V-JBfc 12 5F^13¥3>9 (m B ^ m # # ^ (th) AEDD US □T0019274 H%JgB r^Sfflr'y f>;i/#?««!Ci5»;nMia©eeFfbj si fe*7nyxi» h14.¥fi£ 103 ^moyvb i: bT.H$$S©®-eli86$nfco beam. #f*a#eB©m^**&#©%aim*:, m^!e©m^w#i: *®w-5». bp*>. ^iso/iec #©m^##tb# #l:*SW4-1"^SS:Btoi:L^t)©x-$i-Dte= *£. c ft ©SBC 4;DBgSip©®T-%H *7D'> ’xl? hffliiwt-feofc. cft6©ma%B%&m&f6&i:. ruv^bcDmgzwM tfeo #m##k##(ba#m»#$-&©#ai& it. b"C-t4. 3 tt-HWC^t^bfeo jy.TtC*PB«©ffi®j£ji ttitbr. 8*^6 ©me#&mic##b*ma*©%A&Mb. B*^6©tisssm*%** ut= ^©ami4. 9%% gm#*©#^-^©##amm WbSKicfe d y."F© "j-Kftim® * b a=$ ft^o (1) CMC (Global Motion Compensation) 7] it SbS^ b?b©t6titoiti::$ft'T. g#A#©#@. BP*>. /?> (pan) *i<7$-^£6titilb rsbicas-^. x -a (mm&x. »j\) ■«. sews. ^©e^to^ms^v- ;i7^-^-eilbt. b;HS$ffl«S^±if-5iy-;t (2) DRC(Dyna*ic Resolution Conversion)^?3; ##tb©*mkf6*m#e(b©#m@cA b-t mftmim©#mR&m#i-6Aa (3) NewPred 7? S Back Channel (_h D US) &®JS! b"CJ-MiuIcGSISftfc VOP (Video Object Plane ) 0# &6ismo ©%!##&## bx kbx?#jcwmi-6Aa 2#B msii^m a. t##ib@*©^x. 3>y>v/K#ct;*%3*©##ca*©m A&Ro. «fiw. sitoMsis (mm^mw) ©gat®»;ml. #$©i//<;pam@&M * • u wm&jEt rmmmmmj ztmtzmt b&. AMj&amsi: bm [Hook Base] ©l@iEi5©6ak rgftl36S*j &{Sf6^#16©#a&kf©m@C@m©mA& Bt'feo %A1:. IPMP ®#a#©$l:&6®J###©#&l4. f ©t#$ System SB Version-1 f 14 r7.y^|gj ©^*3)lS$fttio C© f7y7j ^a?14#J@iea^—7b©%#©7 b b X8^gfc9-©<5W)i6i*ft. i—»fl4. ma. ^CCfe^URLtS»fre.©Xt7>D-b*-C. i6«* ipmp c©^m©^m^h bT«5i?«sra©sfttt-?>ffls MPEG dRliffltiU 2000 ff 4 E ffl MPEG TSa-SS# fiP*>s Problem Statements CffljkStiU #&©## (DIS) CS3S WG11 © 11C© ProblemStatements lOWt-LTS ®@jSS rgsgj CFP PCall For Proposals j e e* 6PtE@fllS©Btti * 7"nyx 7 unless urffEi^irtiiuko 2oooff 9 B, * t-d2/ x 7 t-tii. m&tt©8 to#tetg$iitti&S:®U aSrtSeStilkXSffJSctfcb Vte= f©iB#, timtii IPMP tlSmetekSIECo^As-orffote., 3^e (tbe 12ffs) im*iPMPAa©#%##ieMf6# ca^^evt^TSto^ffoico 5fc1\ ®*S$©ZgH4& £01 o tc$«S1-.E. McM UT ©, *l'T\ 3>-r>'71t—ztfl|x StP RA +P—/#?©-!' >7— 7x-x$$i^rn o-< >ty-»-K7^©##K*cMf t&lt, ^©Hli§fiWbrS»%:8 g V, UX**©fffiP¥©S#ffiS4ff o feo *Wt)»S$**©*S*S (WGll) ^.©iSttiti 2000 ff 9 U*©*«tt 2000 ff 10E20 B2pe>©5#-;b (7^77) iart-ffton. #teE$Xi?JM5lim (WorkingDraft) version 1.0 4fMUfeo W©T\ 2001 WtitK'f 7 VTHulBWD1.0-t*OT+»» ©#^&e7^m&kz<D‘b®cisMtztm£ti£&McMMu %mt Uli^iCMlfc. f©m. *7-ni/-x7 hSXireti:, (to) -l,>7-7x-7©S$kk*Ch5>Xr^'>3>©Slff8 |g (Walkthrough) 4*K C0® WD2.0&fMU£= *%L^ 7-;h©#m ro >^77«fmmff-K7j ©«fcfc©i8 Sffi»-t*B® i:*o fc, HlESH&t;: i6mm©^HK@Bf6#%©^A&#*!i- £Sx ;®i9 S§|7,n y x 7 h 4SSB Lfc» Cffl, * 7’Di/x7 hS-y-til —hf 3)teto©SIESIE7‘D'7x 7 hTiix 3 7^77#—/t 4tffh£: St!Tt-LA4§6n&UtoffS@^»ff74' ;• 77‘1;:M emm# (m#^#ff#io) ©msza;tciii"-i. 7; x v—> a y^e^v &«su w©wsiti&tssESHitiBig u **m#ca@©R@^, e#^a©%#@g» efflUftssitiauco 2001 ff 3 M© IS0/IEC JTC-l/SC29 /WGll(MPEG)i/>if41-;v^a-eiis MIC Walkthrough 4% Sl£-t}\ WD3.0 6fffiL C2th^MPEG#&©±# PMPEG-nj Cimf^#4##gL6. IPMP © WD3.0 -ai, b** 6©StiBtfsssfca-tcsoa$n. *707x7 h©±@»mmk»ct. WSMf^-fbAst IfSEPI IS0/IEC JTC-1 SC29/WG1U IPMP WfOSWiSS'Jfflh ^hu-^>ty»-K7, e^xh e^s»u, )$MW3o lOItts fiST'D hntK $1317(77 —7 x —7 SUMMARY This project has started as a three-year-project aiming at further activation of global standardization in the area of home digital appliances. This is a part of NEDO global standardization activity support for new industry, which is fully supported by Japanese government. This project intends to enhance international competitiveness in this new and revolutionary industry field, and at the same time, to contribute to establish the global standard of this area, thus contributing directly to ISO/IEC, JTC-1 activity through proposing elementary technologies and extensions! technologies to existing function of MPEG standard. Last but not least, having more of a voice and power in discussions in the international standard body is also the purpose of this project. Therefore, beforehand of this project kick-off, the potential participants in the related industry group are invited and sought for membership, with explanation of the overview and the purpose of this project. Fortunately, professional and experienced engineers from the industry have joined in and the project started actual activities. We drew out three-year-plan (1998,1999 and 2000), and get the project under way according to the plan. Below is the summary of our activity each fiscal year. For fiscal year 1998, we focused on coding technology proposals form Japan Industry Group and supported them in standardization