Image description. Cover Image End of image description. What Is IPEDS? The Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) is a system of survey components that collects data from all institutions that provide postsecondary education and are eligible to receive Title IV funding across the United States and other U.S. jurisdictions. These data are used at the federal and state level for policy analysis and development; at the institutional level for benchmarking and peer analysis; and by students and parents, through the College Navigator (https://nces.ed.gov/collegenavigator/), an online tool to aid in the college search process. Additional information about IPEDS can be found on the website at https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds. What Is the Purpose of This Report? The Data Feedback Report is intended to provide institutions a context for examining the data they submitted to IPEDS. The purpose of this report is to provide institutional executives a useful resource and to help improve the quality and comparability of IPEDS data. What Is in This Report? The figures in this report provide a selection of indicators for your institution to compare with a group of similar institutions. The figures draw from the data collected during the 2019-20 IPEDS collection cycle and are the most recent data available. The inside cover of this report lists the pre-selected comparison group of institutions and the criteria used for their selection. The Methodological Notes at the end of the report describe additional information about these indicators and the pre-selected comparison group. Where Can I Do More with IPEDS Data? Each institution can access previously released Data Feedback Reports from 2005 and customize this 2020 report by using a different comparison group and IPEDS variables of its choosing. To learn how to customize the 2020 report, visit this resource page https://nces.ed.gov/Ipeds/Help/View/2. To download archived reports or customize the current Data Feedback Report, visit the ‘Use the Data’ portal on the IPEDS website https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds and click on Data Feedback Report. Daemen College Amherst, NY Daemen College COMPARISON GROUP Comparison group data are included to provide a context for interpreting your institution’s indicators. For this report, you specified a custom comparison group. The custom comparison group chosen by Daemen College includes the following 35 institutions: Alfred University (Alfred, NY) Alvernia University (Reading, PA) Canisius College (Buffalo, NY) Chatham University (Pittsburgh, PA) Chestnut Hill College (Philadelphia, PA) D'Youville College (Buffalo, NY) DeSales University (Center Valley, PA) Franklin Pierce University (Rindge, NH) Gannon University (Erie, PA) Georgian Court University (Lakewood, NJ) Gwynedd Mercy University (Gwynedd Valley, PA) Holy Family University (Philadelphia, PA) Hood College (Frederick, MD) Iona College (New Rochelle, NY) Ithaca College (Ithaca, NY) Keuka College (Keuka Park, NY) King's College (Wilkes-Barre, PA) Le Moyne College (Syracuse, NY) Manhattanville College (Purchase, NY) Marist College (Poughkeepsie, NY) Marywood University (Scranton, PA) Medaille College (Buffalo, NY) Mercyhurst University (Erie, PA) Mount Saint Mary College (Newburgh, NY) Mount St. Mary's University (Emmitsburg, MD) Nazareth College (Rochester, NY) Niagara University (Niagara University, NY) Roberts Wesleyan College (Rochester, NY) Saint Francis University (Loretto, PA) Salve Regina University (Newport, RI) St Bonaventure University (Saint Bonaventure, NY) University of Saint Joseph (West Hartford, CT) Utica College (Utica, NY) Wagner College (Staten Island, NY) Waynesburg University (Waynesburg, PA) The figures in this report have been organized and ordered into the following topic areas: Topic Area Figures Pages 1) Admissions (only for non-open-admissions schools) 1 and 2 3 2) Student Enrollment 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 3, 4, 5 and 6 3) Awards 11 6 4) Charges and Net Price 12 and 13 6 5) Student Financial Aid 14, 15 and 16 7 6) Military Benefits* [No charts applicable] 7) Retention and Graduation Rates 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 and 25 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 8) Finance 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 and 31 12 and 13 9) Staff 32, 33 and 34 13 and 14 10) Libraries* 35 and 36 14 *These figures only appear in customized Data Feedback Reports (DFRs), which are available through Use the Data portal on the IPEDS website. IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 2 Daemen College Figure 1. Number of first-time undergraduate students who Figure 2. Percent of first-time undergraduate applicants admitted, applied, were admitted, and enrolled full and part time: and percent of admitted students enrolled full and part Fall 2019 time: Fall 2019 Image description. Image description. HorizontalAdmissions Bar measure chart with 4 groups with 2 items per group. HorizontalAdmissions Bar measure chart with 3 groups with 2 items per group. YX scale titled ScaleNumber label. of students. YX scale titled ScalePercent label. of students. ItemGroup 1, 1,Your Applied institution (N=35). 