disClosure: A Journal of Social Theory Volume 2 The Buying and Selling of Culture Article 15 4-15-1993 [Book Review] Radical Artifice. Marjorie Perloff. University of Chicago Press. Erik Reece University of Kentucky DOI: https://doi.org/10.13023/DISCLOSURE.02.15 Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/disclosure Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License. Recommended Citation Reece, Erik (1993) "[Book Review] Radical Artifice. Marjorie Perloff. University of Chicago Press.," disClosure: A Journal of Social Theory: Vol. 2 , Article 15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13023/DISCLOSURE.02.15 Available at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/disclosure/vol2/iss1/15 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by disClosure: A Journal of Social Theory. Questions about the journal can be sent to [email protected] 132 Kai Nielsen Book Reviews 133 gland: Clarendon Press, 1988), xi, 239-40, 290-91. 5. Karl Popper, The Open Society and Its Enemies~ Vol II (London: Routledge nnd REVIEW ESSAYS Kegan Paul, 1945), 81-58. 6. G.A. Cohen, History. Uibour, and Freedom; Jon Elster, Making Sense ~f Marx (Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1985); John E. Roemer, Radical Artifice. Free to Lose (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988); nnd Jeffrey Marjorie Perloff Reiman, "Exploitation, Force and the Moral Assessment of Capitalism: University of Chicago Press Thoughts on Roemer and Cohen," Philosophy and Public Affa irs 16, no. 1 .(Winter 1987): 3-41. Reviewed by Erik Reece 7. Carl Hempel, "Scientific Rationality: Analytic vs. Pragmatic Perspectives" in Seemingly since Jacob Epstein's 1988 polemic, "Who Killed Poetry?" Theodore E. Geraets (ed.), Rationality Today (Ottawa: University of Ott11wn there has been much sectarian ballyhoo over the purpose of poetry in the Press, 1979), 46-66. contemporary, highly m~diated American techno-culture. The post-Bent practitioners, trafficking in subversive subject matter, rail against the 8. I explicitly carry this out for religious claims in my "On Speaking of God," Theoria 28 (1962) :110-137. Reprinted in Mostafa Faghfo ury (ed .), Analytical formulaic lyric that creative writing workshops manufacture in what has Philosophy of Religion in Canada (Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 1982), to be the worst example of supply-side economics since 11of1ody, so the 75-96. argument goes, reads poetry anyway. Those cloistered inside university creative writing workshops blame the recondite experiments of the West 9. Kai Nielsen, "True Needs, Rationality and Emancipation" in R. Fitzgernld Coast scholl loosely labelled "the L=A=N=G=U=A=G=E poets", for mak­ (ed.), Human Needs and Politics (Melbourne, Australia: Pergamous Press, ing verse incomp rehensible to that shadowy figure, the man in the street. 1977); Kai Nielsen, "Principles of Rationality," Philosophical Papers ill, no. 2 The L=A=N=G=U=A=G=E apologists riposte that since the world is no (October 1974); Kai Nielsen, "Can There be an Emancipatory Rntion11lity?" longer Wordsworth's pastoral sanctuary of self, the mawkish solipsism of Criticaill,no. 24(December1976), 70-102;Kai Nielsen, "Distrusting Retlson," formal lyric poety is little more than reactionary drivel. Ethics 87, no. 1 (October 1976); and Kai Nielsen, "Reason and Sentiment" in Theodore Geraets (ed.), Rationality Today (Ottawa: University of Ott11wn Press, 1979), 249-79. There are so many schools of poetry and so many genealogies leading to its modern matrix, that to pronounce poetry dead is to profess one's own ignorance of this protean field - perhaps the only modem art form whose emergence hasn't been hamstrung by commercial distractions, as is par­ ticularly the case with film and painting. The question, then, "Who killed poetry?" must be translated into "Who killed poetry's audience?" The assumption behind both questions is that if American readers have turned their backs on poetry, the poets themselves must have mnde a mistake somewhere. Complacent critics who gauge such shifts employ popularity, which then becomes equated w ith populism (in fact a vastly different political enterprise), as a barometer for an art form's vitality. And while it is easytowaxnostalgicabouta lost oral tradition and the days when poetry appeared on the front pages of daily newspapers, American audiences have never been moved by poetry in the way we are told Vladimir Mayakovsky electrified stadiums-full of the Russian masses. While Carl disCwsure: The Buying and Sellinx of Cu/111re disCwsure: The Buying and Selling of Culture 134 Book Reviews Book Reviews 135 Sandburg, Vachel Lindsey, Longfellow and Langston Hughes accrued the Age of Media," begins with the complaint of one of Perloff's Stanford admirable grassroots support for their work, America's truest populist students concerning Language poetry: "Why can't they write like Kafkn ?" poet and most unflagging champion of democracy, Walt Whitman, would Perloff