Carbon Capture and Storage: Setting the New Zealand Scene

Carbon Capture and Storage: Setting the New Zealand Scene

<p><strong>Carbon capture and storage: Setting the New Zealand scene </strong></p><p><strong>Brad Field GNS Science Lower Hutt </strong></p><p><a href="mailto:[email protected]" target="_blank"><strong>[email protected] </strong></a></p><p><strong>GNS Science </strong></p><p><strong>The mitigation wedges required to meet 2050 emission target </strong><br><strong>(if only 2</strong><sup style="top: -0.4997em;"><strong>o </strong></sup><strong>in 2100) </strong></p><p>60 </p><p><strong>CCS </strong></p><p>50 40 30 20 10 <br>0</p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">2009 </li><li style="flex:1">2015 </li><li style="flex:1">2020 </li><li style="flex:1">2025 </li><li style="flex:1">2030 </li><li style="flex:1">2035 </li><li style="flex:1">2040 </li><li style="flex:1">2045 </li><li style="flex:1">2050 </li></ul><p>CCS 14% (17%) </p><p>Power generation efficiency and fuel switching 3% (1%) End-use fuel switching 12% (12%) </p><p>Renewables 21% (23%) </p><p>Nuclear 8% (8%) <br>End-use energy efficiency 42% (39%) </p><p>Percentages represent share of cumulative emissions reductions to 2050. Percentages in brackets represent share of emissions reductions in the year 2050. </p><p>IEA 2012, GCCSI 2012 </p><p><strong>GNS Science </strong></p><p><strong>Deep purple… </strong></p><p><a href="/goto?url=http://www.smh.com.au/environment/weather/temperatures-off-the-charts-as-australia-turns-deep-purple-20130108-2ce33.html" target="_blank"><strong>http://www.smh.com.au/environment/weather/temperatures-off-the-charts-as-australia-turns-deep-purple-20130108-2ce33.html </strong></a></p><p><strong>GNS Science </strong></p><p><strong>The carbon capture, transport and storage process </strong></p><p>Below ~800 m = liquid </p><p>CO2CRC </p><p><strong>GNS Science </strong></p><p><strong>Geological storage of CO</strong><sub style="top: 0.62em;"><strong>2 </strong></sub></p><p><strong>claystone seal rock </strong></p><p><strong>sandstone reservoir rock </strong></p><p>seal reservoir seal injected CO<sub style="top: 0.245em;">2 </sub></p><p>CO2CRC </p><p><strong>CO</strong><sub style="top: 0.41em;"><strong>2 </strong></sub><strong>storage sites: </strong></p><p>natural gas reservoir </p><p>• Several&nbsp;kilometres below surface • Similar&nbsp;locations to oil and natural gas </p><p><strong>GNS Science </strong></p><p><strong>Typical depth ranges for subsurface resources </strong></p><p>Interactions could include leakage/migration, and pressure effects </p><p>IEAGHG Technical Report 2013-08 </p><p><strong>GNS Science </strong></p><p><strong>Global scene </strong></p><p>• 16&nbsp;large CCS projects currently operating or in construction, with a total capture ~ 36 Mtpa of CO<sub style="top: 0.37em;">2 </sub></p><p>• 59&nbsp;large projects being planned:&nbsp;&gt;110 Mtpa </p><p><strong>Government support for&nbsp;CCS: </strong></p><p>• UKP&nbsp;1,000 M government funding • USD&nbsp;3,400 M government funding • AUD&nbsp;1,680 M Flagship Project funding </p><p>Big effort internationally – a lot at stake! Big industry – opportunities </p><p>Global CCS Institute&nbsp;2012, The Global Status of CCS: 2012, Canberra, Australia </p><p>NZ = capture at Kapuni (no storage) </p><p><strong>GNS Science </strong></p><p><strong>Sleipner Field CO</strong><sub style="top: 0.62em;"><strong>2 </strong></sub><strong>Storage, Norway </strong></p><p><a href="/goto?url=http://www.statoilhydro.com" target="_blank">www.statoilhydro.com </a><br>Capture: Amine process </p><p>Sleipner A <br>Sleipner T </p><p>0500 m</p><p>CO<sub style="top: 0.105em;">2 </sub>Injection Well </p><p>1000 m</p><p>CO<sub style="top: 0.095em;">2 </sub><br>Utsira </p><p>Formation </p><p>1500 m</p><p>Sleipner Øst Production and Injection&nbsp;Wells </p><p>2000 m</p><p>Tore Torp, StatoilHydro, Norway </p><p>0<br>500 </p><p>m<br>1000 m<br>1500 m<br>2500 