Mossbauer Spectroscopy of 57Fe

Mossbauer Spectroscopy of 57Fe

Mossbauer Spectroscopy of 57F e Dennis V. Perepelitsa∗ MIT Department of Physics (Dated: April 6, 2007) Using recoilless Mossbauer spectroscopy methods, we investigate the atomic absorption spectra of the 14.4keV transition in 57F e compounds. The natural linewidth of this transition is determined 2 to the correct order of magnitude with χν = .75. Hyperfine energy shifts in iron oxide and iron sulfate are investigated and measured. The ratio of ground and excited state magnetic moment in 57F e is found to be −1.73(2). The internal magnetic field in metallic iron is found to be 350(2) kG. 2 The phenomenon of relativistic time dilation is confirmed with χν = 1.52. 1. INTRODUCTION In 1958, Rudolf Mossbauer devised a method that al- lowed the phenomenon of practical resonance absorption to occur. Using this method, absorption spectroscopy become possible at a much higher resolution than was otherwise available at the time. Within the next several years, scientists investigated the details of several atomic spectra, measuring hyperfine splitting effects and other values with heretofore unrealizable accuracy. In this experiment, we probe the absorption spectra of the 14.4 keV line of species containing 57F e. 2. THEORY FIG. 1: Left to right: energy level diagram of the 14.4 keV 3 1 3 → 2 iron-57 transition, split by the Zeeman effect, altered by the electric quadrupole interaction. Significantly modified Mossbauer [1] presents how to achieve the phenomenon from http://www.cmp.liv.ac.uk/ of resonance absorption by fixing the emission source in a crystal lattice and moving it gently with respect to the absorption source. The first order approximation of the passed through an absorber of width x, we use the fol- new energy E0 given velocity v is given by the Doppler lowing equation in [2]. Below, A and N are the atomic effect: weight of iron-57 and Avogadro’s number, respectively. 2 0 v σ Γ N x E = E 1 + (1) 0( 2 ) A 0 Z ∞ − 2 c (E 1+ v −E −∆C)2+ Γ C(v) = η L(E) e [ c ] 0 ( 2 ) dE (3) The natural linewidth of an absorption line reflects a 0 fundamental quantum property of incoming radiation - the uncertainty in the energy is tied to the uncertainty in 2.1. Hyperfine interactions the lifetime of the excited state through Heisenberg’s re- lation: ∆E∆τ = /2. The spectral line has a Lorentzian ~ Three physical phenomena contribute to the number, profile centered on E with intensity I and full-width 0 0 location and width of observed absorption peaks. half-maximum (FWHM) Γ: Under the influence of a magnetic field, such as that exhibited internally by iron in some compounds, Zeeman 2 splitting of the energy levels according to total angular I Γ L(E) = 0 2 (2) momentum number j occurs. Following [3], we report 2 Γ 2 (E − E0) + 2 nuclear magnetic moments as multiples of the nuclear magneton µN . The energy shift from the original energy Of course, both the emission and absorption line have level Ei is, for a given angular number mj and state i is the above profile, with intensities I0 and σ0, respectively. given in [4]: To model the observed absorption spectrum after it has giµN I ∆E(j, i) = −µiB0 = − B0 = −giµN mjB0 ~ ∗Electronic address: [email protected] (4) 2 Where µi is the magnetic moment, expressed as a frac- −12 tion gi of the nuclear magneton µN = 3.15 × 10 eV/gauss, and B0 is the magnetic field of the nucleus. Since mj comes in multiples of one-half, the observed spacing between two energy levels with different mj num- bers will some integer multiple of giµN B0. The quadrupole interaction is caused by an electric quadrupole moment in the atomic crystal lattice. The ground state of the atom is not affected, but the first excited state is split into sublevels that correspond to different magnitudes of mj. Let q be the gradient of the electric potential and e2Q the quadrupole moment. The 3 1 energy shift ∆Q for the mj = ± 2 sublevels (the mj = ± 2 energy shift has the same magnitude but opposite sign) is given in [5]: qe2Q 1 FIG. 2: Piston-mounted decay source and associated absorp- ∆Q = 3m2 − j(j + 1) = qe2Q (5) 4j(2j − 1) j 4 tion spectrum measurement chain with adjacent laser inter- ferometry setup for velocity calculation. An energy diagram of combined Zeeman splitting and quadrupole-interaction is given in Figure 1. The chemical isomer shift is caused by a difference in The MSC setup directs the Mossbauer Drive Module chemical environment between source and absorber. It and receives the amplified voltage pulses, which is sends has the effect