Download Chapter (PDF)

Download Chapter (PDF)

7. References Adams, C. J. (1991). The social construction of edible bodies and humans as predator. Ecofeminism and the eating of animals. Hypathia(6), 134-137. Adams, C. J. (2001). Living among meat eaters. The vegetarian’s survival handbook. New York: Continuum. Aiking, H. (2011). Future protein supply. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 22(2), 112-120. Albrecht, S. (2006). Whose voice is heard in online deliberation? A study of par- ticipation and representation in political debates on the Internet. Information, Communication & Society, 9(1), 62-82. Alexandratos, N., & Bruinsma, J. (2012). World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision. ESA Working paper No. 12-03. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Orga- nization. Allen, M. W., & Baines, S. (2002). Manipulating the symbolic meaning of meat to encourage greater acceptance of fruits and vegetables and less proclivity for red and white meat. Appetite, 38(2), 118-130. Anderson, E. W., & Shugan, S. M. (1991). Repositioning for changing preferences: The case of beef versus poultry. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(2), 219-232. Andrews, N. (2017a). Psychosocial factors affecting enactment of pro-environmental values by individuals in their work to influence organisational practices. (Doctoral thesis), Lancaster University. Andrews, N. (2017b). Psychosocial factors influencing the experience of sustainabil- ity professionals. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 8(4), 445-469. Andrews, N. (2018). Conflicted about emotions: ecological grief, love and truth. Retrieved from https://cultureprobe.wordpress.com/2018/11/05/conflicted-abo ut-emotions-ecological-grief-love-and-truth/ Andrews, N., & Hoggett, P. (2019). Facing up to ecological crisis: A psychosocial perspective from climate psychology. In J. Foster (Ed.), Facing up to climate reality: Honesty, disaster and hope: Green House / London Publishing Partnership. 310 The New Meatways and Sustainability Antaki, C., Billig, M., Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (2003). Discourse analysis means doing analysis: A critique of six analytic shortcomings. Discourse Analysis Online, 1(1). Apel, K.-O. (1991). A planetary macroethics for mankind: The need, the apparent difficulty, and the eventual possibility. In E. Deutsch (Ed.), Culture and moder- nity: East-West philosophical Perspectives (pp. 261-278). Honolulu, US: University of Hawaii Press. Asher, K., Green, C., Gutbrod, H., Jewell, M., Hale, G., & Bastian, B. (2014). Study of current and former vegetarians and vegans - Initial findings. Retrieved from https: //faunalytics.org/study-of-current-and-former-vegetarians-and-vegans Asher, K., Green, C., Peake, C., Jewell, M., Gutbrod, H., Hale, G., & Bastian, B. (2016). Study of current and former vegetarians and vegans - Secondary findings. Re- trieved from https://faunalytics.org/study-of-current-and-former-vegetarians -and-vegans Asif, M., Rooney, L. W., Ali, R., & Riaz, M. N. (2013). Application and opportunities of pulses in food system: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 53(11), 1168-1179. Austgulen, M. H. (2014). Environmentally sustainable meat consumption: An anal- ysis of the Norwegian public debate. Journal of Consumer Policy, 37(1), 45-66. Bai, X., van der Leeuw, S., O’Brien, K., Berkhout, F., Biermann, F., Brondizio, E. S., Cudennec, C., et al. (2016). Plausible and desirable futures in the Anthropocene: A new research agenda. Global Environmental Change, 39, 351-362. Bailey, R., & Harper, D. R. (2015). Reviewing interventions for healthy and sustain- able diets. Research paper. London: The Royal Institute of International Affairs - Chatham House. Bajzelj, A., & Bothra, S. (2016). The rise of non-veg - Meat and egg consumption and production in contemporary India. In B. Donaldson & C. Carter (Eds.), The future of meat without animals. London: Rowman & Littlefield International, Ltd. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, US: Prentice Hall. Bankier, D. (1996). The Germans and the final solution: Public opinion under nazism. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. Bar-On, Y. M., Phillips, R., & Milo, R. (2018). The biomass distribution on Earth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(25), 6506-6511. Barnett, C., Clarke, N., Cloke, P., & Malpass, A. (2011). Globalizing responsibility: The political rationalities of ethical consumption. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. Barr, S. (2011). Climate forums: Virtual discourses on climate change and the sus- tainable lifestyle. Area, 43(1), 14-22. Bauer, M., Howard, S., Hagenhoff, V., Gasperoni, G., & Rusanen, M. (2006). The BSE and CJD crisis in the press. In C. Dora (Ed.), In Health, hazards and public debate: Lessons for risk communication from the BSE/CJD saga (pp. 125-164). Geneva: World Health Organization. 7. References 311 Bazeley, P.