Diagnostic Performance of Gadoxetic Acid

Diagnostic Performance of Gadoxetic Acid

® Diagnostic Accuracy Study Medicine OPEN Diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid (Primovist)-enhanced MR imaging versus CT during hepatic arteriography and portography for small hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma ∗ Sun Young Yim, MD, PhDa, Beom Jin Park, MD, PhDb, Soon Ho Um, MD, PhDa, , Na Yeon Han, MD, PhDb, Deuk Jae Sung, MD, PhDb, Sung Bum Cho, MD, PhDb, Seung Hwa Lee, MD, PhDb, Min Ju Kim, MD, PhDb, Jin Yong Jung, MDa, Jin Dong Kim, MD, PhDc, Yeon Seok Seo, MD, PhDa, Dong Sik Kim, MD, PhDd, Hyonggin An, PhDe, Yun Hwan Kim, MD, PhDb Abstract To compare the diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with that of computed tomography (CT) during hepatic arteriography and arterial portography (CT HA/AP) for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from small hypervascular nodules. This retrospective study included 38 patients with 131 hypervascular nodules (2cm) who had underwent MRI and CT HA/AP within a 2-week interval. Two observers analyzed MRI while other 2 observers analyzed CT HA/AP. Thereafter, MRI observers reviewed the CT HA/AP and magnetic resonance (MR) images again using both modalities. HCC was diagnosed by pathologic or imaging studies according to American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) criteria. Alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed on a lesion-by-lesion basis. Diagnostic accuracy (area under the ROC curve [Az]), sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated. The pooled Az was significantly higher for the combined modalities (0.946) than for MRI alone (0.9, P=0.004), and for MRI than for CT HA/AP alone (0.827, P=0.0154). Subgroup analysis for HCC 1cm showed the sensitivity of the combined modalities (79.4%) was significantly higher than for MRI (52.9%) and CT HA/AP alone (50%) (both, P<0.005). The specificity of the combined modalities was not different from MRI alone (98.8% vs. 97.3%, P=0.5), but was significantly higher than for CT HA/AP alone (98.8% vs. 92.5%, P=0.022). Hypervascular HCCs >1 to 2cm can be diagnosed sufficiently by MRI. The combined modalities increased the diagnostic accuracy of HCCs 1cm, compared with MRI or CT HA/AP alone. Abbreviations: CT HA/AP = computed tomography during hepatic arteriography and arterial portography, HCC = hepatocellular carcinoma, MRI = magnetic resonance imaging, ROC = receiver operating characteristic, TACE = transarterial chemoembolization. Keywords: CT HA/AP, gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI, hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma 1. Introduction Editor: Pradeep K Mittal. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents 75% of primary SYY and BJP have contributed equally to the article. liver cancers,[1] which are the seventh most common cancers This study was supported by a grant from the Korea Liver Cancer Association. globally.[2] Hepatocellular carcinoma usually develops in fl The authors have no con icts of interest to disclose. patients with liver cirrhosis with an annual incidence of 1% to a Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine [3] b c 8%, which is the most important and independent risk factor Sungbuk-ku, Department of Radiology, Division of Gastroenterology and for HCC, irrespective of its etiology. Hepatocellular carcinoma Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cheju Halla General Hospital, Jeju- do, d Department of Surgery, e Department of Biostatistics, Korea University shows generally poor prognosis with a 5-year survival rate of College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 12%; however, a cure is very highly likely when it is detected at ∗ [4] Correspondence: Soon Ho Um, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, an early stage (<2cm in diameter). Thus, active surveillance for Korea University College of Medicine, 126-1, Anam-dong 5-ga, Seongbuk-gu, HCC using ultrasonography and tumor markers is recommended Seoul 136-705, Republic of Korea (e-mail: [email protected]). for patients with liver cirrhosis.[4] This policy has gradually Copyright © 2016 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All increased the number of small hepatic nodules detected in rights reserved. cirrhotic livers, and necessitates more efficient recall policies to This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons [3] Attribution-NoDerivatives License 4.0, which allows for redistribution, commercial differentiate HCC from other hepatic nodules. and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with In response to this demand, the European Association for the credit to the author. Study of the Liver (EASL) and the American Association for the Medicine (2016) 95:39(e4903) Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) established noninvasive Received: 21 June 2016 / Received in final form: 10 August 2016 / Accepted: diagnostic criteria for HCC in cirrhotic patients, which proposes 23 August 2016 that one imaging technique (e.g., computed tomography [CT] or http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004903 magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) with a HCC radiological 1 Yim et al. Medicine (2016) 95:39 Medicine hallmark (i.e., arterial hypervascularity and venous/late-phase washout in optimal settings) suffices for diagnosing tumors ≥1cm in diameter.