of shifting all energies by a small amount. to a personal computer for display and analysis. The A more detailed description is given in [5]. piston is driven at a frequency of 6Hz and integrated count times over 1024 sweeps of T ≈ 200µs. To analyze signal stability, the velocity and drive of the MDM was 2.2. Relativistic effects displayed on a digital oscilloscope, and triggered by the rising edge of the MSC. The 57F e atoms in the lattice oscillate at higher fre- An adjacent interferometer setup with a laser of wave- quencies in at higher temperatures, leading to an en- length λ = 632.8 nm detailed in Figure 2 determines the ergy shift of the accompanying absorption peak from velocity of the piston at any given time. Consider the ith the Doppler effect. The first-order Doppler effect, which channel of the MCS. In the integration time T , the path replicates the classical one, negates itself in the aggre- taken by the beam reflecting off the piston travels a dis- gate. Theoretically, however, the second-order term con- tance 2TVi. At each full wavelength of interference, the tributes to a general energy shift. From [6], in the classi- photodiode records a count. If the cycle is repeated N cal limit, the temperature dependence of this shift ∆ET times and Ci total counts recorded, the velocity of that Ciλ is channel is Vi = 2NT . The output of the photodiode is amplified and replaces the input from the proportional counter during calibration runs. d ∆E 3k T = − (6) dT E 2Mc2 3.1. Methodology 3. EXPERIMENTAL SETUP Before an energy spectrum reading, we attempted to The heart of our setup is the ASA-S700A Mossbauer take a velocity calibration using the interferometer setup Drive Module which drives a 57Co source connected to described above. Due to equipment problems on some the end of a piston. 57Co decays by beta capture to days, we calibrated the energy spectrum using the two 57F e in an excited state, which emit 14.4keV gamma rays outer or inner peaks of the metallic iron absorption spec- through atomic de-excitation directed at a proportional trum. counter. The piston is moved periodically as a sawtooth The Drive Module maximum piston velocity was set function of time by the drive circuit, and the desired to 80mm/s for most spectra, and 10mm/s when tak- absorption source is placed between it and the counter. ing the sulfate and temperature-dependent data. The The counter is connected in series to a high-voltage dis- fidelity knob was manually adjusted each time to yield a criminator and signal amplifier, which directs DC voltage crisp velocity curve. After activating the piston motor, pulses to a central multi-channel scaler (MSC) that vary we waited a sufficient time to allow the velocity signal linearly with the observed amount of counts. to stabilize before performing a reading. In all cases, 3 TABLE I: Measured atomic transition energies in enriched metallic iron and iron oxide. 57 Transition F e F e2O3 3/2 → 1/2 −2.79 ± .01 × 10−7 eV −4.17 ± .01 × 10−7 eV 1/2 → 1/2 −1.62 ± .01 × 10−7 eV −2.20 ± .01 × 10−7 eV −1/2 → 1/2 −0.41 ± .01 × 10−7 eV −.41 ± .01 × 10−7 eV 1/2 → −1/2 0.40 ± .01 × 10−7 eV .86 ± .01 × 10−7 eV −1/2 → −1/2 1.57 ± .01 × 10−7 eV 2.61 ± .01 × 10−7 eV −3/2 → −1/2 2.68 ± .01 × 10−7 eV 4.30 ± .01 × 10−7 eV FIG. 3: Plot of fractional energy shift against temperature. we recorded absorption spectra until the low absorption peaks and background noise differed by several hundred ∆E1. The results are counts. −7 To determine the natural line width of enriched iron- ∆E0 = (1.99 ± .01) × 10 eV −7 57, we recorded the absorption spectra of sodium fer- ∆E1 = −(1.15 ± .01) × 10 eV (7) rocyanide (Na3F e(CN)6) for widths of 0.1, 0.25 and 0.5 2 mg/cm . Hyperfine interactions were observed in the ab- From these facts, (4) and the established value of µ0 sorption spectra of metallic iron (enriched 57F e), iron ox- in [3], we can calculate ratio of the ground state and first ide (F e2O3) and iron sulfates (F e2(SO4)3 and F e(SO4)). excited state magnetic moment and the internal magnetic Finally, we placed a metallic iron sample in a resistance field. Our results are summarized in Table II. heater and recorded its absorption spectra at four values of the temperature. 4.3. Hyperfine interactions in F e2O3 4. DATA ANALYSIS A similar fitting process resulted in the data in Ta- ble I. As indicated in Figure 1, we must account for an additional quadrupole shift ∆Q in the excited substates.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    4 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us