m</p><p>9% CO<sub style="top: 0.2046em;">2 </sub></p><p>Heimdal Formation </p><p>Started injecting in 1996. ~ 1 Mtpa. 16 Mt so far; 21-30 Mt planned. The extra equipment cost for the CO<sub style="top: 0.245em;">2 </sub>compression and the drilling of the CO<sub style="top: 0.245em;">2 </sub>injection well was roughly 100 million USD. </p><p><strong>GNS Science </strong></p><p><strong>Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) - Weyburn </strong></p><p>• International&nbsp;trading of CO<sub style="top: 0.285em;">2 </sub>• CCUS&nbsp;(“Utilisation”) </p><p><strong>Source: </strong>ARI and Melzer Consulting (2010). </p><p><strong>Enhanced oil recovery, and CO</strong><sub style="top: 0.37em;"><strong>2 </strong></sub><strong>storage </strong></p><p>Weyburn oilfield in Canada, was discovered in 1954. In October 2000, EnCana began injecting carbon dioxide to boost oil production. Overall, some 20 Mt of carbon dioxide will be permanently sequestered at ~1500 m over the lifespan of the project. The gas is being supplied via a 205 mile long pipeline (costing 100 million US$) from the lignite-fired Dakota Gasification Company synfuels plant site in North Dakota. </p><p>IEA Greenhouse Gas R&amp;D Programme </p><p><strong>GNS Science </strong></p><p><strong>Gorgon – world’s largest storage project, 2015 </strong></p><p><strong>Description </strong>– Construction of 10 million </p><p>tonnes per year LNG plant. CO<sub style="top: 0.4107em;">2 </sub>to be captured from natural gas and injected into the Dupuy Formation <strong>Capture </strong>– CO<sub style="top: 0.4122em;">2 </sub>separation (part of gas </p><p><em>Image courtesy of Chevron </em></p><p>separation for LNG) </p><p>• <em>Capture to commence </em>– 2015 (est) </p><p><strong>Storage </strong>– Onshore – beneath Barrow Island at a depth of approx 2000m </p><p>• <em>Storage commence </em>– 2015 (est) • <em>Storage rate – </em>3 to 4 million tpa </p><p><strong>Partners </strong>– Chevron, Exxon-Mobil, Shell </p><p>Petroleum in Western Australia September 2009, Dept of Mines and Petroleum. </p><p><strong>GNS Science </strong></p><p><strong>NZ emissions from large point sources total 5-8 Mtpa </strong></p><p><strong>(small on a global scale) </strong></p><p>Glenbrook <br>~1-2 Mt /yr </p><p>K Thompson </p><p>Huntly <br>≤4-5 Mt /yr </p><p>Kapuni <br>≤0.8 Mt /yr </p><p><a href="/goto?url=http://www.teara.govt.nz" target="_blank">www.teara.govt.nz </a></p><p>Comalco <br>≤ 0.5 Mt /yr </p><p>vector.co.nz </p><p>rhsconsulting.co.nz </p><p><strong>GNS Science </strong></p><p><strong>Storage opportunities </strong></p><p><strong>Onshore capacity ~ 15,000 Mt </strong></p><p><strong>Likely that we have more than enough! </strong></p><p><strong>CO</strong><sub style="top: 0.2697em;"><strong>2 </strong></sub><br><strong>Storage </strong><br><strong>(Total) </strong><br><strong>Mt </strong><br><strong>Field </strong></p><p><strong>Maui Field </strong></p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1"><strong>Kapuni </strong></li><li style="flex:1"><strong>106 </strong></li></ul><p><strong>23 </strong><br><strong>5</strong></p><p><strong>~200-300 Mt </strong></p><p><strong>McKee Rimu Mangahewa Waihapa/Ngaere Ngatoro </strong><br><strong>843</strong></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1"><strong>Kaimiro </strong></li><li style="flex:1"><strong>2</strong></li></ul><p></p><p>King, P., Bland, K., Funnell, R., Archer, R., and Lever, L. 2009. Opportunities for underground geological storage of CO<sub style="top: 0.245em;">2 </sub>in New </p><p>Zealand - Report CCS-08/5 - <strong>Onshore Taranaki Basin overview</strong>. </p><p>GNS Science Report 2009/58. </p><p>Point source Storage polygon </p><p><strong>GNS Science </strong></p><p><strong>Potential leakage mechanisms and impacts of CO</strong><sub style="top: 0.495em;"><strong>2 </strong></sub><strong>storage on groundwater </strong></p><p>IEAGHG Technical Report 2013-08 from Figure 3 of