(2013). Qualitative data analysis: Practical strategies. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications. Bazerman, M. H., Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Wade-Benzoni, K. (1998). Negotiating with yourself and losing: Making decisions with competing internal preferences. The Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 225-241. Beling, A. E., Vanhulst, J., Demaria, F., Rabi, V., Carballo, A. E., & Pelenc, J. (2018). Discursive synergies for a ”Great Transformation” towards sustainability: Prag- matic contributions to a necessary dialogue between human development, de- growth, and buen vivir. Ecological Economics, 144, 304-313. Bell, A. (1991). The language of news media. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd. Belz, F.-M., & Peattie, K. (2009). Sustainability marketing - A global perspective. Chich- ester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Benton, T. G., Bieg, C., Harwatt, H., Pudasaini, R., & Wellesley, L. (2021). Food sys- tem impacts on biodiversity loss: Three levers for food system transformation in support of nature. Chatham House report. London: The Royal Institute of International Af- fairs. Berzonsky, C. L., & Moser, S. C. (2017). Becoming homo sapiens sapiens: Mapping the psycho-cultural transformation in the anthropocene. Anthropocene, 20, 15- 23. Beyond Zero Emissions. (2014). Zero carbon Australia. Land use: Agriculture and forestry. Discussion paper. Fitzroy, Australia: Beyond Zero Emissions. Billig, M. (1995). Banal nationalism. London: Sage. Billig, M. (2009). Discursive psychology, rhetoric and the issue of agency. Semen, 27. Blake, J. (1999). Overcoming the ”value-action gap” in environmental policy: Ten- sions between national policy and local experience. Local Environment, 4(3), 257- 278. Blonk, H., Kool, A., & Luske, B. (2008). Milieueffecten van Nederlandse consumptie van eiwitrijke producten (in Dutch, Environmental effects of Dutch consumption of protein- rich products). Gouda: BMA/VROM. Bolderdijk, J. W., & Steg, L. (2015). Promoting sustainable consumption: The risks of using financial incentives. In L. A. Reisch & J. Thøgersen (Eds.), Handbook of research on sustainable consumption (pp. 328-342). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. Bong, S. A. (2002). Debunking myths in qualitative data analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(2). Bork, H. R. (2006). Landschaften der Erde unter dem Einfluss des Menschen. Darmstadt, Germany: Primus in Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft (WBG). Boyer, M. (2016). Argentina: Bringing beef to the modern age. (Master’s thesis), Wash- ington State University. 312 The New Meatways and Sustainability Bratanova, B., Loughnan, S., & Bastian, B. (2011). The effect of categorization as food on the perceived moral standing of animals. Appetite, 57(1), 193-196. Brester, G. W., & Schroeder, T. C. (1995). The impacts of brand and generic adver- tising on meat demand. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77(4), 969-979. Broom, M. (2016). Trends in pulse consumption: Now and on the horizon. Presentation for the Grains and Legumes Nutrition Council. Paper presented at the Future of pulse production and consumption. Bryman, A., Becker, S., & Sempik, J. (2008). Quality criteria for quantitative, qual- itative and mixed methods research: A view from social policy. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory & Practice, (4),11 261-276. Burford, G., Hoover, E., Dahl, A., & Harder, M. (2015). Making the invisible visible: Designing values-based indicators and tools for identifying and closing ”value- action gaps”. In V. W. Thoresen, D. Doyle, J. Klein, & R. J. Didham (Eds.), Re- sponsible living: Concepts, education and future perspectives (pp. 113-133). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. Burman, E. (2004). Discourse analysis means analysing discourse: Some comments on Antaki, Billig, Edwards and Potter ”Discourse analysis means doing analysis: A critique of six analytic shortcomings”. Discourse Analysis Online. Caldwell, M. (2013). On the use of play theory in analyses of online public commen- tary. Communicatio, 39(4), 501-517. Cambria, M. (2011). Opinions on the move: An exploration of the ”Article-cum- comments” genre. In S. Sarangi, V. Polese, & G. Caliendo (Eds.), Genre(s) on the move: Hybridization and discourse change in specialized communication (pp. 135-150). Naples, Italy: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane. Cassidy, E. S., West, P.C., Gerber, J. S., & Foley, J. A. (2013). Redefining agricultural yields: From tonnes to people nourished per hectare. Environmental Research Let- ters, 8(3). Cernay, C., Pelzer, E., & Makowski, D. (2016). A global experimental dataset for assessing grain legume production. Sci Data, 3, 160084. Chapman, D. A., Lickel, B., & Markowitz, E. M. (2017). Reassessing emotion in climate

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    32 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us