3239. ItemGroup 1, 1,Your Admitted. institution 62. GroupItem 2, 2, Comparison Admitted (N=35). Group Median 3272. GroupItem 2, 2, Comparison Enrolled full Group time. Median (N=35) 75. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 1994. Median 2538. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 21. Median (N=35) 18. ItemGroup 1, 3,Your Enrolled institution full time 412. (N=35). ItemGroup 1, 3,Your Enrolled institution part time.0.01. GroupItem 2, 4, Comparison Enrolled part Group time Median (N=31). 416. Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=35) 0.01. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 0.01. MedianAdmissions 0.01. measure line, Shape Label: Admissions measure Shape InstitutionLegend, Shape Label: Your institution line,Shape Label: ComparisonGroupLegend, Shape Label: Comparison Group Median (N=35) InstitutionLegend,Shape Label: Your institution End of image description. ComparisonGroupLegend,End of image description. Label: Comparison Group Median 3,239 Applied 62 (N=35) 3,272 Admitted 75 Admitted 1,994 (N=35) 2,538 21 Enrolled full time 18 Enrolled full time 412 (N=35) 416 0 Enrolled part time Enrolled part time 0 0 (N=31) 0 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Number of students Percent of students Your institution Comparison Group Median Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=35) NOTE: Admissions data are presented only for institutions that do not have an open NOTE: Admissions data are presented only for institutions that do not have an open admission policy, and apply to first-time, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate admission policy, and apply to first-time, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students only. For details, see the Methodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in students only. For details, see the Methodological Notes. See 'Use of Median Values for the comparison group. Comparison Group' for how median values are determined. N is the number of institutions SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, in the comparison group. Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2019-20, Admissions SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, component. Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2019-20, Admissions component. Figure 3. Percent of all students enrolled, by race/ethnicity, and percent of students who are women: Fall 2019 Image description. XBar scale chart titled with Scale 10 groups label. with 2 items per group. GroupY scale 1, titled American Percent. Indian or Alaska Native. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 0.01. Median (N=35) 0.01. ItemGroup 1, 2,Your Asian. institution 2. GroupItem 2, 3, Comparison Black or African Group American. Median (N=35) 3. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 9. Median (N=35) 8. ItemGroup 1, 4,Your Hispanic/ institution Latino. 5. GroupItem 2, 5, Comparison Native Hawaiian Group or Median other Pacific(N=35) Islander. 7. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 0.01. Median (N=35) 0.01. ItemGroup 1, 6,Your White. institution 79. GroupItem 2, 7, Comparison Two or more Group races. Median (N=35) 68. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 0.01. Median (N=35) 2. ItemGroup 1, 8,Your Race/ethnicity institution 2. unknown. GroupItem 2, 9, Comparison Nonresident Group alien. Median (N=35) 6. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 1. Median (N=35) 2. ItemGroup 1, 10,Your 100Women. institution 73. Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=35) 64. Race/ethnicityShape or gender line,Shape Label: InstitutionLegend,Shape Label: Your institution ComparisonGroupLegend,End of image description. Label: Comparison Group Median (N=35) 90 79 80 73 68 70 64 60 50 Percent 40 30 20 9 8 7 6 10 3 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 1 2 0 American Indian or Asian Black or African Hispanic/ Native Hawaiian or White Two or Race/ethnicity Nonresident alien Women Alaska Native American Latino other Pacific Islander more races unknown Race/ethnicity or gender Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=35) NOTE: For more information about disaggregation of data by race and ethnicity, see the Methodological Notes. Median values for the comparison group will not add to 100%. See 'Use of Median Values for Comparison Group' for how median values are determined. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2020, Fall Enrollment component. IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 3 Daemen College Figure 4. Unduplicated 12-month headcount of all students and of Figure 5. Enrollment, by student level: Fall 2019 undergraduate students (2018-19), total FTE enrollment (2018-19), and full- and part-time fall enrollment (Fall 2019) Image description. Image description. Enrollment measure Student level XHorizontal scale titled Bar Number chart with of students.5 groups with 2 items per group.