False Killer Whale Dorsal Fin Disfigurements As a Possible

False Killer Whale Dorsal Fin Disfigurements As a Possible

False Killer Whale Dorsal Fin Disfigurements as a Possible Indicator of Long-Line Fishery Interactions in Hawaiian Waters1 Robin W. Baird 2 and Antoinette M. Gorgone3 Abstract: Scarring resulting from entanglement in fishing gear can be used to examine cetacean fishery interactions. False killer whales (Pseudorca crassidens) are known to interact with the Hawai‘i-based tuna and swordfish long-line fish- ery in offshore Hawaiian waters. We examined the rate of major dorsal fin dis- figurements of false killer whales from nearshore waters around the main Hawaiian Islands to assess the likelihood that individuals around the main is- lands are part of the same population that interacts with the fishery. False killer whales were encountered on 11 occasions between 2000 and 2004, and 80 dis- tinctive individuals were photographically documented. Three of these (3.75%) had major dorsal fin disfigurements (two with the fins completely bent over and one missing the fin). Information from other research suggests that the rate of such disfigurements for our study population may be more than four times greater than for other odontocete populations. We suggest that the most likely cause of such disfigurements is interactions with longlines and that false killer whales found in nearshore waters around the main Hawaiian Islands are part of the same population that interacts with the fishery. Two of the animals docu- mented with disfigurements had infants in close attendance and were thought to be adult females. This implies that even with such injuries, at least some fe- males may be able to produce offspring, despite the importance of the dorsal fin in reproductive thermoregulation. Incidental mortality in fisheries is gear on beach-cast animals (e.g., Friedlaender probably the greatest conservation concern et al. 2001); (3) observations of animals in the for cetaceans worldwide (Read et al. 2003). wild with entangled fishing gear (e.g., Knowl- Identifying fishery interactions can be done ton and Kraus 2001); or (4) questionnaire sur- in a variety of ways: (1) using observers on veys of fishermen (e.g., Baird et al. 2002). fishing vessels (e.g., Jefferson et al. 1994); (2) Each of these methods has advantages and examination of wounds, scars, or entangled disadvantages: (1) observer programs provide the most comprehensive and quantitative data 1 Field efforts were funded by the National Marine but are expensive, particularly when fishing Fisheries Service, Southwest Fisheries Science Center, fleets are large; (2) only a small proportion of the Hawaiian Islands Humpback Whale National Marine dead animals ever wash up on a beach, and Sanctuary, the M.R. & Evelyn Hudson Foundation, the U.S. Navy (through the SWFSC), and by a donation beach-cast animals are easily damaged by from Tom and Chris Brayton. Research was undertaken scavengers, obscuring marks; (3) observations under NMFS Scientific Research Permits No. 731-1509 of animals in the wild with entangled fishing and 774-1437. Manuscript accepted 12 November 2004. gear are opportunistic and likely reflect only 2 Corresponding author: Cascadia Research Collec- 1 a small proportion of animals entangled, even tive, 218 2 West 4th Avenue, Olympia, Washington 98501 (e-mail: [email protected] or for large and easily observed species; and 4) [email protected]). questionnaire surveys often suffer from a stra- 3 National Marine Fisheries Service, 101 Pivers Island tegic response bias, with fishermen unlikely Road, Beaufort, North Carolina 28516. to provide information that could result in negative management actions. Rates and pat- Pacific Science (2005), vol. 59, no. 4:593–601 terns of entanglement-related scarring visible : 2005 by University of Hawai‘i Press in photographs of animals in the wild have All rights reserved also been used to assess the frequency of non- 593 594 PACIFIC SCIENCE . October 2005 lethal entanglements (Robbins and Mattila EEZ, in international waters, and in other 2001). At least for some species, use of this central Pacific U.S. EEZs may involve false technique may result in more accurate (and killer whales from the Hawaiian population, likely much higher) estimates of fisheries in- but data are lacking to examine potential teractions than are available from examina- links. We have been photo-identifying false tion of beach-cast animals or opportunistic killer whales as part of a population assess- observations of animals carrying fishing gear. ment of this species in nearshore waters of Such studies may work well on large animals the main Hawaiian Islands. This species is where a high proportion of individuals that easy to approach and photograph, though interact with fishing gear break free, though scarring is difficult to document because applicability is questionable to smaller spe- scars heal the same color as the background cies, or those more difficult to approach and body pigmentation (R.W.B., pers. obs.). In