Tucson Smart City Demonstration Proposal Part 1: Vision Narrative February 4, 2016 Table of Contents 1 Smart City Vision 1 7 Tucson Smart City Team 14 A. Existing Challenges and Proposed Solutions 1 A. Partners and Key Stakeholders 14 B. Program Management, Implementation,and Operation, and B. Governance Processes 14 Approach 2 C. Existing and Potential Public-Private-Partnerships 17 C. Tuscon Smart City Challenge Organizational Chart 3 8 Existing Transportation Infrastructure and Features 18 2 Tucson is an Ideal Smart City Candidate: Population 9 Data Collection, Use, and Policies 19 Characteristics 4 A. Data Currently Collected by the City of Tucson 19 3 Tucson is an Ideal Smart City Candidate: Additional B. How Data Will Be Used and Integrated Across Departments to Characteristics 5 Address City’s Challenges 21 A. Robust Public Transportation System with Frequent Service 5 C. Existing Policies Applicable to Data Collected 22 B. Tucson has a Conducive Demonstration Environment 6 D. Data Collection, Management, and Sharing 23 C. Tucson has Committed and Steadfast Leadership 6 E. How Data from Outside Organizations and Interests will be D. Tucson’s Smart City will be Deeply Integrated with Collected, Managed, and Shared Across Sectors the Sharing Economy 6 or with the Public 23 E. Smart City Data will be Accessible, Discoverable, and Usable 6 F. Terms and Conditions 24 4 Preliminary Site Map 7 10 Approach for Use of Existing Standards, Architecture, A. Selection of Demonstration Area 7 and Certification Processes 25 B. Proposed Technology Solutions 8 11 Smart City Goals, Objectives, and Performance 5 The Tucson Smart City Vision 9 Measures 27 A. Mobility 10 12 Tucson has the Capacity, Commitment, and Capability B. Safety 11 C. Environmental 11 to be the Smart City Challenge Winner 28 6 Potential Risks and Mitigation Measures 13 13 Tucson will Leverage Existing and Extensive Federal Resources and U of A Research Programs 29 Tucson, Arizona Tucson Smart City Demonstration Proposal ii 1 Smart City Vision A. Existing Challenges and Proposed Solutions CHALLENGE PERFORMANCE MEASURES SOLUTIONS in the nation for the Improved level of service without construction of new roadway TUCSON’S Tucson is worst congestion SMART CITY VISION 14th Increase roadway capacity for cyclists while reducing potential for auto-cyclist INCLUDES SOLUTIONS vehicle miles traveled conicts FROM EACH OF THE Freight volumes Focus intra-regional freight trac onto select corridors 75% 10% Improved enforcement of intra-regional overweight trucks on arterials Increase in transit utilization 12 USDOT VISION ELEMENTS MOBILITY nationally on major roads Reduced private and single occupancy vehicle use th highest percentage causes disproportional Develop regional Complete Streets Plan 9 damage to streets Improve transit on-time performance COMMUTERS FHWA SAFETY FOCUS CITY CONGESTIONare struck while crossing the road Year-over-year decrease in number of pedestrian and bicycle crashes and —about 20 are killed per year 250 fatalities—the goal is to move toward zero ANNUALLY Decrease ash ood-related acccidents and deaths around washes (on average) Increase public awareness of alternate transportation alternatives such as Uber, SAFETY Lyft, etc. = CRASHES Development of security related policies and laws 360 Solutions fall into four 1/2 of all WASHES in the FATALITIES = primary categories of projects: region lie in the study area 3 Connected/autonomous 1 vehicle deployment Low number of Performance measures established for siting and locating EV infrastructure City-wide infrastructure DC-fast charging stations Private funding or nancing options are analyzed to expand EV infrastructure 2 inhancement Decrease delays on freight-heavy arterials Move Tucson Smartly Examine policy and/or nancial incentives to encourage alternate freight routes citizen engagement EV through city 3 campaign Maintain ATTAINMENT Reduce emissions on demonstration corridor Transportation data Air Quality status Establish inventory of public and privately owned charging stations with real-time management portal inventory and availability 4 ENVIRONMENTAL Tucson, Arizona Tucson Smart City Demonstration Proposal 1 B. Program Management, Implementation, Operation, and Approach i. Program Management Team The City of Tucson Department of Transportation will be the lead on this project. Our organizational structure will include a Program Administrator, Project Manager, Technical Manager and technical support provided by consultants. Similar to the Tucson Modern Streetcar project, this project will have a The Project Management Team (PMT) made up of representatives from various departments including Procurement, Finance, IT, Sun Tran, and Sun Link. The PMT will also include representatives from The University of Arizona, the