F THE REVI VAL O F THE S PEC ULATI VE S I C O S R I O F P C I C DE, AND THE N E!UENT EV VAL THE RA T AL S I O F O I I O R S MI I C PHI O S O P Y 65—9 DE THE R G NAL E T L H , 8 36 orma Art fic a S oc et rev ve in M o ern C v i zat on .