This Thesis Has Been Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for a Postgraduate Degree (E.G

This Thesis Has Been Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for a Postgraduate Degree (E.G

This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: • This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. • A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. • This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. • The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. • When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF LACUNAR STROKE: ISCHAEMIC STROKE OR BLOOD BRAIN BARRIER DYSFUNCTION? EMMA LOUISE BAILEY BSc Hons Doctor of Philosophy University of Edinburgh 2011 CONTENTS Acknowledgements .....................................................................................................i Declaration ...............................................................................................................iii Publications ………………………………………………………………………..iv List of figures ………………………………………………………………………v List of tables …………………………………………………………………….....xi Abstract ……………………………………………………………………………xiv List of abbreviations ………………………………………………………………xvi CHAPTER 1 :GENERAL INTRODUCTION........................................................ 1 1.1 Stroke – why is it important?.............................................................................. 1 1.1.1 Disability and recurrence ............................................................................ 1 1.1.2 What constitutes a stroke?........................................................................... 1 1.2 Anatomy of stroke................................................................................................ 2 1.2.1 The cerebral blood supply........................................................................... 2 1.2.2 Autoregulation............................................................................................. 3 1.3 The effect of ischaemia on different vascular territories determines the clinical classification of stroke subtypes................................................................... 4 1.4 Lacunar Stroke..................................................................................................... 6 1.4.1 Clinical Syndromes ..................................................................................... 6 1.4.2 Prognosis..................................................................................................... 7 1.4.3 Risk Factors................................................................................................. 7 1.4.4 Brain and vascular territory......................................................................... 7 1.5 The appearance of acute lacunar lesions on imaging (see figure 1.4). .......... 10 Doctor of Philosophy University of Edinburgh 1.5.1 Cavitation of lacunar lesions..................................................................... 11 1.6 The wider implications and features of disease in the small deep perforating arterioles.................................................................................................................... 12 1.7 General Pathophysiology................................................................................... 13 1.7.1 Parenchymal lesions.................................................................................. 13 1.7.2 Vascular pathology.................................................................................... 14 1.8 What causes lacunar stroke? Evidence for a distinct arteriopathy............... 16 1.9 The problems of studying lacunar stroke pathology. ..................................... 17 1.9.1 Why would an animal model be useful?................................................... 18 1.10 Systematic Reviews – the value of and design ............................................... 19 1.11 Aims of the thesis.............................................................................................. 20 CHAPTER 2 : HUMAN LACUNAR STROKE PATHOLOGY – A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW........................................................................................ 21 2.1 Background......................................................................................................... 21 2.2 Materials and methods ...................................................................................... 21 2.2.1 Search strategy .......................................................................................... 21 2.2.2 Inclusion/Exclusion criteria ...................................................................... 22 2.2.3 Data extraction .......................................................................................... 22 2.2.4 Study quality ............................................................................................. 23 2.2.5 Data analysis ............................................................................................. 24 2.3 Results ................................................................................................................. 25 2.3.1 Search results ............................................................................................ 25 2.3.2 Study characteristics.................................................................................. 25 Doctor of Philosophy University of Edinburgh 2.3.3 Pathological assessments .......................................................................... 32 2.3.4 Terminology and definitions..................................................................... 32 2.3.5 Study quality score.................................................................................... 32 2.3.6 Pathological findings................................................................................ 33 2.3.7 Vascular lesions ....................................................................................... 36 2.4 Discussion............................................................................................................ 39 2.4.1 Strengths & weaknesses of the review and primary studies: .................... 40 2.4.2 Interpretation............................................................................................. 41 2.5 Conclusion........................................................................................................... 42 CHAPTER 3 : A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF POTENTIAL ANIMAL MODELS OF LACUNAR STROKE. .................................................................... 43 3.1 Background......................................................................................................... 43 3.2 Materials and Methods...................................................................................... 43 3.2.1 Study Identification................................................................................... 43 3.2.2 Search Strategy.......................................................................................... 44 3.2.3 Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria............................................................... 44 3.2.4 Data Extraction.......................................................................................... 45 3.2.5 Study Quality Assessment ........................................................................ 45 3.3 Results ................................................................................................................. 46 3.3.1 Methodological characteristics of included studies .................................. 46 3.3.2 Lesion induction methods ......................................................................... 49 3.4 Discussion............................................................................................................ 55 3.5 Conclusion........................................................................................................... 58 Doctor of Philosophy University of Edinburgh CHAPTER 4 : THE SPONTANEOUSLY HYPERTENSIVE STROKE PRONE RAT AS A MODEL OF SUBCORTICAL ISCHAEMIC STROKE. A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW........................................................................................ 59 4.1 Background......................................................................................................... 59 4.2 Materials and Methods...................................................................................... 60 4.2.1 Search strategy .......................................................................................... 60 4.2.2 Data extraction .......................................................................................... 60 4.2.3 Study quality ............................................................................................. 60 4.3 Results ................................................................................................................. 61 4.3.1 The available literature.............................................................................. 61 4.3.2 Study methodology ................................................................................... 63 4.3.3 Structural Pathological Findings - Brain parenchyma (Figure. 4.4):........ 65 4.3.4 Structural findings: Vessels (Figure 4.5.) ................................................

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    364 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us