Seed Fate and Density of Soil Seedbanks of Four Acacia Species In

Seed Fate and Density of Soil Seedbanks of Four Acacia Species In

Seed fate and density of soil seed banks of four Acacia species in the Kruger National Park, South Africa Samanta Adele Stelli A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Science, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science. Johannesburg 2011 DECLARATION I declare that this thesis is my own, unaided work, unless specifically acknowledged in the text. It has not been submitted in any form for another degree or diploma award at any other university or institution of tertiary education. This thesis is being submitted for the Degree of Masters of Science at the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. Supervisor: Professor E.T.F. Witkowski University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. Signed: Date: 07 October 2011 xxi ABSTRACT Observations of the changes in woody plant density in the Kruger National Park (KNP) over 58 years have shown an increase in large woody plant density on granite substrates, which is attributed to fire and herbivore density. Woody plants persist in areas with frequent fires, herbivory and drought by resprouting or protecting seeds in the ground. Soil seed banks, which are stores of seeds below ground or in leaf litter, provide 'insurance' for trees and allow populations to persist in unfavourable environments. No comprehensive studies have been conducted on soil seed bank ecology of Acacia species in the Kruger National Park, a research gap which this study aimed to fill. The spatial distribution and density of in situ soil seed banks for four Acacia species, A. grandicornuta, A. nilotica, A. senegal and A. tortilis was assessed in the Skukuza land system of the KNP, South Africa. In situ soil seed banks were quantified for eight mature trees per species during 2005/2006. Greenhouse and field seed burial trials were carried out for one year and 16 months respectively, between 2005 and 2007, to investigate the persistence of Acacia seeds over an extended period of time. Post-dispersal seed predation of Acacia seeds was investigated during July 2006 in six demarcated grids within 15 km of Skukuza. Overall soil seed bank density differed significantly among species, being highest for A. tortilis (19.5 ± 6.4 seeds m-2), followed by A. grandicornuta (12.1 ± 6.9 seeds m-2), A. nilotica (4.9 ±1.8 seeds m-2) and lowest for A. senegal (0.6 seeds ± 0.4 seeds m-2). Generally, seed bank density decreased with depth in the soil and distance from the centre of the tree canopy. Seed bank density increased significantly with a decrease in soil compaction for A. senegal only, while it was not related to over-storey canopy shading or herbaceous biomass for any of the species. No significant relationship was found between seed bank density and tree characteristics such as stem diameter, bark thickness or tree canopy area for any of the species. Viability of seeds from the seed bank decreased between species as follows: A. tortilis (77% of 142 seeds), A. nilotica (61% of 39 seeds), A. grandicornuta (58% of 87 seeds), and A. senegal (0% of 4 seeds). For all species with viable seeds, viability decreased with distance from the centre of the tree canopy. Bruchid beetle predation (assessed on 100 newly produced seeds) was low for all four species. Fifty seeds each of A. grandicornuta, A. senegal and A. tortilis and 100 A. nilotica seeds were destroyed by fire during the field seed burial trial, of which four hundred seeds/species were used. Of the remaining seeds, 15% of A. senegal, 19% of A. grandicornuta, 34% of A. nilotica and 66% of A. tortilis remained intact after 16 months xxi in the field. Of these, 65% of A. tortilis, 27% of A. nilotica, 5% of A. grandicornuta and no A. senegal seeds were still viable. The percentage of remaining intact, viable seeds was highest under tree canopy cover and buried for A. tortilis (86%), A. nilotica (39%) and A. grandicornuta (6%), but the micro-site placement of seeds had a significant effect on viability for A. nilotica only (d.f. = l; χ2 = 7.5; P = 0.006). In the greenhouse seed burial trial (150 seeds/species/treatment), one percent of the total seed lot germinated, which was 2.9% of A. grandicornuta, 0.7% of A. senegal and 0.2% of both A. nilotica and A. tortilis. A. tortilis had the highest percentage of remaining intact, viable seeds (92.2%), followed by A. nilotica (58.3%), A. grandicornuta (57.6%) and A. senegal (0%). The number of remaining intact, viable seeds was highest when watered with the average rainfall (327 seeds), followed by the highest (314 seeds) and lowest rainfall (296 seeds). There was no association between rainfall treatments and the number of remaining intact, viable seeds for any of the species, except for A. grandicornuta where the number of remaining intact, viable seeds increased significantly with the average rainfall. Across six grids in the Skukuza land