photograph, or those where fishing gear en- this study we use photographs of false killer tanglement usually results in death. whales to assess whether animals around the False killer whales (Pseudorca crassidens) main islands exhibit potential signs of in- have been documented interacting with the teractions with long-line fisheries, and we Hawai‘i-based tuna and swordfish long-line compared injury rates with those of other fishery (Nitta and Henderson 1993, Carretta populations of odontocetes. et al. 2004). The estimated size of the Hawai‘i ‘‘stock’’ of false killer whales, from a line tran- materials and methods sect survey covering the entire Hawaiian Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), is only 268 Fieldwork occurred around all the main individuals, with a coefficient of variation Hawaiian Islands from 2000 to 2004, though (CV) of 1.08 (Barlow 2003). Mobley et al. effort varied among islands. We used a variety (2000) derived an estimate of 121 individuals of research vessels ranging in size from 6 to 18 (CV ¼ 0.47) based on aerial surveys within m long. During 2002 and 2003 we often used approximately 45 km of the main Hawaiian two research vessels simultaneously but main- Islands. This stock is listed as ‘‘strategic’’ by tained a distance of at least several kilometers the U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service between the vessels to cover different por- (NMFS), because the estimated level of seri- tions of the study area. Survey speeds were ous injury and mortality from this fishery generally between 16 and 30 km/hr, and two (less than four animals per year) is greater to five observers scanned 360 degrees around than the Potential Biological Removal (PBR) the boat. Search effort was concentrated in level (approximately one animal per year) set sea conditions less than Beaufort 4, off the by NMFS (Carretta et al. 2004). Most false leeward coasts of all islands. We searched killer whales caught in the long-line fishery nonsystematically both near shore and out to are released alive but usually trailing gear approximately 42 km from shore, in waters up and/or with apparent injuries or hooks still to 4,000 m deep, attempting to cover as much embedded. This fishery does not occur within of the study area as possible given sea condi- approximately 80 km of the Hawaiian Islands tions. All encounters with all species of odon- but extends offshore and into international tocetes were recorded, and in the case of false waters outside the Hawai‘i EEZ, as well as killer whales, we made efforts to obtain multi- into other U.S. territorial waters in the cen- ple photographs of every individual in each tral Pacific. False killer whales in the near- group encountered, using Canon SLR film shore waters of the main Hawaiian Islands (2000–2002) or digital (2003–2004) cameras are genetically distinct from animals in the with 100- to 300-mm zoom lenses. All photo- eastern tropical Pacific Ocean (Chivers et al. graphs were examined and individuals identi- 2003); however, the offshore range of the fied based on the size and location of notches Hawaiian population has not yet been deter- on the dorsal fin. The program Finscan (Hill- mined. Some or all of the fishery interactions man et al. 2003) was used to assist in match- that occur throughout the Hawaiian Islands ing individuals. Individuals were considered False Killer Whale Fishery Interactions . Baird and Gorgone 595 distinctive (or ‘‘marked’’) if the notches on (estimated at less than a year of age) the first the dorsal fins were large enough to be recog- time they were seen. Individual HIPc177 was nizable in any good-quality photograph. We seen with the infant surfacing in infant posi- classified individuals as having major dorsal tion, further suggesting a mother-offspring fin disfigurements if they were missing the relationship ( J. Mann, pers. comm.). Photo- dorsal fin or if it was completely bent over at graphs were obtained of both the left and the base. right side of individual HIPc177, and from examination of photographs only a small results amount of unpigmented scar tissue (estimated at @1cm2) was visible at the site of the miss- Between 2000 and 2004 we spent 1,684 hr ing dorsal fin, suggesting that the wound had searching for cetaceans, covering 23,558 km healed completely. The area of the missing of trackline on 234 different vessel days (a fin was raised @1 cm above the dorsal surface day with two boats searching simultaneously of the whale. was counted as two vessel days). Search effort was spread over 10 months of the year (all discussion except July and August), though the total number of search days per month for all 5 yr Collapsed or missing dorsal fins have not pre- varied from 6 to 49. During this time we viously been reported for false killer whales encountered 417 groups of odontocetes, and have only rarely been reported for any representing 16 species.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    10 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us