activities. Standardization of coding tools need proper evidence and presentation. Finally, the activity led to the good results and the tools were included in MPEG standard. The tools are as follows. (1) GMC (Global Motion Compensation) Tool GMC is a tool related to the motion vector detection. Obtained image from camera pan, zoom, or rotation needs large size motion vector information to get correct motion vector. This proposed tool realizes such motion vector information with less parameter of vector information to get the same level of motion vector information. (2) DRC (Dynamic Resolution Conversion) DRC is the method to adjust the resolution of the coding picture and then transport this stream in proportion to the coding complexity to the low level of acceptable picture resolution (3) NewPred NewPred rectifies a damaged picture by referring a picture without any damage extracted from VOP, that has been transmitted through back channel line (up link) in advance. For Fiscal Year 1999, we focused on the area of contents distribution business, especially on IPMP (Intellectual Property Management and Protection) technology that is closely related to patents and copyrights. Our activity was to investigate and analyze the current specification of its completion level and its contents, and promote “new extension proposals ” that suffice and correct current specifications. Specifically, our activity put emphasis on sorting out the problems in [Hook Base] specification, and establishing and managing the ad-hoc group that promotes call for new proposals. The management and colntrol information of IPMP management signal set was adopted to the draft standard of IPMP version- 1, which was so-called [hook base approach]. This hook base approach does not have sufficient function of IPMP because it only defines the space to display the place to obtain IPMP tool, and a user is, for example, to go to indicated URL to obtain required IPMP tool by download. We pointed out this method had problems in terminal compatibility and system interoperability. At MPEG Geneva meeting in May 2000, we reached to issue the problem statement of this subject. This statement showed publicly that IPMP version- 1 included in Systems DIS had problems. After that, WGll issued the official CfP (Call for Proposal) in response to the problem statement, and this was the restart of solution of the problems. With the issue of the CfP, we suggested the project member to submit the proposal for this IPMP extension standard category in September 2000, and the project supported checking the contents of the proposals and their documentations. As a result, Japanese proposals for CfP are decided and brought to international stage. For Fiscal Year 2000, we focused on supporting proposals for IPMP extension, that is submitted from domestic companies. In the first place, we started to examine proposals on how to keep compatibility between terminals, and then examined those on supplement functions to realize interface conversion, protocol conversion, and roaming service at contents server side and RA server side. Our project supported the international standardization activities of those proposals, discussed with international keypersons of IPMP breakout groups, and helped documentations concerning those activities. The proposals were submitted to the international committee (WGl 1) by the end of September 2000 and considered at La Baule (France) meeting from October 20,2000. After the discussion there, the working draft version 1.0 (WD1.0) was issued. In Pisa (Italy) meeting held in December, WD1.0 should be amended and good proposals from our project members should be consolidated into the standard, but oppositions from abroad hampered the standardization of IPMP system itself and the process has retreated to great extent. With that situation in mind, we re-examined the WD1.0, and proposed interface definition and transaction walkthrough. WD2.0 in Pisa meeting was realized in this way. Tools proposed from our project members, for example “contents electronic distribution service” lacked the verification evidence from actual tests. In order to make up for such lack, and beef up the proposal, we drafted the plan of verification test project. The verification test project is made to support our project. The test system, with contents server centered in the whole system, aims to obtain information that can never be available without testing.