Summary of Technical Evaluations

Summary of Technical Evaluations

Summary of Technical Evaluations Prepared for: CAWS Advisory Committee Chicago, IL November 2015 Prepared by: In Association with: Summary of Technical Evaluations | Table of Contents CAWS Advisory Committee TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES __________________________________ 1 2.0 ANS CONTROL MEASURES _______________________________________ 4 2.1 Dispersal and ANS of Concern __________________________________________________ 4 2.2 Control Measure Risk Reduction Screening _______________________________________ 6 2.3 Control Measure Secondary Screening __________________________________________ 11 2.4 Control Measure Combinations _________________________________________________ 16 2.5 Enhanced Combination Analysis by Species _____________________________________ 22 2.6 Comparison of Long Term Scenarios ____________________________________________ 26 2.7 Summary ___________________________________________________________________ 32 2.8 Next Steps __________________________________________________________________ 35 2.9 References __________________________________________________________________ 37 3.0 COMMERCIAL CARGO NAVIGATION _______________________________ 39 3.1 Background of CAWS Commercial Cargo Navigation ______________________________ 39 3.1.1 Waterway Infrastructure and Identified Capital Needs _______________________________ 41 3.1.2 Maritime Transportation Operation Considerations _________________________________ 46 3.1.3 Transportation Usage, Commodities and Industries _________________________________ 49 3.2 Trends Analysis _____________________________________________________________ 59 3.3 Mode Shift Potential __________________________________________________________ 61 3.4 Current and Forecasted CAWS Demand _________________________________________ 63 3.4.1 Overall Commodity Forecasts, by Commodity _____________________________________ 65 3.4.2 Long Term (2040) CAWS Demand ______________________________________________ 75 3.5 Scenario Evaluation __________________________________________________________ 76 3.5.1 Description of Scenarios ______________________________________________________ 76 3.5.2 Assumptions and Evaluation Criteria ____________________________________________ 78 3.5.3 Comparison of Scenarios _____________________________________________________ 82 3.6 Summary ___________________________________________________________________ 82 3.7 References __________________________________________________________________ 86 4.0 FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT AND WATER QUALITY CONVEYANCE _____ 88 4.1 Background and Existing Conditions ____________________________________________ 89 4.2 Potential Long Term Strategy __________________________________________________ 90 i Summary of Technical Evaluations | Table of Contents CAWS Advisory Committee 4.2.1 System Components _______________________________________________________ 90 4.2.2 Assumptions _____________________________________________________________ 92 4.2.3 Implications and Comparison of Potential AIS Control Points _______________________ 93 4.3 Summary ___________________________________________________________________ 97 4.4 References __________________________________________________________________ 99 5.0 WATER QUALITY ______________________________________________ 100 5.1 Background ________________________________________________________________ 101 5.2 Water Quality Standards _____________________________________________________ 101 5.3 Antidegradation _____________________________________________________________ 103 5.4 Total Maximum Daily Loads ___________________________________________________ 104 5.5 NPDES Permitting Implications ________________________________________________ 105 5.5.1 Wastewater Treatment Plants _______________________________________________ 106 5.5.2 Stormwater and MS4 Permittees ____________________________________________ 109 5.5.3 Combined Sewer Overflows ________________________________________________ 110 5.6 Summary __________________________________________________________________ 111 5.7 References _________________________________________________________________ 112 6.0 CONTAMINATED SEDIMENT _____________________________________ 113 6.1 Chicago River System Upstream of Stickney ____________________________________ 113 6.1.1 North Shore Channel _______________________________________________________ 113 6.1.2 Upper North Branch of the Chicago River above Albany Avenue _____________________ 114 6.1.3 North Branch of the Chicago River (NBCR) below Albany Avenue ____________________ 114 6.1.4 Chicago River Main Channel _________________________________________________ 114 6.1.5 South Branch of the Chicago River, Bubbly Creek, and nearby slips___________________ 115 6.2 Calumet River System