IEAGHG 2011/11. Not to scale. </p><p><strong>GNS Science </strong></p><p>Test venting of CO<sub style="top: 0.205em;">2</sub>, Otway project, Australia – a deliberate “leak” </p><p><strong>Many risks, but… </strong></p><p>Photo: Sandeep Sharma, CO2CRC </p><p>• <strong>CO</strong><sub style="top: 0.495em;"><strong>2 </strong></sub><strong>storage done for 15</strong><sup style="top: -0.6em;"><strong>+ </strong></sup><strong>years (EOR for longer) </strong></p><p>• <strong>Risks are recognised (often site-specific) </strong></p><p>• <strong>They can be assessed by site studies (cost:benefit) </strong>• <strong>Phases of assessing risk – progression of methods </strong>• <strong>Peer reviews of risk – iterative? (Gorgon) </strong>• <strong>Risk is closely linked to potential for litigation, fines </strong></p><p><strong>GNS Science </strong></p><p><strong>General concepts </strong></p><p>• <strong>Geological site assessments – site-specific </strong></p><p>• <strong>Monitoring and verification - reduce risk, provide proof </strong></p><p>• <strong>What constitutes “leakage”? </strong>• <strong>Phases </strong></p><p>– Block&nbsp;delineation/prioritising – Permitting&nbsp;(overlaps?) – Planning&nbsp;and approval – Operation – Post-injection – Handover </p><p>• <strong>Context – changing perceptions, demographics, politics </strong></p><p><strong>GNS Science </strong></p><p><strong>What’s special about New Zealand? </strong></p><p>1. Local&nbsp;variations in geology 2. Active&nbsp;faults, active seismicity 3. General&nbsp;societal perspectives – climate? NIMBY? 4. Maori&nbsp;perspectives 5. Small&nbsp;population &amp; economy 6. Currently&nbsp;smug (“green”), with adequate electricity supply (?) </p><p>7. No&nbsp;regulations specifically on CCS (yet) <em>assurance (3-way); flexibility (geology!) </em></p><p>8. CO<sub style="top: 0.37em;">2 </sub>not used for enhanced oil recovery (yet) 9. Axial&nbsp;ranges; Cook Strait&nbsp;(<em>pipelines or ships?) </em>10. Uncertain&nbsp;where new large point sources might be. </p><p><strong>GNS Science </strong></p><p><strong>Potential issues include…. </strong></p><p>• <strong>Regulations </strong></p><p>– New&nbsp;legislative requirements – Onus&nbsp;on regulators to predict potential resource interactions? <br>(priority of use, avoidance of conflict?) </p><p>– Would&nbsp;regions be asked to accept a share of long-term liability, post-injection, or just central government? </p><p>• <strong>CCS infrastructure </strong></p><p>– When&nbsp;will fields become depleted/available and which ones might be suitable for storage of CO<sub style="top: 0.4103em;">2 </sub>– ownership? good condition? </p><p>• <strong>Acceptance </strong></p><p>‒ What benefits might there be for regions? ‒ Engagement with communities </p><p><strong>GNS Science </strong></p><p><strong>Summary </strong></p><p>• Globally,&nbsp;CCS is needed if we are to meet emission targets • Currently,&nbsp;NZ emissions are small – may change • New&nbsp;Zealand has “enough” storage capacity • Uncertain&nbsp;where/when CCS will be implemented in NZ • At&nbsp;least 10 special features for New Zealand • Regulators&nbsp;may need to prioritise pore space use • Regulations&nbsp;should enable project planning, help avoid litigation and reassure communities </p><p><strong>GNS Science </strong></p><p>Thank you </p><p><strong>GNS Science </strong></p><p><strong>Useful publications include: </strong></p><p><a href="/goto?url=http://www.publish.csiro.au/pid/6467.htm" target="_blank">http://www.publish.csiro.au/pid/6467.htm </a></p><p><a href="/goto?url=http://www.ieaghg.org/" target="_blank">http://www.ieaghg.org/ </a></p><p>Paperback - February 2012 ISBN: 9780643094857 - AU $ 39.95 </p><p>Technical Report 2013-08 </p><p>An eBook version is available from </p><p>eBooks.com </p><p><strong>GNS Science </strong></p>

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    20 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us