system, A. grandicornuta was the most dominant woody plant of six study species, followed by Dichrostachys cinerea, A. tortilis, A. nilotica, A. senegal and A. nigrescens. Woody plant density in grids varied between 226 plants ha-1 (Grid 3) to 1618 plants ha-1 (Grid 5), with a mean density of 862 ± 195 plants ha-1. Overall, woody plant species diversity was low (Shannon Wiener Index, 1.8 ± 2.8; Evenness Index, 0.7 ± 0.02; Simpson's Reciprocal Index, 4.5 ± 0.6). The dung of nine species of large herbivore was recorded across all six grids. Large herbivores favoured seeds of indehiscent (55 A. tortilis seeds and 11 A. nilotica seeds) over dehiscent pods (1 A. grandicornuta seed). Only 9% (five A. tortilis seeds and one A. grandicornuta seed) of the 67 seeds extracted from dung germinated after a six-week germination trial. Less than half the remaining ungerminated A. nilotica seeds (46%) and A. tortilis seeds (40%) tested viable. There was no correlation between the number of termitaria recorded and the number of Acacia trees growing on them (r = 0.07). Termite mounds occupied 0.0009 ± 0.0003 ha per grid matrix (0.8%). Only four rodent species were recorded across all six grids, Mastomys coucha (multimammate mouse), Rhabdomys pumilio (striped mouse), Aethomys chrysophilus (red veld rat) and Tatera leucogaster (highveld gerbil). Rodent species diversity was low (Shannon Wiener Index, 0.6 ± 0.2; Evenness Index, 0.6 ± 0.2; Simpson's Reciprocal Index, 1.9 ± 0.3). In the field cafeteria trial there was a significant difference in the percentage of seeds removed between seed species (P < 0.05; F = 2.8; d.f. = 3, 236). There was a xxi significant difference in the percentage of seeds removed from trays placed under vegetation cover compared with trays placed in the open (P = 0.034). This study suggests that A. grandicornuta, A. nilotica and A. tortilis seeds form short-term persistent seed banks, while A. senegal seeds are transient and do not form seed banks. Seeds of several woody plants were ingested by large herbivores and selected by rodents. The relevance of soil seed banks to regeneration of Acacia trees needs to be evaluated by investigating whether these species rely more on seed production or resprouting for individual recruitment into tree populations. Once this issue is clarified the effect of certain factors on seed fate and consequently, recruitment of individuals into plant populations, can be more clearly understood. This will assist in managing and understanding these potentially encroaching species in the Kruger National Park, South Africa. KEYWORDS: in situ soil seed banks, persistence, germination, post-dispersal seed predation. ABBREVIATIONS: KNP (Kruger National Park), NPNR (Nylsvley Provincial Nature Reserve), CSF (Corey Shape Factor), GI (Germination Index), PCQ (Point-Centred Quarter), GUD (Giving-Up Density), GPS (Global Positioning System), SE (Standard Error). xxi DEDICATION I would like to dedicate this dissertation to my supervisor, my parents, my sister and my partner for all their patience, support and advice. Also to all my friends who assisted me in completing my field work. xxi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to acknowledge my supervisor, Prof. Ed Witkowski, for all his support, advice, generosity and patience during my years as an MSc student. His openness, willingness to help and great sense of humour made it all that much easier to get through. My great appreciation goes to both Prof. Neville Pillay and Prof. David Mycock at the University of the Witwatersrand for their advice and assistance during my study. I would like to thank Dr. Holger Eckhardt for his role as my Kruger National Park supervisor and both Guin and Nick Zambatis at Scientific Services at Kruger for their knowledge contribution and assistance with certain aspects of my project. My heartfelt thanks goes to Dr Anouska Kinahan for giving me the opportunity to assist her in and use data from her post-graduate research project, as well as for her time in editing the fourth chapter of my draft thesis. Many thanks to Brad Wilson for his assistance in the field and his advice and sense of humour, which kept me going in the long hours of seed bank sampling! I would also like to thank Dr. Chantal Helm for her temperature data from the Wits Greenhouse. My wholehearted thanks goes to all the Kruger game guards and field assistants who spent many sweltering hours assisting me with fieldwork and keeping me safe in the bush, specifically Velly, Sam and Chris. The South African National Parks Fellowship (funded by the Andrew Mellon Foundation) in Plant Ecology is thanked profoundly for its generous bursary awarded for achievement of this study, as well the South African National Research Foundation for the bursary (NRF 2069152) and the University of the Witwatersrand for the Postgraduate Merit Award.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    178 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us