====================================================================== Language in India www.languageinindia.com ISSN 1930-2940 Vol. 19:6 June 2019 ===================================================================== Word Order in Biate M Hemminlal Haokip, Ph.D. Scholar Department of Linguistics Assam University, Silchar 788011 [email protected] Phone: 8402023162 ====================================================================== Abstract The paper aims to discuss the word order pattern in Biate (ISO639-3), an endangered and undocumented language spoken in Jaintia Hills of Meghalaya, Dima Hasao (North Cachar Hills) district of Assam and some parts of Mizoram and Manipur. Biate stands for both the people and the language. It is spoken by 19,000 speakers (Ethnologue 2019). Grierson-Konow (1904) and Graham Thurgood (2003) classified Biate to the Old-Kuki sub-group of Sino-Tibetan language family. The paper will discuss and examine the word order pattern, which is one of the primary ways in which languages differ from one another. Biate is a verb-final language, with SOV as its basic word order. It exhibits a large number of characteristics expected of it as an OV language. Biate employs postpositions (PP), which follow the noun phrase they combine with. Like other Kuki-Chin languages, the genitive is indicated by the possessor which precedes the possessed item. The Adjective follows the noun (NAdj) in Biate. Noun modifiers like numerals and classifiers follow the noun. Relative clause precedes the noun (RelN) in Biate. Keywords: Biate, Kuki-Chin, Word order, Tibeto-Burman Introduction Biate is one of the recognized tribes of Assam, Meghalaya, Mizoram, and Manipur under ‘Any Kuki Tribes’. The word Biate has varied meanings; the most common meaning that seems everybody accepts is worshippers, referring to a common worship of a particular deity or different worship of various deities by their ancestors from time immemorial, (Remsiama Ngamlai, 20141). Thus, they derived Biate as Bia ‘worship’ and Te ‘people’ which we can be literally translated as worshippers. According to Ramdina Lalsim (2012)2 the Biates identified themselves as ‘riam’ meaning ‘human being’ which also exclusively implies to their entire brethren Chin-Kuki-Mizo group. Biate is one of the verb-final languages of Sino-Tibetan language family. It is mainly spoken in Jaintia Hills of Meghalaya, and Dima-Hasao (North Cachar Hills) district of Assam and some 1 Ngamlai, Remsiama (2014) The Status of the Biate Tribe in North east India: A Study on Ethnic Minority Rights. MA dissertation’ IGNOU 2Lalsim, R. (2012) ‘History of the Biates and their Folktales’ ==================================================================== Language in India www.languageinindia.com ISSN 1930-2940 19:6 June 2019 M Hemminlal Haokip, Ph.D. Scholar Word Order in Biate 103 parts of Mizoram and Manipur. It is one of the endangered languages of North East India. Grierson (1904) and Graham Thurgood (2003) classified Biate under the Old-Kuki sub-group of Kuki-Chin languages. They are a closely related to Hmar, Hrangkhol, Hiroi-Lamgang, Ranglong, Anal, Kom, Chiru, etc. It is spoken by 19,000 speakers (Ethnologue 2019). They inhabit the southeastern part of Jaintia Hills District of Meghalaya extending to the western part of North Cachar Hills district of Assam. The area lies approximately between 25 ̊ 5’ to 25 ̊ 30’ North latitude and 29 ̊ 28’ to 93 ̊ East Latitude and is mostly covered by thatch and thick forest having approximately 400 km in size (Lalsim, 2012). The Map of Northeast India and Biate inhabited area of Assam and Meghalaya is shown in the following; (b) (a) Figure 1: (a) Map showing North East India and (b) Map showing Biate inhabited villages of Assam and Meghalaya (prepared by Laldikzualla Nampui). The paper attempts to describe the word order typology of Biate and shows the importance of different syntactic constituent of Biate. One of the primary ways in which languages differ from one another is in the order of constituents, or, as it is most commonly termed, their word order. When people refer to the word order of a language, they often are referring specifically to the order of subject, object, and verb with respect to each other (Mathew S. Dryer 2007). All languages in the world have six possible basic word orders: they are SVO, SOV, VSO, VOS, OSV, and OVS. Of these six, however, only three normally occur as dominant orders. The three which do not occur at all, or at least are excessively rare, are VOS, OSV, and OVS (Greenberg 1963). The present paper is divided into three sections: the first section discusses Greenberg’s word order universal correlation with Biate. In the second, the predicted OV characteristic of Tibeto-Burman languages by Mathew S. Dryer with Biate is discussed. The third section discusses the remaining word order of Biate other than what had discussed in the first and second section. 