D4.3 Report on Appraisal of Vaccine Benefit-Risk Methodology

D4.3 Report on Appraisal of Vaccine Benefit-Risk Methodology

www.advance-vaccines.eu Accelerated Development of VAccine beNefit-risk Collaboration in Europe Grant Agreement nº115557 D4.3 Report on appraisal of vaccine benefit-risk methodology WP4 Methods for burden of disease, vaccination coverage, vaccine safety and effectiveness, impact and benefit-risk monitoring V2.0 [Final] Lead beneficiary: P95 Date: 04/11/2014 Nature: Report Dissemination level: CO © Copyright 2013 ADVANCE Consortium D4.3 Appraisal of vaccine benefit-risk methodology WP4. Methods Version: v2.0 – Final IMI - 115557 Author(s): Advance Benefit-Risk Working Group Security: CO 2/86 TABLE OF CONTENTS DOCUMENT INFORMATION .................................................................................... 4 DOCUMENT HISTORY ............................................................................................. 5 DEFINITIONS ......................................................................................................... 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................ 9 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 10 1.1 ADVANCE PROJECT ................................................................................................ 10 1.2 OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE OF THE REPORT ....................................................................... 11 1.3 STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT ...................................................................................... 11 2. SPECIFICITIES OF BENEFIT-RISK ASSESSMENTS OF VACCINES ..................... 12 3. BENEFIT-RISK METHODOLOGY ........................................................................ 17 3.1 DESCRIPTIVE OR SEMI-QUANTITATIVE FRAMEWORKS ........................................................ 17 3.1.1 Summary tools ............................................................................................. 18 3.1.2 BRAT framework ........................................................................................... 20 3.1.3 PrOACT-URL framework ................................................................................ 24 3.1.4 Other frameworks ......................................................................................... 27 3.1.5 Concluding remarks ...................................................................................... 28 3.2 BENEFIT-RISK MEASURES .......................................................................................... 29 3.2.1 Numbers needed to treat and variants thereof ................................................ 29 3.2.2 Differences in benefits and risks ..................................................................... 33 3.2.3 Ratios in benefits and risks ............................................................................ 34 3.2.4 Concluding remarks ...................................................................................... 36 3.3 COMPOSITE HEALTH MEASURES ................................................................................. 37 3.3.1 QALY ........................................................................................................... 37 3.3.2 DALY ........................................................................................................... 38 3.3.2 HALE ........................................................................................................... 38 3.3.4 Concluding remarks ...................................................................................... 39 3.4 QUANTITATIVE BENEFIT-RISK FRAMEWORKS .................................................................. 39 3.4.1 ‘Principles of Threes’, TURBO and Beckmann ................................................... 39 3.4.2 Benefit-less-risk analysis ................................................................................ 40 3.4.3 Multi-criteria decision analysis and extensions ................................................. 40 3.4.4 Data-driven benefit-risk assessment (Sarac et al.) ........................................... 44 3.4.5 Clinical utility index ....................................................................................... 44 3.4.6 Concluding remarks ...................................................................................... 45 3.5 MODELLING APPROACHES (HTA) ................................................................................ 45 3.5.1 Decision trees ............................................................................................... 46 3.5.2 State transition models .................................................................................. 47 3.5.3 Discrete event simulation .............................................................................. 