Cultural Heritage Screen Report

Cultural Heritage Screen Report

Lincolnville Go Station Improvements: Cultural Heritage Screening Report Prepared for: Metrolinx 20 Bay Street, Suite 1800 Toronto ON M5J 2W3 ~ METROLINX Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. 300W-675 Cochrane Drive Markham ON L3R 0B8 () Stantec File No. 1135200010 October 12, 2017 LINCOLNVILLE GO STATION IMPROVEMENTS: CULTURAL HERITAGE SCREENING REPORT Project Personnel EA Project Manager: Alex Blasko, B.Sc. (Hon.) Heritage Consultant: Heidy Schopf, MES, CAHP Task Manager: Meaghan Rivard, MA, CAHP Report Writer: Heidy Schopf, MES, CAHP Laura Walter, MA GIS Specialist: Sean Earles Office Assistants: Carol Naylor Quality Review: Meaghan Rivard, MA, CAHP Independent Review: Tracie Carmichael, BA, B. Ed. () Stantec Sign-off Sheet This document was prepared by Stantec Consulting Ltd. (“Stantec”) for the account of Metrolinx (the “Client”). The material in it reflects Stantec’s professional judgment in light of the scope, schedule and other limitations stated in the document and in the contract between Stantec and the Client. The opinions in the document are based on conditions and information existing at the time the document was published and do not take into account any subsequent changes. The report has been prepared based, in part, on information provided by others as cited in the Reference section. Stantec has not verified the accuracy and / or completeness of third party information. Prepared by (signature) Heidy Schopf, MES, CAHP Cultural Heritage Specialist Reviewed by (signature) Signed by Tracie Carmichael on behalf of: Meaghan Rivard, MA, CAHP Senior Cultural Heritage Specialist Reviewed by (signature) Tracie Carmichael, BA, B.Ed. Senior Associate, Environmental Services Approved by (Metrolinx signature) Arthur Fidera Project Manager, Metrolinx () Stantec LINCOLNVILLE GO STATION IMPROVEMENTS: CULTURAL HERITAGE SCREENING REPORT Acknowledgements Jeremy Collins: Coordinator, Acquisitions and Conservation Services, Ontario Heritage Trust Karla Barboza: Heritage Advisor, Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport Christine Halis: Secretary-Treasurer, Committee of Adjustment, Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville () Stantec LINCOLNVILLE GO STATION IMPROVEMENTS: CULTURAL HERITAGE SCREENING REPORT Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................................... II EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ I ABBREVIATIONS .....................................................................................................................III 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................1. 1 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE REPORT ......................................................................................1. 1 1.2 CULTURAL HERITAGE STUDY AREA ........................................................................1. 2 2.0 STUDY PURPOSE AND METHODS ...........................................................................2. 1 2.1 METROLINX HERITAGE PROTOCOLS ......................................................................2. 1 2.2 METHODOLOGY .........................................................................................................2. 1 3.0 THEMATIC HISTORY ..................................................................................................3. 1 3.1 TOWNSHIP OF WHITCHURCH ...................................................................................3. 1 4.0 PROPERTY DATA SHEETS ........................................................................................4. 1 5.0 CULTURAL HERITAGE SCREENING .........................................................................5. 1 5.1 EXISTING HERITAGE RECOGNITIONS ..................................................................... 5.1 5.1.1 Existing Heritage Recognitions .................................................................... 5.1 5.2 CULTURAL HERITAGE SCREENING QUESTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................5. 1 5.2.1 Summary of Findings .................................................................................. 5.2 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................6. 1 7.0 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................7. 1 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Metrolinx Potential Heritage Property Descriptions ..............................................2. 2 Table 2: Results of CHSR Screening, Town of Whitchurch-Stouffville ............................... 5.3 Table 3: Results of CHSR Screening, Township of Uxbridge ...................................................5. 