1. Correlation of Greenberg’s Universals Word Order with Biate Word Order In this section we correlate some of the Greenberg’s universals of word order typology which are relevant to Biate word order. It is discuss in the following. Universal 1: It states that in declarative sentences with nominal subject and object, the dominant order is almost always one in which the subject precedes the object. ==================================================================== Language in India www.languageinindia.com ISSN 1930-2940 19:6 June 2019 M Hemminlal Haokip, Ph.D. Scholar Word Order in Biate 104 Biate has SOV word order where the nominal subject precedes nominal object. Thus, we can conclude that Biate agrees with Greenberg’s universal 1 as shown in (1). (1) Alal-in tʰeihai a-fak Alal-ERG mango 3SG-eat ‘Alal ate Mango’ Universal 2: In languages with prepositions, the genitive almost always follows the governing noun, while in languages with postpositions it almost always precedes. Biate agrees the second universal as the language has postpositional and the genitive precedes the governing noun. It has no separate genitive marker but like in other Kuki-Chin languages, genitive is indicated by word order in which the possessor precedes the possessed item as shown in (2) and (3). (2) Lalpu lekʰabu Lalpu book ‘Lalpu’s book.’ (3) ki-pa zakua almira-a a-om my-father coat almira-PP 3SG-exist ‘My father’s coat.’ Universal 3: With overwhelmingly greater than chance frequency, languages with normal SOV order are postpositional. Biate shows postpositional ad position and its basic word order is SOV hence, Biate agrees with the fourth universal as shown in (4) (4) lekʰabu dotsam tsuŋa a-om book table PP 3SG-exist ‘The book is on the table.’ Universal 4: If a language has dominant SOV order and the genitive follows the governing noun, then the adjective likewise follows the noun. Biate is an SOV language where the genitive precedes governing noun as stated and shown with example in the second universal above. Thus we can conclude that Biate doesn’t correlate universal 4. Universal 5: If in a language with dominant SOV order, there is no alternative basic order, or only OSV as the alternative, then all adverbial modifiers of the verb likewise precede the verb. ==================================================================== Language in India www.languageinindia.com ISSN 1930-2940 19:6 June 2019 M Hemminlal Haokip, Ph.D. Scholar Word Order in Biate 105 Biate agrees the seventh universal and its examples are given in (6), (7), and (8) (6) Athaŋ-in bu a-nek Athang-ERG rice 1SG-eat S O V ‘Athang ate rice.’ (7) bu Athaŋ-in a-nek rice Athang-ERG 1SG-eat O S V ‘Athang ate rice.’ (8) naite rattak a-ṭap child loudly 3SG-cry ‘The child cries loudly.’ 2. Predicted OV characteristics of TB languages by Dryer in relation with Biate The distribution of OV and VO order among Tibeto-Burman languages is fairly clearcut and easy to describe. VO order is found only in two groups, namely Karen and Bai, and the remaining languages are all not only OV but generally fairly rigidly verb-final (Mathew S. Dryer, 2008). The OV characteristics of Tibeto-Burman languages as predicted by Mathew S. Dyer which are related to Biate are discus below. The SOV word order of Biate is illustrated in (9). (9) amampu-n iva a-mu he-ERG bird 3SG-see S O V ‘He sees the bird’ Postposition and postpositional phrases precede the verb and a word ‘able’ and ‘want’ follow the verb it governs as illustrated in (10) and (11) (10) ninreŋkan biakin-aʔ nin-fe tʰei everybody church-LOC 21PL-go able ‘everybody can go to church’ (11) in-aʔ ki-fe nuam home-LOC 1SG-go want ‘I want to go home’ Like in Tibeto-Burman the predicate nominal in Biate precedes the copula as in example (12) where ipa ‘man’ precedes the copula ‘a-ni’. ==================================================================== Language in India www.languageinindia.com ISSN 1930-2940 19:6 June 2019 M Hemminlal Haokip, Ph.D. Scholar Word Order in Biate 106 (12) ipa a-ni man 3SG-be ‘He is a man’ In a comparative construction in TB languages, the standard of comparison precedes the adjective, which is also applicable in Biate. We can also say that the marker of comparison follows the standard of comparison as in (13) (13) amampu ki raŋin a-toi ual he I than 3SG-short COMPM ‘He is shorter than me.’ Complementizers marking clauses functioning as arguments of the verb occur at the end of the clause, as illustrated by the complementizer ‘in’ in (14). (14) ofiz-a ki-mu raŋ-in rilpek-ro office-LOC 1S-see FUT-COMP tell-IMP ‘tell him that I will see him in the office’ Similarly, Subordinators marking adverbial subordinate clauses occur at the end of the clause, as illustrated by intsu ‘after’ in (15). (15) a-hoŋ intsu ki-fe raŋ 3S-come after I-go will ‘After he comes, I will go’ The above example (15) also illustrates how subordinate adverbial clauses precede the main clause.