48 3.5.4 Dynamic transmission models ........................................................................ 49 3.5.5 Meta-analytic approaches .............................................................................. 50 3.5.6 Concluding remarks ...................................................................................... 51 3.6 PARAMETER ESTIMATION AND UNCERTAINTY .................................................................. 52 3.7 PREFERENCE ELICITATION ......................................................................................... 56 © Copyright 2013 ADVANCE Consortium D4.3 Appraisal of vaccine benefit-risk methodology WP4. Methods Version: v2.0 – Final IMI - 115557 Author(s): Advance Benefit-Risk Working Group Security: CO 3/86 4.7.1 Focus groups ................................................................................................ 58 4.7.2 Conjoint analysis overview ............................................................................. 61 4.7.3 Choice Based Conjoint methods ..................................................................... 62 4. DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................... 74 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................... 78 © Copyright 2013 ADVANCE Consortium D4.3 Appraisal of vaccine benefit-risk methodology WP4. Methods Version: v2.0 – Final IMI - 115557 Author(s): Advance Benefit-Risk Working Group Security: CO 4/86 DOCUMENT INFORMATION Grant Agreement 115557 Acronym ADVANCE Number Full title Accelerated Development of VAccine beNefit-risk Collaboration in Europe Project URL http://www.advance-vaccines.eu IMI Project officer Angela Wittelsberger ([email protected]) Report on appraisal on the vaccine benefit-risk Deliverable Number 4.3 Title methods Methods for burden of disease, vaccination coverage, Work package Number 4 Title vaccine safety and effectiveness, impact and benefit- risk monitoring Delivery date Contractual Month 12 Actual Status Current version / v2.0 Draft Final x Nature Report x Prototype Other Dissemination Level Public Confidential x Vincent Bauchau (GSK), Eduoard Ledent (GSK), Bennett Levitan (J&J), Authors (Partner) Thomas Verstraeten (P95), Yuan Zhong (J&J) Kaatje Bollaerts (P95) Email [email protected] Responsible Author Partner P95 Phone +32 485 78 96 57 Description of the Report deliverable Key words Benefit-risk, Methodology, Vaccine © Copyright 2013 ADVANCE Consortium D4.3 Appraisal of vaccine benefit-risk methodology WP4. Methods Version: v2.0 – Final IMI - 115557 Author(s): Advance Benefit-Risk Working Group Security: CO 5/86 DOCUMENT HISTORY NAME DATE VERSION DESCRIPTION Kaat Bollaerts (P95), Bennett Levitan (J&J),Eduoard Ledent 20/07/2014 1.0 First draft (GSK), Zhong Yuan (J&J), Vincent Bauchau (GSK), Thomas Verstraeten (P95) Vincent Bauchau(GSK), 10/08/2014 1.0 Reviewed Thomas Verstraeten (P95) Kaat Bollaerts (P95) 25/08/2014 1.1 Second draft Shahrul Mt-Isa (ICL), Bennett Levitan (J&J), Zhong Yuan (J&J), 07/10/2014 1.1 Reviewed Marianne Van Der Sande (RIVM), Matti Lehtinen (UTA),Tyra Krause (SSI) Kaat Bollaerts (P95), Bennett Levitan 22/10/2014 1.2 Third draft (J&J),Eduoard Ledent (GSK) Zhong Yuan (J&J), 25/10/2014 1.2 Reviewed Thomas Verstraeten (P95) Kaat Bollaerts (P95) 3/11/2014 2.0 Final version © Copyright 2013 ADVANCE Consortium D4.3 Appraisal of vaccine benefit-risk methodology WP4. Methods Version: v2.0 – Final IMI - 115557 Author(s): Advance Benefit-Risk Working Group Security: CO 6/86 DEFINITIONS . Participants of the ADVANCE Consortium are referred to herein according to the following codes: - EMC. Erasmus Universitair Medisch Centrum Rotterdam (Netherlands) - Coordinator - UNIBAS. Universitaet Basel (Switzerland) - Managing entity of the IMI JU funding - AEMPS. Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios (Spain) - ASLCR. Azienda Sanitaria Locale della Provincia di Cremona (Italy) - AUH. Aarhus Universitetshospital (Denmark) - CRX. Crucell Holland BV (Netherlands) - ECDC. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (Sweden) - EMA. European Medicines Agency (United Kingdom) - GSK. GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, S.A. (Belgium) – EFPIA Coordinator - KI. Karolinska Institutet (Sweden) - LSHTM. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (United Kingdom) - MHRA. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (United Kingdom) - NOVARTIS. Novartis Pharma AG (Switzerland) - OU. The Open University (United Kingdom) - P95. P95 (Belgium) - PEDIANET. Società Servizi Telematici SRL (Italy) - PFIZER. Pfizer Limited (United Kingdom) - RCGP. Royal College of General Practitioners (United Kingdom) - RIVM. Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    86 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us