immediately understands that to mea·n "that Kafka, no matter how have trouble securing an NEA grant in this the centennial year of his death. difficult his meanings, how subtle his network of references, how ambigu­ Because populism ultimately is debased by self-interest and suspicion of ous his tone, wrote prose whose syntax is perfectly lucid." If Kafka can the unfamiliar, poets I:iave almost by definition always set themselves evoke such resonant textures from perfectly crafted understatement, why outside of public taste. must the contemporary reader be verbally abused by a vocabulary and syntax that seldom allow for any referential footing. Perloff's answer The central question concerning American poetry, then, must shift becomes the basis of the book's subtitle. "[W]hereas Kafka positioned from "Why doesn't anyone read poetry?" to "What is the role of poetry in himself vis-a-vis the discourses of law, of justice, of business, nnd of our contemporary culture?" Such an inquiry must first be an evaluation of bourgeois respectability ... our own contact with these discourses tends to a consumer culture governed by the ecumenical image, perpetuated in a be always already mediated by a third voice, the voice of the medin," virtual reality where a recent poll showed the majority of Americans writes Perloff. For the remaining 200 pages, she fervently disnrms the believe a fictitious TV character would make a better President than the all­ attackers of Language writing by squeezing water from poems thnt seem too-real Vice-President. Because all of our experience is mediated in some to many readers like the most sterile, impenetrable stones. way by the omni-present cathode ray, the search for a Whitmanesque poetic of "natural speech" becomes superfluous. As anthropologist James Perloff makes no claims to represent all of American poetry, nor does Clifford has argued, the "authentic" voice of regional and ethnic diversity she mask her belief that a very select group of poets have been doing the is always "staged" in some way that privileges the medium over the only work of real importance throughout this century. Though, as I hnve message. The medium has itself become so carnivorous that, according to said, pedigrees abound, the vein of poetry Perloff has mined throughout Clifford's famous allegory, when an English ethnographer quizzed a hercareermightbered uced to this: IMAGE-OBJECT-TEXT. Ezrn Pound Mpongwe chief on certain tribal terms, the chief retrieved from his hut an introduced Imagism into poetry around 1914, emphasizing the presentn­ earlier English ethnographer's compendium of African religious terms. tion of things over the vacuously impressionistic, "poetic" language of emotionalism. Objectivism grew out of Imagism in the '30s, celebrating the For many poets, then, it makes no sense to represent an irretrievable poem as a thing in itself- a part of reality rather than a representation of it. voice of authenticity. Before the poet can articulate the landscape, the self, Contemporary poets like John Cage, Clark Coolidge, Charles Bernstein, or relationships with others, s/he must first express the complexity of Lyn H ejinian, Michael Palmer and many others have learned the lessons of working within a language that has been so p aradoxically desensitized by both Imagism and Objectivism to emerge as poets primarily concerned over-exposure and neglect. The poetry that has grown up around this kind with rupturing the illusion that language is somehow a vehicle for romnn­ of cultural skepticism first became known as Language poetry, or the New tic transcendence, or a transparent film through which the world can be Sentence. The field has long sinse become too diverse for the label to serve filtered. OneofPerloff's stunning observations -stunning because it seems more than a nominal distinction betWeen itself and say the New Formal- so obvious, yet has been ignored by literary critics -is that it took Americnn ' I ism, the New York School, or Deep Image poetry. This para tactic poetic has advertising decades to catch up to the efficiency oflmagism 's presentation also come under heavy attack for its supposed aridity, its urbane intellec­ over the tedious verbose descriptions that comprised most ads in the early tual exercises, its rejection of "the real world" - in short, its "rndiclll part of the century (the book is plentifully illustrated to prove Perloff's artifice." point). The problem is that once advertising learned the powerful seduc­ tiveness of the image, "the image had become a problematic poetry Marjorie Perloff takes up the thorny issue of contemporary poetics at property." For Perloff, if the image has become the dominant form of precisely this objection. Radical Artifice (1991), subtitled "Writing Poetry in commerce under capitalism, the function of a radical poetics must nt some disClosure: The Buying and Selling of Culture disClosure: The Buying and Sl'llinx of Cult1Jr£' 136 Book Reviews Book Reviews 137 level attack the image.