[3,5] Therefore, most hypervascular HCCs are diagnosed and are treated, based on imaging findings alone, even without pathologic confirmation, except for HCCs <1cm, while hypovascular HCCs still require histologic proof. How- ever, which imaging modalities or their combinations are most competent for diagnosing small hypervascular HCCs remains unclear. A Japanese study revealed that the combination of CT during arterial portography (CTAP) and double-phase CT during hepatic arteriography (CTHA) achieved a sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 97% in detecting hypervascular HCC.[6] Another Japanese study reported a significantly lower detectabil- ity of small hypervascular HCC on conventional dynamic CT or gadolinium-enhanced MRI, compared with double-phase CTHA.[7] Meanwhile, gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI is widely used to Figure 1. Flow chart of patients. detect and characterize various hepatic nodules. The high contrast generated by gadoxetic acid between focal hepatic lesions and the background parenchyma in the hepatobiliary locoregional treatment. Thus, the remaining 38 patients met the phase (HBP) helps in differentiating early HCC from benign inclusion criteria and represented 131 arterial enhancing lesions cirrhotic nodules.[8,9] Several studies report the excellent measuring 0.5 to 2.0cm for final analysis. performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI in detecting small HCC, compared with conventional dynamic CT or gadolinium- 2.2. Reference standard for diagnosis based MRI.[10,11] Furthermore, a few studies demonstrated that gadoxetic acid-based dynamic MRI was more sensitive than The diagnosis of HCC was established by either pathologic combining CTHA and CTAP (CT HA/AP) in diagnosing small examinations or image studies. HCC,[12,13] and thus may replace CT HA/AP in the pre- Imaging criteria for the diagnosis of HCC were lesions >1cm therapeutic evaluation of patients with HCC. However, the that were identified through multimodality imaging (e.g., foregoing studies included both hypervascular and hypovascular ultrasonography, CT, and MRI). These lesions were diagnosed HCCs; therefore, this prospect may not be valid when evaluating as HCC even without histologic proof if they showed the HCC hypervascular HCC. radiological hallmark (i.e., arterial hypervascularity and venous/ To date, a study comparing the diagnostic accuracy between late-phase washout) on MRI with enhancement on CTHA and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI and CT HA/AP in detecting small perfusion defect on CTAP imaging. For lesions 1cm that satisfied hypervascular HCC (2cm) is lacking. In the present study, we the same aforementioned radiologic findings, HCC was diagnosed evaluated the diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced if a definite growth (>1cm) was noted during 12-month follow-up MRI and CT HA/AP in discriminating HCC from small hyper- period after the index imaging study or persistent dense nodular vascular hepatic lesions (in particular, tumors 1and2cm)in lipiodol uptake was noted on a follow-up multidetector CT or MRI patients with cirrhosis, and we further assessed whether combining after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). both modalities could improve the diagnostic efficacy. The diagnosis of non-HCC lesions was largely based on imaging findings and their stability on follow-up CT HA/AP or MRI. A nodule was diagnosed as hemangioma when it 2. Materials and methods demonstrated typical and stable images whereas a nodule was diagnosed as arterioportal shunts when it either appeared as 2.1. Patient selection pleomorphic arterial enhancing lesions that remained unchanged The Institutional Review Board of our hospital approved for at least 12 months or disappeared during follow-up without this retrospective study and informed consent was waived. any distinct nondynamic magnetic resonance (MR) images. The inclusion criteria were patients with hepatic nodular lesions 2cm in diameter with a hypervascularity on CTHA or on the 2.3. Magnetic resonance examination arterial phase of dynamic MRI, underlying liver cirrhosis, available imaging data of both CT HA/AP and gadoxetic acid- Magnetic resonance imaging was performed using one of two 3.0- enhanced MRI obtained within a 2-week interval, and lesions T MR systems (Achieva, Philips Healthcare, Best,

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    9 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us