3 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Project Location ...................................................................................................1. 3 Figure 2: Cultural Heritage Study Area ...............................................................................1. 5 Figure 3: Study Area overlaid on the 1860 map of the County of York, Canada West ......... 3.7 Figure 4: Study Area overlaid on the 1878 map of the Township of Whitchurch and 1877 map of the Township of Uxbridge ................................................................3. 9 () Stantec LINCOLNVILLE GO STATION IMPROVEMENTS: CULTURAL HERITAGE SCREENING REPORT Figure 5: Study Area overlaid on the 1922 Topographic map of Markham ........................ 3.11 Figure 6: Study Area overlaid on the 1954 Aerial Photo of Whitchurch ............................. 3.13 Figure 7: Property Lines and Addresses within the Cultural Heritage Study Area ............... 5.1 Figure 8: Conditional Heritage Properties ...........................................................................5. 1 LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A: PROPERTY DATA SHEETS AND CHSR SCREENING FORMS () Stantec LINCOLNVILLE GO STATION IMPROVEMENTS: CULTURAL HERITAGE SCREENING REPORT Executive Summary Stantec Consulting Ltd. (Stantec) was retained by Metrolinx to complete environmental studies to support planned improvements for the Lincolnville Layover and Go Station site. According to Ontario Regulation (O. Reg.) 157/10 (Government of Ontario 2014b), Metrolinx is identified as a prescribed public body for the purposes of Part III.1 of the Ontario Heritage Act (Government of Ontario 2009). As such, Metrolinx is responsible for the establishment and maintenance of a cultural heritage conservation policy and procedure for the identification and management of provincial heritage properties. As well, section B.4 of the Ministry of Tourism, Culture, and Sport (MTCS) Standards and Guidelines for Conservation of Provincial Heritage Properties (Standards and Guidelines), applies to all Metrolinx properties (MTCS 2010). In addition, assessment was conducted to meet the requirements of Section 2.6.1 of the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) (Government of Ontario 2014a) made under the Planning Act (Government of Ontario 1990). The purpose of this Cultural Heritage Screening Report (CHSR) is to screen the Cultural Heritage study area for properties with known or potential cultural heritage value or interest (CHVI) and make recommendations for further study, as appropriate. Further study would include completion of a Cultural Heritage Evaluation Report (CHER) and Cultural Heritage Evaluation (CHE) Recommendations Report for each property identified as having known or potential CHVI as per the Metrolinx Interim Cultural Heritage Management Process (2013). Under the Metrolinx Terms of Reference, there are three possible outcomes when identifying CHVI during the screening process: 1. Potential Provincial Heritage Property - The property is owned or occupied by Metrolinx, and the answer to at least one screening question is ‘yes’ (except age). 2. Conditional Heritage Property - The property is not owned or occupied by Metrolinx and the answer to at least one question is ‘yes’ (except age). 3. Adjacent Land - The property is adjacent to a protected heritage property. This CHSR considers all properties within 50 metres (m) of the existing Lincolnville Layover Facility. The CHSR was conducted by Meaghan Rivard, Senior Cultural Heritage Specialist, Heidy Schopf, Cultural Heritage Specialist, and Laura Walter, Cultural Heritage Specialist Assistant, all with Stantec Consulting Ltd. The site visit was conducted on November 7th, 2016. () Stantec i LINCOLNVILLE GO STATION IMPROVEMENTS: CULTURAL HERITAGE SCREENING REPORT A total of 12 properties were screened as part of this study. Of these, five were found to be Conditional Heritage Properties. These include: • 13121 Tenth Line • 13203 Tenth Line • 2299 York Durham Line • 2499 York Durham Line • 2699 York Durham Line All planned improvements for the Lincolnville Layover and Go Station site are expected to take place within the existing Lincolnville GO Station Site. Accordingly, CHERs are not recommended for the five Conditional Heritage Resources since no direct or indirect impacts are anticipated to these properties resulting from the proposed work. Should the project location change, or work is proposed within 50 metres of the Conditional Heritage Resources, then drawings of the planned improvements should be reviewed to confirm if impacts are anticipated and if CHERs are required. No further work from a heritage perspective is recommended for the five properties found not to be potential,

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    91 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us