IN MEMORY of ROBERT LOUIS FOLK 30 September 1925 – 4 June 2018

IN MEMORY of ROBERT LOUIS FOLK 30 September 1925 – 4 June 2018

IN MEMORY OF ROBERT LOUIS FOLK 30 September 1925 – 4 June 2018 Robert Folk in a marble quarry in Lipari, Italy. IN MEMORY OF ROBERT LOUIS FOLK Compiled by Murray Felsher, Miles Hayes, Lynton Land, Earle McBride, and Kitty Milliken Produced by Joe Holmes, Research Planning, Inc. Murray Felsher, Ph.D. 1971 FOLKLORE – FIRST CONTACT Having never met him, I knew Robert L. Folk only by reputation. I had left Amherst MA and the University of Massachusetts, where I had undertaken my M.S. work. It was August 1961, and I was married two months earlier. I had spent the summer as a Carnegie College Teaching Intern teaching an Introductory Geology class at CCNY, where I had earned my B.S. As a native New Yorker, I rarely traveled west of the Hudson, and had never been west of the Mississippi. Gathering meager funds and overloading our VW Beetle with all our belongings, we were to be strangers in a strange land, wherein lived strange people who spoke a strangely attractive version of English. I had earlier applied to only two schools for my Ph.D. --- the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the University of Texas at Austin, and was accepted by both. When I approached H.T.U. Smith --- chairman of the UMass Geology Department, for whom I served as a Graduate Teaching Assistant during my years there --- for his advice on where I should pursue my doctorate, he unhesitatingly said “Texas. Bob Folk is there. Without question, Texas.” But I did have a question or two, and H.T.U. spent some time with me telling me what he knew about Texas and especially what he knew (and had heard) about Robert L. Folk. The range of fact and anecdotal hearsay described a man who was both brilliantly eccentric and eccentrically brilliant. H.T.U.'s most positive point was that Folk’s successful Ph.D.s, though numerically few, were sought after and would have no trouble securing positions in academe. As I was certain then that I was destined to spend a lifetime as a professor in some small Liberal Arts college, his words were encouraging --- albeit, my view of my own future was just about as wrong as could be. H.T.U.’s most negative point was that Folk’s Ph.D. students tended to “linger” a bit. It was not clear whether their long “apprenticeships” were a result of his Ph.D. students’ reluctance to “leave the nest,” or whether Folk actually kept them chained to Austin. (Please note above, the year when my Ph.D. was awarded). So I went to Texas. I was going to get my Ph.D. under Folk – simple as that. 2 What I didn’t know (actually there was a mountain of things that I didn’t know) was that the decision to study under Folk does not come from the prospective Ph.D. student. You don’t pick him. He picks you. And as it turned out, I was pretty certain after my first couple of days in Austin, that those were to be my last couple of days in Austin. Newly arrived UT graduate students were subjected to a full-day of formal “acquaintanceship” lectures, tours, and activities, and it wasn’t until my second day in Austin that I actually visited the Geology Building, wherein dwelt the Department of Geology and its denizens – the faculty, the undergraduate majors, and the graduate students. We were informed that the faculty all were present in the building, and were eager to meet the incoming newbies. I took this as a direct invitation to look up Dr. Folk, my Ph.D. advisor (Hah!). He was not difficult to find. He occupied a rather large office that might once have been a small classroom. I stepped into the room, and stopped. Nearly every horizontal surface was covered with books, journals, magazines, mounds of loose pages, and sediment samples and rocks of all sizes, colors, and types. He seemed not to favor sedimentary rocks, as I would have expected, as I recognized a host of igneous and metamorphic rocks piled here and there, as well a number of specimens whose names and origins eluded me completely. A binocular microscope dating from the late 1930s shared a small desk with a brass petrographic microscope that might very well have been used by Antonie van Leeuwenhoek himself --- had the Dutchman ever deigned to cross a Nichol prism. The small desk also carried a typewriter. Not a (then) fancy Selectric-1, introduced by IBM that very year, but rather an ancient standard manual Underwood typewriter that he pounded on to the day he died. And the blackboards --- the blackboards were all filled with layers of barely legible chalk scrawlings (white and colored). Words, sketches, graphs piled one upon the other. Stratigraphically, each