Pima Association of Governments, and the Arizona Department of Transportation. Public outreach and communications will be included in this working group as well. The PMT will develop a scope, schedule and budget that will identify the different tasks necessary to complete the project. The Procurement department will assist with setting up contracts, Intergovernmental Agreements (IGA)s and Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)s necessary to move the project forward. Long lead items will be identified and take priority. A Primavera schedule will be developed in detail. Private partnerships will be identified and MOU’s or contracts will be developed. ii. Implementation PMT will meet on a weekly basis to assess the schedule and modify if necessary. Information will be developed to share with the public. Every opportunity to promote this unique project will be taken. Milestones will be developed that help us create an outline of public information and marketing opportunities. The City of Tucson will be the liaison to the USDOT. We anticipate that something similar to the Project Management Oversight Consultant (PMOC) practice will be instituted to allow for federal oversight. We will develop monthly program reports that include updates on the schedule and budget and anticipate periodic meetings to provide briefings on the progress. Another focus of the PMT will be the policy side of the Smart City Challenge project. The PMT will coordinate with the city, county, Pima Association of Governments and state to identify policies that need to be created to support the smart changes in infrastructure and open data. iii. Operation The first three years will focus on installation and implementation of the tasks identified in the application. The fourth year will be the actual demonstration year. The fourth year will include monitoring of congestion reduction, mobility and safety for vehicles, bicyclists, and pedestrians. The PMT will plan a Smart City Conference at the conclusion of the Demonstration period to provide information and lessons learned to other communities. Tucson, Arizona Tucson Smart City Demonstration Proposal 2 C. Tucson Smart City Challenge Organizatonal Charth Partners Tools Management Team Vision Elements PROGRAM ADMINISTRATOR SHELLIE GINN PROJECT MANAGER JENNIFER TOOTHAKER TECHNICAL MANAGER JORGE RIVEROS, PE, PTOE PROGRAM MANAGEMENT Citizens CONSULTANT Businesses PROJECT MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION PLANNING AND DESIGN INSTALLATION AND DEMONSTRATION TEAM DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION TDOT Program Schedule Public/Private Partnerships Sensor-based Infrastructure Infrastructure Installation Autonomous and U of A Procurement Safety and Security Open Data Architecture After-market Safety Devices Connected Vehicles PAG Finance Rened Implementation Trac Management Center Fleet Installation Global Symposium ADOT OED Plan with Schedule Smart Grid Electrication Open Data Services Lessons Learned Transit FHWA/USDOT/ Program Controls Regional Network Deployment Testing Tech Transfer Procurement NEPA Coordination Schedule Roadway Electrication Open Data Intergovernmental Agreement Cost Dissemination Public Outreach Scope Coordination Public/Private Media and Community Smart Land Use Integration Partnerships INDUSTRY PARTNERS Outreach Policy Development Tucson, Arizona Tucson Smart City Demonstration Proposal 3 2 Tucson is an Ideal Smart City Candidate: Population Characteristics Tucson is perfectly aligned with the USDOTs population characteristics of a Smart City. According to the 2010 Census: POPULATION DENSITY: 2010 CENSUS È 2010 population within City Limits: 516,776 Population within City limits: È 61% of the City’s population are in the urbanized area 516, 776 61% È 75% of traffic is carried on the arterial and collector roadways of City’s population live in the urbanized area È Due to a number of natural and man-made limitations, population is focused in the core È By policy, future growth will be incentivized to locate in the urban core Tucson, Arizona Tucson Smart City Demonstration Proposal 4 3 Tucson is an Ideal Smart City Candidate: Additional Characteristics A. Robust Public Transportation System with Frequent Service In addition to the public transportation system, the City of Tucson has extensive IT and Smart City infrastructure elements already in place. For a more detailed view of these assets, please refer to Section 8 of the proposal. TO PHOENIX SANTA CRUZ RIVER RILLITO RIVER The Smart City “Challenge is a perfect TUCSON MEDICAL CENTER TUCSON BLVD 1ST AVE CAMPBELL AVE RD CLUB COUNTRY opportunity to pair commu- RD ORACLE 10 GRANT RD nity momentum and for- Tucson Univ. Catalina Botanical Pima Medical H.S. Garden ward-thinking transportation Arizona