The Impact of Forest Logging and Fragmentation on Carnivore Species Composition, Density and Occupancy in Madagascar’S Rainforests

The Impact of Forest Logging and Fragmentation on Carnivore Species Composition, Density and Occupancy in Madagascar’S Rainforests

The impact of forest logging and fragmentation on carnivore species composition, density and occupancy in Madagascar’s rainforests B RIAN D. GERBER,SARAH M. KARPANTY and J OHNY R ANDRIANANTENAINA Abstract Forest carnivores are threatened globally by Introduction logging and forest fragmentation yet we know relatively little about how such change affects predator populations. arnivores are one of the most threatened groups of 2009 This is especially true in Madagascar, where carnivores Cterrestrial mammals (Karanth & Chellam, ). have not been extensively studied. To understand better the Declines of predators are often attributed to habitat loss effects of logging and fragmentation on Malagasy carnivores and fragmentation but few quantitative studies have we evaluated species composition, density of fossa examined how carnivore populations and communities 2002 Cryptoprocta ferox and Malagasy civet Fossa fossana, and change with habitat loss or fragmentation (Crooks, ; 2005 carnivore occupancy in central-eastern Madagascar. We Michalski & Peres, ). This is particularly true for ’ photographically-sampled carnivores in two contiguous Madagascar s carnivores, with knowledge lacking about ff (primary and selectively-logged) and two fragmented rain- their ecology and the e ects of anthropogenic disturbances 2010 forests (fragments , 2.5 and . 15 km from intact forest). (Irwin et al., ), especially in the eastern rainforest where Species composition varied, with more native carnivores in only short-term studies have been conducted (Gerber et al., 2010 16 the contiguous than fragmented rainforests. F. fossana was ). With only % of the original primary forests extant absent from fragmented rainforests and at a lower density in Madagascar and those remaining becoming smaller and 2007 in selectively-logged than in primary rainforest (mean more isolated over time (Harper et al., ), habitat loss −2 1.38 ± SE 0.22 and 3.19 ± SE 0.55 individuals km , respect- and fragmentation are serious threats to many endemic 2010 ively). C. ferox was detected in fragments , 2.5 km from species (Irwin et al., ). ’ forest and had similar densities in primary and selectively- To conserve Madagascar s unique biodiversity science is logged forests (0.12 ± SE 0.05 and 0.09 ± SE 0.04 being used to prioritize areas for conservation and −2 adults km , respectively) but was absent in fragments restoration. This planning requires reliable knowledge of ’ ff . 15 km from forest. We identified only two protected areas species distributions and the e ects of human disturbance. in Madagascar that may maintain . 300 adult C. ferox. Although studies of many Malagasy taxa have directly fi Occupancy of broad-striped mongoose Galidictis fasciata bene ted conservation planning the dearth of studies on was positively related to fragment size whereas occupancy of carnivores has excluded them from consideration (Kremen 2008 ring-tailed mongoose Galidia elegans elegans was negatively et al., ). Given that carnivores often have the largest area ff associated with increasing exotic wild cat (Felis spp.) activity requirements of all fauna, can a ect ecosystem dynamics 2009 at a camera site. Degraded rainforest fragments are difficult (Roemer et al., ), and serve as useful focal species for 2001 environments for Malagasy carnivores to occupy; there is a planning (Carroll et al., ), a better understanding of the need to prioritize the reconnection and maintenance of ecology of Malagasy carnivores is required. 10 contiguous forest tracts. Of the extant carnivore species in the endemic family Eupleridae (Yoder et al., 2003; Durbin et al., 2010; Goodman Keywords Cryptoprocta ferox, Eupleridae, fossa, Madagascar, & Helgen, 2010), five are known to occupy the central- Malagasy civet, mongoose eastern rainforests (broad-striped mongoose Galidictis fasciata, fossa Cryptoprocta ferox, Malagasy civet Fossa This paper contains supplementary material that can be fossana, ring-tailed mongoose Galidia elegans elegans and found online at http://journals.cambridge.org small-toothed civet Eupleres goudotii; Gerber et al., 2010). Of these five carnivores, all but G. e. elegans are thought to be declining (IUCN, 2011). C. ferox and G. e. elegans are of particular interest as both are known to prey on lemurs BRIAN D. GERBER* (Corresponding author) and SARAH M. KARPANTY (Goodman, 2003), many of which are also threatened Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, 2011 Virginia, USA. E-mail [email protected] (IUCN, ). Our objectives were to (1) quantify carnivore species JOHNY RANDRIANANTENAINA Centre ValBio, Ranomafana, Madagascar composition, density, and occupancy across a continuum of * Current