Folkian scrawl was superimposed upon another below. Thus, each effectively eradicated whatever previous note, or idea, or comment that might once have been uppermost in his thoughts. It was as if his mind constantly raced far ahead, while his chalk-bearing fingers were not capable of keeping pace. Earlier descriptions of his stature (short), build (wiry), dress (shabby), voice (loud), pitch (high), and demeanor (confident), were spot-on. He was surrounded by students, and I could not tell which might be an undergraduate major, or which might be a current M.S. student, or which might be a current Ph.D. student, or which might be, like myself, a terrified and confused newbie. He seemed to be carrying on several conversations at once. I don’t know how long I stood, transfixed, just inside the door, letting this --- vision --- engulf me. What brought my attention back directly to him was the sudden and complete silence that enveloped the room. He had evidently spotted this outlier --- this 3 outlander standing there, blocking his doorway. He wagged an index finger, motioning me to step forward, ostensibly to explain my uninvited entrance into the gaggle of familiarity with which he surrounded himself. In somewhat of a daze, I stepped forward and introduced myself. Not the original “small-talker,” Dr. Folk immediately asked me what the subject of my M.S. thesis was. His body language told me that he was not necessarily interested, but merely being polite. Mind you, he wasn’t nasty at all, and I gathered that the faculty en masse had been instructed to be nice to the strangers wandering through the halls that day. I told him that it was a series of beach studies on the Outer Beaches of Cape Cod, Massachusetts. I could see immediately that I had gotten his interest --- just a bit, anyway. “What kind of beach studies,” he asked. “It was a statistical study,” I said. He visibly perked up. “What do you know about statistics?” he asked. “Relatively little,” I said, and added, “But though I did major in Geology as an undergrad I did minor in math.” I felt the ice melting in the room. “Do any grain size analyses, did you?” “Yes,” I said. “What sieve procedures did you incorporate,” he asked. (Ah, I thought, “I have you now.”) “No sir,” I said proudly (and somewhat smugly). “ I was lucky enough to have spent a few weeks at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution on the Cape, and used their new WHOI Rapid Sediment Analyzer.” Three or four seconds of an uncomfortably silent glare was followed by a loud, “Hmmpphh,” and then a very loud, “BAH.” This sequence of response turned out to be his initial standard comeback to what he perceived as utter rubbish and/or nonsense being tossed his way (by anybody). Then followed a long (it seemed never-ending) discourse on the inaccuracy and imprecision of any sediment grain size analysis based on sediment falling through a column of water housed in a glass cylinder. He breathlessly covered the problems, such as those associated with particle response to wall friction of the settling tube, and agglomeration of smaller individual particles, and on and on. And his commentary was laced with publication citations (including his own). He then asked me to either “justify” my dismal choice of sediment grain size analysis tool and/or specify the errors entailed within his own sieve methodologies. Figuring that my career in Texas was near its end, I decided to go for the “and” option and proceeded to defend the settling tube and bash the sieves. Surely, and without question, I was convinced that The Man Who Would Be My Ph.D. Advisor (Hah!) ---- Was Not Going To Be My Ph.D. Advisor. I was done for, right out of the starting gate. His final comment was that in Nature, sediments do not settle through the water column via “tubes.” By this time, I was so shattered that I found myself saying, (it was myself saying it --- though I couldn’t believe it afterwards,) “Yes, Dr. Folk, I do agree, but in Nature nor do sediments settle through the water column via nested metal sieves.” I turned around, and as the startled crowd in his office made 4 way for me, I headed for the door. Before I reached it, he shouted, “I’ll see you here tomorrow at 10 am.” So that was that. The axe was to fall at 10 am the next day. I wasn’t sure what to do next. I didn’t know anyone at all --- at the University, in Austin, in the whole State of Texas. I’d “sassed” and impugned my future mentor (Hah!). I drove across North Lamar to the small apartment we’d just rented on 12th Street.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    68 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us