INVERSION EFFECTS on MOUNTAIN LEE WAVES Simon

INVERSION EFFECTS on MOUNTAIN LEE WAVES Simon

P1.4 INVERSION EFFECTS ON MOUNTAIN LEE WAVES Simon Vosper ¤, Peter Sheridan Met O±ce, U.K. 1. INTRODUCTION 0 where U is the geostrophic wind speed, g = g¢θ/θ0 and θ0 is a reference potential temperature. The e®ect of a sharp low-level temperature inver- sion on the flow over a mountain has been investi- gated via two-dimensional (2-D) idealised numerical 3. RESULTS model simulations. The main focus of this study is the e®ect of an inversion on the formation of lee Results from simulations over a range of Fi and waves, lee-wave rotors, low-level hydraulic jumps, H=zi show that several distinct flow types occur. In upper-level wave breaking and upwind flow block- general, as the inversion strength increases (Fi de- ing. Severe turbulence associated with the majority creases) the following phenomena occur: of these phenomena represents a hazard to aviators Lee waves on the inversion in mountainous regions. This study is an extension ² of that recently presented by Vosper (2004). { Stationary downstream interfacial waves on the inversion 2. DESCRIPTION OF SIMULATIONS Lee waves with rotors ² The simulations were conducted using the Met O±ce { BLASIUS model. In the idealised problem considered Surface flow reversal and recirculation be- the upwind velocity pro¯le is independent of height neath the lee-wave crest, as shown in (above the boundary layer) and directed normal to an Fig. 2(a) for example. isolated 2-D ridge. The upstream strati¯cation con- Hydraulic jump sists of a neutral layer immediately above the ground ² which is capped by a sharp temperature inversion. { A stationary hydraulic jump occurs above Above the inversion the flow is stably strati¯ed and the downwind foot of the mountain, as the Brunt-VÄaisÄalÄa, frequency is independent of height shown in Fig. 2(b) for example. (N = 0:01 s¡1). A range of inversion strengths (measured by the di®erence in potential tempera- For weak inversions, where Fi is large (typically ture, ¢θ, across the inversion) and inversion heights, greater than unity) none of the above features are zi, were considered. The mountain shape considered present. was an isolated 2-D cosine ridge with height, H, and As shown in Fig. 3(a) the results can be presented width L, ¯xed at 400 m and 10 km, respectively. A in terms of a flow regime diagram. This approach no-slip lower boundary condition was employed and clearly distinguishes between the areas of parameter this gave rise to a boundary layer below the inversion. space where the di®erent flow types occur. For suf- An example upstream pro¯le is presented in Fig. 1. ¯ciently low inversions (high H=zi), the highly non- Two important controlling non-dimensional pa- linear hydraulic jumps dominate at low Fi, while lee rameters are the Froude number, Fi, de¯ned in the waves with rotors occur at slightly higher values of usual way for a two-layer shallow water flow, and the Fi. Note that linear theory predicts the presence of ratio of mountain height to inversion height, H=zi. lee waves on the inversion for some of the temper- The Froude number is de¯ned as ature pro¯les used in this study. Fig. 3(a) shows that, as Fi decreases, linear theory provides a good U Fi = estimate (the solid line in the ¯gure) of when lee pg0zi waves appear. However, since the wavelength of ¤ the lee waves is much shorter than the hill width Corresponding author address: Simon Vosper, Met O±ce, FitzRoy Road, Exeter, Devon, EX1 3PB, U.K.; in these simulations, linear theory signi¯cantly un- email:simon.vosper@meto±ce.com derestimates the wave amplitude. 2.0 (a) u 1.5 v 1.0 z /km 0.5 0.0 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 -1 Wind speed /ms 2.0 (b) 1.5 1.0 z /km 0.5 0.0 284 288 292 296 300 θ /K Figure 1: Pro¯les of (a) wind and (b) potential tem- perature used to initialize a 2-D simulation. In the example shown, ¢θ = 3:84 K across the inversion height, which occurs at zi = 1 km. The geostrophic wind (U; V ) = (8; 0) ms¡1. Figure 2: Flow ¯eld for flow over a hill of width L = 10 km, with H=zi = 0:5 (zi = 800 m) and (a) Fi = 0:6 (¢θ = 6:53 K) and (b) Fi = 0:4 Simulations were also conducted using a narrower (¢θ = 14:69 K). Colour shaded contours represent ridge, of width L = 2:5 km, which is closer to the res- the streamwise velocity component and line contours onant lee wave wavelength. In this case, it was found show the potential temperature (interval 1 K). that, in addition to accurately predicting the wave- length of the simulated lee wave, linear theory can make a reasonable quantitative prediction of the lee- gorised according to distinctive, mountain influenced wave maximum amplitude. Linear theory also pro- near-surface flow features and values of Fi and H=zi have been diagnosed from radiosonde pro¯les. Thus vides a useful prediction of the bound in Fi H=zi space where surface flow reversal (i.e. lee-w¡ave ro- a flow regime diagram has been constructed for East tors) will occur (see Fig. 3(b)). Falkland (see accompanying paper 2.4 by Sheridan et al.). Despite the large number of complicating fac- Recent observations of near-surface flow across tors involved in categorising the observed flows, the mountains on East Falkland (south Atlantic) indi- regime diagram derived from the observations does cate that the presence of a strong temperature in- bear some resemblance to those shown in Fig. 3. version influences the formation of rotors and strong downslope winds. Having constructed the regime di- agrams for the above 2-D simulations, it is interest- 4. REFERENCES ing to consider whether the approach can be useful in examining the observed 3-D flows. To this end, Vosper, S.B., 2004: Inversion e®ects on mountain the flows observed on East Falkland have been cate- lee waves. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., in press. -1 Z =U/Nzi 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 No lee wave Lee wave 1.2 Hydraulic jump Linear theory critical Lee wave rotor Fi for lee waves 1 ) i 0.8 (g'z √ / U = i 0.6 F 0.4 0.2 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 H/zi -1 Z =U/Nzi 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 No lee wave Lee wave Linear theory 1.2 Lee wave rotors critical Fi for Hydraulic jump lee waves 1 ) i 0.8 (g'z √ / U = i 0.6 F 0.4 0.2 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 H/zi Figure 3: Regime diagrams showing the Fi and H=zi dependence of the flow for hill widths, L, of (a) 10 km and (b) 2.5 km. The solid curve represents the linear theory prediction of the maximum Fi for which a steady trapped lee wave is present on the inversion. In (b) the dotted curve bounds the region of param- eter space for which lee-wave rotors occur according to linear theory..

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    3 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us