address: 201 Wagar, Department of Fish, Wildlife & Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-1474, USA disturbed rainforests to gain insights into the impacts of Received 21 February 2011. Revision requested 16 May 2011. forest logging and fragmentation on Malagasy carnivores, Accepted 1 June 2011. (2) investigate the influence of exotic carnivore species, © 2012 Fauna & Flora International, Oryx, 46(3), 414–422 doi:10.1017/S0030605311001116 http://journals.cambridge.org Downloaded: 16 Jul 2012 IP address: 129.82.113.190 Carnivores in Madagascar’s rainforests 415 (3) Fragmented < 2.5 km Mahatsinjo, Tsinjoarivo km 0120.5 Camera station (4) Fragmented > 15 km FIG. 1 The four rainforest study sites where we sampled carnivores using a grid of Station camera traps during May–October 2008 (Areas 1 & 2) and October–December, East flowing rivers 2009 (Areas 3 & 4). Top inset Boundary (2) Selectively-logged shows the location of the main map in Madagascar, and the Area of interest (1) Primary Forest cover 2005 bottom the layout of camera Ranomafana stations among rainforest 0204010 National Park fragments at Mahatsinjo, Tsinjoarivo (Area 3), as an km example. human activity, landscape characteristics and microhabitat at the Valohoaka-Vatoharanana (Area 1, primary) and on the occupancy of native carnivores, and (3) estimate the Sahamalaotra (2, selectively-logged) trail systems in 2 population of C. ferox island-wide as it is of particular Ranomafana National Park, which protects 412 km of interest to conservation planners because of its ecological mostly mid altitude rainforest; these two areas are separated role as the largest carnivore on Madagascar. This is the first by a river that divides the Park into two main parcels. The published study of the effects of habitat disturbance on the primary rainforest comprises a mixture of unlogged forest carnivore community of the Malagasy rainforests. with little human disturbance and forest with minimal selective logging; the selectively-logged rainforest experi- enced moderate logging pre-1991 (J.C. Razafimahaimodison, Study area pers. comm.). We sampled in two fragmented rainforests, at Mahatsinjo,Tsinjoarivo (3, fragments , 2.5 km from intact We carried out this research in four areas along forest) and Ialatsara Forest Station (4, fragments . 15 km Madagascar’s eastern rainforest escarpment, selected to from intact forest). represent a continuum of exposure to forest logging and We consider forest fragmentation to include the additive fragmentation (Fig. 1). We sampled in contiguous rainforest or synergistic effects of forest loss, fragmentation and © 2012 Fauna & Flora International, Oryx, 46(3), 414–422 http://journals.cambridge.org Downloaded: 16 Jul 2012 IP address: 129.82.113.190 416 B. D. Gerber et al. TABLE 1 Details of the camera-trap sampling grids at four rainforest sites in eastern Madagascar (primary, selectively-logged, fragments , 2.5 km and . 15 km from intact forest; numbered in Fig. 1), with summary capture–recapture data of the individually-identifiable Cryptoprocta ferox and Fossa fossana, and number of camera-trap events of other carnivore species. 1, Primary 2, Selectively-logged 3, Fragments , 2.5 km 4, Fragments . 15 km Mean camera station spacing ± SD, 513 ± 93 (27) 567 ± 94 (26) 558 ± 128 (31) 584 ± 86 (27) m (no. of stations) Sampling dates 12 Aug. 2008– 9 Jun. 2008– 15 Oct. 2009– 20 Oct. 2008– 9 Oct. 2008 9 Aug. 2008 7 Dec. 2009 11 Dec. 2008 No. of trap nights1 1,446 1,417 1,379 1,323 No. of individually-identifiable species Cryptoprocta ferox (adults): male–female 3–3 (75) 2–2 (37) 1–0 (1) 0–0 (0) (recaptures)2 Fossa fossana: male–female (recaptures)2 16–17 (644) 11–11 (428) 0–0 (0) 0–0 (0) No. of trap events of individually-unidentifiable species3 Canis familiaris 7 17 169 97 Eupleres goudotii 2160 0 Felis spp. 0 0 23 16 Galidia elegans elegans 1,554 427 28 185 Galidictis fasciata 52 10 10 27 Viverricula indica 0 0 22 49 1 Trap nights are total sampling effort where at least one of two remote cameras was functioning at a station for 1 day 2 Individuals can be re-caught at multiple stations on a single sampling occasion 3 Number of photographic events (lumping all photos of a species within 30 minutes as one event) of a species at a site degradation as such disturbances are often concurrent Methods and we cannot distinguish each effect in this study (Laurance & Cochrane, 2001). The two distances were The two contiguous rainforests were sampled in the cold- selected to assess if proximity to contiguous forest, and a dry season (May–October 2008) and the two fragmented hypothesized proximity to more intact carnivore popu- rainforests in the warm-dry season (October–December lations, affects our findings. Area 3 is 150 km north of 2009). The timing of sampling was logistically constrained Ranomafana

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    9 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us