TRANSPORT MARKET STUDY 2018 PL - SK - HU - SI Client Maarten Gutt [email protected] PKP PLK S.A. Krzysztof Jamrozik Polskie Linie Kolejowe [email protected] POLAND Emilia Skowronska [email protected] Miroslav Matúšek ŽSR [email protected] Železnice Slovenskej Lauko Ladislav republiky, Bratislava [email protected] SLOVAKIA Réka Németh VPE [email protected] Vasúti Pályakapacitás- elosztó Kft. Nóra Hobot HUNGARY [email protected] Lőrinc Czakó MÁV Zrt. [email protected] Magyar Államvasutak Ágnes Lengyelné Kerekes HUNGARY [email protected] Kövesdi Szilárd [email protected] GYSEV Andrea Mosóczi GYSEV Raaberbahn [email protected] HUNGARY Márk Háry [email protected] Franc Klobucar SŽ-I [email protected] Slovenske železnice- Miran Pirnar Infrastruktura, d.o.o. [email protected] SLOVENIA Contents Glossary/Abbreviations............................................................................................................ 1 List of tables ............................................................................................................................. 5 List of figures and graphs ........................................................................................................ 7 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 10 1 Objective of Transport Market Study ........................................................................... 12 1.1 Aspects of establishing the Amber RFC .............................................................. 12 1.2 Structure of TMS objectives ................................................................................. 14 2 Metodology of work and methods of investigation ...................................................... 16 2.1 Working process of TMS elaboration .................................................................. 16 2.2 Baselines for the TMS elaboration ....................................................................... 17 2.3 Methods used in TMS elaboration ....................................................................... 19 3 Characteristics of Amber Rail Freight Corridor ........................................................... 20 3.1 Legislative aspects of Amber RFC establishment ................................................ 20 3.2 Amber RFC governance structure ........................................................................ 21 3.3 RFC graphical representation of proposed routing .............................................. 24 4 Economic analysis ......................................................................................................... 27 4.1 Basic general characteristics of the countries of the Amber RFC........................ 27 4.2 Economic indicators ............................................................................................. 32 4.3 Industry ................................................................................................................. 35 4.4 Results and summary of the findings of Chapter 4 .............................................. 40 5 Analysis of transport and traffic indicators ................................................................... 42 5.1 Liberalization of rail transport services market .................................................... 42 5.2 The European Railway Performance Index.......................................................... 44 5.3 Analysis of transport infrastructure of the Amber RFC countries ....................... 48 5.4 Rail transport analysis .......................................................................................... 53 5.4.1 Poland ........................................................................................................... 53 5.4.2 Slovakia ........................................................................................................ 56 5.4.3 Hungary ........................................................................................................ 58 5.4.4 Slovenia ........................................................................................................ 62 5.5 Analysis of transport indicators of the Amber RFC countries ............................. 64 5.6 Analysis of intermodal transport terminals .......................................................... 73 5.7 Results and summary of the findings of Chapter 5 .............................................. 81 6 Prognosis of transport performance development ........................................................ 83 7 Analysis of Port of Koper in the Republic of Slovenia................................................. 91 7.1 Basic information about the Port of Koper .......................................................... 92 7.2 Analysis of the Port of Koper throughput ............................................................ 96 8 Transport potential of selected countries ...................................................................... 99 9 Amber RFC graphical representation ......................................................................... 105 9.1 Technical parameters of Amber RFC ................................................................. 111 9.2 Basic information on Małaszewicze dry port ..................................................... 124 9.3 Summary basic comparison of RFC infrastructure ............................................ 127 9.4 Result and summary of the findings of Chapter 9 .............................................. 129 10 Last mile ...................................................................................................................... 131 11 Comparative analysis of rail and road freight transport within the Amber RFC ........ 135 11.1 Socio-economic benefits of the Amber RFC establishment .............................. 137 12 SWOT analysis of Amber RFC................................................................................... 139 12.1 Characteristics of SWOT analysis process ......................................................... 139 12.2 SWOT analysis of Amber RFC .......................................................................... 141 12.3 Resulting SWOT strategy of the Amber RFC .................................................... 144 13 Strategic map of Amber RFC ...................................................................................... 147 14 Amber RFC Marketing Strategy ................................................................................. 151 15 Conclusions and recommendations ............................................................................. 157 List of appendices ................................................................................................................ 161 TRANSPORT MARKET STUDY AMBER RAIL FREIGHT CORRIDOR GLOSSARY/ABBREVIATIONS Glossary/ Definition abbreviations AB Allocation Body European Agreement on Important International Combined Transport AGTC Lines and Related Installations AT Republic of Austria BCh Беларуская чыгунка (Belarusian Railway – national railway company) Balanced scorecard (BSC) is a visual tool used to measure the BSC effectiveness of an activity against the strategic plans of a company. Balanced scorecards are often used during strategic planning to make sure the company's efforts are aligned with overall strategy and vision. BY Belarus Compania Naƫională de Căi Ferate (Manager of infrastructure in CFR Romania) CNC The Core Network Corridors Corridor One Stop Shop A joint body designated or set up by the RFC organizations for applicants C-OSS to request and to receive answers, in a single place and in a single operation, regarding infrastructure capacity for freight trains crossing at least one border along the Freight Corridor (EU Regulation No. 913/ 2010, Art. 13). CZ Czech Republic DB Netz DB Netz AG (German railway infrastructure manager company) DE Federal Republic of Germany EC European Commission European Railway Traffic Management System ERTMS is a major industrial project being implemented by the European Union, which will serve to make rail transport safer and more ERTMS competitive. It is made up of all the train-borne, trackside and lineside equipment necessary for supervising and controlling, in real-time, train operation according to the traffic conditions based on the appropriate Level of Application. European Train Control System ETCS This component of ERTMS guarantees a common standard that enables trains to cross national borders and enhances safety. It is a signalling and control system designed to replace the several incompatible safety 2018 1 TRANSPORT MARKET STUDY AMBER RAIL FREIGHT CORRIDOR systems currently used by European railways. As a subset of ERTMS, it provides a level of protection against overspeed and overrun depending upon the capability of the line side infrastructure. EU European Union GCI The Global Competitiveness Index GDP Gross Domestic Product GYSEV GYSEV Raaberbahn (Austrian – Hungarian railway company) HDI Human Development Index HR Croatia HU Hungary HŽ Hrvatske Željeznice (Croatian Railways) IEF Index of Economy Freedom IM Infrastructure Manager Infrastructure - Technical specification for interoperability relating to the infrastructure subsystem of the rail system in the European Union INF TSI Commission reugulation (EU) No 1299/2014 of 18 November 2014 on the technical specifications for interoperability relating to the ‘infrastructure’ subsystem