Upstream of Alsip _______________________________________ 116 6.2.1 Cal-Sag Channel / Little Calumet River / Thorn Creek / Grand Cal River _______________ 116 6.2.2 Calumet River, O’Brien Locks to Lake Michigan___________________________________ 117 6.3 Summary __________________________________________________________________ 118 6.4 References _________________________________________________________________ 119 7.0 SUMMARY ____________________________________________________ 120 ii Summary of Technical Evaluations | Table of Contents CAWS Advisory Committee TABLE OF TABLES Table 1: ANS of Concern Identified in the GLRMIS Document _________________________________ 5 Table 2: Control Measure Risk Reduction Screening ________________________________________ 10 Table 3: Control Measures Secondary Screening __________________________________________ 15 Table 4: Potential Control Measure Combinations for the CAWS ______________________________ 21 Table 5: Control Measure Combinations by Species ________________________________________ 23 Table 6: Relating Passing Probability with Risk Reduction ___________________________________ 25 Table 7: Relating Passing Probability with Risk Reduction by Species __________________________ 25 Table 8: Potential Long Term Scenarios by Species ________________________________________ 28 Table 9: Relating Passing Probability to Risk Reduction by Potential Long Term Scenario __________ 31 Table 10: Risk Reduction by Species for Potential Long Term Scenarios ________________________ 32 Table 11: CAWS Lock Usage (2013) ____________________________________________________ 43 Table 12: Inland Waterway System Primary Industries and Commodities ________________________ 50 Table 13: Facilities Lakeside of Proposed Scenarios ________________________________________ 54 Table 14: Factors that Affect Freight Modal Choice _________________________________________ 61 Table 15: Commodities in Each Commodity Group _________________________________________ 69 Table 16: Summary of 2020 Forecast Assumptions _________________________________________ 70 Table 17: Forecast Summary of Industry Specific Actions and Trends by Commodity Group (GLMRIS) 71 Table 18: 2020 GLMRIS Future Without Project Forecasts, by Commodity ______________________ 71 1 Table 19: Current Volumes by Commodity and Segment (2011-12 average, ktons) _______________ 73 Table 20: 2020 “Low Forecast” Volumes by Commodity and Segment (ktons) ____________________ 74 Table 21: 2020 “High Forecast” Volumes by Commodity and Segment (ktons) ___________________ 74 Table 22: 2040 Forecast Volumes by Commodity (ktons) ____________________________________ 75 Table 23: 2040 Forecast Volumes by Segment (ktons) ______________________________________ 76 Table 24: Cost Impact Assumptions _____________________________________________________ 80 Table 25: Current and Forecast Volumes Impacted by Separation (ktons) _______________________ 82 Table 26: Comparison of Scenarios _____________________________________________________ 85 Table 27: Potential Ranges of Future Regulatory Requirements ______________________________ 109 iii Summary of Technical Evaluations | Table of Contents CAWS Advisory Committee TABLE OF FIGURES Figure 1: Conceptual Elements of Potential Long Term Solution ________________________________ 2 Figure 2: GLMRIS Risk Assessment _____________________________________________________ 7 Figure 3: Probability of Establishment Elements ____________________________________________ 8 Figure 4: Example Dispersal Points ______________________________________________________ 8 Figure 5: Physical Barrier Separation Concept _____________________________________________ 16 Figure 6: ANS Lock System Concept ____________________________________________________ 19 Figure 7: Control Point Locations for Conceptual Long Term Scenarios _________________________ 26 Figure 8: Pathway Proximity of Control Points _____________________________________________ 29 Figure 9: Cumulative Effect of Control Points – Mississippi to Great Lakes _______________________ 30 Figure 10: Cumulative Effect of Control Points – Great Lakes to Mississippi ______________________ 31 Figure 11: CAWS Segments ___________________________________________________________ 40 Figure 12: Historical Lake Michigan Elevations ____________________________________________ 48 Figure 13: Frequency of Lake Michigan Elevations Exceeding CAWS Water Level ________________ 48 Figure 14: Freight Transportation “Service Spectrum” _______________________________________ 50 Figure 15: Chicago Region as Defined in FHWA Freight Analysis Framework (FAF) _______________ 51 Figure 16: Greater Chicago Region Marine Flows by Commodity, Tons (2011) ___________________ 52 Figure 17: Greater Chicago Region

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    132 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us